Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Two-Faced Russia? Civilian Interests and Great Power Politics in the High North

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Russia’s main civilian interests in the Arctic is to use the Russian Arctic as a “resource base” for the Russian economy (oil/gas). Russia wants its claims to the undersea territory beyond the 200 nautical mile line recognised. It also has a strong interest in securing more traffic along the Northern Sea Route (NSR), which it wants recognized as “national waters”. On the other hand, Russia has been building up its military forces in the Arctic. These are to a large extent defensive, made in order to secure Russia’s second-strike nuclear capability. However, parts of Russia’s build-up of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, especially its deployment of long-range missiles on most surface vessels and the building of air defence bases along the NSR, risk fuelling a NATO-Russia security dilemma.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See for example: Lavrov (2016), Patrushev (2015), Patrusjev (2014), Putin (1999, 2007, 2014), Shoigu (2018a).
 
2
In the Russian foreign policy concept of 2000 Russia is described as a ‘great power, one of the most influential centers in the modern world’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation 2000). In Russia’s 2009 National Security Strategy towards 2020 Russia is described as a ‘world power’ (mirovaya derzhava) (President of the Russian Federation 2009). Russia’s National Security Strategy from 2015 states that Russia’s long-term strategic national interests are to consolidate the Russian Federation’s ‘status as a leading world power’ in a ‘poly-centric world’ (Rossiskaya Gazeta 2015: § 30).
 
3
A detailed list of the influx of resources to modernise equipment can be found in Cooper (2016). Also see: Defense Intelligence Agency (2017).
 
4
Thus, they argue that Russia’s nuclear forces consists of roughly 318 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), with approximately 1138 warheads. Submarines: 10 operational nuclear ballistic submarines (SSBN) (6 Delta IV, 1 Delta III, 3 Borei class), each with 16 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) with a maximum loading of more than 700 warheads. This amount may have been reduced to 600 warheads due to New START implementation. Strategic bombers (Tu-160 (Blackjack), Tu-95MS (Bear)): 60–70 (50 deployed under New START) with a maximum loading of 786 warheads [on air-launched cruise missiles (ALCM)]. The number may be lower due to New START. On top of this, Russia has a number of non-strategic nuclear weapons, approximately 1.830 warheads. In 2018 Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris assessed that the air force controlled some 500 warheads, the air defence had some 300 warheads in its inventory, the army had some 140 warheads and the navy up to around 810 warheads (Kristensen and Norris 2018).
 
5
Among the more critical voices on Russia’s presumed enhanced capabilities is (Renz 2014).
 
6
One of the successes is Novatek’s Yamal LNG project, where subsidiaries of the China National Petroleum Corporation own 20% alongside France’s Total (10%), Novatek (50.1%) and the Silk Road Fond (9.9%).
 
7
According to new Russian rules, a foreign state must send a notification of a ship travelling along the NSR at least 45 days in advance and include a description of the ship, its objective, route and period of sailing as well as data on the ship’s motor, the name of the captain etc. (Staalesen 2019c). Additional limitations have been placed on foreign warships (Sudakov 2019).
 
8
The remaining around 40% of Russia’s sea-based strategic nuclear weapons are placed at the Russian Pacific Fleet’s SSBN’s, which are based at Vilyuchinsk at Kamptjatka. They also occasionally operate in Arctic Waters (Åtland 2018).
 
9
The 200th is a Separate Motor Rifle Brigade that includes a main battle tank unit, which has T-80BVMs adapted for Arctic conditions and three motorised rifle units in BTR-82A, artillery and air defence assets. The 80th is a Separate Motor Rifle Brigade with Soviet era MT-LBV vehicles adapted for Arctic conditions (Army Recognition 2018). The 80th has a battalion of 122-mm 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled howitzers adapted for Arctic conditions and is supported by a small number of Mi-24 attack helicopters and Mi-8 rescue helicopters. It is also supported by two air surveillance regiments, namely the 331st and 332 Radio-Technical Regiments in Severomorsk and Arkhangelsk (Boulègue 2019: 17–18).
 
10
Army recognition counts 38 surface vessels and 42 submarines (Army Recognition 2018). Jane’s says 41 submarines and 37 surface vessels in the Northern Fleet compared to 21 submarines and 52 surface ships in the Pacific Fleet. Russianships.info (2019) lists 37 active surface vessels in the Northern Fleet and 41 submarines (Russianships.info 2019). In comparison, in the late 1980s the Northern Fleet of the Soviet Union had 172 submarines, including 39 SSBNs, 46 cruise missile submarines and 87 attack submarines (Klimenko 2016: 18).
 
11
Due to New START the warhead loading on the missiles on Delta IV and Borei submarines may have been reduced (Kristensen and Korda 2019).
 
12
Kristensen and Korda says up to ten boats (Kristensen and Korda 2019). Other sources speak of up to 14 Borei and Borei II (Borei A) nuclear submarines (Gady 2019).
 
13
Furthermore, Russia’s Northern Fleet has six active Akula-class submarines, four Sierra I-III-class (SSGN) (nuclear guided missile submarine) (Kondor), four Victor III-class, one Lada-class submarine and seven Kilo-class diesel electric submarines (Novosibirsk), where the Rostov on Don fired Kalibr missiles at targets in Syria in the Mediterranean on 8 December 2015 (Jane’s 2019).
 
14
The short-range air defence systems are mostly the Pantsir S-1 or Tor M2DT. The Tor M2DT is designed specifically for Arctic conditions, and according to the Russian Ministry of Defence, 12 such unites were delivered to the Arctic forces in 2018 (Moscow Times 2018b). Also the Pantsir S-1 now comes in an Arctic version, which is to be delivered to Russia’s Arctic forces (Army Recognition 2019).
 
15
The S-400 is often described as having a 400-km range and being able to hit a range of targets at all heights and speeds. However, the 40N6 missile with the purported 400-km range is not yet operational and has failed several tests. More likely, the range should be set between 200 and 250 km, at medium to high altitudes against large, high-value targets such as AWACS surveillance aircraft or aircraft for transport. Effective range against ‘agile fighter jets and cruise missiles operating at low altitudes can be as little as 20–35 km’ (Dalsjö et al. 2019: 10).
 
16
Back in 2016, the Swedish Defence Research Agency argued in a report that ‘[a]ir defence assets are scarce and covering the entire region is a tall order’ (Persson 2016: 82). To some extent, this is still the case, taking the large distances into account. For a similar view, see: Boulègue (2019: 25).
 
