skip to main content
10.1145/2993148.2993179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing the articulation features of children's touchscreen gestures

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Children’s touchscreen interaction patterns are generally quite different from those of adults. In particular, it has been established that children’s gestures are recognized by existing algorithms with much lower accuracy than are adults’ gestures. Previous work has qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed adults’ gestures to promote improved recognition, but this has not been done for children’s gestures in the same systematic manner. We present an analysis of gestures elicited from 24 children (age 5 to 10 years old) and 27 adults in which we calculate geometric, kinematic, and relative articulation features of the gestures. We examine the effect of user age on 22 different gesture features to better understand how children’s gesturing abilities and behaviors differ between various age groups, and from adults. We discuss the implications of our findings and how they will contribute to creating new gesture recognition algorithms tailored specifically for children.

References

  1. Nor Azah Abdul Aziz, Firat Batmaz, Roger Stone, and Paul Wai Hing Chung. 2013. Selection of touch gestures for children’s applications. Proceedings of SAI, IEEE, 721–726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Examining the need for visual feedback during gesture interaction on mobile touchscreen devices for kids. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 157–164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2015. Children (and adults) benefit from visual feedback during gesture interaction on mobile touchscreen devices. IJCCI 6, 17–27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Berthel Tate, Jaye Nias, Robin Brewer, and Germaine Irwin. 2014. Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts. JPUC 18, 6, 1471–1483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lisa Anthony, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2013. Understanding the consistency of users’ pen and finger stroke gesture articulation. Proceedings of GI, Canadian Information Processing Society, 87–94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lisa Anthony and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. $N-protractor: a fast and accurate multistroke recognizer. Proceedings of GI, Canadian Information Processing Society, 117–120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ahmed Sabbir Arif and Cristina Sylla. 2013. A comparative evaluation of touch and pen gestures for adult and child users. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 392–395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zainab Hamza. 2014. Study of Touch Gesture Performance by Four and Five Year-Old Children: Point-and-Touch, Drag- and-Drop, Zoom-in and Zoom-out, and Rotate. Master's Thesis. Minnesota State University - Mankato.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zainab Hamza and Guarionex Salivia. 2015. Study of Touch Gestures Performance in Touch Devices by Young Children. IJRITCC 3, 3, 1395–1400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Herold and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2012. The 1¢ Recognizer: a fast, accurate, and easy-to-implement handwritten gesture recognition technique. Proceedings of SBIM, Eurographics Association, 39–46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Hyewon Suh, India Irish, Daniella Kim, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Touchscreen prompts for preschoolers: designing developmentally appropriate techniques for teaching young children to perform gestures. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 109–118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Levent Burak Kara and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2005. An image-based, trainable symbol recognizer for hand-drawn sketches. Computers & Graphics 29, 4, 501–517. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. WeeSan Lee, Levent Burak Kara, and Thomas F. Stahovich. 2007. An efficient graph-based recognizer for hand-drawn symbols. Computers & Graphics 31, 4, 554–567. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lorna McKnight and Daniel Fitton. 2010. Touch-screen technology for children. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 238–241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vicente Nacher, Javier Jaen, Elena Navarro, Alejandro Catala, and Pascual Gonzalez. 2015. Multi-touch gestures for pre-kindergarten children. IJHCS 73, 37–51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jean Piaget. 1983. Piaget’s Theory. Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Janet C. Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2003. What’s going on?: discovering what children understand about handwriting recognition interfaces. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 135-140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Janet C Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2003. “Good enough for what?”: acceptance of handwriting recognition errors by child users. Proceedings of IDC, ACM Press, 155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dean Rubine. 1991. Specifying gestures by example. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 25, 4, 329–337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tevfik Metin Sezgin and Randall Davis. 2005. HMM-based efficient sketch recognition. Proceedings of IUI, ACM Press, 281–283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Steve Smithies, Kevin Novins, and James Arvo. 1999. A handwriting-based equation editor. Proceedings of GI, Canadian Information Process Society, 84–91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tiffany Y. Tang, Maldin Yifan He, and Vince Lineng Cao. 2016. “One Doesn’t Fit All”: A Comparative Study of Various Finger Gesture Interaction Methods. Proceedings of DUXU, Springer International Publishing, 88-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2013. Relative accuracy measures for stroke gestures. Proceedings of ICMI, ACM Press, 279–286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. Gestures as point clouds: a $P recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of ICMI, ACM Press, 273–280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2014. Gesture Heatmaps: Understanding gesture performance with colorful visualizations. Proceedings of ICMI, ACM Press, 172–179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Andrew D. Wilson, and Yang Li. 2007. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of UIST, ACM Press, 159–168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Julia Woodward, Alex Shaw, Annie Luc, Brittany Craig, Juthika Das, Phillip Hall Jr., Akshay Holla, Germaine Irwin, Danielle Sikich, Quincy Brown, and Lisa Anthony. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Characterizing How Interface Complexity Affects Children’s Touchscreen Interactions. Proceedings of CHI, ACM Press, 1921-1933. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing the articulation features of children's touchscreen gestures

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICMI '16: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
          October 2016
          605 pages
          ISBN:9781450345569
          DOI:10.1145/2993148

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 October 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader