Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3-D Sustainability and Its Contribution to Governance Assessment in Legal Terms: Examples and Perspectives

Author : Volker Mauerhofer

Published in: Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Environmental, social and economic capitals, capacities and carrying capacities provide the theoretical construct of the three dimensions of a sustainable development. Based thereon, this chapter aims firstly to provide a conceptual overview on two main objectives of multilevel rule of law systems that should be addressed when adapting these systems towards a more sustainable direction. This first aim is addressed based on ‘3-D Sustainability’, a concept offering six flexibly applicable decision-making criteria for priority setting between these sustainability dimensions based on the burden of proof in the sense of the precautionary principle. The theoretical application of these criteria on several real-world examples of legislative acts indicates the concept’s usefulness in practice. The two main objectives identified within this first aim are to stay through international environmental policy within the environmentally sustainable scale and to politically define flexible legal trade-off mechanisms, which more sustainably deal with conflicts among these sustainability dimensions. Secondly, the chapter strives to identify ways to strengthen the application of the existing international environmental legislation. Thus, several innovative mechanisms are identified that overcome current implementation and enforcement deadlocks, without changing existing laws, but also increasing its direct effect. In summary, the chapter innovatively offers—based on ongoing research—several solution proposals for addressing in a sustainable manner geopolitical and organizational scales as well as trade-offs when it comes to re-writing existing environmental legal institutions (de lege ferenda). It further provides proposals for the innovative implementation of existing normative regimes without modifying legal text (de lege lata).

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Adger WN, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2005) The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol Soc 10(2):9CrossRef Adger WN, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2005) The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol Soc 10(2):9CrossRef
go back to reference Agardy T (2000) Effects of fisheries on marine ecosystems: a conservationist’s perspective. ICES J Mar Sci 57:761–765CrossRef Agardy T (2000) Effects of fisheries on marine ecosystems: a conservationist’s perspective. ICES J Mar Sci 57:761–765CrossRef
go back to reference Alcott B (2008) The sufficiency strategy: would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecol Econ 64:770–786CrossRef Alcott B (2008) The sufficiency strategy: would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecol Econ 64:770–786CrossRef
go back to reference Applegate JS (2000) The precautionary preference: an american perspective on the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6:413–443CrossRef Applegate JS (2000) The precautionary preference: an american perspective on the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6:413–443CrossRef
go back to reference Azar C, Holmberg J, Karlsson S (2002) Decoupling—past trend and prospects for the future. A report of the Department of Physical Resource Theory of the Chalmers University of Technology and Götheburg University with contributions by Tobias Person, Robert Ayres, Thomas Sterner and Jonas Nässèn to the Environmental Advisory Council of the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. Retrieved 31 Mar 2014. http://www.mvb.gov.se Azar C, Holmberg J, Karlsson S (2002) Decoupling—past trend and prospects for the future. A report of the Department of Physical Resource Theory of the Chalmers University of Technology and Götheburg University with contributions by Tobias Person, Robert Ayres, Thomas Sterner and Jonas Nässèn to the Environmental Advisory Council of the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. Retrieved 31 Mar 2014. http://​www.​mvb.​gov.​se
go back to reference Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132CrossRef Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132CrossRef
go back to reference Carlman I (2008) Control system for sustainable development. In: Dubois DM (ed) Proceedings of the computing anticipatory systems: CASYS = 07 C eighth international conference, 8. American Institute of Physics, vol 1051, pp 187–194 Carlman I (2008) Control system for sustainable development. In: Dubois DM (ed) Proceedings of the computing anticipatory systems: CASYS = 07 C eighth international conference, 8. American Institute of Physics, vol 1051, pp 187–194
go back to reference Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8CrossRef Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8CrossRef
go back to reference Cordonier Segger M-C (2004) Significant developments in sustainable development law and governance: a proposal. Nat Resour Forum 28:61–74CrossRef Cordonier Segger M-C (2004) Significant developments in sustainable development law and governance: a proposal. Nat Resour Forum 28:61–74CrossRef
go back to reference Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–193CrossRef Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–193CrossRef
go back to reference de Graaf HJ, Musters CJM, ter Keurs WJ (1996) Sustainable development: looking for new strategies. Ecol Econ 16:205–216CrossRef de Graaf HJ, Musters CJM, ter Keurs WJ (1996) Sustainable development: looking for new strategies. Ecol Econ 16:205–216CrossRef
go back to reference De Mooij RA, van Den Bergh JCJM (2002) Growth and the environment in Europe: a guide to the debate. Empirica 29:79–91CrossRef De Mooij RA, van Den Bergh JCJM (2002) Growth and the environment in Europe: a guide to the debate. Empirica 29:79–91CrossRef
go back to reference Del Monte-Luna P, Brook BW, Zetina-Rejón MJ, Cruz-Escalona VH (2004) The carrying capacity of ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:485–495CrossRef Del Monte-Luna P, Brook BW, Zetina-Rejón MJ, Cruz-Escalona VH (2004) The carrying capacity of ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:485–495CrossRef
go back to reference Dobson A (1996) Environment sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environ Politics 5:401–428CrossRef Dobson A (1996) Environment sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environ Politics 5:401–428CrossRef
go back to reference Dovers SR (1995) A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecol Econ 12:93–106CrossRef Dovers SR (1995) A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecol Econ 12:93–106CrossRef
go back to reference Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11:130–141CrossRef Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11:130–141CrossRef
go back to reference EEA (2002) Environmental signals. Benchmarking the millennium. European environmental agency regular indicator report Luxemburg: office for official publications of the European communities EEA (2002) Environmental signals. Benchmarking the millennium. European environmental agency regular indicator report Luxemburg: office for official publications of the European communities
go back to reference Ehrlich PR (2008) Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environ Dev Econ 13:1–20CrossRef Ehrlich PR (2008) Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environ Dev Econ 13:1–20CrossRef
go back to reference Essington TE (2001) The precautionary approach in fisheries management: the devil is in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 16:121–122CrossRef Essington TE (2001) The precautionary approach in fisheries management: the devil is in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 16:121–122CrossRef
go back to reference European Court of Justice—ECJ (2004) Case C-127/02 Waddenvereniging and Vogelbeschermingsvereniging [2004] ECR I-7405 European Court of Justice—ECJ (2004) Case C-127/02 Waddenvereniging and Vogelbeschermingsvereniging [2004] ECR I-7405
go back to reference European Union Council Environment (2002) 2457th meeting of the EU Council Environment at 17th December 2002 in Luxemburg European Union Council Environment (2002) 2457th meeting of the EU Council Environment at 17th December 2002 in Luxemburg
go back to reference European Union (2002) Decision No. 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Official Journal L, vol 242, p 1. 10 Sept 2002. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg European Union (2002) Decision No. 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Official Journal L, vol 242, p 1. 10 Sept 2002. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg
go back to reference Faber M, Proops J, Baumgärtner S (1996) The use of the entropy concept in ecological economics. In: Faber M, Proops J (eds) Ecological economics: concepts and methods. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 115–135 Faber M, Proops J, Baumgärtner S (1996) The use of the entropy concept in ecological economics. In: Faber M, Proops J (eds) Ecological economics: concepts and methods. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 115–135
go back to reference Farley HM, Smith ZA (2014) Sustainability: if it’s everything, is it nothing? Routledge, London, 176 pp Farley HM, Smith ZA (2014) Sustainability: if it’s everything, is it nothing? Routledge, London, 176 pp
go back to reference Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241CrossRef Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241CrossRef
go back to reference Freestone D (1998) The burden of proof in natural resources legislation. In: FAO Legislative Study, no 63, Rome Freestone D (1998) The burden of proof in natural resources legislation. In: FAO Legislative Study, no 63, Rome
