skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858283acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Best Paper

HCI Research as Problem-Solving

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This essay contributes a meta-scientific account of human-computer interaction (HCI) research as problem-solving. We build on the philosophy of Larry Laudan, who develops problem and solution as the foundational concepts of science. We argue that most HCI research is about three main types of problem: empirical, conceptual, and constructive. We elaborate upon Laudan's concept of problem-solving capacity as a universal criterion for determining the progress of solutions (outcomes): Instead of asking whether research is 'valid' or follows the 'right' approach, it urges us to ask how its solutions advance our capacity to solve important problems in human use of computers. This offers a rich, generative, and 'discipline-free' view of HCI and resolves some existing debates about what HCI is or should be. It may also help unify efforts across nominally disparate traditions in empirical research, theory, design, and engineering.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p4956-oulasvirta.mp4

mp4

237.4 MB

References

  1. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1905-1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers 23, 6: 604-621. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alan F. Blackwell. 2015. HCI As an Inter-Discipline. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 503-516. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732505 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Florian Block, James Hammerman, Michael Horn, et al. 2015. Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement Around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 867-876. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702231 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles, ACM, 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard A Bolt. 1980. "Put-that-there": Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jelmer P. Borst, Niels A. Taatgen, and Hedderik van Rijn. 2015. What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A ProcessModel Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2971-2980. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702156 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, et al. 2015. Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 525-534. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702525 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. John M Carroll and Robert L Campbell. 1986. Softening up hard science: reply to newel1 and card. Human-Computer Interaction 2, 3: 227-249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Andy Crabtree, Alan Chamberlain, Rebecca E. Grinter, Matt Jones, Tom Rodden, and Yvonne Rogers (eds.). 2013. Introduction to the Special Issue of "The Turn to The Wild." ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3: 13:1-13:4. http://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491501 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM, 541-550. Retrieved August 21, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1124855 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Serge Egelman and Eyal Peer. 2015. Scaling the Security Wall: Developing a Security Behavior Intentions Scale (SeBIS). Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2873-2882. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702249 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, et al. 2015. "I Always Assumed That I Wasn't Really That Close to {Her}": Reasoning About Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 153-162. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. David R. Flatla, Alan R. Andrade, Ross D. Teviotdale, Dylan L. Knowles, and Craig Stewart. 2015. ColourID: Improving Colour Identification for People with Impaired Colour Vision. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3543-3552. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702578 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Douglas J Gillan and Randolph G Bias. 2001. Usability science. I: foundations. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction 13, 4: 351-372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 111-120. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1357074 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems San Jose, California, USA, 1-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas T Hewett, Ronald Baecker, Stuart Card, et al. 1992. ACM SIGCHI curricula for human-computer interaction. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 19, 3: 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kasper Hornbæk and Morten Hertzum. 2007. Untangling the usability of fisheye menus. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 14, 2: 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrew Howes, Benjamin R Cowan, Christian P Janssen, et al. 2014. Interaction science SIG: overcoming challenges. Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1127-1130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Edwin L. Hutchins, James D. Hollan, and Donald A. Norman. 1985. Direct manipulation interfaces. Human- Computer Interaction 1, 4: 311-338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 234-241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3819-3828. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The Big Hole in HCI Research. interactions 22, 2: 48-51. http://doi.org/10.1145/2729103 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kari Kuutti and Liam J. Bannon. 2014. The Turn to Practice in HCI: Towards a Research Agenda. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3543-3552. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gierad Laput, Eric Brockmeyer, Scott E. Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2015. Acoustruments: Passive, Acoustically-Driven, Interactive Controls for Handheld Devices. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2161-2170. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702414 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Larry Laudan. 1978. Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Moon-Hwan Lee, Seijin Cha, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2015. Patina Engraver: Visualizing Activity Logs As Patina in Fashionable Trackers. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1173-1182. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702213 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gitte Lindgaard. 2014. The usefulness of traditional usability evaluation methods. interactions 21, 6: 80-82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pedro Lopes, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Affordance++: Allowing Objects to Communicate Dynamic Use. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2515-2524. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702128 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Martin Weigel, Tong Lu, Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Carmel Majidi, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. iSkin: Flexible, Stretchable and Visually Customizable On-Body Touch Sensors for Mobile Computing. Proceedings of the 33Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 207-210. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702514 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Evgeny Morozov. 2014. To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jörg Müller, Dieter Eberle, and Constantin Schmidt. 2015. BaseLase: An Interactive Focus+Context Laser Floor. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3869- 3878. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702246 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Allen Newell and Stuart K. Card. 1985. The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 1, 3: 209-242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance Matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2: 139-178. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2003. Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual review of psychology 54, 1: 491- 516.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. James Patten, Hiroshi Ishii, Jim Hines, and Gian Pangaro. 2001. Sensetable: a wireless object tracking platform for tangible user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 253-260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Stuart Reeves. 2015. Human-computer interaction as science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. John Rieman. 1996. A field study of exploratory learning strategies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 3, 3: 189-218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5, 2: 1-129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Bryan Semaan, Heather Faucett, Scott P. Robertson, Misa Maruyama, and Sara Douglas. 2015. Designing Political Deliberation Environments to Support Interactions in the Public Sphere. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3167-3176. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702403 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Will Simm, Maria Angela Ferrario, Adrian Friday, et al. 2015. Tiree Energy Pulse: Exploring Renewable Energy Forecasts on the Edge of the Grid. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1965-1974. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702285 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. R William Soukoreff and I Scott MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. International journal of human-computer studies 61, 6: 751--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Aditya Vashistha, Edward Cutrell, Gaetano Borriello, and William Thies. 2015. Sangeet Swara: A CommunityModerated Voice Forum in Rural India. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 417-426. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702191 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. Formalizing Agreement Analysis for Elicitation Studies: New Measures, Significance Test, and Toolkit. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1325-1334. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702223 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Keith Vertanen, Haythem Memmi, Justin Emge, Shyam Reyal, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2015. VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry Using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 659-668. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702135 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Daniel Wigdor, Hao Jiang, Clifton Forlines, Michelle Borkin, and Chia Shen. 2009. WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multisurface visual collaboration system. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1237-1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Wesley Willett, Bernhard Jenny, Tobias Isenberg, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2015. Lightweight Relief Shearing for Enhanced Terrain Perception on Interactive Maps. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3563-3572. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702172 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Na Wang, et al. 2015. Resilience Mitigates the Negative Effects of Adolescent Internet Addiction and Online Risk Exposure. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4029-4038. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702240 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Shumin Zhai. 2004. Characterizing computer input with Fitts' law parameters--the information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6: 791-809. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 493--502. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240704 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HCI Research as Problem-Solving

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader