skip to main content
research-article

Exploring the Role of Common Model of Cognition in Designing Adaptive Coaching Interactions for Health Behavior Change

Published:26 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Our research aims to develop intelligent collaborative agents that are human-aware: They can model, learn, and reason about their human partner’s physiological, cognitive, and affective states. In this article, we study how adaptive coaching interactions can be designed to help people develop sustainable healthy behaviors. We leverage the common model of cognition (CMC) [31] as a framework for unifying several behavior change theories that are known to be useful in human–human coaching. We motivate a set of interactive system desiderata based on the CMC-based view of behavior change. Then, we propose PARCoach, an interactive system that addresses the desiderata. PARCoach helps a trainee pick a relevant health goal, set an implementation intention, and track their behavior. During this process, the trainee identifies a specific goal-directed behavior as well as the situational context in which they will perform it. PARCCoach uses this information to send notifications to the trainee, reminding them of their chosen behavior and the context. We report the results from a 4-week deployment with 60 participants. Our results support the CMC-based view of behavior change and demonstrate that the desiderata for proposed interactive system design is useful in producing behavior change.

References

  1. Stefano V. Albrecht and Peter Stone. 2018. Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems. Artif. Intell. 258 (2018), 66–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John R. Anderson and Christian J. Lebiere. 2014. The Atomic Components of Thought. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher J. Armitage. 2009. Effectiveness of experimenter-provided and self-generated implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in a sample of the general population: A randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 28, 5 (2009), 545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ariane Bélanger-Gravel, Gaston Godin, and Steve Amireault. 2013. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol. Rev. 7, 1 (2013), 23–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. L. Booth, B. E. Ainsworth, M. Pratt, and U. Ekelund. 2003. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil. Eval. Industr. 189, 194 (1996), 4–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joseph A. Cafazzo, Mark Casselman, Nathaniel Hamming, Debra K. Katzman, and Mark R. Palmert. 2012. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: A pilot study. J. Med. Internet Res. 14, 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tathagata Chakraborti, Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2018. Projection-aware task planning and execution for human-in-the-loop operation of robots in a mixed-reality workspace. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’18). IEEE, 4476–4482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W. McDonald, and James A. Landay. 2009. Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Catrinel Craciun, Natalie Schüz, Sonia Lippke, and Ralf Schwarzer. 2012. Facilitating sunscreen use in women by a theory-based online intervention: A randomized controlled trial. J. Health Psychol. 17, 2 (2012), 207–216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sean R. Downer, John G. Meara, and Annette C. Da Costa. 2005. Use of SMS text messaging to improve outpatient attendance. Med. J. Austr. 183, 7 (2005), 366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Honglu Du, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Gregory Michael Youngblood, Ashwin Ram, and Peter Pirolli. 2016. A group-based mobile application to increase adherence in exercise and nutrition programs: A factorial design feasibility study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Honglu Du, G. Michael Youngblood, and Peter Pirolli. 2014. Efficacy of a smartphone system to support groups in behavior change programs. In Proceedings of the Wireless Health 2014 on National Institutes of Health Conference. 1–8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Elizabeth G. Eakin, Sheleigh P. Lawler, Corneel Vandelanotte, and Neville Owen. 2007. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change a systematic review. Am. J. Prevent. Med. 32, 5 (2007), 419–434. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Emily B. Falk, Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Christopher N. Cascio, Francis Tinney, Yoona Kang, Matthew D. Lieberman, Shelley E. Taylor, Lawrence An, Kenneth Resnicow, and Victor J. Strecher. 2015. Self-affirmation alters the brain’s response to health messages and subsequent behavior change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7 (2015), 1977–1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Victoria L. Franklin, Annalu Waller, Claudia Pagliari, and Stephen A. Greene. 2006. A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diab. Med. 23, 12 (2006), 1332–1338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jillian Fry and Roni A. Neff. 2009. Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 11, 2 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Peter M. Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran. 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38 (2006), 69–119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260106380021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Arthur C. Graesser, Kurt VanLehn, Carolyn P. Rose, Pamela W. Jordan, and Derek Harter. 2001. Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Mag. 22, 4 (2001), 39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Martin S. Hagger and Aleksandra Luszczynska. 2014. Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: State of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl. Psychol.: Health Well-Being 6, 1 (2014), 1–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Andrea Hartzler, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Shiwali Mohan, Michael Silva, Paula Lozano, James D. Ralston, Evette Ludman, Dori Rosenberg, Katherine M. Newton, Lester Nelson, and Peter Pirolli. 2016. Acceptability of a team-based mobile health (mHealth) application for lifestyle self-management in individuals with chronic illnesses. In Proceedings of the Conference Proceedings: 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 2016. 3277–3281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Christopher Helf, Patrick Zwickl, Helmut Hlavacs, and Peter Reichl. 2015. mHealth stakeholder integration: A gamification-based framework-approach towards behavioural change. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia. ACM, 268–274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Victoria Hollis, Artie Konrad, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Change of heart: Emotion tracking to promote behavior change. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2643–2652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Emily B. Kahn, Leigh T. Ramsey, Ross C. Brownson, Gregory W. Heath, Elizabeth H. Howze, Kenneth E. Powell, Elaine J. Stone, Mummy W. Rajab, and Phaedra Corso. 2002. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity a systematic review and the task force on community preventive services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22, 4 (2002), 73--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Karen B. Eden, C. Tracy Orleans, Cynthias Mulrow, Nola Pender, and Steven Teutsch. 2002. Does counseling by clinicians improve physical activity? A summary of the evidence. Ann. Internal Med. 137, 3 (2002), 208–215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Subbarao Khambapati. 2018. Challenges of human-aware AI systems. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb7CWilXjag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Been Kim, Caleb M. Chacha, and Julie A. Shah. 2015. Inferring team task plans from human meetings: A generative modeling approach with logic-based prior. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 52 (2015), 361–398. https://www.jair.org/index.php/jair/article/view/10932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kenneth R. Koedinger, Emma Brunskill, Ryan S. J. D. Baker, Elizabeth A. McLaughlin, and John Stamper. 2013. New potentials for data-driven intelligent tutoring system development and optimization. AI Mag. 34, 3 (9 2013), 27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2484Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Artie Konrad, Victoria Bellotti, Nicole Crenshaw, Simon Tucker, Les Nelson, Honglu Du, Peter Pirolli, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Finding the adaptive sweet spot: Balancing compliance and achievement in automated stress reduction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3829–3838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. John E. Laird. 2012. The Soar Cognitive Architecture. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. John E. Laird, Christian Lebiere, and Paul S. Rosenbloom. 2017. A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Mag. 38, 4 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pat Langley, John E. Laird, and Seth Rogers. 2009. Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 2 (2009), 141–160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Christine Lisetti, Reza Amini, Ugan Yasavur, and Naphtali Rishe. 2013. I can help you change! an empathic virtual agent delivers behavior change health interventions. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 4, 4 (2013), 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 9 (2002), 705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2006. New directions in goal-setting theory. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 15, 5 (2006), 265–268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Chris Martin, Tracey Perfect, and Greg Mantle. 2005. Non-attendance in primary care: The views of patients and practices on its causes, impact and solutions. Fam. Pract. 22, 6 (2005), 638–643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick. 2012. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Shiwali Mohan, Hesham Rakha, and Matt Klenk. 2019. Acceptable planning: Influencing individual behavior to reduce transportation energy expenditure of a city. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 66 (2019), 555–587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Shiwali Mohan, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, and Andrea Hartzler. 2020. Designing an AI health coach and studying its utility in promoting regular aerobic exercise. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 10, 2 (2020), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Shiwali Mohan, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Michael Silva, and Peter Pirolli. 2017. On designing a social coach to promote regular aerobic exercise. In Proceedings of the AAAI Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 4721–4727. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Shiwali Mohan, Frances Yan, Victoria Bellotti, Ahmed Elbery, Hesham Rakha, and Matthew Klenk. 2019. On influencing individual behavior for reducing transportation energy expenditure in a large population. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 461–467. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Inbal Nahum-Shani, Eric B. Hekler, and Donna Spruijt-Metz. 2015. Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: A pragmatic framework. Health Psychol. 34, S (2015), 1209. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-56045-002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pablo Paredes, A. Tewari, and J. Canny. 2013. Design principles for the conceptualization of games for health behavior change. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Charlie Pinder, Jo Vermeulen, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Russell Beale. 2018. Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 3 (2018), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Peter Pirolli. 2016. A computational cognitive model of self-efficacy and daily adherence in mHealth. Translat. Behav. Med. 6, 4 (2016), 496–508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Peter Pirolli, Shiwali Mohan, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Les Nelson, Michael Silva, and Aaron Springer. 2017. Implementation intention and reminder effects on behavior change in a mobile health system: A predictive cognitive model. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, 11 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. James O. Prochaska. 2013. Transtheoretical model of behavior change. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, 1997–2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan E. Rhodes and Kerry S. Courneya. 2003. Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 42, 1 (2003), 129–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Anthony Rodgers, Tim Corbett, Dale Bramley, Tania Riddell, Mary Wills, Ruey-Bin Lin, and Mark Jones. 2005. Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tobacco Contr. 14, 4 (2005), 255–261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Paul S. Rosenbloom, Abram Demski, and Volkan Ustun. 2016. The Sigma cognitive architecture and system: Towards functionally elegant grand unification. J. Artif. Gen. Intell. 7, 1 (2016), 1–103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Jeff Sauro. 2011. A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Measuring Usability LLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Daniel Schulman, Timothy W. Bickmore, and Candace L. Sidner. 2011. An intelligent conversational agent for promoting long-term health behavior change using motivational interviewing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: AI and Health Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Paschal Sheeran and Sheina Orbell. 1999. Implementation intentions and repeated behaviour: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29, 2–3 (1999), 349–369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Mical Kay Shilts, Marcel Horowitz, and Marilyn S. Townsend. 2004. Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Am. J. Health Promot. 19, 2 (2004), 81–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Candace L. Sidner, Timothy Bickmore, Bahador Nooraie, Charles Rich, Lazlo Ring, Mahni Shayganfar, and Laura Vardoulakis. 2018. Creating new technologies for companionable agents to support isolated older adults. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8, 3 (2018), 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Aaron Springer, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Shiwali Mohan, Lester Nelson, Michael Silva, and Peter Pirolli. 2018. Leveraging self-affirmation to improve behavior change: A mobile health app experiment. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6, 7 (2018), e157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Fiona G. Stacey, Erica L. James, Kathy Chapman, Kerry S. Courneya, and David R. Lubans. 2015. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. Jl Cancer Survivorl 9, 2 (2015), 305–338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Leona Tam, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Jelena Spanjol. 2010. When planning is not enough: The self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits. Health Psycholl 29, 3 (2010), 284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. J. Graham Thomas and Dale S. Bond. 2015. Behavioral response to a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) to reduce sedentary behavior in obese adults: Implications for JITAI optimization. Health Psychol. 34, S (2015), 1261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Myrthe Tielman, Marieke van Meggelen, Mark A. Neerincx, and Willem-Paul Brinkman. 2015. An Ontology-Based Question System for a Virtual Coach Assisting in Trauma Recollection. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 17–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Robert Tobias. 2009. Changing behavior by memory aids: A social psychological model of prospective memory and habit development tested with dynamic field data. Psychol. Rev. 116, 2 (2009), 408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Kurt Vanlehn. 2011. Educational psychologist the relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46, 4 (2011), 197–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Thomas L. Webb, Judith Joseph, Lucy Yardley, and Susan Michie. 2010. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J. Med. Internet Res. 12, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Susan J. Woolford, Kathryn L. C. Barr, Holly A. Derry, Christina M. Jepson, Sarah J. Clark, Victor J. Strecher, and Kenneth Resnicow. 2011. OMG do not say LOL: Obese adolescents’ perspectives on the content of text messages to enhance weight loss efforts. Obesity 19, 12 (2011), 2382–2387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Role of Common Model of Cognition in Designing Adaptive Coaching Interactions for Health Behavior Change

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
      ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 11, Issue 1
      March 2021
      245 pages
      ISSN:2160-6455
      EISSN:2160-6463
      DOI:10.1145/3453938
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2021
      • Accepted: 1 September 2020
      • Revised: 1 June 2020
      • Received: 1 September 2019
      Published in tiis Volume 11, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format