go back to reference Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRef Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRef
go back to reference Grimeaud D (2004) The EC water framework directive—an instrument for integrating water policy. RECIEL 13(1):27–39 Grimeaud D (2004) The EC water framework directive—an instrument for integrating water policy. RECIEL 13(1):27–39
go back to reference Heazle M (2006) Lessons in precaution: the international Whaling commission experience with precautionary management. Mar Policy 30(5):496–509CrossRef Heazle M (2006) Lessons in precaution: the international Whaling commission experience with precautionary management. Mar Policy 30(5):496–509CrossRef
go back to reference Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRef Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRef
go back to reference Iovanna R, Newbold SC (2007) Ecological sustainability in policy assessments: a wide-angle view and a close watch. Ecol Econ 63:639–648 Iovanna R, Newbold SC (2007) Ecological sustainability in policy assessments: a wide-angle view and a close watch. Ecol Econ 63:639–648
go back to reference IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1980) World conservation strategy, international union for conservation of nature and natural resources (IUCN)/united nations environment programme (UNEP)/world wide fund for nature (WWF). IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Gland IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1980) World conservation strategy, international union for conservation of nature and natural resources (IUCN)/united nations environment programme (UNEP)/world wide fund for nature (WWF). IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Gland
go back to reference Jordan GJ, Fortin M-J (2002) Scale and topology in the ecological economics sustainability paradigm. Ecol Econ 41:361–366CrossRef Jordan GJ, Fortin M-J (2002) Scale and topology in the ecological economics sustainability paradigm. Ecol Econ 41:361–366CrossRef
go back to reference Kallio TJ, Nordberg P, Ahonen A (2007) Rationalizing sustainable development’—a critical treatise. Sustain Dev 15:41–51CrossRef Kallio TJ, Nordberg P, Ahonen A (2007) Rationalizing sustainable development’—a critical treatise. Sustain Dev 15:41–51CrossRef
go back to reference Kazazi M (1996) Burden of proof and related issues: a study on evidence before international tribunals. Kluwer Law International, Hague Kazazi M (1996) Burden of proof and related issues: a study on evidence before international tribunals. Kluwer Law International, Hague
go back to reference Kokott J (1998) The burden of proof in comparative and international human rights law: civil and common law approaches with special reference to the American and German legal systems. Kluwer Law International, Hague Kokott J (1998) The burden of proof in comparative and international human rights law: civil and common law approaches with special reference to the American and German legal systems. Kluwer Law International, Hague
go back to reference Lamberton G (2005) Sustainable sufficiency—an internally consistent version of sustainability. Sustain Dev 13(1):53–68CrossRef Lamberton G (2005) Sustainable sufficiency—an internally consistent version of sustainability. Sustain Dev 13(1):53–68CrossRef
go back to reference Malanczuk P (1995) Sustainable development: some critical thoughts in the light of the Rio Conference. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 23–52 Malanczuk P (1995) Sustainable development: some critical thoughts in the light of the Rio Conference. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 23–52
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2008a) 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 63:496–506CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2008a) 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 63:496–506CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2008b) Conservation of wildlife in the European union with a focus on Austria. In: Panjwani P (ed) Wildlife law: a global perspective. American Bar Association (ABA) Publishing, Cleveland, pp 1–55 Mauerhofer V (2008b) Conservation of wildlife in the European union with a focus on Austria. In: Panjwani P (ed) Wildlife law: a global perspective. American Bar Association (ABA) Publishing, Cleveland, pp 1–55
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2009) Legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—an approach for global precautionary governance change’. In: Proceedings of the 15th ISDRC 2009, Utrecht/The Netherlands, 5th–8th July 2009. Retrieved 8 July 2009. http://globalchallenge2009.geo.uu.nl Mauerhofer V (2009) Legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—an approach for global precautionary governance change’. In: Proceedings of the 15th ISDRC 2009, Utrecht/The Netherlands, 5th–8th July 2009. Retrieved 8 July 2009. http://​globalchallenge2​009.​geo.​uu.​nl
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2011) A bottom-up ‘convention-check’ to improve top-down global protected area governance. Land Use Policy 28:877–886CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2011) A bottom-up ‘convention-check’ to improve top-down global protected area governance. Land Use Policy 28:877–886CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2012) A legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—addressing global precautionary land governance change. Land Use Policy 29:652–660CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2012) A legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—addressing global precautionary land governance change. Land Use Policy 29:652–660CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2013a) Social capital, social capacity and social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures 53:63–73CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2013a) Social capital, social capacity and social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures 53:63–73CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2013b) The ‘governance-check’: assessing the sustainability of public spatial decision-making structures. Land Use Policy 30:328–336CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2013b) The ‘governance-check’: assessing the sustainability of public spatial decision-making structures. Land Use Policy 30:328–336CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2013c) Lose less instead of win more: the failure of decoupling and perspectives for competition in a degrowth economy. Environ Values 22:43–57CrossRef Mauerhofer V (2013c) Lose less instead of win more: the failure of decoupling and perspectives for competition in a degrowth economy. Environ Values 22:43–57CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V, Hubacek K, Coleby A (2013) From polluter pays to provider gets: distribution of rights and costs under payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 18(4):41CrossRef Mauerhofer V, Hubacek K, Coleby A (2013) From polluter pays to provider gets: distribution of rights and costs under payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 18(4):41CrossRef
go back to reference Mauerhofer V (2014) Challenging the labyrinth: sustainable scales, trade-offs and perspectives through environmental law. In: Sancin V, Kovič-Dine M (eds) International environmental law: contemporary concerns and challenges in 2014. Ius Software, d.o.o, GV Založba, Ljublijana, pp 25–42 Mauerhofer V (2014) Challenging the labyrinth: sustainable scales, trade-offs and perspectives through environmental law. In: Sancin V, Kovič-Dine M (eds) International environmental law: contemporary concerns and challenges in 2014. Ius Software, d.o.o, GV Založba, Ljublijana, pp 25–42
go back to reference Mauerhofer V, Kim RE (2014) Interpretation of ecological integrity in the sense of planetary boundaries: a new way forward for implementing multilateral environmental agreements. In: ISEE (ed) Book of abstracts of the biannual International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) 2014 conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 13th–15th August, p. 14. Retrieved at 13 Aug 2014. http://isee2014.yourhost.is Mauerhofer V, Kim RE (2014) Interpretation of ecological integrity in the sense of planetary boundaries: a new way forward for implementing multilateral environmental agreements. In: ISEE (ed) Book of abstracts of the biannual International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) 2014 conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 13th–15th August, p. 14. Retrieved at 13 Aug 2014. http://​isee2014.​yourhost.​is
go back to reference OECD (2002) Indicators to measure decoupling of environment pressures from economic growth. SG/SD. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris OECD (2002) Indicators to measure decoupling of environment pressures from economic growth. SG/SD. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
go back to reference Opdam PFM, Broekmeyer MEA, Kistenkas FH (2009) Identifying uncertainties in judging the significance of human impacts on natura 2000 sites. Environ Sci Policy 12:912–921CrossRef Opdam PFM, Broekmeyer MEA, Kistenkas FH (2009) Identifying uncertainties in judging the significance of human impacts on natura 2000 sites. Environ Sci Policy 12:912–921CrossRef
go back to reference Opschoor H, van der Straaten J (1993) Sustainable development: an institutional approach. Ecol Econ 7:203–222CrossRef Opschoor H, van der Straaten J (1993) Sustainable development: an institutional approach. Ecol Econ 7:203–222CrossRef
go back to reference Paterson J (2007) Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the precautionary principle. Nat Hazards 42:515–528CrossRef Paterson J (2007) Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the precautionary principle. Nat Hazards 42:515–528CrossRef
go back to reference Pinto MCW (1995) Reflections on the term sustainable development and its institutional implications. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 72–99 Pinto MCW (1995) Reflections on the term sustainable development and its institutional implications. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 72–99
go back to reference Prévost D (2004). Selected international developments regarding health and environmental regulation of relevance to the European Union. Eur Environ Law Rev 13:38–60 Prévost D (2004). Selected international developments regarding health and environmental regulation of relevance to the European Union. Eur Environ Law Rev 13:38–60
go back to reference Princen T (1997) The shading and distancing of commerce: when internalization is not enough. Ecol Econ 20:235–253CrossRef Princen T (1997) The shading and distancing of commerce: when internalization is not enough. Ecol Econ 20:235–253CrossRef
go back to reference Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRef Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRef
go back to reference Ross A (2009) Modern interpretations of sustainable development. J Law Soc 36:33–54CrossRef Ross A (2009) Modern interpretations of sustainable development. J Law Soc 36:33–54CrossRef
go back to reference Satake A, Rudel TK, Onuma A (2008) Scale mismatches and their ecological and economic effects on landscapes: a spatially explicit model. Glob Environ Change 18(4):768–775CrossRef Satake A, Rudel TK, Onuma A (2008) Scale mismatches and their ecological and economic effects on landscapes: a spatially explicit model. Glob Environ Change 18(4):768–775CrossRef
go back to reference Schneidewind U, Zarnt A (2014) The politics of sufficiency. Oekom Publisher, Munich Schneidewind U, Zarnt A (2014) The politics of sufficiency. Oekom Publisher, Munich
go back to reference Shi T (2004) Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability. Ecol Econ 48:23–36CrossRef Shi T (2004) Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability. Ecol Econ 48:23–36CrossRef
go back to reference Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855 CrossRef Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855 CrossRef
go back to reference Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15(4):29 Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15(4):29
go back to reference UNFCCC (1994) United nations framework convention on climate change, 1771 UNTS 107,UN Doc.A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1 UNFCCC (1994) United nations framework convention on climate change, 1771 UNTS 107,UN Doc.A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1
go back to reference Verwey DR (2004) The European Community, the European Union and the international law of treaties - a comparative legal analysis of the Community and Union’s external treaty-making practice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague Verwey DR (2004) The European Community, the European Union and the international law of treaties - a comparative legal analysis of the Community and Union’s external treaty-making practice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
go back to reference Visseren-Hamakers I, Leroy P, Glasbergen P (2012) Conservation partnerships and biodiversity governance: fullfilling governance functions through interactions. Sustain Dev 20:264–275CrossRef Visseren-Hamakers I, Leroy P, Glasbergen P (2012) Conservation partnerships and biodiversity governance: fullfilling governance functions through interactions. Sustain Dev 20:264–275CrossRef
go back to reference Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publications, Gabriola Island/BC Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publications, Gabriola Island/BC
go back to reference World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Young OR (1994) The problem of scale in human-environment relations. J Theor Politics 6:429–447CrossRef Young OR (1994) The problem of scale in human-environment relations. J Theor Politics 6:429–447CrossRef
go back to reference Zandvoort H (2005) Globalisation, environmental costs, and progress, the role of consensus and liability 52(6) Water Science and Technology 43–50, as cited in: J. P. van der Sluijs, Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference, Environmental Modelling and Software, In Press, 2006, Corrected Proof Zandvoort H (2005) Globalisation, environmental costs, and progress, the role of consensus and liability 52(6) Water Science and Technology 43–50, as cited in: J. P. van der Sluijs, Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference, Environmental Modelling and Software, In Press, 2006, Corrected Proof
Metadata
Title
3-D Sustainability and Its Contribution to Governance Assessment in Legal Terms: Examples and Perspectives
Author
Volker Mauerhofer
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_3