Abstract
With recent advances in consumer electronics and the increasingly urgent need for public security, camera networks have evolved from their early role of providing simple and static monitoring to current complex systems capable of obtaining extensive video information for intelligent processing, such as target localization, identification, and tracking. In all cases, it is of vital importance that the optimal camera configuration (i.e., optimal location, orientation, etc.) is determined before cameras are deployed as a suboptimal placement solution will adversely affect intelligent video surveillance and video analytic algorithms. The optimal configuration may also provide substantial savings on the total number of cameras required to achieve the same level of utility.
In this article, we examine most, if not all, of the recent approaches (post 2000) addressing camera placement in a structured manner. We believe that our work can serve as a first point of entry for readers wishing to start researching into this area or engineers who need to design a camera system in practice. To this end, we attempt to provide a complete study of relevant formulation strategies and brief introductions to most commonly used optimization techniques by researchers in this field. We hope our work to be inspirational to spark new ideas in the field.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Recent Advances in Camera Planning for Large Area Surveillance: A Comprehensive Review
- Besma R. Abidi, Nash R. Aragam, Yi Yao, and Mongi A. Abidi. 2009. Survey and analysis of multimodal sensor planning and integration for wide area surveillance. ACM Computing Surveys 41, 1, Article 7 (Jan. 2009), 36 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steven Abrams, Peter K. Allen, and Konstantinos Tarabanis. 1999. Computing camera viewpoints in an active robot work-cell. International Journal of Robotics Research 18 (1999), 267--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammad Al Hasan, Krishna K. Ramachandran, and John E. Mitchell. 2008. Optimal placement of stereo sensors. Optimization Letters 2, 1 (2008), 99--111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khaled Amriki and Pradeep K. Atrey. 2011. Towards optimal placement of surveillance cameras in a bus. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christophe Andrieu, Nando de Freitas, and Arnaud Doucet. 2000. Reversible jump MCMC simulated annealing for neural networks. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 11--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Angella, L. Reithler, and F. Gallesio. 2007. Optimal deployment of cameras for video surveillance systems. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS’07). 388--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Becker, Gutemberg Guerra-Filho, and Fillia Makedon. 2009. Automatic sensor placement in a 3D volume. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assisstive Environments (PETRA’09). ACM, New York, NY, Article 36, 8 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Bodor, Andrew Drenner, Paul Schrater, and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos. 2007. Optimal camera placement for automated surveillance tasks. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 50, 3 (2007), 257--295. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Bodor, Paul Schrater, and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos. 2005. Multi-camera positioning to optimize task observability. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS’05). 552--557.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Bonabeau, Marco Dorigo, and Guy Theraulaz. 1999. Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY. Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. P. Brooks, N. Friel, and R. King. 2003. Classical model selection via simulated annealing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 65, 2 (2003), 503--520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paolo Burelli, Luca Gaspero, Andrea Ermetici, and Roberto Ranon. 2008. Virtual camera composition with particle swarm optimization. In Smart Graphics, Andreas Butz, Brian Fisher, Antonio Krueger, Patrick Olivier, and Marc Christie (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5166. Springer, Berlin, 130--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Y. Chen and Y. F. Li. 2004. Automatic sensor placement for model-based robot vision. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 34, 1 (2004), 393--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xing Chen. 2009. Improved Detection and Tracking of Objects in Surveillance Video. Ph.D. dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Xing Chen and James Davis. 2008. An occlusion metric for selecting robust camera configurations. Machine Vision and Applications 19, 4 (2008), 217--222. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimitrios Chrysostomou and Antonios Gasteratos. 2012. Optimum multi-camera arrangement using a bee colony algorithm. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST). 387--392.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dimitrios Chrysostomou, Georgios Ch. Sirakoulis, and Antonios Gasteratos. 2012. A bio-inspired multi-camera topology for crowd analysis. In 1st International Workshop on Pattern Recognition and Crowd Analysis.Google Scholar
- V. Chvatal. 1975. A combinatorial theorem in plane geometry. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 18, 1 (1975), 39--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Conci and L. Lizzi. 2009. Camera placement using particle swarm optimization in visual surveillance applications. In 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 3485--3488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcelo C. Couto, Cid C. Souza, and Pedro J. Rezende. 2008. Experimental evaluation of an exact algorithm for the orthogonal art gallery problem. In Experimental Algorithms, Catherine C. McGeoch (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5038. Springer, Berlin, 101--113. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcelo C. Couto, Pedro J. de Rezende, and Cid C. de Souza. 2011. An exact algorithm for minimizing vertex guards on art galleries. International Transactions in Operational Research 18, 4 (2011), 425--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- George B. Dantzig. 1963. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Dipankar Dasgupta. 1999. An overview of artificial immune systems and their applications. In Artificial Immune Systems and Their Applications, Dipankar Dasgupta (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, 3--21.Google Scholar
- Pierre David, Vincent Idasiak, and F. Kratz. 2007. A Sensor Placement Approach for the Monitoring of Indoor Scenes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4793. Springer, Berlin, 110--125. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benoit Debaque, Rym Jedidi, and Donald Prevost. 2009. Optimal video camera network deployment to support security monitoring. In 12th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION’09). 1730--1736.Google Scholar
- Simon Denman, Alina Bialkowski, Clinton Fookes, and Sridha Sridharan. 2011. Determining operational measures from multi-camera surveillance systems using soft biometrics. In 2011 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS). 462--467. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joachim Denzler, Matthias Zobel, and Heinrich Niemann. 2002. On optimal camera parameter selection in Kalman filter based object tracking. In Pattern Recognition, Luc Gool (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2449. Springer, Berlin, 17--25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marco Dorigo, Vittorio Maniezzo, and Albert Colorni. 1996. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 26, 1 (1996), 29--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ali O. Ercan, Danny B. Yang, Abbas El Gamal, and Leonidas J. Guibas. 2006. Optimal placement and selection of camera network nodes for target localization. In 2nd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 389--404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ugur Murat Erdem and Stan Sclaroff. 2004. Optimal placement of cameras in floorplans to satisfy task requirements and cost constraints. In Proceedings of OMNIVIS Workshop.Google Scholar
- Ugur Murat Erdem and Stan Sclaroff. 2006. Automated camera layout to satisfy task-specific and floor plan-specific coverage requirements. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 103, 3 (2006), 156--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emre Ertin, John W. Fisher, and Lee C. Potter. 2003. Maximum mutual information principle for dynamic sensor query problems. In 2nd International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’03). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 405--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Duc Fehr, Loren Fiore, and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos. 2009. Issues and solutions in surveillance camera placement. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’09). 3780--3785. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guodong Feng, Min Liu, Xuemei Guo, Jun Zhang, and Guoli Wang. 2011. Genetic algorithm based optimal placement of PIR sensor arrays for human localization. In 2011 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). 1080--1084.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steve Fisk. 1978. A short proof of Chvátal’s watchman theorem. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 24, 3 (1978), 374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shachar Fleishman, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Dani Lischinski. 1999. Automatic camera placement for image-based modeling. In 7th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 1999. 12--20, 315. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clinton Fookes, Frank Lin, Vinod Chandran, and Sridha Sridharan. 2012. Evaluation of image resolution and super-resolution on face recognition performance. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 23, 1 (2012), 75--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan E. Gelfand and Adrian F. M. Smith. 1990. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 410 (1990), 398--409.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David E. Goldberg. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jose-Joel Gonzalez-Barbosa, Teresa Garcia-Ramirez, Joaquin Salas, Juan-Bautista Hurtado-Ramos, and Jose-de-Jesus Rico-Jimenez. 2009. Optimal camera placement for total coverage. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’09). 844--848. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vincent Granville, Mirko Krivanek, and Jean-Paul Rasson. 1994. Simulated annealing: A proof of convergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16, 6 (1994), 652--656. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ned Greene, Michael Kass, and Gavin Miller. 1993. Hierarchical z-buffer visibility. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’93). ACM, New York, NY, 231--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abhinav Gupta, Anurag Mittal, and Larry S. Davis. 2007a. COST: An approach for camera selection and multi-object inference ordering in dynamic scenes. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’07). 1--8.Google Scholar
