skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858200acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Characterizing How Interface Complexity Affects Children's Touchscreen Interactions

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most touchscreen devices are not designed specifically with children in mind, and their interfaces often do not optimize interaction for children. Prior work on children and touchscreen interaction has found important patterns, but has only focused on simplified, isolated interactions, whereas most interfaces are more visually complex. We examine how interface complexity might impact children's touchscreen interactions. We collected touch and gesture data from 30 adults and 30 children (ages 5 to 10) to look for similarities, differences, and effects of interface complexity. Interface complexity affected some touch interactions, primarily related to visual salience, and it did not affect gesture recognition. We also report general differences between children and adults. We provide design recommendations that support the design of touchscreen interfaces specifically tailored towards children of this age.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1921-woodward.mp4

mp4

186.7 MB

References

  1. Nor Azah Abdul Aziz, Firat Batmaz, Roger Stone, and Paul Wai Hing Chung. 2013. Selection of touch gestures for children's applications. Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013, 721--726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Jaye Nias, Berthel Tate, and Shreya Mohan. 2012. Interaction and Recognition Challenges in Interpreting Children's Touch and Gesture Input on Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ACM Press, 225--234. http://doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396671 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Examining the need for visual feedback during gesture interaction on mobile touchscreen devices for kids. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 157--164. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485775 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Berthel Tate, Jaye Nias, Robin Brewer, and Germaine Irwin. 2014. Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 6, 1471--1483. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0749--9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lisa Anthony and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2010. A lightweight multistroke recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, Canadian Information Processing Society, 245--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lisa Anthony and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. $Nprotractor: a fast and accurate multistroke recognizer. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, 117--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ahmed Sabbir Arif and Cristina Sylla. 2013. A comparative evaluation of touch and pen gestures for adult and child users. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 392--395. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485804 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Keith E. Beery, Norman A. Buktenica, and Natasha A. Beery. 2004. The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, 5th Edition. Modern Curriculum Press, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robin Brewer, Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Germaine Irwin, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Using gamification to motivate children to complete empirical studies in lab environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 388--391. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485816 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Quincy Brown, Lisa Anthony, Robin Brewer, Germaine Irwin, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Challenges of Replicating Empirical Studies with Children in HCI. Proceedings of the CHI2013 Workshop on the Replication of HCI Research, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 53--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Quincy Brown, Lisa Anthony, Jaye Nias, Berthel Tate, Robin Brewer, and Germaine Irwin. 2013. Towards Designing Adaptive Touch-Based Interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI 2013 Third Mobile Accessibility Workshop, 4pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Quincy Brown and Lisa Anthony. 2012. Toward comparing the touchscreen interaction patterns of kids and adults. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Workshop on Educational Software, Interfaces and Technology, 4pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cynthia Chiong and Carly Shuler. 2010. Learning: Is there an app for that? Investigations of young children's usage and learning with mobile devices and apps. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, NY, NY. Retrieved August 23, 2012 from http://dmlcentral.net/resources/4496Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Andy Cockburn, David Ahlström, and Carl Gutwin. 2012. Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 3, 218--233. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.11.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nick Donnelly, Kyle Cave, Rebecca Greenway, Julie A Hadwin, Jim Stevenson, and Edmund Sonuga-Barke. 2007. Visual search in children and adults: top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60, 1, 120--36. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600625362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Henry Gleitman, James Gross, and Daniel Rossberg. 2010. Psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tracy Anne Hammond and Brandon Paulson. 2011. Recognizing sketched multistroke primitives. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 1, 1, 1--34. http://doi.org/10.1145/2030365.2030369 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Amanda Harris, Jochen Rick, Victoria Bonnett, Nicola Yuill, Rowanne Fleck, Paul Marshall, and Yvonne Rogers. 2009. Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, International Society of the Learning Sciences, 335--344. http://doi.org/10.3115/1600053.1600104 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. James Herold and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2012. The 1 Recognizer: a fast, accurate, and easy-to-implement handwritten gesture recognition technique. Proceedings of the International Symposium on SketchBased Interfaces and Modeling, Eurographics Association, 39--46. http://doi.org/10.2312/SBM/SBM12/039-046 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Hyewon Suh, India Irish, Daniella Kim, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Touchscreen prompts for preschoolers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 109--118. http://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771851 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Uta Hinrichs and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2011. Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 3023--3032. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979391 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L.B. Kara and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2005. An imagebased, trainable symbol recognizer for hand-drawn sketches. Computers & Graphics 29, 4, 501--517. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2005.05.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hong-hoe Kim, Paul Taele, Stephanie Valentine, Erin McTigue, and Tracy Hammond. 2013. KimCHI: a sketch-based developmental skill classifier to enhance pen-driven educational interfaces for children. Proceedings of the International Symposium on SketchBased Interfaces and Modeling, ACM Press, 33--42. http://doi.org/10.1145/2487381.2487389 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mary J. LaLomia. 1994. User acceptance of handwritten recognition accuracy. Extended Abstracts of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 107--108. http://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260086 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. WeeSan Lee, Levent Burak Kara, and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2007. An efficient graph-based recognizer for hand-drawn symbols. Computers & Graphics 31, 4, 554--567. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2007.04.007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yang Li. 2010. Protractor: a fast and accurate gesture recognizer. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2169--2172. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753654 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Viktor Lowenfeld and W. Lambert Brittain. 1982. Creative and Mental Growth. MacMillan, NY, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorna McKnight and Brendan Cassidy. 2010. Children's Interaction with Mobile Touch-Screen Devices. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 2, 2, 18 pp. http://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2010040101 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lorna Mcknight and Daniel Fitton. 2010. Touch-screen Technology for Children?: Giving the Right Instructions and Getting the Right Responses. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 238--241. http://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810580 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ian Christopher McManus. 2009. The history and geography of human handedness. In Language lateralization and psychosis (1st ed.), Iris E. C. Sommer and Reneé S. Kahn (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 37--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vicente Nacher, Javier Jaen, Elena Navarro, Alejandro Catala, and Pascual González. 2015. Multi-touch gestures for pre-kindergarten children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 73, 37--51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.08.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Cathleen Norris and Elliot Soloway. 2004. Envisioning the handheld-centric classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30, 4, 281--294. http://doi.org/10.2190/MBPJ-L35D-C4K6-AQB8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Pekka Parhi, Amy K. Karlson, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2006. Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM Press, 203--210. http://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152260 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jean Piaget. 1983. Piaget's Theory. In Handbook of Child Psychology, P Mussen (ed.). Wiley & Sons, NY, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Janet C. Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2003. "Good enough for what"?: acceptance of handwriting recognition errors by child users. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 155--155. http://doi.org/10.1145/953536.953565 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Glenda L. Revelle and Emily Reardon. 2009. Designing and testing mobile interfaces for children. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, 329--332. http://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551876 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shyam Reyal, Shumin Zhai, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2015. Performance and User Experience of Touchscreen and Gesture Keyboards in a Lab Setting and in the Wild. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 679--688. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702597 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Geoff Romeo, Suzy Edwards, S. McNamara, Ian Walker, and Christopher Ziguras. 2003. Touching the screen: Issues related to the use of touchscreen technology in early childhood education. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, 3, 329--339. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467--8535.00330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Dean Rubine. 1991. Specifying gestures by example. SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 25, 4, 329--337. http://doi.org/10.1145/127719.122753 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kathy Ryall, Meredith Ringel Morris, Katherine Everitt, Clifton Forlines, and Chia Shen. 2006. Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, IEEE, 8pp. http://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2006.12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Tevfik Metin Sezgin and Randall Davis. 2005. HMMbased efficient sketch recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM Press, 281--283. http://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040899 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mike Sharples, Inmaculada Amedillo Sanchez, Marcelo Milrad, and Giasemi Vavoula. 2009. Mobile learning: small devices, big issues. In Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products, N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong and S. Barnes (eds.). Springer, Heidelberg, 233--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Carly Shuler. 2009. Pockets of Potential: Using Mobile Technologies to Promote Children's Learning. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, NY, NY. Retrieved August 23, 2012 from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/publication/indu stry-brief-pockets-of-potential-using-mobiletechnologies-to-promote-childrens-learning/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jerry R. Thomas. 1980. Acquisition of motor skills: information processing differences between children and adults. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 51, 1, 158--173. http://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1980.10609281Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. Gestures as point clouds: a $P recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ACM Press, 273--280. http://doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388732 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Gabriel Cramariuc, and Doina Maria Schipor. 2015. Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years: Experimental findings and relationship to motor skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74, 54--76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Daniel Vogel, Géry Casiez, and Laurent Grisoni. 2011. Estimating the perceived difficulty of pen gestures. Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, 89--106. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--64223771--3_9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2010. Direct Pen Interaction with a Conventional Graphical User Interface. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 4, 324--388. http://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2010.499839Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Htet Htet Aung, Brandon Rothrock, and Brad A. Myers. 2005. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. Extended Abstracts of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1869--1872. http://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057043 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Andrew D. Wilson, and Yang Li. 2007. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 159--168. http://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing How Interface Complexity Affects Children's Touchscreen Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader