Top

Published in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency in Insurance Regulation and Supervisory Law of Selected European Jurisdictions

Author : Pierpaolo Marano

Published in: Transparency in Insurance Regulation and Supervisory Law

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Solvency II Directive and Insurance Distribution Directive have introduced harmonised rules across the European Union. This chapter compares the transparency as outlined in these Directives and the insurance regulation and supervisory laws in the EU Member States, which are included in the analysis made in this book. The different harmonisation pursued by the above Directives—maximum v. minimum—could result in differences in the transposition of the principle of transparency in these Member States.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Transparency in Dutch Insurance Regulation and Financial Supervision

next chapter Transparency in Australian Insurance Law and Regulation: Regulation and Intermediaries

On the use of hard law and soft law in the insurance regulation in the European Union, see Marano (2017), p. 12 ff.

See Recital No. 16 of Solvency II, which adds: ‘The term beneficiary is intended to cover any natural or legal person who is entitled to a right under an insurance contract. Financial stability and fair and stable markets are other objectives of insurance and reinsurance regulation and supervision which should also be taken into account but should not undermine the main objective’.

See Article 31. See also CEIOPS, Recommendations on Independence and Accountability, May 2006, p. 10.

According to Article 34(4) of Solvency II, ‘Member States shall ensure that supervisory authorities have the power to develop, in addition to the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement and where appropriate, necessary quantitative tools under the supervisory review process to assess the ability of the insurance or reinsurance undertakings to cope with possible events or future changes in economic conditions that could have unfavourable effects on their overall financial standing. The supervisory authorities shall have the power to require that corresponding tests are performed by the undertakings’.

On the supervisory review process, i.e. the overall process conducted by the supervisory authority in reviewing the situation of undertakings subject to its supervision, see Van Hulle (2019), p. 387 ff.

See Article 31.

See Article 371 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35.

See Van Hulle (2019), p. 376.

Better Regulation Guidelines and the associated ‘Toolbox’ are available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation-why-and-how/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en.

See Commission Staff Working Document, Better Regulation Guidelines, 2017, p. 4.

The Agreement replaces the previous Agreement from 2003 and the Interinstitutional accord on impact assessment from 2005. The Agreement is available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2016:123:TOC.

See OECD, Better Regulation Practices across the European Union, March 2019, available at http://www.oecd.org/publications/better-regulation-practices-across-the-european-union-9789264311732-en.htm.

See Article 22(3a) of the Financial Market Authority Act (FMABG; Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehördengesetz).

See Marano (2017), p. 16.

According to Recital No. 77 of Solvency II ‘Within the framework of an internal market it is in the interest of policy holders that they should have access to the widest possible range of insurance products available in the Community’.

See Article 31(3) of Solvency II.

See Article 32 of IDD. For a comparison between the sanction under the IDD and those of the USA, see: Defever (2020) and Martinez and Marano (2020).

According to Article 32 of IDD, ‘where the publication of the identity of the legal persons, or identity or personal data of natural persons, is considered by the competent authority to be disproportionate following a case-by-case assessment conducted on the proportionality of the publication of such data or where publication jeopardises the stability of financial markets or an ongoing investigation, the competent authority may decide to defer publication, not to publish, or to publish the sanctions on an anonymous basis’.

See Recital No. 2 of Solvency II.

See Recital No. 16 and Article 27 of Solvency II.

See Article 36 of Solvency II.

See Floreani (2017), p. 263.

See Article 35 of Solvency II.

See Article 304 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35.

See Article 46 of Solvency II, which adds that ORSA shall be taken into account on an ongoing basis in the strategic decisions of the undertaking.

See Article 46 of Solvency II.

According to Recital no 14 of Solvency II, ‘The protection of policy holders presupposes that insurance and reinsurance undertakings are subject to effective solvency requirements that result in an efficient allocation of capital across the European Union. In light of market developments, the current system is no longer adequate. It is therefore necessary to introduce a new regulatory framework’.

See Avesani et al. (2017), p. 298.

See Article 51 of Solvency II.

EIOPA-BoS-15/154, Need for high-quality public disclosure: Solvency II’s report on solvency and financial condition and the potential role of external audit, June 2015.

See Articles from 307 to 311 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35.

See Article 304(1)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35.

See Article 19 of IDD.

See Article 6 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2359.

See Article 19(1)(e) of IDD.

See Article 22(3) of IDD.

See Article 29(2) of IDD.

See Article 29(3) of IDD.

See Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of 26 November 2014 on key information documents (KID) for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs).

See Article 20(8) of IDD and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1469 of 11 August 2017 laying down a standardised presentation format for the IPID.

See Marano (2020).

Han (2015).

Avesani RG, Corsano V, Zingaretti E, Amadei A (2017) Pillar II: risk governance. In: Andenas M, Avesani RG, Manes P, Vella F, Wood PR (eds) Solvency II: a dynamic challenge for the insurance market. Il Mulino, New York

Defever K (2020) Enaction of Chapter VII of the insurance distribution directive – what can member states learn from the enforcement failures of the United States? In: Marano P, Noussia K (eds) Insurance distribution directive: a legal analysis. Springer, Berlin

Floreani A (2017) Solvency II: the supervisory reporting and market disclosure. In: Marano P, Siri M (eds) Insurance regulation in the European Union. Solvency II and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Han BC (2015) The transparency society. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoCrossRef

Marano P (2017) Sources and tools of the insurance regulation in the European Union. In: Marano P, Siri M (eds) Insurance regulation in the European Union. Solvency II and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRef

Marano P (2020) The Contribution of Product Oversight and Governance (POG) to the Single Market: a set of organisational rules for business conduct. In: Marano P, Noussia K (eds) Insurance distribution directive: a legal analysis. Springer, Berlin

Martinez LP, Marano P (2020) The new EU rules on insurance customer/policyholder protection viewed against the NAIC model acts. Global Jurists

Van Hulle K (2019) Solvency requirements for EU insurers. Solvency II is good for you. Intersentia, Cambridge

Title: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency in Insurance Regulation and Supervisory Law of Selected European Jurisdictions
Author: Pierpaolo Marano
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Transparency in Insurance Regulation and Supervisory Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63620-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-63621-0

Copyright Year: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63621-0_14