Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. A Post-American Geopolitical World Order: Uneven Development and the Shifting Balance of Power

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is two-fold. On the one hand, it reflects at an empirical level the first layer of the theoretical framework outlined in Chapter 1, the systemic level. This is the geopolitical context within which both Obama and Trump have had to lead US foreign policy. On the other hand, it provides an empirical analysis of how the post-Cold War order has evolved into a less US-friendly order. This chapter reviews debates on the crisis of the Liberal International Order and it develops an analysis of the changing balance of economic power between the United States and China. Then, it explores geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, the Eurasian supercontinent, and the Indo-Pacific. It argues that the geopolitical world order has become post-American because of the uneven geographical development of capitalism and the rise of China is a highly strategic region of the world, the Western Pacific.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arduino, A. (2018). China’s private army: Protecting the New Silk Road. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Arduino, A. (2018). China’s private army: Protecting the New Silk Road. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Arrighi, G. (2005) Hegemony unravelling-1. New Left Review, 32(March/April), 23–80 Arrighi, G. (2005) Hegemony unravelling-1. New Left Review, 32(March/April), 23–80
go back to reference Ashman, S. (2006). From world market to world economy. In B. Dunn & H. Radice (Eds.), 100 years of permanent revolution (pp. 88–104). London: Pluto Press. Ashman, S. (2006). From world market to world economy. In B. Dunn & H. Radice (Eds.), 100 years of permanent revolution (pp. 88–104). London: Pluto Press.
go back to reference Baldwin, H. W. (1957). Strategy of the Middle East. Foreign Affairs, 35(4), 655–665.CrossRef Baldwin, H. W. (1957). Strategy of the Middle East. Foreign Affairs, 35(4), 655–665.CrossRef
go back to reference Barnett, T. P. (2004). The Pentagon’s new map: War and pace in the twenty-first century . New York: Putnam. Barnett, T. P. (2004). The Pentagon’s new map: War and pace in the twenty-first century . New York: Putnam.
go back to reference Beckley, M. (2011). China’s century? Why America’s edge will endure. International Security, 36(3), 41–78.CrossRef Beckley, M. (2011). China’s century? Why America’s edge will endure. International Security, 36(3), 41–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Blackwill, D., & Tellis, A. J. (2019). The India dividend: New Delhi remains Washington’s best hope in Asia. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), 173–183. Blackwill, D., & Tellis, A. J. (2019). The India dividend: New Delhi remains Washington’s best hope in Asia. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), 173–183.
go back to reference Bolt, P. J. (2014). Sino-Russian relations in a changing world order. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 8(4), 47–69. Bolt, P. J. (2014). Sino-Russian relations in a changing world order. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 8(4), 47–69.
go back to reference Brooks, S., & Wohlforth, W. (2015/2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China’s rise and the fate of America’s global position. International Security, 40(3), 7–53. Brooks, S., & Wohlforth, W. (2015/2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China’s rise and the fate of America’s global position. International Security, 40(3), 7–53.
go back to reference Brzezinski, Z. (1997). A geostrategy for Eurasia. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 50–64.CrossRef Brzezinski, Z. (1997). A geostrategy for Eurasia. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 50–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Brzezinski, Z. (2012). Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power. New York: Basic Books. Brzezinski, Z. (2012). Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Bukharin, N. (1972). Imperialism and world economy. London: The Merlin Press (originally published in 1917). Bukharin, N. (1972). Imperialism and world economy. London: The Merlin Press (originally published in 1917).
go back to reference Burrows, M. J., & Harris, J. (2009). Revisiting the future: Geopolitical effects of the financial crisis. The Washington Quarterly, 32(2), 27–38.CrossRef Burrows, M. J., & Harris, J. (2009). Revisiting the future: Geopolitical effects of the financial crisis. The Washington Quarterly, 32(2), 27–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlson, A. (2011). Moving beyond sovereignty? A brief consideration of recent changes in China’s approach to international order and the emergence of the tianxia concept. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), 89–102. Carlson, A. (2011). Moving beyond sovereignty? A brief consideration of recent changes in China’s approach to international order and the emergence of the tianxia concept. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), 89–102.
go back to reference Cox, K. R. (2002). Political geography: Territory, state, and society. Malden (USA): Blackwell.CrossRef Cox, K. R. (2002). Political geography: Territory, state, and society. Malden (USA): Blackwell.CrossRef
go back to reference Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (6th ed.). New York: The Guildford Press. Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (6th ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.
go back to reference Elson, A. (2011). Governing global finance: The evolution and reform of the international financial architecture. USA: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Elson, A. (2011). Governing global finance: The evolution and reform of the international financial architecture. USA: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Erşen, E. (2014). Rise of new centres of power in Eurasia: Implications for Turkish foreign policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5(2), 184–191.CrossRef Erşen, E. (2014). Rise of new centres of power in Eurasia: Implications for Turkish foreign policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5(2), 184–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Farchy, J. (2016, May 10) China revives old path to profit. Financial Times Special Report—The New Trade Routes: Silk Road Corridor. 1–4. Farchy, J. (2016, May 10) China revives old path to profit. Financial Times Special Report—The New Trade Routes: Silk Road Corridor. 1–4.
go back to reference Freedman, L. (1998) The revolution in strategic affairs. International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi Paper 318, 38(318), 5–10. Freedman, L. (1998) The revolution in strategic affairs. International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi Paper 318, 38(318), 5–10.
go back to reference Glaser, C. L. (2013). How oil influences U.S. national security. International Security, 38(2), 112–146. Glaser, C. L. (2013). How oil influences U.S. national security. International Security, 38(2), 112–146.
go back to reference Glaser, C. L. (2015). A U.S.–China grand bargain? The hard choice between military competition and accommodation. International Security, 39(4), 49–90. Glaser, C. L. (2015). A U.S.–China grand bargain? The hard choice between military competition and accommodation. International Security, 39(4), 49–90.
go back to reference Goh, E., & Steinberg, D. I. (2016). Myanmar’s management of China’s influence: From mutual benefit to mutual dependence. In E. Goh (Ed.), Rising China’s influence in developing Asia (pp. 55–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Goh, E., & Steinberg, D. I. (2016). Myanmar’s management of China’s influence: From mutual benefit to mutual dependence. In E. Goh (Ed.), Rising China’s influence in developing Asia (pp. 55–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
go back to reference Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. US and UK: Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. US and UK: Blackwell.
go back to reference Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Hettner-Lecture, Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag. Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Hettner-Lecture, Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
go back to reference Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism. UK and US: Verso. Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism. UK and US: Verso.
go back to reference Hatzopoulos, P., & Kambouri, N. (2018). Piraeus port as a machinic assemblage: Labour, precarity, and struggles. In B. Neilson, N. Rossiter, & R. Samaddar (Eds.), Logistical Asia: The labour of making a world region (pp. 155–174). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Hatzopoulos, P., & Kambouri, N. (2018). Piraeus port as a machinic assemblage: Labour, precarity, and struggles. In B. Neilson, N. Rossiter, & R. Samaddar (Eds.), Logistical Asia: The labour of making a world region (pp. 155–174). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Hung, H. (2008). Rise of China and the global overaccumulation crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 15(2), 149–179.CrossRef Hung, H. (2008). Rise of China and the global overaccumulation crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 15(2), 149–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.CrossRef Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Jervis, R., Gavin, F. J., Rovner, J., & Labrosse, D. N. (2018). Introduction. In R. Jervis, F. J. Gavin, J. Rovner, & D. N. Labrosse (Eds.), Chaos in the liberal order: The Trump presidency and international politics in the twenty-first (pp. X–xvi). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef Jervis, R., Gavin, F. J., Rovner, J., & Labrosse, D. N. (2018). Introduction. In R. Jervis, F. J. Gavin, J. Rovner, & D. N. Labrosse (Eds.), Chaos in the liberal order: The Trump presidency and international politics in the twenty-first (pp. X–xvi). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kagan, R. (2012). The World America made. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Kagan, R. (2012). The World America made. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. D. (2012). The revenge of geography: What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. New York: Random House. Kaplan, R. D. (2012). The revenge of geography: What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. New York: Random House.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. D. (2014). Asia’s cauldron: The South China Sea and the end of a stable Pacific. New York: Random House. Kaplan, R. D. (2014). Asia’s cauldron: The South China Sea and the end of a stable Pacific. New York: Random House.
go back to reference Karaganov, S. (2018). The new Cold War and the emerging greater Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 85–93.CrossRef Karaganov, S. (2018). The new Cold War and the emerging greater Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 85–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Kupchan, C. (2010). How enemies become friends: The sources of stable peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Kupchan, C. (2010). How enemies become friends: The sources of stable peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lenin, V. I. (1939). Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. New York: International Publishers. Lenin, V. I. (1939). Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. New York: International Publishers.
go back to reference Luttwak, E. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics. In G. Ó. Tuathail, S. Dalby, & P. Routledge (Eds.), The geopolitics reader (pp. 125–130). London: Routledge. Luttwak, E. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics. In G. Ó. Tuathail, S. Dalby, & P. Routledge (Eds.), The geopolitics reader (pp. 125–130). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Mastanduno, M. (2014). Order and change in world politics: The financial crisis and the breakdown of the US–China grand bargain. In G. J. Ikenberry (Ed.), Power, order, and change in world politics (pp. 162–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Mastanduno, M. (2014). Order and change in world politics: The financial crisis and the breakdown of the US–China grand bargain. In G. J. Ikenberry (Ed.), Power, order, and change in world politics (pp. 162–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Maull, H. W. (2019). The once and future international order. Survival, 61(2), 7–32. CrossRef Maull, H. W. (2019). The once and future international order. Survival, 61(2), 7–32. CrossRef
go back to reference Mearsheimer, J. J. (2006). China’s unpeaceful rise. Current History, 105(690), 160–162. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2006). China’s unpeaceful rise. Current History, 105(690), 160–162.
go back to reference Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50.CrossRef Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, T. (2017). China’s Asian dream: Empire building along the New Silk Road. London: Zed Books.CrossRef Miller, T. (2017). China’s Asian dream: Empire building along the New Silk Road. London: Zed Books.CrossRef
go back to reference Owens, M. T. (1999). In defense of classical geopolitics. Naval War College Review, LII(4), 59–76. Owens, M. T. (1999). In defense of classical geopolitics. Naval War College Review, LII(4), 59–76.
go back to reference Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2017). Indo-US relations under Modi: The strategic logic underlying the embrace. International Affairs, 93(1), 133–146.CrossRef Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2017). Indo-US relations under Modi: The strategic logic underlying the embrace. International Affairs, 93(1), 133–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Pham, J. P. (2006). Beijing’s great game: Understanding Chinese strategy in Central Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interests, 28(1), 53–67.CrossRef Pham, J. P. (2006). Beijing’s great game: Understanding Chinese strategy in Central Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interests, 28(1), 53–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, P. (2015). The global village myth: Distance, war, and the limits of power. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Porter, P. (2015). The global village myth: Distance, war, and the limits of power. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Rachman, G. (2011). Zero-sum WORLD. Great Britain: Atlantic Books. Rachman, G. (2011). Zero-sum WORLD. Great Britain: Atlantic Books.
go back to reference Saull, R. (2012). Rethinking hegemony: Uneven development, historical blocs, and the world economic crisis. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 323–338.CrossRef Saull, R. (2012). Rethinking hegemony: Uneven development, historical blocs, and the world economic crisis. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 323–338.CrossRef
go back to reference Skidmore, D. (2012). The Obama presidency and US foreign policy: Where’s the multilateralism? International Studies Perspectives, 13(1), 43–64.CrossRef Skidmore, D. (2012). The Obama presidency and US foreign policy: Where’s the multilateralism? International Studies Perspectives, 13(1), 43–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58(2), 139–155.CrossRef Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58(2), 139–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.CrossRef Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, N. (2006). The geography of uneven development. In B. Dunn & H. Radice (Eds.), 100 years of permanent revolution: Results and prospects (pp. 180–195). London: Pluto Press. Smith, N. (2006). The geography of uneven development. In B. Dunn & H. Radice (Eds.), 100 years of permanent revolution: Results and prospects (pp. 180–195). London: Pluto Press.
go back to reference Song, W. (2014). Interests, power and China’s difficult game in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Journal of Contemporary China, 23(85), 85–101.CrossRef Song, W. (2014). Interests, power and China’s difficult game in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Journal of Contemporary China, 23(85), 85–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Sparke, M. (2007). Geopolitical fear, geoeconomic hope and the responsibilities of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 338–349.CrossRef Sparke, M. (2007). Geopolitical fear, geoeconomic hope and the responsibilities of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 338–349.CrossRef
go back to reference Sridharan, E. (2017). Where is India headed? Possible future directions in India foreign policy. International Affairs, 93(1), 51–68.CrossRef Sridharan, E. (2017). Where is India headed? Possible future directions in India foreign policy. International Affairs, 93(1), 51–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Stokes, D. (2018). Trump, American hegemony and the future of the Liberal International Order. International Affairs., 94(1), 133–150.CrossRef Stokes, D. (2018). Trump, American hegemony and the future of the Liberal International Order. International Affairs., 94(1), 133–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor, P. J. (1993). Geopolitical world orders. In P. J. Taylor & G. Kearns (Eds.), Political geography of the twentieth century: A global analysis (pp. 32–61). London: Belhaven Press. Taylor, P. J. (1993). Geopolitical world orders. In P. J. Taylor & G. Kearns (Eds.), Political geography of the twentieth century: A global analysis (pp. 32–61). London: Belhaven Press.
go back to reference Turner, S. (2009). Russia, China and a multipolar world order: The danger in the undefined. Asian Perspective, 33(1), 159–184. Turner, S. (2009). Russia, China and a multipolar world order: The danger in the undefined. Asian Perspective, 33(1), 159–184.
go back to reference Wan, M. (2016). The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The construction of power and the struggle for the East Asian international order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Wan, M. (2016). The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The construction of power and the struggle for the East Asian international order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Weitz, R. (2014). The Russia-China gas deal: Implications and ramifications. World Affairs, 177(3), 80–86. Weitz, R. (2014). The Russia-China gas deal: Implications and ramifications. World Affairs, 177(3), 80–86.
go back to reference Xinbo, W. (2018). China in search of a liberal partnership international order. International Affairs, 94(5), 995–1018.CrossRef Xinbo, W. (2018). China in search of a liberal partnership international order. International Affairs, 94(5), 995–1018.CrossRef
go back to reference Zakaria, F. (2008). The post-American world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Zakaria, F. (2008). The post-American world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Metadata
Title
A Post-American Geopolitical World Order: Uneven Development and the Shifting Balance of Power
Author
Zeno Leoni
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54742-4_4