nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Sustainable Circularity

verfasst von : Maria Magdalena Ramirez-Corredores, Mireya R. Goldwasser, Eduardo Falabella de Sousa Aguiar

Erschienen in: Decarbonization as a Route Towards Sustainable Circularity

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter discusses different aspects of a sustainable circular economy, by reviewing the cumulative knowledge on strategies, approaches, and business models developed to close the cycle involving C-bearing compounds and materials. Some approaches, such as the role of the bioeconomy and of the renewable resources, as well as the introduction of the eco-design, eco-efficiency, and eco-effectiveness concepts, are discussed. A Circular Economy (CE) conceived as a way of minimizing, even avoiding waste generation is most appropriate in a decarbonizing scenario. However, circularity per se is not a warrant for sustainability and other measures need to be in place, to accomplish a sustainable circular economy. Within a decarbonization strategy, closing the carbon cycle becomes a circularity challenge. Unless the electric sector firstly passes through a drastic decarbonization, any electrification strategy will fail or be too slow to achieve the sustainability goals. The difficulties in assessing, monitoring, and measuring advances of circularity are also part of this chapter. Other required changes, such as business model, policies and regulations, social behavior, and product uses, for instance, are also discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Decarbonization

Nächstes Kapitel Perspectives and Future Views

General union environment action programme to 2020 ‘living well, within the limits of our planet’, in 1386/2013/EU. The 7th Environment Action Programme: European Union (2013), p. 30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386

Y. Kalmykova et al., Circular economy—from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135, 190–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034CrossRef

A.G. Olabi, Circular economy and renewable energy. Energy 181, 450–454 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.196CrossRef

M.M. Ramirez-Corredores et al., Identification of opportunities for integrating chemical processes for carbon (dioxide) utilization to nuclear power plants. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 150, 111450, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111450

G. Moraga et al., Circular economy indicators: what do they measure? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 146, 452–461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045CrossRef

C. Lohan, T. Kylä-Harakka-Ruonala, EESC opinion: Monitoring framework for the circular economy. 2018/C 367/19 Report (The European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels, Belgium, 2018), p. 6

Ellen Macarthur Foundation, Circular economy butterfly diagram (2019). https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy-diagram. Accessed July 2021

A.P.M. Velenturf et al., Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Sci. Total Environ. 689, 963–969 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.449CrossRef

UN World Commission, Environment and Development: Our Common Future United Nations (Oslo, Norway, 1987), p. 300. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

10.

United Nations, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Brussels, Belgium, 2015), p. 35. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

11.

International Advisory Council, Global Bioeconomy Summit. Innovation in the Global Bioeconomy (2018), p. 108. https://gbs2020.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GBS_2018_Report_web.pdf. Accessed Feb 2020

12.

European Commission, Innovating for Sustainable Growth—A Bioeconomy for Europe (European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2012), p. 64. http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/bioeconomycommunicationstrategy_b5_brochure_web.pdf

13.

C. Bauer et al., New energy externalities developments for sustainability: Technical data, costs, and life cycle inventories of advanced fossil power generation systems. Deliverable no 7.2—RS 1a, Final Report (Paul Scherrer Institut & Inst. für Energiewirtschaft & Rationelle Energieanwendung, Univ. Stuttgart, 2008), p. 265

14.

D. Gielen et al., Prospects for CO₂ Capture and Storage (International Energy Agency (IEA), 2004), p. 252

15.

R. Guerrero-Lemus, J.M. Martínez-Duart, in Renewable energies and CO2: Cost analysis, environmental impacts and technological trends-2012 edition, ed. by ed. R. Guerrero-Lemus, J.M. Martnez-Duart, Lecture Notes in Energy, vol. 3 (2013), p. 395. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4385-7

16.

Trade and Agriculture Directorate and United Nations Environment Programme, Biofuel performance with respect to environmental and other criteria, in economic assessment of biofuel support policies (2007 MCM mandate). TAD/CA(2008)6/FINAL Report (OECD, IEA, 2008), pp. 36–52

17.

P. Moriarty, D. Honnery, What is the global potential for renewable energy? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(1), 244–252 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151CrossRef

18.

Covestro, Pure facts—why the circular economy matters (2016). https://www.covestro.com/-/media/covestro/country-sites/global/documents/k-2016/7_pur_pure_facts_circular_economy_engl.pdf?la=en&hash=CAC6CB692A27D5C4902873B62ED0AC17FF396F6A. Accessed Jul

19.

M. North, Across the board: Michael North on carbon dioxide biorefinery. Chemsuschem 12(8), 1763–1765 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900676MathSciNetCrossRef

20.

W.Y. Cheah et al., Biorefineries of carbon dioxide: from carbon capture and storage (CCS) to bioenergies production. Biores. Technol. 215, 346–356 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.019CrossRef

21.

P. Styring et al., Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: Closing the Carbon Cycle (Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2015), p. 336

22.

P. Feron, Growing interest in CO2 -capture from air. Greenh. Gases: Sci. Technol. 9(1), 3–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1850CrossRef

23.

M. Aresta, Carbon dioxide utilization: the way to the circular economy. Greenh. Gas Sci Technol. 9, 610–612 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ghgCrossRef

24.

M. Aresta et al., in An Economy Based on Carbon Dioxide and Water, Potential of Large Scale Carbon Dioxide Utilization, ed. by M. Aresta (Switzerland AG, Springer, 2019), p. 436. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15868-2

25.

N.V. Von Der Assen et al., Environmental assessment of CO₂ capture and utilisation, in Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: Closing the Carbon Cycle, ed. by P. Styring et al. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015), pp. 45–56

26.

N. Wang et al., The circular economy and carbon footprint: a systematic accounting for typical coal-fuelled power industrial parks. J. Clean. Prod. 229, 1262–1273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.064CrossRef

27.

T.T.D. Cruz et al., Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage/utilization: from current state to future research directions and opportunities. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 108, 103309, 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103309

28.

M. Finkbeiner, V. Bach, Life cycle assessment of decarbonization options—towards scientifically robust carbon neutrality. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 26(4), 635–639 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01902-4CrossRef

29.

J.L. Galvez-Martos et al., Environmental assessment of aqueous alkaline absorption of carbon dioxide and its use to produce a construction material. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 107, 129–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.008

30.

M. Moreno-Gonzalez et al., Carbon-neutral fuels and chemicals: economic analysis of renewable syngas pathways via CO₂ electrolysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 244, 114452, 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114452

31.

National Academies of Sciences-Engineering-Medicine, Gaseous carbon waste resources, in Gaseous Carbon Waste Streams Utilization: Status and Research Needs (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2019), pp. 27–38. https://doi.org/10.17226/25232

32.

National Academies of Sciences-Engineering-Medicine, in Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2019), p. 510. https://doi.org/10.17226/25259

33.

P.D. Jensen et al., Highlighting the need to embed circular economy in low carbon infrastructure decommissioning: the case of offshore wind. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 24, 266–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.012CrossRef

34.

P.-C. Chiang, S.-Y. Pan, Prospective and perspective, in Carbon Dioxide Mineralization and Utilization, ed. by P.-C. Chiang, S.-Y. Pan (Springer, 2017), pp. 441–446

35.

E.A. Quadrelli et al., Potential CO₂ utilisation contributions to a more carbon-sober future: a 2050 vision, in Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: Closing the Carbon Cycle, 1st edn. (Elsevier Inc, 2014), pp. 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62746-9.00016-5

36.

J.P. Lange, Towards circular carbo-chemicals—the metamorphosis of petrochemicals. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(8), 4358–4376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE00532DCrossRef

37.

T. Taraphdar, Reducing Carbon Footprint. Pet. Technol. Q. 16(2), 1000399, 9 (2011)

38.

S.K. Hoekman et al., CO2 recycling by reaction with renewably-generated hydrogen. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4(1), 44–50 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.012CrossRef

39.

W.M. Budzianowski, Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(9), 6507–6521 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.016CrossRef

40.

M. Götz et al., Renewable power-to-gas: a technological and economic review. Renew. Energy 85, 1371–1390 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066CrossRef

41.

F. Graf et al., Injection of biogas, SNG and hydrogen into the gas grid. GWF, Gas/Erdgas 2(1), 30–40 (2011)

42.

M. Kaltschmitt et al., Energie aus biomasse: Grundlagen, techniken und verfahren (Springer, Germany, 2009), p. 216

43.

M. Sterner, Bioenergy and renewable power methane in integrated 100% renewable energy systems: Limiting global warming by transforming energy systems. Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften Thesis from Kassel University Press GmbH, Erneuerbare Energien und Energieeffizienz (Renewable Energies and Energy Efficiency), 23 Sep 2009, p. 230

44.

K. Mccormick, N. Kautto, The bioeconomy in europe: an overview. Sustainability (Switzerland) 5(6), 2589–2608 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589CrossRef

45.

M. Adamowicz, Bioeconomy–concept, application and perspectives. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 1(350), 29–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5604/00441600.1232987CrossRef

46.

G. Centi, S. Perathoner, Catalytic transformation of CO2 to fuels and chemicals, with reference to biorefineries, in The Role of Catalysis for the Sustainable Production of Bio-fuels and Bio-chemicals, ed. by K.S. Triantafyllidis, et al. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013), pp. 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-56330-9.00016-4

47.

A.P.M. Velenturf et al., A new perspective on a global circular economy, in RSC Green Chemistry, ed. by L.E. Macaskie et al. (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020), pp.3–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016353-00001

48.

A. Di Bartolo et al., A review of bioplastics and their adoption in the circular economy. Polymers. 13(8), 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081229

49.

Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between Economy, Society and the Environment (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2018), p. 107. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/sustainable-bioeconomy-europe-strengthening-connection-between-economy-society_en

50.

European Economic and Social Committee, Opinion on a sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Off. J. Eur. Union 4 (2019). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8ebe492b-a79d-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-222756549

51.

D. Carrez, P. Van Leeuwen, Bioeconomy: Circular by Nature. The European Files (2016), pp. 34–35

52.

A. Temmes, P. Peck, Do forest biorefineries fit with working principles of a circular bioeconomy? A case of Finnish and Swedish initiatives. For. Policy Econ. 101896, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.013

53.

A. Raudaskoski, Placing the bio-economy in the context of the circular economy (Unpublished Presentation) (2017), 14. https://www.ethica.fi/fi/circular-economy/

54.

R. Marshall et al., The organic waste gold rush: Optimising resource recovery in the UK bioeconomy. Resource Recovery from Waste (2018), p. 8

55.

J. Gallagher et al., Adapting stand-alone renewable energy technologies for the circular economy through eco-design and recycling. J. Ind. Ecol. 23(1), 133–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12703CrossRef

56.

A. Cicci et al., Circular extraction: an innovative use of switchable solvents for the biomass biorefinery. Green Chem. 20(17), 3908–3911 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8gc01731jCrossRef

57.

R. Shogren et al., Plant-based materials and transitioning to a circular economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 19, 194–215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.04.007CrossRef

58.

A.P.M. Velenturf, P. Purnell, Resource recovery from waste: restoring the balance between resource scarcity and waste overload. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9(9), 1603–1619 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091603CrossRef

59.

G. Iaquaniello et al., Waste to chemicals for a circular economy. Chem. Eur. J. 24(46), 11831–11839 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201802903CrossRef

60.

E. Antonetti et al., Waste-to-chemicals for a circular economy: the case of urea production (waste-to-urea). Chemsuschem 10(5), 912–920 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201601555CrossRef

61.

The Circular Bioeconomy: Knowledge Guide. (Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry, 2021), p. 4. https://www.cifor.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Flyer%20-%20Knowledge%20Guide_Circular%20Bioeconomy-v4.pdf

62.

M. Carus, L. Dammer, The “circular bioeconomy”—concepts, opportunities and limitations. Nova pap. 1, 9 (2018). www.bio-based.eu/nova-papers

63.

A.P.M. Velenturf, P. Purnell, What a sustainable circular economy would look like. Conversation (2020), p. 4. https://theconversation.com/what-a-sustainable-circular-economy-would-look-like-133808

64.

C.L. Trica et al., Environmental factors and sustainability of the circular economy model at the European union level. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(4), 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041114

65.

M. Busu, Adopting circular economy at the European union level and its impact on economic growth. Soc. Sci. 8(5), 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050159

66.

European Commission, Circular economy action plan. For a cleaner and more competitive Europe (European Union, Luxemburg, 2020), p. 28. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/45cc30f6-cd57-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-170854112

67.

V. Rizos et al., Circular economy for climate neutrality: setting the priorities for the EU. Policy Brief (4), 11 (2019)

68.

European Economic and Social Committee, Monitoring the implementation of the circular economy. Off. J. Eur. Union (10), 6 (2018). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d3dad2e1-cc55-11e8-9424-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-222756728

69.

T. Keijer et al., Circular chemistry to enable a circular economy. Nat. Chem. 11(3), 190–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0226-9CrossRef

70.

H.J. Strumpf et al., Sabatier carbon dioxide reduction system for long-duration manned space application, in 21st International Conference on Environmental Systems (1991) https://doi.org/10.4271/911541

71.

W.M. Chen, H. Kim, Circular economy and energy transition: a nexus focusing on the non-energy use of fuels. Energy Environ. 30(4), 586–600 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19845759CrossRef

72.

A.P.M. Velenturf et al., Co-producing a vision and approach for the transition towards a circular economy: perspectives from government partners. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(5), 20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051401

73.

Y.V. Fan et al., Cross-disciplinary approaches towards smart, resilient and sustainable circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 232, 1482–1491 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.266CrossRef

74.

P. Purnell et al., New governance for circular economy: policy, regulation and market contexts for resource recovery from waste, in RSC green chemistry, ed. by L.E. Macaskie et al. (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020), pp. 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016353-00395

75.

A. Velenturf, P. Purnell, Moving beyond waste management towards a circular economy. (Proc. Valuing the Infrastructure of Cities, Regions and Nations, Leeds, UK, 2017), p. 14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316580374_Moving_beyond_waste_management_towards_a_circular_economy

76.

J.J. Klemeš et al., Process integration and circular economy for renewable and sustainable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 116, 109435, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109435

77.

R.K. Sinha, N.D. Chaturvedi, A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 114, 109304, 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109304

78.

B.K. Sovacool et al., Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry: a critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110856

79.

A. Velenturf, How to make a business case for resource recovery? in Proceedings of the Meteor Conference (Newcastle, UK, 2018), p. 14. https://rrfw.org.uk/2018/09/04/how-to-make-a-business-case-for-resource-recovery/

80.

E. Iacovidou et al., Quality of resources: a typology for supporting transitions towards resource efficiency using the single-use plastic bottle as an example. Sci. Total Environ. 647, 441–448 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.344CrossRef

81.

F.E. Garcia-Muiña et al., Identifying the equilibrium point between sustainability goals and circular economy practices in an industry 4.0 manufacturing context using eco-design. Soc. Sci. 8(8), 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8080241

82.

C.-W. Chen, Improving circular economy business models: opportunities for business and innovation. Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev. 64(1), 48–58 (2020)CrossRef

83.

T. Helmer Pedersen, F. Conti, Improving the circular economy via hydrothermal processing of high-density waste plastics. Waste Manage. 68, 24–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.002CrossRef

84.

T. Hees, et al. Tailoring hydrocarbon polymers and all-hydrocarbon composites for circular economy. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 40(1), 1800608, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201800608

85.

A.P.M. Velenturf, Initiating resource partnerships for industrial symbiosis. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 4(1), 117–124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1328285CrossRef

86.

W.J.J. Huijgen, R.N.J. Comans, Carbon dioxide sequestration by mineral carbonation: Literature review. ECN-C--03-016 Report (Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 2003), p. 53

87.

A. Velenturf, Circular economy, the energy transition and sustainable design for decommissioning in North sea oil and gas, in Proceedings of the Offshore Decommissioning Conference (Virtual, UK host., 2020), p. 13

88.

A.P.M. Velenturf et al., Reducing material criticality through circular business models: challenges in renewable energy. One Earth 4(3), 350–352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.016CrossRef

89.

B. Mignacca et al., Modularisation as enabler of circular economy in energy infrastructure. Energy Policy 139, 111371, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111371

90.

M. Borrello et al., Three propositions to unify circular economy research: a review. Sustainability (Switzerland). 12(10), 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104069

91.

J.L. Mishra et al., Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country. Manag. Decis. 59(8), 1784–1800 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1111CrossRef

92.

K. Hobson, Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 40, 88–104 (2016)CrossRef

93.

R. Lantto et al., Going beyond a circular economy: a vision of a sustainable economy in which material, value and information are integrated and circulate together. Ind. Biotechnol. 15(1), 12–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2019.29156.rlaCrossRef

Titel: Sustainable Circularity
verfasst von: Maria Magdalena Ramirez-Corredores
Mireya R. Goldwasser
Eduardo Falabella de Sousa Aguiar
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Decarbonization as a Route Towards Sustainable Circularity
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19998-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-19999-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19999-8_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"