- Abhinav Gupta, Anurag Mittal, and Larry S. Davis. 2007b. COST: An approach for camera selection and multi-object inference ordering in dynamic scenes. In ICCV’07. 1--8.Google Scholar
- Darrall Henderson, Sheldon H. Jacobson, and Alan W. Johnson. 2003. The theory and practice of simulated annealing. In Handbook of Metaheuristics, Fred Glover and Gary A. Kochenberger (Eds.). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 57. Springer US, 287--319.Google Scholar
- John H. Holland. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eva Horster and Rainer Lienhart. 2006. On the optimal placement of multiple visual sensors. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks. ACM, 111--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eva Horster and Rainer Lienhart. 2009. Multi-Camera Networks: Concepts and Applications. Elsevier, Chapter 5, Optimal Placement of Multiple Visual Sensors.Google Scholar
- Y.-C. Hsieh, Y.-C. Lee, and P.-S. You. 2011. The optimal locations of surveillance cameras on straight lanes. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 5 (2011), 5416--5422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Indu, Santanu Chaudhury, Nikhil R. Mittal, and Asok Bhattacharyya. 2009. Optimal sensor placement for surveillance of large spaces. In 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras. (ICDSC’09). 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dervis Karaboga and Bahriye Basturk. 2007. A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization 39, 3 (2007), 459--471. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dervis Karaboga, Beyza Gorkemli, Celal Ozturk, and Nurhan Karaboga. 2012. A comprehensive survey: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review (2012), 1--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Karmarkar. 1984. A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4, 4 (1984), 373--395. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giorgos D. Kazazakis and Antonis A. Argyros. 2002. Fast positioning of limited-visibility guards for the inspection of 2D workspaces. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2002., Vol. 3. 2843--2848.Google Scholar
- James Kennedy. 1997. The particle swarm: Social adaptation of knowledge. In IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1997. 303--308.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Kennedy and Russell Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, Vol. 4. 1942--1948.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Kennedy and Russell Eberhart. 1997. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation., Vol. 5. 4104--4108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kamyoung Kim, Alan T. Murray, and Ningchuan Xiao. 2008. A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for surveillance sensor placement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35, 5 (2008), 935--948.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Kirkpatrick. 1984. Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies. Journal of Statistical Physics 34, 5 (1984), 975--986.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krishna Reddy Konda and Nicola Conci. 2012. Camera positioning for global and local coverage optimization. In 2012 6 International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC). 1--6.Google Scholar
- Krishna Reddy Konda and Nicola Conci. 2013a. Optimal configuration of PTZ camera networks based on visual quality assessment and coverage maximization. In 2013 7th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC). 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krishna Reddy Konda and Nicola Conci. 2013b. Global and local coverage maximaization in multi-camera networks by stochastic optimization. Infocommunications Journal 2013 (2013).Google Scholar
- Krishna Reddy Konda and Nicola Conci. 2014. Real-time reconfiguration of PTZ camera networks using motion field entropy and visual coverage. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’14). ACM, New York, NY, Article 18, 8 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. N. Krishnanand and D. Ghose. 2009. Glowworm swarm optimization for simultaneous capture of multiple local optima of multimodal functions. Swarm Intelligence 3, 2 (2009), 87--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ailsa H. Land and Alison G. Doig. 1960. An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1960), 497--520.Google Scholar
- Monique Laurent. 2001. A comparison of the Sherali-Adams, Lovsz-Schrijver and Lasserre relaxations for 0-1 programming. Mathematics of Operations Research 28 (2001), 470--496. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. T. Lee and Arthur K. Lin. 1986. Computational complexity of art gallery problems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 32, 2 (1986), 276--282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bennett Liles. 2005. PTZ cameras. Sound and Video Contractor 23, 6 (June 2005), 46--51.Google Scholar
- Junbin Liu, Clinton Fookes, Tim Wark, and Sridha Sridharan. 2012. On the statistical determination of optimal camera configurations in large scale surveillance networks. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision - Volume Part I (ECCV’12). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 44--57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Junbin Liu, Sridha Sridharan, Clinton Fookes, and Tim Wark. 2014. Optimal camera planning under versatile user constraints in multi-camera image processing systems. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23, 1 (Jan. 2014), 171--184. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liang Liu, Xi Zhang, and Huadong Ma. 2010. Optimal node selection for target localization in wireless camera sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 59, 7 (Sept. 2010), 3562--3576.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aaron Mavrinac and Xiang Chen. 2013. Modeling coverage in camera networks: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision 101, 1 (2013), 205--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. McCool, V. Chandran, S. Sridharan, and C. Fookes. 2008. 3D face verification using a free-parts approach. Pattern Recognition Letters 29, 9 (2008), 1190--1196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas Metropolis, Arianna W. Rosenbluth, Marshall N. Rosenbluth, Augusta H. Teller, and Edward Teller. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 21, 6 (1953), 1087--1092.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anurag Mittal and Larry Davis. 2004. Visibility Analysis and Sensor Planning in Dynamic Environments Computer Vision - ECCV 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3021. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 175--189.Google Scholar
- Anurag Mittal and Larry S. Davis. 2008. A general method for sensor planning in multi-sensor systems: Extension to random occlusion. International Journal of Computer Vision 76, 1 (2008), 31--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siti Kamaliah Mohd Yusoff, Abas Md Said, and Idris Ismail. 2011. Optimal camera placement for 3D environment. In Software Engineering and Computer Systems, Jasni Mohamad Zain, Wan Maseribt Wan Mohd, and Eyas El-Qawasmeh (Eds.). Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 180. Springer, Berlin, 448--459.Google Scholar
- Eduardo Monari and Kristian Kroschel. 2009. A knowledge-based camera selection approach for object tracking in large sensor networks. In 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’09). 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eduardo Monari and Kristian Kroschel. 2010. Dynamic sensor selection for single target tracking in large video surveillance networks. In 2010 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). 539--546. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yacine Morsly, Nabil Aouf, Mohand Said Djouadi, and Mark Richardson. 2012. Particle swarm optimization inspired probability algorithm for optimal camera network placement. IEEE Sensors Journal 12, 5 (2012), 1402--1412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yacine Morsly, Mohand Said Djouadi, and Nabil Aouf. 2010. On the best interceptor placement for an optimally deployed visual sensor network. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC). 43--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seyed Akbar Mostafavi and Mehdi Dehghan. 2011. Optimal visual sensor placement for coverage based on target location profile. Ad Hoc Networks 9, 4 (2011), 528--541. Multimedia Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vikram P. Munishwar and Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh. 2010. Scalable target coverage in smart camera networks. In 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’10). ACM, New York, NY, 206--213. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vikram P. Munishwar and Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh. 2011. Target-oriented coverage maximization in visual sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWac’11). ACM, New York, NY, 175--178. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2069131.2069164 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vikram P. Munishwar and Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh. 2013. Coverage algorithms for visual sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 9, 4, Article 45 (July 2013), 36 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2489253.2489262 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan T. Murray, Kamyoung Kim, James W. Davis, Raghu Machiraju, and Richard Parent. 2007. Coverage optimization to support security monitoring. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31, 2 (2007), 133--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prabhu Natarajan, Pradeep K. Atrey, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2015. Multi-camera coordination and control in surveillance systems: A survey. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 11, 4, Article 57 (June 2015), 30 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2710128 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prabhu Natarajan, Trong Nghia Hoang, Kian Hsiang Low, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2012. Decision-theoretic coordination and control for active multi-camera surveillance in uncertain, partially observable environments. In 2012 6th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC). 1--6.Google Scholar
