Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 2/2017

04-04-2017

A note on the valuation of asset management firms

Authors: Juha Joenväärä, Bernd Scherer

Published in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Market capitalization relative to assets under management is often used to value asset management firms. Huberman’s (2004) dividend discount model implies that cross-sectional variations in this metric are explained by cross-sectional differences in operating margins, and yet we find no evidence of this in our data set. We show that a superior model—inspired by the work of Berk and Green (2004)—includes also the level of fees as an explanatory variable. This approach dramatically increases the fit of our valuation model and casts doubt on the relevance of the so-called Huberman puzzle.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
More general valuation frameworks are available, yet despite their technical feasibility for modeling purposes, from a practical standpoint they cannot be implemented without deep insider knowledge (all internal and external contract terms) of the particular asset management firm being modeled.
 
2
We also use GICS (Global Industry Classification System) codes to ensure that the matched manager is a pure asset manager.
 
3
These data are given in Columns 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 of Table 1.
 
4
Influential data points are discovered by calculating Cooks distance for each regression. BX (Blackrock) and KKR (Kohlberg/Kravies/Roberts) are identified as influential (Cooks distance exceeding 1).
 
5
Optionality in fee income would render the dividend discount model as a theoretical tool close to useless. Empirically, our approach might still work if income from performance-based fees is reasonably steady, i.e., if the optionality does not materialize. Asset management firms with performance-based fees have an even stronger incentive to monitor capacity and limit assets under management as eroding alpha cuts directly into their revenue stream.
 
6
See Scherer (2010, 2011) concerning real-world frictions and their effect on optimal risk management by asset management firms.
 
7
Suppose the CAPM is used as our asset pricing model. Then the risk-adjusted discount rate for fees on a US small cap portfolio would be the expected returns on those stocks, or \(R=R_{\mathrm {US}\_\mathrm{small}\_\mathrm{cap}} =r_f +\hat{b} _{\mathrm {US}\_\mathrm{small}\_\mathrm{cap}} \left( {R_{\mathrm {US}\_\mathrm{market}\_\mathrm{portfolio}}} -r_f \right) \).
 
Literature
go back to reference Berk, J.B., Green, R.C.: Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets. J. Polit. Econ. 112, 1269–1295 (2004)CrossRef Berk, J.B., Green, R.C.: Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets. J. Polit. Econ. 112, 1269–1295 (2004)CrossRef
go back to reference Bhattacharya, S., Pfleiderer, P.: Delegated portfolio management. J. Econ. Theory 36, 1–25 (1985)CrossRef Bhattacharya, S., Pfleiderer, P.: Delegated portfolio management. J. Econ. Theory 36, 1–25 (1985)CrossRef
go back to reference Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., Stanton, R., Whitelaw, R.: The Economics of Asset Management, NYU Stern Working Paper (2004) Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., Stanton, R., Whitelaw, R.: The Economics of Asset Management, NYU Stern Working Paper (2004)
go back to reference Chevalier, J., Ellison, G.: Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. J. Polit. Econ. 105, 1167–1200 (1997)CrossRef Chevalier, J., Ellison, G.: Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. J. Polit. Econ. 105, 1167–1200 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Dangl, T., Wu, Y., Zechner, J.: Market discipline and internal governance in the mutual fund industry. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21(5), 2307–2343 (2008)CrossRef Dangl, T., Wu, Y., Zechner, J.: Market discipline and internal governance in the mutual fund industry. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21(5), 2307–2343 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E., MacBeth, J.: Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests. J. Polit. Econ. 81, 607–636 (1973)CrossRef Fama, E., MacBeth, J.: Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests. J. Polit. Econ. 81, 607–636 (1973)CrossRef
go back to reference Goetzmann, W.N., Ingersoll, J., Ross, S.A.: High watermarks and hedge fund management contracts. J. Financ. 58, 1685–1717 (2003)CrossRef Goetzmann, W.N., Ingersoll, J., Ross, S.A.: High watermarks and hedge fund management contracts. J. Financ. 58, 1685–1717 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference Huberman, G.: What is the NPV of Expected Future Profits of Money Managers? Working Paper, Columbia University (2004) Huberman, G.: What is the NPV of Expected Future Profits of Money Managers? Working Paper, Columbia University (2004)
go back to reference Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R.F., Taylor, L.: Scale and skill in active management. J. Financ. Econ. 116(1), 23–45 (2015)CrossRef Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R.F., Taylor, L.: Scale and skill in active management. J. Financ. Econ. 116(1), 23–45 (2015)CrossRef
go back to reference Petersen, M.: Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(1), 435–480 (2008)CrossRef Petersen, M.: Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(1), 435–480 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Ross, S.A.: A Neoclassical Look at Behavioral Finance: The Closed End Funds Puzzle (Chapter 4). Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004) Ross, S.A.: A Neoclassical Look at Behavioral Finance: The Closed End Funds Puzzle (Chapter 4). Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)
go back to reference Scherer, B.: Should asset managers hedge their fees at risk? J. Appl. Corp. Financ. 22(4), 96–102 (2010)CrossRef Scherer, B.: Should asset managers hedge their fees at risk? J. Appl. Corp. Financ. 22(4), 96–102 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Scherer, B.: Market risks in asset management companies. Quant. Financ. 12(10), 1547–1556 (2011)CrossRef Scherer, B.: Market risks in asset management companies. Quant. Financ. 12(10), 1547–1556 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychol. Bull. 76, 105–110 (1971)CrossRef Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychol. Bull. 76, 105–110 (1971)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A note on the valuation of asset management firms
Authors
Juha Joenväärä
Bernd Scherer
Publication date
04-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1934-4554
Electronic ISSN: 2373-8529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-017-0287-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 2/2017 Go to the issue