skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300317acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Direct Finger Manipulation of 3D Object Image with Ultrasound Haptic Feedback

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this study, we prototype and examine a system that allows a user to manipulate a 3D virtual object with multiple fingers without wearing any device. An autostereoscopic display produces a 3D image and a depth sensor measures the movement of the fingers. When a user touches a virtual object, haptic feedback is provided by ultrasound phased arrays. By estimating the cross section of the finger in contact with the virtual object and by creating a force pattern around it, it is possible for the user to recognize the position of the surface relative to the finger. To evaluate our system, we conducted two experiments to show that the proposed feedback method is effective in recognizing the object surface and thereby enables the user to grasp the object quickly without seeing it.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper087.mp4

mp4

191.6 MB

References

  1. 2018. Bullet Real-Time Physics Simulation. https://pybullet.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. Intel Corporation. https://www.intel.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerald Bianchi, Benjamin Knoerlein, Gabor Szekely, and Matthias Harders. 2006. High precision augmented reality haptics. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics, Vol. 6. 169--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alex Butler, Otmar Hilliges, Shahram Izadi, Steve Hodges, David Molyneaux, David Kim, and Danny Kong. 2011. Vermeer: Direct Interaction with a 360? Viewable 3D Display. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 569--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tom Carter, Sue Ann Seah, Benjamin Long, Bruce Drinkwater, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. UltraHaptics: multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 505--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. R. Gavrilov. 2008. The possibility of generating focal regions of complex configurations in application to the problems of stimulation of human receptor structures by focused ultrasound. Acoustical Physics 54, 2 (2008), 269--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Radim Hal-sr and Jan Flusser. 1998. Numerically stable direct least squares fitting of ellipses. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization, Vol. 98. Citeseer, 125--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Seungju Han and Joonah Park. 2014. Holo-haptics: Haptic interaction with a see-through 3d display. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics. IEEE, 512--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. William S. Harwin and Nicholas Melder. 2002. Improved haptic rendering for multi-finger manipulation using friction cone based god-objects. In Proceedings of the Eurohaptics conference. Citeseer, 82--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Keisuke Hasegawa and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2013. A method for distribution control of aerial ultrasound radiation pressure for remote vibrotactile display. In SICE Annual Conference, 2013 Proceedings of. IEEE, 223--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Otmar Hilliges, David Kim, Shahram Izadi, Malte Weiss, and Andrew Wilson. 2012. HoloDesk: Direct 3D Interactions with a Situated Seethrough Display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2421--2430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Seki Inoue, Yasutoshi Makino, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2015. Active touch perception produced by airborne ultrasonic haptic hologram. In Proceedings of the World Haptics Conference. IEEE, 362--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Seki Inoue, Yasutoshi Makino, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2016. MidAir Ultrasonic Pressure Control on Skin by Adaptive Focusing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 68--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Seki Inoue, Yasutoshi Makino, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2016. Scalable Architecture for Airborne Ultrasound Tactile Display. In Proceedings of the International AsiaHaptics conference. Springer, 99--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Takayuki Iwamoto, Mari Tatezono, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2008. Noncontact method for producing tactile sensation using airborne ultrasound. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 504--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hideki Kakeya, Ken Okada, and Hayato Takahashi. 2018. {Papers} Time-Division Quadruplexing Parallax Barrier with Subpixel-Based Slit Control. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications 6, 3 (2018), 237--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nam-Woo Kim, Dong-Hak Shin, Dong-Jin Kim, Byung-Gook Lee, and Eun-Soo Kim. 2009. Vision-Based 3D Fingertip Interface for Spatial Interaction in 3D Integral Imaging System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. 1006--1011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Georgios Korres and Mohamad Eid. 2016. Haptogram: ultrasonic point-cloud tactile stimulation. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 7758--7769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. J. J. Lamore, H. Muijser, and C. J. Keemink. 1986. Envelope detection of amplitude-modulated high-frequency sinusoidal signals by skin mechanoreceptors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79, 4 (1986), 1082--1085.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Benjamin Long, Sue Ann Seah, Tom Carter, and Sriram Subramanian. 2014--11. Rendering Volumetric Haptic Shapes in Mid-air Using Ultrasound. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 6 (2014--11), 181:1--181:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yasutoshi Makino, Yoshikazu Furuyama, Seki Inoue, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2016. HaptoClone (Haptic-Optical Clone) for mutual teleenvironment by real-time 3D image transfer with midair force Feedback. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1980--1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yasuaki Monnai, Keisuke Hasegawa, Masahiro Fujiwara, Kazuma Yoshino, Seki Inoue, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2014. HaptoMime: Midair Haptic Interaction with a Floating Virtual Screen. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 663--667. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sylvain Paris and Frdo Durand. 2006. A fast approximation of the bilateral filter using a signal processing approach. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision. Springer, 568--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Radu Bogdan Rusu and Steve Cousins. 2011. 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and automation. IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Antti Sand, Ismo Rakkolainen, Poika Isokoski, Jari Kangas, Roope Raisamo, and Karri Palovuori. 2015. Head-mounted Display with Midair Tactile Feedback. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rajinder Sodhi, Ivan Poupyrev, Matthew Glisson, and Ali Israr. 2013. AIREAL: interactive tactile experiences in free air. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 4 (2013), 134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ryoko Takahashi, Keisuke Hasegawa, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2018. Lateral Modulation of Midair Ultrasound Focus for Intensified Vibrotactile Stimuli. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 276--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. A. Talvas, M. Marchal, and A. LÃlcuyer. 2013. The god-finger method for improving 3D interaction with virtual objects through simulation of contact area. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. 111--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. Ting, T. Jen, C. Chen, H. D. Shieh, and Y. Huang. 2016. 3D Air-Touch User Interface With High Touch Accuracy on Stereoscopic Displays. Journal of Display Technology 12, 5 (2016), 429--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Guo-Zhen Wang, Yi-Pai Huang, Tian-Sheuan Chang, and Tsu-Han Chen. 2014. Bare finger 3D air-touch system using an embedded optical sensor array for mobile displays. Journal of Display Technology 10, 1 (2014), 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Takumi Yoshida, Keitaro Shimizu, Tadatoshi Kurogi, Sho Kamuro, Kouta Minamizawa, Hideaki Nii, and Susumu Tachi. 2011. RePro3D: full-parallax 3D display with haptic feedback using retro-reflective projection technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on VR Innovation. IEEE, 49--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Qu Zhang and Hideki Kakeya. 2014. A High Quality Autostereoscopy System Based on Time-Division Quadplexing Parallax Barrier. E97-C, 11 (2014), 1074--1080.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Craig B Zilles and J Kenneth Salisbury. 1995. A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol. 3. IEEE, 146--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Direct Finger Manipulation of 3D Object Image with Ultrasound Haptic Feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format