Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Forum

A new type of debate for global warming and scientific literacy

Author: Catherine Gautier

Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education | Issue 3/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Expanding on some ideas introduced in the paper by Albe and Gombert (2012) “Studentscommunication, argumentation and knowledge in a citizenconference on global warming”, I explore two issues relevant to their work: global warming (GW) as a socioscientific controversy and scientific literacy in regards to climate change science. For the first issue, the definition of GW socioscientific controversy provided in the article raises controversies in both scientific communities and society or social groups concerned by the issue. I review this from two perspectives that can be considered at the extreme ends of a spectrum of perspectives. I then address the role of debates in education about global warming and climate change and suggest a new type of classroom debates to replace those addressing the existence and cause of global warming.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceeding National Academy of Science USA, 107, 12107–12109.CrossRef Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceeding National Academy of Science USA, 107, 12107–12109.CrossRef
go back to reference Clayton, D., & Gautier, C. (2006). Scientific argumentation in earth system science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 374–382. Clayton, D., & Gautier, C. (2006). Scientific argumentation in earth system science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 374–382.
go back to reference Doran, P., & Zimmerman, M. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 90, 22–23.CrossRef Doran, P., & Zimmerman, M. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 90, 22–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Gautier, C., & Rebich, S. (2005). The use of a mock environment summit to support learning about global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 5–16. Gautier, C., & Rebich, S. (2005). The use of a mock environment summit to support learning about global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 5–16.
go back to reference Gautier, C., & Solomon, R. (2005). A preliminary study of students’ asking quantitative scientific questions for inquiry-based climate model experiments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 432–443. Gautier, C., & Solomon, R. (2005). A preliminary study of students’ asking quantitative scientific questions for inquiry-based climate model experiments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 432–443.
go back to reference Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2010). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes. Project on Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2010). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes. Project on Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Miller, J. (2002). Civic scientific literacy: A necessity in the 21st century. FAS Public Interest Reports, 55, 3–6. Miller, J. (2002). Civic scientific literacy: A necessity in the 21st century. FAS Public Interest Reports, 55, 3–6.
go back to reference Mindell, A. (1995). Sitting in the fire: Large group transformation using conflict and diversity. Portland: Lao Tse Press. Mindell, A. (1995). Sitting in the fire: Large group transformation using conflict and diversity. Portland: Lao Tse Press.
go back to reference Mindell, A. (2002). The deep democracy of open Forums: How to transform organizations into communities: Practical steps to conflict prevention and resolution for the family, workplace and world. Charlottesville: Hampton Roads. Mindell, A. (2002). The deep democracy of open Forums: How to transform organizations into communities: Practical steps to conflict prevention and resolution for the family, workplace and world. Charlottesville: Hampton Roads.
go back to reference National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). International mathematics and science literacy (Indicator 16–2011). The condition of education. Retrieved November 2011. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). International mathematics and science literacy (Indicator 16–2011). The condition of education. Retrieved November 2011.
go back to reference Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686–1687.CrossRef Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686–1687.CrossRef
go back to reference Somerville, R. C. J., & Hassol, S. (2011). Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today, 64, 48–53. Somerville, R. C. J., & Hassol, S. (2011). Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today, 64, 48–53.
go back to reference Steward, C. O. (2009). Socioscientific controversies: A theoretical and methodological framework. Communication Theory, 19, 124–145.CrossRef Steward, C. O. (2009). Socioscientific controversies: A theoretical and methodological framework. Communication Theory, 19, 124–145.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new type of debate for global warming and scientific literacy
Author
Catherine Gautier
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cultural Studies of Science Education / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1871-1502
Electronic ISSN: 1871-1510
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9417-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Cultural Studies of Science Education 3/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partner