- Prabhu Natarajan, Trong Nghia Hoang, Yongkang Wong, Kian Hsiang Low, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2014. Scalable decision-theoretic coordination and control for real-time active multi-camera surveillance. In International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’14). ACM, New York, NY, Article 38, 6 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brad Nelson and Pradeep K. Khosla. 1994. Integrating sensor placement and visual tracking strategies. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994, Vol. 2. 1351--1356.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Olague and Roger Mohr. 2002. Optimal camera placement for accurate reconstruction. Pattern Recognition 35, 4 (2002), 927--944.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph O’Rourke. 1987. Art Gallery Theorems and Algorithms. Oxford University Press, Inc., 282 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siva Ram, K. R. Ramakrishnan, P. K. Atrey, V. K. Singh, and M. S. Kankanhalli. 2006. A design methodology for selection and placement of sensors in multimedia surveillance systems. In 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks. ACM, 121--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sumantra Dutta Roy, Santanu Chaudhury, and Subhashis Banerjee. 2004. Active recognition through next view planning: A survey. Pattern Recognition 37, 3 (2004), 429--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefan Rudolph, Sarah Edenhofer, Sven Tomforde, and Jörg Hähner. 2014. Reinforcement learning for coverage optimization through PTZ camera alignment in highly dynamic environments. In International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’14). ACM, New York, NY, Article 19, 6 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Ryan, Simon Denman, Clinton Fookes, and Sridha Sridharan. 2011. Textures of optical flow for real-time anomaly detection in crowds. In 2011 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS). 230--235. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davide Scaramuzza. 2014. Omnidirectional camera. In Computer Vision, Katsushi Ikeuchi (Ed.). Springer US, 552--560.Google Scholar
- William R. Scott, Gerhard Roth, and Jean-Francois Rivest. 2003. View planning for automated three-dimensional object reconstruction and inspection. ACM Computing Surveys 35, 1 (March 2003), 64--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sabesan Sivapalan, Daniel Chen, Simon Denman, Sridha Sridharan, and Clinton Fookes. 2011. Gait energy volumes and frontal gait recognition using depth images. In 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petr Slavik. 1997. A tight analysis of the greedy algorithm for set cover. Journal of Algorithms 25, 2 (1997), 237--254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Snidaro, R. Niu, P. K. Varshney, and G. L. Foresti. 2003. Automatic camera selection and fusion for outdoor surveillance under changing weather conditions. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2003. 364--369. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanislava Soro and Wendi Heinzelman. 2007. Camera selection in visual sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS’07). 81--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Sturm, Srikumar Ramalingam, Jean-Philippe Tardif, Simone Gasparini, and João Barreto. 2011. Camera models and fundamental concepts used in geometric computer vision. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision 6, 1 (Jan. 2011), 1--183. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomokazu Takahashi, Osanori Matsugano, Ichro Ide, Yoshito Mekada, and Hiroshi Murase. 2006. Planning of multiple camera arrangement for object recognition in parametric eigenspace. In 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06), Vol. 1. 603--606. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Konstantinos A. Tarabanis, Peter K. Allen, and Roger Y. Tsai. 1995. A survey of sensor planning in computer vision. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 11, 1 (1995), 86--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Konstantinos A. Tarabanis, Roger Y. Tsai, and Peter K. Allen. 1994. Analytical characterization of the feature detectability constraints of resolution, focus, and field-of-view for vision sensor planning. CVGIP: Image Understanding 59, 3 (1994), 340--358. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton van den Hengel, Rhys Hill, Ben Ward, Alex Cichowski, Henry Detmold, Chris Madden, Anthony Dick, and John Bastian. 2009. Automatic camera placement for large scale surveillance networks. In 2009 Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lieven Vandenberghe and Stephen Boyd. 1996. Semidefinite programming. SIAM Review 38 (1996), 49--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bang Wang. 2011. Coverage problems in sensor networks: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 43, 4, Article 32 (Oct. 2011), 53 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanbiao Wang, G. Pottie, K. Yao, and D. Estrin. 2004. Entropy-based sensor selection heuristic for target localization. In 3rd International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’04). 36--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qiang Wang, Jing Wu, and Chengnian Long. 2013. On-line configuration of large scale surveillance networks using mobile smart camera. In 2013 7th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC). 1--6. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDSC.2013.6778238Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Winkler and Bernhard Rinner. 2014. Security and privacy protection in visual sensor networks: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 47, 1, Article 2 (May 2014), 42 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2545883 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jingxin Xu, S. Denman, S. Sridharan, and C. Fookes. 2012. Activity analysis in complicated scenes using DFT coefficients of particle trajectories. In IEEE 9th International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS’12). 82--87. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yichun Xu, Bangjun Lei, Shuifa Sun, Fangmin Dong, and Chilan Chai. 2010. Three particle swarm algorithms to improve coverage of camera networks with mobile nodes. In 2010 IEEE 5th International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications (BIC-TA). 816--820.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yi-Chun Xu, Bangjun Lei, and EmileA. Hendriks. 2013. Constrained particle swarm algorithms for optimizing coverage of large-scale camera networks with mobile nodes. Soft Computing 17, 6 (2013), 1047--1057. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi-Chun Xu, Bangjun Lei, and Emile A. Hendriks. 2011. Camera network coverage improving by particle swarm optimization. Journal on Image and Video Processing, Article 3 (Jan. 2011), 10 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Yabuta and H. Kitazawa. 2008. Optimum camera placement considering camera specification for security monitoring. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS’08). 2114--2117.Google Scholar
- Yi Yao, Chung-Hao Chen, B. Abidi, D. Page, A. Koschan, and M. Abidi. 2008. Sensor planning for automated and persistent object tracking with multiple cameras. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’08). 1--8.Google Scholar
- Yi Yao, Chung-Hao Chen, B. Abidi, D. Page, A. Koschan, and M. Abidi. 2010. Can you see me now? Sensor positioning for automated and persistent surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 40, 1 (2010), 101--115. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohamed Younis and Kemal Akkaya. 2008. Strategies and techniques for node placement in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks 6, 4 (2008), 621--655. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jian Zhao. 2011. Camera Planning and Fusion in a Heterogeneous Camera Network. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kentucky. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jian Zhao and S. S. Cheung. 2009. Optimal visual sensor planning. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS’09). 165--168.Google Scholar
- Jian Zhao and S. C. S. Cheung. 2007. Multi-camera surveillance with visual tagging and generic camera placement. In 1st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’07). 259--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jian Zhao, Sen-Ching S. Cheung, and Thinh Nguyen. 2009. Multi-Camera Networks: Concepts and Applications. Elsevier, Chapter 6, Optimal Visual Sensor Network Configuration.Google Scholar
- Pu Zhou and Chengnian Long. 2011. Optimal coverage of camera networks using PSO algorithm. In 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), Vol. 4. 2084--2088.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Recent Advances in Camera Planning for Large Area Surveillance: A Comprehensive Review
Recommendations
Camera handoff and placement for automated tracking systems with multiple omnidirectional cameras
In a multi-camera surveillance system, both camera handoff and placement play an important role in generating an automated and persistent object tracking, typical of most surveillance requirements. Camera handoff should comprise three fundamental ...
Camera-to-camera mapping for hybrid pan-tilt-zoom sensors calibration
SCIA'07: Proceedings of the 15th Scandinavian conference on Image analysisVideo surveillance becomes more and more extended in industry and often involves automatic calibration system to remain efficient. In this paper, a video-surveillance system that uses stationary-dynamic cameras devices is presented. The static camera is ...
Image-based pan-tilt camera control in a multi-camera surveillance environment
ICME '03: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo - Volume 2In automated surveillance systems with multiple cameras, the system must be able to position the cameras accurately. Each camera must be able to pan-tilt such that an object detected in the scene is in a vantage position in the camera's image plane and ...
Comments