Marion Koelle
Matthias Kranz
Andreas Möller
ABSTRACT
Data glasses do carry promising potential for hands-free interaction, but also raise various concerns amongst their potential users. In order to gain insights into the nature of those concerns, we investigate how potential usage scenarios are perceived by device users and their peers. We present results of a two-step approach: a focus group discussion with 7 participants, and a user study with 38 participants. In particular, we look into differences between the usage of data glasses and more established devices such as smart phones. We provide quantitative measures for scenario-related social acceptability and point out factors that can influence user attitudes. Based on our quantitative and qualitative results, we derive design implications that might support the development of head-worn devices and applications with an improved social acceptability.
- Agarwal, A., and Meyer, A. Beyond usability: evaluating emotional response as an integral part of the user experience. In CHI'09 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2009), 2919--2930. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Azuma, R. T. A survey of augmented reality. PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT 6, 4 (1997), 355--385.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bohn, J., Coroamă, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F., and Rohs, M. Social, economic, and ethical implications of ambient intelligence and ubiquitous computing. In Ambient intelligence. Springer, 2005, 5--29.Google Scholar
- Brewster, S., Murray-Smith, R., Crossan, A., Vasquez-Alvarez, Y., and Rico, J. The gaime project: Gestural and auditory interactions for mobile environments. BRIT COMP S (2009).Google Scholar
- Costanza, E., Inverso, S. A., Pavlov, E., Allen, R., and Maes, P. eye-q: Eyeglass peripheral display for subtle intimate notifications. In MobileHCI'06, ACM (2006), 211--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DeBlasio, J., and Walker, B. N. Documentation in a medical setting. PROC HUM FACT ERGON SOC ANNU MEET 53, 11 (2009), 645--649.Google Scholar
- Denning, T., Dehlawi, Z., and Kohno, T. In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses: perspectives on recording and privacy-mediating technologies. In CHI'14, ACM (2014), 2377--2386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., and Lehner, K. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In CHI'00, ACM (2000), 201--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hosokawa, S. The walkman effect. POP MUSIC 4 (1984), 165--180.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoyle, R., Templeman, R., Armes, S., Anthony, D., Crandall, D., and Kapadia, A. Privacy behaviors of lifeloggers using wearable cameras. In UbiComp'14 (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karrer, K., Glaser, C., Clemens, C., and Bruder, C. Technikaffinität erfassen--der Fragebogen TA-EG {assessing technical affinity--the questionnaire ta-eg}. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt tech. Systeme 8 (2009), 196--201.Google Scholar
- Kleinman, L. Physically present, mentally absent: Technology use in face-to-face meetings. In CHI'07 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2007), 2501--2506. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucero, A., Lyons, K., Vetek, A., Järvenpää, T., White, S., and Salmimaa, M. Exploring the interaction design space for interactive glasses. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2013), 1341--1346. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McAtamney, G., and Parker, C. An examination of the effects of a wearable display on informal face-to-face communication. In CHI'06, ACM (2006), 45--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McNaney, R., Vines, J., Roggen, D., Balaam, M., Zhang, P., Poliakov, I., and Olivier, P. Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinsons. In CHI'14, ACM (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Möller, A., Kranz, M., Schmid, B., Roalter, L., and Diewald, S. Investigating self-reporting behavior in long-term studies. In CHI'13, ACM (2013), 2931--2940. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Montero, C. S., Alexander, J., Marshall, M. T., and Subramanian, S. Would you do that?: Understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces. In MobileHCI'10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 275--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nguyen, D. H., Bedford, A., Bretana, A. G., and Hayes, G. R. Situating the concern for information privacy through an empirical study of responses to video recording. In CHI'11, ACM (2011), 3207--3216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Palen, L., Salzman, M., and Youngs, E. Going wireless: behavior & practice of new mobile phone users. In CSCW'00, ACM (2000), 201--210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Profita, H. P., Clawson, J., Gilliland, S., Zeagler, C., Starner, T., Budd, J., and Do, E. Y.-L. Don't mind me touching my wrist: a case study of interacting with on-body technology. In ISWC'13, ACM (2013), 89--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rico, J., and Brewster, S. Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In CHI'10, ACM (2010), 887--896. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronkainen, S., Häkkilä, J., Kaleva, S., Colley, A., and Linjama, J. Tap input as an embedded interaction method for mobile devices. In TEI'07, ACM (2007), 263--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. J RISK UNCERTAINTY 1, 1 (1988), 7--59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Serrano, M., Ens, B. M., and Irani, P. P. Exploring the use of hand-to-face input for interacting with head-worn displays. In CHI'14, ACM (2014), 3181--3190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutherland, I. E. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In FJCC'68, ACM (1968), 757--764. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, S. C. Illusions of control how we overestimate our personal influence. CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI 8, 6 (1999), 187--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walter, S., Wendt, C., Böhnke, J., Crawcour, S., Tan, J.-W., Chan, A., Limbrecht, K., Gruss, S., and Traue, H. C. Similarities and differences of emotions in human--machine and human--human interactions. ERGONOMICS (2013), 1--13.Google Scholar
- Washington, M. C., Okoro, E. A., and Cardon, P. W. Perceptions of civility for mobile phone use in formal and informal meetings. Business Communication Quarterly 77, 1 (2013), 52--64.Google Scholar
- Wilkowska, W., and Ziefle, M. Privacy and data security in e-health: Requirements from the users perspective. Health informatics journal 18, 3 (2012), 191--201.Google Scholar
- Wolf, K., Schmidt, A., Bexheti, A., and Langheinrich, M. Lifelogging: You're wearing a camera? IEEE PERVAS COMPUT 13, 3 (2014), 8--12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ziefle, M., and Rocker, C. Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts. In PervasiveHealth'10, IEEE (2010), 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Don't look at me that way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage
Recommendations
Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGesture-based mobile interfaces require users to change the way they use technology in public settings. Since mobile phones are part of our public appearance, designers must integrate gestures that users perceive as acceptable for pub-lic use. This ...
May I Still Define Myself? Exploring How Dissonance in Displaying Personal Information Through Head-Mounted Augmented Reality Can Affect Personal Information Sovereignty
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHead-mounted Augmented Reality enables individuals to overlay digital information onto the physical world, consequently influencing how they assess and react to augmented social situations. While prior work has shown that augmenting social situations ...
Send me bubbles: multimodal performance and social acceptability
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe use of performance as the focus of interaction provides the opportunity for exploratory and individual experiences but can also put users in an uncomfortable position. This paper presents an initial user study of a mobile remote awareness ...
Comments