skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466154acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cultivating energy literacy: results from a longitudinal living lab study of a home energy management system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents results of a three-year research project focused on the emplacement of Home Energy Management Systems (HEMS) in a living lab setting with seven households. The HEMS used in this study allowed householders to monitor energy consumption both in real-time and in retrospective on the TV and on mobile devices. Contrasting with existing research focused on how technology persuades people to consume less energy, our study uses a grounded approach to analyze HEMS emplacement. As an important result, we present here the issue of 'energy literacy'. Our study reveals that, by using HEMS, participants became increasingly literate in understanding domestic electricity consumption. We discuss the role HEMS played in that process and how the acquired literacy changed energy consumption patterns. We conclude that literacy in energy consumption has value on its own and explain how eco feedback system designs can benefit from this understanding.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T., A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25 (2005), 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., Weiss, A., Beck, E., and Tscheligi, M., Trends in the Living Room and Beyond: Results from Ethnographic Studies Using Creative and Playful Probing, Information Systems Journal, 6 (2008), 1--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blevis, E., Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse, In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brynjarsdottir, H., Hakansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P., Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability, In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burgess, J. and Nye, M., Re-materialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems, Energy, 36 2008, 4454--4459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chetty, M., Brush, A. J. B., Meyers, B. R., and Johns, P., It's not easy being green: understanding home computer power management, In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1033--1042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. E., Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home, In Proc. UbiComp 2008, ACM Press (2008), 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Darby, S., Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption, In Proc. International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, Springer (2001), 685--696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Darby, S., The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays, Oxford, 2006, 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, F. D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13 (1989), 319--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dewey, J., Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, John Dewey The Later Works, 12 (1938), viii, 546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdóttir, H., Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Egan, C. and Policy, E., How Customers Interpret and Use Comparative Graphics of Their Energy Use, Comparative and General Pharmacology, (1995), 3945.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Statistical Office Germany, Income, Consumption and Living Standards - Households in the informations society (ICT), Federal Statistical Office Germany, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzpatrick, G. and Smith, G., Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8 (2009), 37--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Flick, U., Assessing the Quality of Qualitative Health Research: Criteria, Process and Writing, An introduction to qualitative research, 10 (2006), 384--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogg, B. J., Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Følstad, A., Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10 (2008), 99--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J., The design of eco-feedback technology, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L., The discovery of grounded theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1967), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustafsson, A. and Gyllenswärd, M., The PowerAware Cord: Energy Awareness through Ambient Information Display, In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 14231426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., and Burgess, J., Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors, Energy Policy, 38 (2010), 6111--6119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., and Burgess, J., Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term, Energy Policy, (2012), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hassenzahl, M., Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality, Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, (2006), 266--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. He, H. A., Greenberg, S., and Huang, E. M., One Size Does Not Fit All: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hess, J. and Ogonowski, C., Steps toward a living lab for socialmedia concept evaluation and continuous userinvolvement, In Proc. EuroITV 2010, (2010), 171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Houwelingen, J. H. v. and Raaij, W. F. v., The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on InHome Energy Use, The Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1989), 98--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L., Björksog, C., Ò, M. B., and Monti, P., Designing Effective Feedback of Electricity Consumption for Mobile User Interfaces, PsychNology Journal, 7 (2009), 265--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jönsson, L., Broms, L., and Katzeff, C., Watt-Lite; Energy Statistics Made Tangible, Energy, (2010), 240--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kempton, W., Folk quantification of energy, Energy, 7 (1982), 817--827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mankoff, J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A., and Sengers, P., Environmental sustainability and interaction, In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E., Materializing energy, In Proc. DIS 2009, ACM Press (2009), 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Pierce, J., Schiano, D. J., and Paulos, E., Home , Habits , and Energy : Examining Domestic Interactions and Energy Consumption, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1985--1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Riche, Y., Dodge, J., and Metoyer, R. A., Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Schwartz, T., Betz, M., Ramirez, L., and Stevens, G., Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation, In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 452--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sheldrick, B. and Macgill, S., Local energy conservation initiatives in the UK:Their nature and achievements, Energy Policy, 16 (1988), 562--578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shove, E., Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: the Social Organization of Normality., Oxford Berg Slocum, 0 (2003), 221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stern, P. C., What Psychology Knows About Energy Conservation, American Psychologist, 47 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevens, G., Pipek, V., and Wulf, V., Appropriation infrastructure: mediating appropriation and production work, Journal of Organizational and End User, 22 ( 2010), 58--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Strengers, Y. A. A., Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life, In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011) 2135--2144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. van Dam, S. S., Bakker, C. a., and van Hal, J. D. M., Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term, Building Research & Information, 38 (2010), 458--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Wallenborn, G., Orsini, M., and Vanhaverbeke, J., Household appropriation of electricity monitors, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35 (2011), 146--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Wilhite, H., Shove, E., Luzenhiser, L., and Kempton, W., Twenty years of energy demand management: we know more about individual behavior but how much do we really know about demand, In Proc. ACEEE 2000, (2000), 435--453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cultivating energy literacy: results from a longitudinal living lab study of a home energy management system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader