skip to main content
10.1145/2807442.2807508acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Makers' Marks: Physical Markup for Designing and Fabricating Functional Objects

Published:05 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

To fabricate functional objects, designers create assemblies combining existing parts (e.g., mechanical hinges, electronic components) with custom-designed geometry (e.g., enclosures). Modeling complex assemblies is outside the reach of the growing number of novice ``makers' with access to digital fabrication tools. We aim to allow makers to design and 3D print functional mechanical and electronic assemblies. Based on a formative exploration, we created Makers' Marks, a system based on physically authoring assemblies with sculpting materials and annotation stickers. Makers physically sculpt the shape of an object and attach stickers to place existing parts or high-level features (such as parting lines). Our tool extracts the 3D pose of these annotations from a scan of the design, then synthesizes the geometry needed to support integrating desired parts using a library of clearance and mounting constraints. The resulting designs can then be easily 3D printed and assembled. Our approach enables easy creation of complex objects such as TUIs, and leverages physical materials for tangible manipulation and understanding scale. We validate our tool through several design examples: a custom game controller, an animated toy figure, a friendly baby monitor, and a hinged box with integrated alarm.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p103.mp4

mp4

61.6 MB

References

  1. Fischler, M. A., and Bolles, R. C. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. CACM 24, 6 (June 1981), 381--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Follmer, S., Carr, D., Lovell, E., and Ishii, H. CopyCAD: remixing physical objects with copy and paste from the real world. In UIST '10 Adjunct, 381--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Follmer, S., and Ishii, H. KidCAD: digitally remixing toys through tangible tools. In CHI '12, 2401--2410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gupta, A., Fox, D., Curless, B., and Cohen, M. Duplotrack: a real-time system for authoring and guiding duplo block assembly. In UIST'12, 389--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jacobson, A., Panozzo, D., Glauser, O., Pradalier, C., Hilliges, O., and Sorkine-Hornung, O. Tangible and modular input device for character articulation. In SIGGRAPH '14 Emerging Technologies, 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Laput, G., Brockmeyer, E., Hudson, S. E., and Harrison, C. Acoustruments: Passive, acoustically-driven, interactive controls for handheld devices. In CHI '15, 2161--2170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lau, M., Ohgawara, A., Mitani, J., and Igarashi, T. Converting 3D furniture models to fabricatable parts and connectors. In ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 30, ACM (2011), 85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lau, M., Saul, G., Mitani, J., and Igarashi, T. Modeling-in-context: user design of complementary objects with a single photo. In Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium '10, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lee, J., Su, V., Ren, S., and Ishii, H. HandSCAPE: a vectorizing tape measure for on-site measuring applications. In CHI '00, 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lee, J. C., Avrahami, D., Hudson, S. E., Forlizzi, J., Dietz, P. H., and Leigh, D. The Calder toolkit: Wired and wireless components for rapidly prototyping interactive devices. In DIS '04, 167--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lowe, D. G. Method and apparatus for identifying scale invariant features in an image and use of same for locating an object in an image. US Patent 6,711,293, 03 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mueller, S., Mohr, T., Guenther, K., Frohnhofen, J., and Baudisch, P. faBrickation: fast 3D printing of functional objects by integrating construction kit building blocks. In CHI '14, 3827--3834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Prevost, R., Whiting, E., Lefebvre, S., and Sorkine-Hornung, O. Make it stand: Balancing shapes for 3D fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July 2013), 81:1--81:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., et al. Scratch: programming for all. CACM 52, 11 (2009), 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Savage, V., Chang, C., and Hartmann, B. Sauron: Embedded single-camera sensing of printed physical user interfaces. In UIST '13, 447--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Schmidt, R., and Singh, K. Meshmixer: an interface for rapid mesh composition. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Talks, ACM (2010), 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Song, H., Guimbreti'ere, F., Hu, C., and Lipson, H. ModelCraft: capturing freehand annotations and edits on physical 3D models. In UIST '06, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Villar, N., Scott, J., Hodges, S., Hammil, K., and Miller, C. .NET Gadgeteer: A platform for custom devices. In Pervasive 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Weichel, C., Alexander, J., Karnik, A., and Gellersen, H. SPATA: Spatio-tangible tools for fabrication-aware design. In TEI '15, 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Weichel, C., Lau, M., and Gellersen, H. Enclosed: a component-centric interface for designing prototype enclosures. In TEI '13, 215--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Weichel, C., Lau, M., Kim, D., Villar, N., and Gellersen, H. W. MixFab: a mixed-reality environment for personal fabrication. In CHI '14, 3855--3864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Willis, K., Brockmeyer, E., Hudson, S., and Poupyrev, I. Printed optics: 3D printing of embedded optical elements for interactive devices. In UIST '12, 589--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Makers' Marks: Physical Markup for Designing and Fabricating Functional Objects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '15: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology
      November 2015
      686 pages
      ISBN:9781450337793
      DOI:10.1145/2807442

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 November 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of297submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader