skip to main content
10.1145/3357236.3395442acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Entangling the Roles of Maker and Interpreter in Interpersonal Data Narratives: Explorations in Yarn and Sound

Published:03 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

To explore how materials, data, and humans collaborate to produce physical data representations, we created a series of artefacts from personal data we collected (about commuting, forgetting, and busy-ness) in different media---yarn and sound. We exchanged these artefacts without providing guidelines for how to interpret them in order to study where the boundary between maker and interpreter emerges. Through creating hand-crafted physicalizations and sonifications, we present three themes on making personal data narratives: matching data to the materials (and vice versa), accepting the materials' will to co-author, and negotiating between the experience of the data and data of the experience. In exchanging the artefacts, we explored the role of the interpreter as a re-maker and how multiple narratives can productively co-exist. We conclude with a discussion about how reimagining the roles of maker and interpreter might lead to new interactions with personal data narratives.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Jason Alexander, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, Johan Kildal, and Abhijit Karnik. 2015. Exploring the Challenges of Making Data Physical. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing System (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2417--2420. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amid Ayobi, Tobias Sonne, Paul Marshall, and Anna L. Cox. 2018. Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Roland Barthes. 2006. The Death of the Author. In Participation. Whitechapel and The MIT Press, London, UK, 41--45. (Original work published in 1968).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jane Bennett. 2004. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political theory 32, 3 (2004), 347--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Rae Ellen Bichell. 2016. Social Security Data Errors Can Turn People Into The Living Dead. (10 August 2016). https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/08/10/489318279/social-security-data-errors-can-turnpeople-into-the-living-dead.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Leslie Birch. 2016. This Innovative Tech Dress Brings Colorful Diary to Life #WearableWednesday #WearableTech @ITP_NYU. (2016). https://blog.adafruit.com/2016/12/14/thisinnovative-tech-dress-brings-colorful-diary-to-lifewearablewednesday-wearabletech-itp_nyu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chris Bopp, Ellie Harmon, and Amy Voida. 2017. Disempowered by Data: Nonprofits, Social Enterprises, and the Consequences of Data-Driven Work. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3608--3619. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mark Cartwright and Bryan Pardo. 2015. Vocalsketch: Vocally imitating audio concepts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--46. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702387Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alan Chamberlain, Mads Bødker, and Konstantinos Papangelis. 2017. Mapping Media and Meaning: Autoethnography as an Approach to Designing Personal Heritage Soundscapes. In Proceedings of the 12th International Audio Mostly Conference on Augmented and Participatory Sound and Music Experiences (2017-08--23) (AM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--4. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3123514.3123536Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Keke Chen and Ling Liu. 2004. ClusterMap: Labeling Clusters in Large Datasets via Visualization. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 285--293. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1031171.1031233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stuart Cornejo and Duncan Haffenden. 2018. Towards ecological and embodied design of auditory display. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD '18). Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 191--196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21785/icad2018.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kate Crawford, Jessa Lingel, and Tero Karppi. 2015. Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18, 4 (2015), 479--496. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Audrey Desjardins and Timea Tihanyi. 2019. Listening Cups: A Case of Data Tactility and Data Stories. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Laura Devendorf, Kristina Andersen, Daniela K. Rosner, Ron Wakkary, and James Pierce. 2019. From HCI to HCI-Amusement: Strategies for Engaging What New Technology Makes Old. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35:1--35:12. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Laura Devendorf, Abigail De Kosnik, Kate Mattingly, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Probing the Potential of Post-Anthropocentric 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 170--181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kristin N. Dew and Daniela K. Rosner. 2018. Lessons from the Woodshop: Cultivating Design with Living Materials. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article Paper 585, 12 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, and David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 649--661. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064714Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, David Chatting, David Kirk, and John Vines. 2016. Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 685--698. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daniel A Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 731--742. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sarah Fox, Noura Howell, Richmond Wong, and Franchesca Spektor. 2019. Vivewell: Speculating Near-Future Menstrual Tracking through Current Data Practices. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541--552. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323695Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Michael Friendly. 2008. A Brief History of Data Visualization. In Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 15--56. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--33037-0_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jacob Goldstein and David Kestenbaum. 2011. U.S. Home Prices, Sung As Opera. (26 April 2011). https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2011/04/27/135737940/the-case-shiller-index-sung-as-operaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Visda Goudarzi. 2016. Exploration of sonification design process through an interdisciplinary workshop. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2986416.2986422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rebecca Gulotta, Alex Sciuto, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2015. Curatorial agents: How systems shape our understanding of personal and familial digital information. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3453--3462. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kevin D Haggerty and Richard V Ericson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. The British journal of sociology 51, 4 (2000), 605--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Otto Hans-Martin Lutz, Jacob Leon Kroger, Manuel Schneiderbauer, and Manfred Hauswirth. 2019. Surfing in sound: Sonification of hidden web tracking. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology, 306--309. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Jon Bird. 2015. Activity Tracking: Barriers, Workarounds and Customisation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 617--621. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Karey Helms. 2019. Do You Have to Pee? A Design Space for Intimate and Somatic Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1209--1222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Rundong (Kevin) Tian, Tomás Vega Galvez, Nan-Wei Gong, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Biosignals As Social Cues: Ambiguity and Emotional Interpretation in Social Displays of Skin Conductance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 865--870. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Tomás Alfonso Vega Gálvez, Rundong Tian, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2018. Tensions of Data-Driven Reflection: A Case Study of Real-Time Emotional Biosensing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 431:1--431:13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-Affirming Biosensing in Public: Sounding Heartbeats on a Red Bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 680:1--680:16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Carmen Hull and Wesley Willett. 2017. Building with Data: Architectural Models as Inspiration for Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1217--1264. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Samuel Huron, Pauline Gourlet, Uta Hinrichs, Trevor Hogan, and Yvonne Jansen. 2017. Let's Get Physical: Promoting Data Physicalization in Workshop Formats. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1409--1422. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064798Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jonna Häkkilä and Lasse Virtanen. 2016. Aesthetic physical items for visualizing personal sleep data. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1173--1177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2965019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2019. Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 236--248. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353800Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3227--3236. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Annie Kelly, Matt Whitlock, Brielle Nickoloff, Angel Lam, Danielle Albers Szafir, and Stephen Voida. 2017. Becoming Butterflies: Interactive Embodiment of the Butterfly Lifecycle. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--96. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3123136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Da-jung Kim, Yeoreum Lee, Saeyoung Rho, and Youn-kyung Lim. 2016. Design Opportunities in Three Stages of Relationship Development between Users and Self-Tracking Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 699--703. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nam Wook Kim, Hyejin Im, Nathalie Henry Riche, Alicia Wang, Krzysztof Gajos, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2019. DataSelfie: Empowering People to Design Personalized Visuals to Represent Their Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 79:1--79:12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Hyosun Kwon, Joel E. Fischer, Martin Flintham, and James Colley. 2018. The Connected Shower: Studying Intimate Data in Everyday Life. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4 (Dec. 2018). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3287054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Steven Landry and Myounghoon Jeon. 2017. Participatory design research methodologies: A case study in dancer sonification. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD '17). Georgia Institute of Technology, 182--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Grace Li and Bruce N Walker. 2019. Mixed speech and non-speech auditory displays: impacts of design, learning, and individual differences in musical engagement. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology, 133--139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 557--566. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405--414. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030166Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Decomposition as Design: Co-Creating (with) Natureculture. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 605--614. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Dan Lockton, Some Paving, and Water Carriage. 2018. Apophenia As Method-Or, Everything Is Either A Metaphor Or An Analogue Computer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Giorgia Lupi and Stefanie Posavec. 2016. Dear data. Chronicle Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Deborah Lupton. 2014. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: The future of design. ACM, 77--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Murali Mani and Si Fei. 2017. Effective Big Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 21st International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium (IDEAS 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 298--303. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3105831.3105857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. David McGookin and Stephen Brewster. 2011. Earcons. In The sonification handbook. https://sonification.de/handbook/chapters/chapter14/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Michael A Nees. 2018. Auditory graphs are not the "killer app" of sonification, but they work. Ergonomics in Design 26, 4 (2018), 25--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. John G Neuhoff. 2019. Is sonification doomed to fail?. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD '19). Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Bettina Nissen and John Bowers. 2015. Data-Things: Digital Fabrication Situated within Participatory Data Translation Activities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2467--2476. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702245Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2014. Counterfunctional things: exploring possibilities in designing digital limitations. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 375--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Zachary Pousman, John Stasko, and Michael Mateas. 2007. Casual information visualization: Depictions of data in everyday life. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1145--1152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Stephen Roddy and Brian Bridges. 2016. Sounding human with data: the role of embodied conceptual metaphors and aesthetics in representing and exploring data sets. In Music Technology Workshop (MusTWork16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1163--1172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Kimiko Ryokai, Elena Durán López, Noura Howell, Jon Gillick, and David Bamman. 2018. Capturing, Representing, and Interacting with Laughter. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Alper Sarikaya and Michael Gleicher. 2017. Scatterplots: Tasks, data, and designs. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 1 (2017), 402--412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99--108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Thomas Smith, Simon J. Bowen, Bettina Nissen, Jonathan Hook, Arno Verhoeven, John Bowers, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Exploring Gesture Sonification to Support Reflective Craft Practice. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702497Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Simon Stusak and Ayfer Aslan. 2014. Beyond physical bar charts: an exploration of designing physical visualizations. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, 1381--1386. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581311Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Alexandra Supper. 2012. The search for the "killer application": Drawing the boundaries around the sonification of scientific data. In The Oxford handbook of sound studies. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Conglei Shi, Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Lora A. Oehlberg, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. Supporting the design and fabrication of physical visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, 3845--3854. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Tatiana Tekuová, Jörn Kohlhammer, Slawomir J. Skwarek, and Galina V. Paramei. 2008. Perception of Direction Changes in Animated Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1394281.1394331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, 1--13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Anna Vallgårda and Tomas Sokolar. 2010. Material Computing: Computing Materials. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing - Adjunct (UbiComp '10 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 383--384. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1864431.1864447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Bruce N Walker, Amanda Nance, and Jeffrey Lindsay. 2006. Spearcons: Speech-based earcons improve navigation performance in auditory menus. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2006). Georgia Institute of Technology, 63--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Bruce N Walker and Michael A Nees. 2011. Theory of sonification. In The sonification handbook. Logos Publishing House, Berlin, Germany, 9--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Jordan Wirfs-Brock. 2019. Recipes for Breaking Data Free: Alternative Interactions for Experiencing Personal Data. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 325--330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. KatieAnna Wolf and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2019. Toward Supporting End-User Design of Soundscape Sonifications. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD '19). Georgia Institute of Technology, 268--276. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Shamima Yasmin. 2017. Data Visualization versus Data Perception. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3141226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Jack Zhao and Andrew Vande Moere. 2008. Embodiment in data sculpture: a model of the physical visualization of information. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (DIMEA '08). ACM, 343--350. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1413634.1413696Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Entangling the Roles of Maker and Interpreter in Interpersonal Data Narratives: Explorations in Yarn and Sound

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 2020
      2264 pages
      ISBN:9781450369749
      DOI:10.1145/3357236

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader