skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017744acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pre-College Computing Outreach Research: Towards Improving the Practice

Published:08 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Europe, Australia, and North America face two similar challenges with respect to computing--there have not been enough students matriculating to keep up with demand and the lack of diversity remains an issue. To address these challenges, private and public resources have been allocated to educate primary and secondary students in computing. Previous meta-studies on these often segregated outreach efforts within the United States indicate that research on their impact remains spotty, short-term, and inconsistent, leaving a gap in the ability to evaluate their long-term impact. Building upon previous research focused in the U.S., this study examines similarities and differences in the results of 17 formal, peer-reviewed computing education research journals and conferences across Australia, Europe, and North America during 2009-2015. Results indicate that a lacuna exists in international research, paralleling results of the more narrowly focused study of U.S. venues. The paper further defines the major issues researchers face in conducting assessment studies for outreach and recommendations for addressing this gap.

References

  1. Andrews, E., Weaver, A., Hanley, D., Shamatha, J., Melton, G. 2005. Scientists and Public Outreach: Participation, Motivations, and Impediments. Journal of Geosci Ed. 53, 3, (May 2005), 281--293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano, N.E. 2015. Canada needs 182,000 people to fill those IT positions by 2019. IT World Canada, December 15, 2015. Retrieved January 4, 2016, from http://www.itworldcanada.com/article/canada-needs-182000-people-to-fill-these-it-positions-by-2019/287535Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aritajati, C., Rosson, M.B., Pena, J., Cinque, D., and Segura, A. 2015. A Socio-Cognitive Analysis of Summer Camp Outcomes and Experiences. In Proc of SIGCSE '15. ACM, NY, USA, 581--586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Australia Computer Society. 2015. Australia's Digital Pulse. Retrieved January 4, 2016 from http://www.acs.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/69720/02062015-Australias-Digital-Pulse-FINAL.PDFGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Government Job Outlook. 2016. Software and Application Programmers. Retrieved January 4, 2016, from http://joboutlook.gov.au/occupation.aspx'search=alpha&tab=prospects&cluster=&code=2613Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartel, A.S., Krasny, M.E., Harrison, E.Z. 2003. Beyond the Binary: Approaches to Integrating University Outreach with Research and Teaching. J of Higher Edu Out and Engage. 8, 2, (Sp/Su 2003), 89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boise State University. 2015. Policy Title: Faculty Tenure and Promotion Guidelines. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from https://policy.boisestate.edu/academic-affairs-faculty-administration/policy-title-faculty-promotion-guidelines/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottomley, L.J., and Parry, E.A. 2002. Assessment of an Engineering Outreach Program: Hands on Engineering. In Proceedings of the 2002 Am Soc for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 7.241.1--7.241.5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from https://depts.washington.edu/gs630/Spring/Boyer.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyer, E. 1996. The Scholarship of Engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach. 1, 1, (Sp 1996), 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Employment Statistics, Employment by detailed occupation. Retrieved August 18, 2015 from http://1.usa.gov/1NSVkTTGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Employment Statistics, Fastest growing occupations. Retrieved August 18, 2015 from http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_203.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chao, S. and Henderson, M. 2012. Gendered Differences in the Participation of Australian Tertiary Computer Science: Implications for Schools. In Proc of Australian Computers in Education Conf, (Perth, Australia, Oct 2--5, 2012). 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton, K., Beekhuyzen, J. and Nielsen, S. 2012. Now I know what ICT can do for me! Inf Sys J. 22, 5, (September 2012), 375--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cobb, W., Buxner, S. R., Shebby, S. M., and Shipp, S. 2015. Best Practices in the Evaluation of Public Outreach Events. In 46th Lunar & Planet Sci Conf, (The Woodlands, TX, March 16--20, 2015). 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig, A. 2015. Theorising about gender and computing interventions through an evaluation framework. Info Sys J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig, M and Diane Horton. 2009. Gr8 designs for Gr8 girls: a middle-school program and its evaluation. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09). ACM, NY, USA, 221--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Decker, A., McGill, M., and Settle, A. 2016. Towards a Common Framework for Evaluating Computing Outreach Activities. In Proc SIGCSE 2016. ACM, NY, USA, 627--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. 2016. Enrolment count by gender and year, 2001--2014 (uCube). Retrieved January 4, 2016, from http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Digital Agenda for Europe:A Europe 2020 Initiative. 2015. Retrieved January 4, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/grand-coalition-digital-jobs-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ecklund, E. H., James, S. A., Lincoln, A. E. 2012. How Academic Biologists and Physicists View Science Outreach. PLoS ONE. 7, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Felix, D.A., Hertle, M.D., Conley, J.G., Washington, L.B., et al. 2004. Assessing Precollege Science Education Outreach Initiatives: A Funder's Perspective. Sundberg M, ed. Cell Biology Education. 3, 3, (Fall 2004), 189--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gibson, H.L., Chase, C. 2002. Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students? Attitudes Toward Science. Wiley Periodicals. 693--705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Guzdial, M., Ericson, B., McKlin, T., and Engelman, S. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proc ICER '12. ACM, New York, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hoegh, A. and Moskal, B.M. 2009. Examining science and engineering students' attitudes toward computer science. In Proc of the 39th IEEE international conference on Frontiers in education conference (FIE'09). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1306--1311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hubelbank, J., Demetry, C., Nicholson, S., Blaisdell, S., Quinn, P., Rosenthal, E., & Sontgerath, S. 2007. Long-term effects of a middle school engineering outreach program for girls: A controlled study. In Proc, Am Soc for Eng Ed Annual Conference & Exhibition. 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jaschik, S. 2007. 'Scholarship Reconsidered' as Tenure Policy. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/02/wcuGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan, K.S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., and Antes, G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 96, 3, (Mar 2003), 118--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Lakanen A., Isomöttönen, V. and Lappalainen, V. 2014. Five years of game programming outreach: understanding student differences. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, NY, 647--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Laursen, S., Liston, C., Thiry, H., and Graf, J. 2007. What Good Is a Scientist in the Classroom? Participant Outcomes and Program Design Features for a Short-Duration Science Outreach Intervention in K-12 Classrooms. CBE Life Sci Educ. 6, 1, (Sp 2007), 49--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Manning, C., Lin, K., and Goodman, I.F. 2013. The Science Festival Alliance: Creating a Sustainable National Network of Science Festivals Final Summative Evaluation Report. Retrieved April 9, 2016 from http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/2013-08-09_SFA_2010--2012_Final_Evaluation_Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. McGill, M.M., Decker, A., and Settle, A. 2015. Does Outreach Impact Choices of Major for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students?. In Proc ICER '15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71--80 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. McGill, M.M., Decker, A., and Settle, A. 2016. Undergraduate students' perceptions of the impact of pre-college computing activities on choices of major. ACM Transactions on Comp Education. 16:4, Art 15, 33 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. McLachlan, C., Craig, A. and Coldwell, J. 2010. Student Perceptions of ICT: A Gendered Analysis. In Proc. 12th Australasian Comp Ed Conf (ACE 2010), Brisbane, Aus. CRPIT, 103. Clear, T. & Hamer, J. Eds., ACS. 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Menard, S. 2014. Handbook of Longitudinal Research: Design, Measurement, and Analysis. Elsevier Science, Burlington, VT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Missouri State. 2015. Citizenship & Service Learning. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from https://www.missouristate.edu/casl/148051.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Plano-Clark, V., Anderson, N., Wertz, J.A., Zhou, Y., Schumacher, K., and Miaskowski, C. 2014. Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 23, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sullivan, K., Byrne, J.R., Bresnihan, N., O'Sullivan, K., Tangney, B. 2015. CodePlus -- Designing an after school computing programme for girls. In Frontiers in Education Conf (FIE) Oct 2015. IEEE, 1--5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Taris, T. 2000. A primer in longitudinal data analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Tew, A.E., Dorn, B., Schneider, O. 2012. Toward a validated computing attitudes survey. In Proc of the 9th Int'l computing education research (ICER '12). ACM, NY, USA, 135--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Texas Women's University Board of Regents. 2016. Faculty Promotion and Tenure. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from http://www.twu.edu/regents/p-faculty-promotion-and-tenure-effective.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. uniteIT e-Inclusion Network. Gender Equality Working Group. Retreived January 4, 2016 from http://www.unite-it.eu/group/gender-equalityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, J., Hong, H., Ravitz, J., and Marielena, I. 2015. Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields. In ITiCSE '15. ACM (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Weibe, E., Williams, L., Yang, K., and Miller, C. 2003. Computer Science Attitude Survey. Tech Report. North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Raleigh, NC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pre-College Computing Outreach Research: Towards Improving the Practice

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
        March 2017
        838 pages
        ISBN:9781450346986
        DOI:10.1145/3017680

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate105of348submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader