Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
3D Research
Erschienen in: 3D Research 3/2018

01.09.2018 | 3DR Express

Measuring Effect of Packet Reordering on Quality of Experience (QoE) in Video Streaming

verfasst von: Asif Ali Laghari, Hui He, Muhammad Ibrahim Channa

Erschienen in: 3D Research | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Video streaming is an important part of the Internet and it is widely used for IPTV, video conferencing and E-learning. The quality of experience (QoE) of users about the video contents is important for service providers to improve services and provide quality of service to end users. The video quality is affected by packet reordering, delay and loss in the network, which degrades the QoE of end users. In this paper, we conducted several experiments on video streaming creating artificial packet reorder to measure user stratification level of video quality as well as acceptable network level for end users. We used NetEm tool for creating artificial packet reorder in video streaming, recording and playing videos for participants for perception, and investigated the QoE of different packet reorder percentage. From our experiments, we found that QoE of users is decreased when video quality is reordered due to network traffic. This work will help content providers to provide QoE to users based on service level agreements.

Graphical Abstract

Vorheriger Artikel A Novel Hybrid Contrast Enhancement Technique
Nächster Artikel A New Objective Image Quality Assessment Metric: For Color and Grayscale Images

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Tinta, S. P., Mohr, A. E., & Wong, J. L. (2009). Characterizing end-to-end packet reordering with UDP traffic. In IEEE symposium on computers and communications, 2009. ISCC 2009 (pp. 321–324).
2.
Joshi, R., Mandava, M., & Saraph, G. P. (2008). End-to-end quality of service (QoS) over internet. IETE Technical Review, 25(4), 216–221.CrossRef
3.
Zhou, X., & Van Mieghem, P. (2004). Reordering of IP packets in Internet. In International workshop on passive and active network measurement (pp. 237–246).
4.
Asano, A., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2010). The effect of packet reordering and encrypted traffic on streaming content leakage detection. In 2010 Proceedings of 19th international conference on computer communications and networks.
5.
6.
Usman, M. A., Shin, S. Y., Shahid, M., & Lövström, B. (2017). A no reference video quality metric based on jerkiness estimation focusing on multiple frame freezing in video streaming. IETE Technical Review, 34(3), 309–320.CrossRef
7.
Exarchakos, G., Druda, L., Menkovski, V., & Liotta, A. (2015). Network analysis on Skype end-to-end video quality. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 11(1), 17–42.CrossRef
8.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Shafiq, M., & Khan, A., (2016). Assessing effect of cloud distance on end user’s quality of experience (QoE). In 2016 2nd IEEE international conference on computer and communications (ICCC) (pp. 500–505).
9.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Ibrahim, M., & Shaikh, S. (2017). Automatic network policy change on the basis of quality of experience (QoE). Procedia Computer Science, 107, 657–659.CrossRef
10.
Laghari, A. A., Sadhayo, I. H., & Channa, M. I. (2015). Enhanced autonomic networking management architecture (Enama). Engineering, Science & Technology, 14(1), 9–13.
11.
Le Callet, P., Möller, S., & Perkis, A., (2013). Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience (2012). In European network on quality of experience in multimedia systems and services (COST Action IC 1003).
12.
Laghari, A. A., Laghari, K. U. R., Channa, M. I., & Falk, T. H., (2012). QON: Quality of experience (QoE) framework for network services. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on software technology and engineering (ICSTE’12).
13.
Charonyktakis, P., Plakia, M., Tsamardinos, I., & Papadopouli, M. (2016). On user-centric modular QoE prediction for VoIP based on machine-learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(6), 1443–1456.CrossRef
14.
Laghari, A. A., Channa, M. I., Laghari, K. R., Aman, M., & Memon, M. (2013). EQOM: enhanced quality of experience (QoE) framework for multimedia services. UACEE International Journal of Computer Science and Its Applications, 3(1), 85–89.
15.
Timmerer, C., Maiero, M., & Rainer, B. (2016). Which adaptation logic? An objective and subjective performance evaluation of http-based adaptive media streaming systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1606.​00341.
16.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Shafiq, M., & Khan, A., (2017). Impact of storage of mobile on quality of experience (QoE) at user level accessing cloud. In 2017 IEEE 9th international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN) (pp. 1402–1409).
17.
18.
Laghari, A. A., Dilshad, A., & Memon, M. S. (2012). Merging quality of experience with autonomic networks. Sindh University Research Journal (SURJ) (Science Series), 44(2AB), 69–74.
19.
Wang, L., & Gelenbe, E. (2015). Demonstrating voice over an autonomic network. In IEEE international conference on autonomic computing (ICAC) (pp. 139–140).
20.
Yohannes, D., & Mali, D. (2016). Effect of delay, packet loss, packet duplication and packet reordering on voice communication quality over WLan. Technia, 8(2), 1071.
21.
Laghari, K. R., Issa, O., Speranza, F., & Falk, T. H. (2012). Quality-of-experience perception for video streaming services: Preliminary subjective and objective results. In Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) (pp. 1–9).
22.
Hemminger, S. (2005). Network emulation with NetEm. In Linux conf au (pp. 18–23).
23.
24.
BT, R.I.R. (2002). Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures.
25.
ITU-T RECOMMENDATION, P. (1999). Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.
Metadaten
Titel
Measuring Effect of Packet Reordering on Quality of Experience (QoE) in Video Streaming
verfasst von
Asif Ali Laghari
Hui He
Muhammad Ibrahim Channa
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2018
Verlag
3D Display Research Center
Erschienen in
3D Research / Ausgabe 3/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 2092-6731
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-018-0179-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

3D Research 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

3DR Express

An Effective DOS Attack Detection Model in Cloud Using Artificial Bee Colony Optimization

3DR Express

3D Point Cloud Initial Registration Using Surface Curvature and SURF Matching

3DR Express

Improvement of Large-Vehicle Detection and Monitoring on CPEC Route

3DR Express

Asymmetric Optical Image Triple Masking Encryption Based on Gyrator and Fresnel Transforms to Remove Silhouette Problem

3DR Express

Pixel Overlapping Image Steganography Using PVD and Modulus Function

3DR Express

An Efficient Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Four-Moded Census Transform for High-Resolution Images

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise