Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Research in Engineering Design 2/2018

21-07-2017 | Original Paper

A novel approach to include sustainability concepts in classical DFMA methodology for sheet metal enclosure devices

Authors: Jaime Mesa, Heriberto Maury, René Arrieta, Lesmes Corredor, Jorge Bris

Published in: Research in Engineering Design | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays sustainable design is a mandatory requirement in the product development process. For this reason, design methodologies are addressed to establish a close relationship between environmental, social and economic impact indicators and product features from early design stages, especially in those features related to its manufacturing. In this paper, the design for manufacturing and assembly—DFMA methodology is adapted to sheet metal enclosure devices, integrating functional and component relationships to minimize particular sustainability indicators such as energy consumption, carbon footprint, number of parts, required amount of material, assembly time and manufacturing costs. Savings with the proposed method are achieved following specific sub-tasks oriented to define new simplified product components, considering changes in manufacturing processes and re-defining mechanical connections between parts. Traditional DFMA approaches consider manufacturing and assembly issues related to a reduction of product complexity and economic savings. The proposed method aims to examine the benefits in life cycle stages such as raw material consumption, service, maintenance, upgrading and end of life—EOL. The methodology is validated through a redesign of a sheet metal industrial clock, in which the sustainability impacts are calculated from a comparison of an existent product vs. a new product development. The implementation of the method in the case study demonstrate reductions of more than 25% in product mass, consumed energy and CO2 footprint, and more than 50% in theoretical assembly time and product complexity. Sustainability indicators of the proposed method are selected from literature analysis and taking into account attributes of sheet metal enclosure devices.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alting L, Legarth J (1995) Life cycle engineering and design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(2):569–580CrossRef Alting L, Legarth J (1995) Life cycle engineering and design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(2):569–580CrossRef
go back to reference Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design. Pergamon Press, Oxford Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design. Pergamon Press, Oxford
go back to reference Bayoumi A (2000) Design for manufacture and assembly (DFMA): concepts, benefits and applications. Cairo University international MDP conference; Current advances in mechanical design and production, vol 7. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 501–510 Bayoumi A (2000) Design for manufacture and assembly (DFMA): concepts, benefits and applications. Cairo University international MDP conference; Current advances in mechanical design and production, vol 7. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 501–510
go back to reference Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (2002) Product design for manufacture and assembly, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (2002) Product design for manufacture and assembly, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York
go back to reference Borchardt M, Wendt MH, Pereira GM, Sellitto MA (2017) Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. J Clean Prod 19:49–57CrossRef Borchardt M, Wendt MH, Pereira GM, Sellitto MA (2017) Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. J Clean Prod 19:49–57CrossRef
go back to reference CEC (2003) Integrated product policy-building on environmental life cycle thinking. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels CEC (2003) Integrated product policy-building on environmental life cycle thinking. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
go back to reference Chiu M, Chu C-H (2012) Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(7):1259–1272CrossRef Chiu M, Chu C-H (2012) Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(7):1259–1272CrossRef
go back to reference Cimren E, Bassi A, Fiskel J (2010) T21-Ohio, a system dynamics approach to policy assessment for sustainable development: a waste to profit case study. Sustainability 2:2814–2832CrossRef Cimren E, Bassi A, Fiskel J (2010) T21-Ohio, a system dynamics approach to policy assessment for sustainable development: a waste to profit case study. Sustainability 2:2814–2832CrossRef
go back to reference Eastwood MD, Haapala KR (2015) A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assesment during design for manufacturing. J Clean Prod 108:54–64CrossRef Eastwood MD, Haapala KR (2015) A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assesment during design for manufacturing. J Clean Prod 108:54–64CrossRef
go back to reference Fiskel J, McDaniel J, Spitzley D (1998) Measuring product sustainability. J Sustain Prod Des 6:7–19 Fiskel J, McDaniel J, Spitzley D (1998) Measuring product sustainability. J Sustain Prod Des 6:7–19
go back to reference Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JC (2001) Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J Clean Prod 19:2004–20014CrossRef Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JC (2001) Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J Clean Prod 19:2004–20014CrossRef
go back to reference Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JC (2014) A network model to assit ‘design for remanufacture’ integration into the design process. J Clean Prod 64:244–253CrossRef Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JC (2014) A network model to assit ‘design for remanufacture’ integration into the design process. J Clean Prod 64:244–253CrossRef
go back to reference Hauschild M, Wenzel H, Alting L (1999) Life cycle design—a route to the sustainable culture? Annals CIRP 48(1):393–396 Hauschild M, Wenzel H, Alting L (1999) Life cycle design—a route to the sustainable culture? Annals CIRP 48(1):393–396
go back to reference Herva M, Franco A, Carrasco EF, Roca E (2011) Review of corporate environmental indicators. J Clean Prod 19:1687–1699CrossRef Herva M, Franco A, Carrasco EF, Roca E (2011) Review of corporate environmental indicators. J Clean Prod 19:1687–1699CrossRef
go back to reference Issa II, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC, Rozenfeld H (2015) Leading product-related environmental performance indicators: a selection guide and database. J Clean Prod 108:321–330CrossRef Issa II, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC, Rozenfeld H (2015) Leading product-related environmental performance indicators: a selection guide and database. J Clean Prod 108:321–330CrossRef
go back to reference Kremer GE et al (2016) Directions for instilling economic and environmental sustainability across product supply chains. J Clean Prod 112:2066–2078CrossRef Kremer GE et al (2016) Directions for instilling economic and environmental sustainability across product supply chains. J Clean Prod 112:2066–2078CrossRef
go back to reference Kulatunga AK, Karunatilake N, Weerasinghe N, Ihalawatta RK (2015) Sustainable manufacturing based decision support model for product design and development process. Proc CIRP 26:87–92CrossRef Kulatunga AK, Karunatilake N, Weerasinghe N, Ihalawatta RK (2015) Sustainable manufacturing based decision support model for product design and development process. Proc CIRP 26:87–92CrossRef
go back to reference Pigosso DC et al (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18:21–31CrossRef Pigosso DC et al (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18:21–31CrossRef
go back to reference Pinzón R, Lascano S, Maury-Ramirez H (2012) Chapter 53: design for manufacturing and assembly and CAE tools—the case of a rice husker. In: DAAAM international scientific book. DAAAM International, Vienna. ISBN 978-3-901509-86-5. ISSN 1726-9687 Pinzón R, Lascano S, Maury-Ramirez H (2012) Chapter 53: design for manufacturing and assembly and CAE tools—the case of a rice husker. In: DAAAM international scientific book. DAAAM International, Vienna. ISBN 978-3-901509-86-5. ISSN 1726-9687
go back to reference Ramani K et al (2010) Integrated sustainable lifecycle design: a review. J Mech Des 136:091004–1–091004-15 Ramani K et al (2010) Integrated sustainable lifecycle design: a review. J Mech Des 136:091004–1–091004-15
go back to reference Riba C (2002) Diseño Concurrente. Ediciones UPC, Barcelona Riba C (2002) Diseño Concurrente. Ediciones UPC, Barcelona
go back to reference Sinclair M, Siemieniuch C, Henshaw M (2015) Job design for manufacturing in an era of sustainability. In: Sharples S, Shorrock S, Waterson P (eds) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2015: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors. Taylor and Francis, Daventry, pp 338–345 Sinclair M, Siemieniuch C, Henshaw M (2015) Job design for manufacturing in an era of sustainability. In: Sharples S, Shorrock S, Waterson P (eds) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2015: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors. Taylor and Francis, Daventry, pp 338–345
go back to reference Tischner U et al (2000) How to do eco-design?—a guide for environmentally and economically sound design. Verlag, Frankfurt Tischner U et al (2000) How to do eco-design?—a guide for environmentally and economically sound design. Verlag, Frankfurt
go back to reference Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2002) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2002) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference UPME. Direction of Electric Energy (2015) Monthly report generation variables and the Colombian electricity market—January 2015. Mining and Energy Planning Unit, Bogotá UPME. Direction of Electric Energy (2015) Monthly report generation variables and the Colombian electricity market—January 2015. Mining and Energy Planning Unit, Bogotá
go back to reference Wimmer W, Zust R (2002) Ecodesign pilot product investigation, learning and optimization tool for sustainable product development. Klulwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Wimmer W, Zust R (2002) Ecodesign pilot product investigation, learning and optimization tool for sustainable product development. Klulwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Metadata
Title
A novel approach to include sustainability concepts in classical DFMA methodology for sheet metal enclosure devices
Authors
Jaime Mesa
Heriberto Maury
René Arrieta
Lesmes Corredor
Jorge Bris
Publication date
21-07-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Research in Engineering Design / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0934-9839
Electronic ISSN: 1435-6066
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0265-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Research in Engineering Design 2/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partners