17
For a similar opinion, see Danish Defence Intelligence Services (2018).
 
Literature
go back to reference Åtland, K. (2014). interstate relations in the Arctic: An emerging security dilemma? Comparative Strategy, 33(2), 145–166.CrossRef Åtland, K. (2014). interstate relations in the Arctic: An emerging security dilemma? Comparative Strategy, 33(2), 145–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Bryce-Rogers, A. (2013). Russian military reform in the aftermath of the 2008 Russia-Georgia War. Demokratizatsiya, 21(3). Bryce-Rogers, A. (2013). Russian military reform in the aftermath of the 2008 Russia-Georgia War. Demokratizatsiya, 21(3).
go back to reference Bukkvoll, T. (2009). Russia’s military performance in Georgia. Military Review (November–December), 57–68. Bukkvoll, T. (2009). Russia’s military performance in Georgia. Military Review (November–December), 57–68.
go back to reference Byers, M. (2013). International law and the Arctic (Vol. 103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Byers, M. (2013). International law and the Arctic (Vol. 103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Byers, M. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: An Arctic case study. International Relations, 31(4), 375–402.CrossRef Byers, M. (2017). Crises and international cooperation: An Arctic case study. International Relations, 31(4), 375–402.CrossRef
go back to reference Byers, M. (2019). Cold, dark, and dangerous: International 1 cooperation in the arctic and space. Polar Record, 55(1). Byers, M. (2019). Cold, dark, and dangerous: International 1 cooperation in the arctic and space. Polar Record, 55(1).
go back to reference Conley, H. A., & Rohloff, C. (2015). The new ice curtain. Russia’s strategic reach to the Arctic. CSIS Europe Program. Conley, H. A., & Rohloff, C. (2015). The new ice curtain. Russia’s strategic reach to the Arctic. CSIS Europe Program.
go back to reference Connolly, R., & Sendstad, C. (2018). Russian rearmament. An assessment of defense-industrial performance. Problems of Post-Communism, 65(3), 243–160. Connolly, R., & Sendstad, C. (2018). Russian rearmament. An assessment of defense-industrial performance. Problems of Post-Communism, 65(3), 243–160.
go back to reference Dalsjö, R., Berglund, C., & Jonsson, M. (2019). Bursting the bubble. Russian A2/AD in the Baltic Sea Region: Capabilities, countermeasures, and implications (No. FOI-R–4651–SE). FOI. Dalsjö, R., Berglund, C., & Jonsson, M. (2019). Bursting the bubble. Russian A2/AD in the Baltic Sea Region: Capabilities, countermeasures, and implications (No. FOI-R–4651–SE). FOI.
go back to reference Flake, L. E. (2017). Contextualising and disarming Russia’s Arctic security posture. Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 30(1), 17–29.CrossRef Flake, L. E. (2017). Contextualising and disarming Russia’s Arctic security posture. Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 30(1), 17–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerasimov, V. (2013). Russian military chief predicts resource wars soon. Sputnik International. Gerasimov, V. (2013). Russian military chief predicts resource wars soon. Sputnik International.
go back to reference Gresh, G. F. (2018). Eurasia’s maritime rise and global security: From the Indian Ocean to Pacific Asia and the Arctic. Berlin: Springer. Gresh, G. F. (2018). Eurasia’s maritime rise and global security: From the Indian Ocean to Pacific Asia and the Arctic. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference IISS. (2019). Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia. The Military Balance, 119(1), 166–221.CrossRef IISS. (2019). Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia. The Military Balance, 119(1), 166–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Kjaergaard, S. (2018). The Arctic: ‘So Fucking Peaceful’. University of Leicester. Kjaergaard, S. (2018). The Arctic: ‘So Fucking Peaceful’. University of Leicester.
go back to reference Klimenko, E. (2016). Russia’s Arctic security policy. Still quiet in the high north?. Stockholm: SIPRI. Klimenko, E. (2016). Russia’s Arctic security policy. Still quiet in the high north?. Stockholm: SIPRI.
go back to reference Konyshev, V., & Sergunin, A. (2014). Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic? Defense and Security Analysis, 323–335. Konyshev, V., & Sergunin, A. (2014). Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic? Defense and Security Analysis, 323–335.
go back to reference Konyshev, V., Sergunin, A., & Subbotin, S. (2017). Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis. The Polar Journal, 7(1). Konyshev, V., Sergunin, A., & Subbotin, S. (2017). Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis. The Polar Journal, 7(1).
go back to reference Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2019). Russian nuclear forces, 2019. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 75(2), 73–84.CrossRef Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2019). Russian nuclear forces, 2019. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 75(2), 73–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2016). Russian nuclear forces, 2016. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 125–134. Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2016). Russian nuclear forces, 2016. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 125–134.
go back to reference Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2018). Russian nuclear forces, 2018. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(3), 185–195.CrossRef Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2018). Russian nuclear forces, 2018. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(3), 185–195.CrossRef
go back to reference Kristensen, K. S., & Sakstrup, C. (2016). Russisk Politik i Arktis efter Ukrainekrisen (Russian Policy in the Arctic after the Ukraine-crisis). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Kristensen, K. S., & Sakstrup, C. (2016). Russisk Politik i Arktis efter Ukrainekrisen (Russian Policy in the Arctic after the Ukraine-crisis). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
go back to reference McDermott, R. N. (2009). Russia’s conventional armed forces and the georgian war. Parameters (Spring), 65–80. McDermott, R. N. (2009). Russia’s conventional armed forces and the georgian war. Parameters (Spring), 65–80.
go back to reference Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.
go back to reference Neumann, I. B. (2008). Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development. Neumann, I. B. (2008). Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development.
go back to reference Patrusjev, N. (2014, October 16). Cold war II. Nikolay Patrushev: The ‘sobering up of the Ukrainians will be harsh and painful’. Rossiskaja Gazeta (via BBC Monitoring). Patrusjev, N. (2014, October 16). Cold war II. Nikolay Patrushev: The ‘sobering up of the Ukrainians will be harsh and painful’. Rossiskaja Gazeta (via BBC Monitoring).
go back to reference Persson, G. (2016). Russia’s military capability in a Ten-year perspective (Vol. FOI-R–4326–SE). Stockholm: FOI. Persson, G. (2016). Russia’s military capability in a Ten-year perspective (Vol. FOI-R–4326–SE). Stockholm: FOI.
go back to reference Poulsen, N. B., & Staun, J. (2018). Kreml i Krig: Ruslands brug af militær magt (The Kremlin at War: Russia’s use of military force). København: DJØF Forlag. Poulsen, N. B., & Staun, J. (2018). Kreml i Krig: Ruslands brug af militær magt (The Kremlin at War: Russia’s use of military force). København: DJØF Forlag.
go back to reference Putin, Vladimir. (2007). Speech of Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Munich Conference on Security Policy. Putin, Vladimir. (2007). Speech of Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Munich Conference on Security Policy.
go back to reference Renz, B. (2014). Russian military capability after 20 years of reform. Survival, 56(3), 61–84.CrossRef Renz, B. (2014). Russian military capability after 20 years of reform. Survival, 56(3), 61–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarrabezoles, A., Lasserre, F., & Hagouagn’rin, Z. (2016). Arctic shipping insurance: towards a harmonisation of practices and costs? Polar Record, 52(4). Sarrabezoles, A., Lasserre, F., & Hagouagn’rin, Z. (2016). Arctic shipping insurance: towards a harmonisation of practices and costs? Polar Record, 52(4).
go back to reference Shoigu, S. (2018b, August 31). Shoygu: Arktika stala tsentrom interesov ryada gosudarstv, chto mozhet privesti k konfliktam (Shoigu: The Arctic has become the center of interest of a number of states, which can lead to conflicts). Tass.ru. https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5509944. Shoigu, S. (2018b, August 31). Shoygu: Arktika stala tsentrom interesov ryada gosudarstv, chto mozhet privesti k konfliktam (Shoigu: The Arctic has become the center of interest of a number of states, which can lead to conflicts). Tass.ru. https://​tass.​ru/​armiya-i-opk/​5509944.
go back to reference SIPRI. (2018). SIPRI military expenditure database: Russia. SIPRI military expenditure database. Accessed February 5, 2019. SIPRI. (2018). SIPRI military expenditure database: Russia. SIPRI military expenditure database. Accessed February 5, 2019.
go back to reference The President of the Russian Federation. (2009, March 27). Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Arktike na period do 2020 goda i dal’neyshuyu perspektivu (The Foundation of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the period up to 2020 and beyond). Rossiskaya Gazeta. https://rg.ru/2009/03/30/arktika-osnovy-dok.html. The President of the Russian Federation. (2009, March 27). Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Arktike na period do 2020 goda i dal’neyshuyu perspektivu (The Foundation of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the period up to 2020 and beyond). Rossiskaya Gazeta. https://​rg.​ru/​2009/​03/​30/​arktika-osnovy-dok.​html.
go back to reference The President of the Russian Federation. (2017, July 27). Ob utverzhdenii Osnov gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti voyenno-morskoy deyatel’nosti na period do 2030 goda (On approval of the fundamentals of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of naval activities for the period up to 2030). http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/42117. The President of the Russian Federation. (2017, July 27). Ob utverzhdenii Osnov gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti voyenno-morskoy deyatel’nosti na period do 2030 goda (On approval of the fundamentals of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of naval activities for the period up to 2030). http://​kremlin.​ru/​acts/​bank/​42117.
go back to reference The Russian Government. (2015). Partial revised submission of the Russian Federation to the commission on the limits of the continental shelf in respect of the continental shelf of the Russian Federation in the Arctic ocean. Arctic Portal. http://library.arcticportal.org/1862/. Accessed February 5, 2019. The Russian Government. (2015). Partial revised submission of the Russian Federation to the commission on the limits of the continental shelf in respect of the continental shelf of the Russian Federation in the Arctic ocean. Arctic Portal. http://​library.​arcticportal.​org/​1862/​. Accessed February 5, 2019.
go back to reference Tsygankov, A. P. (2008). Russia’s international assertiveness. What does it mean for the west? Problems of Post-Communism. Tsygankov, A. P. (2008). Russia’s international assertiveness. What does it mean for the west? Problems of Post-Communism.
go back to reference USGS. (2008). Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the arctic circle. Denver: U.S. Geological Survey. USGS. (2008). Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the arctic circle. Denver: U.S. Geological Survey.
go back to reference Zysk, K. (2015). Mellom fredsretorikk og militær opprustning: Russlands sikkerhedspolitiske og militære atferd i nordområderne (Between peace rhetoric and military disarmament: Russia’s security policy and military behavior in the northern regions). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Zysk, K. (2015). Mellom fredsretorikk og militær opprustning: Russlands sikkerhedspolitiske og militære atferd i nordområderne (Between peace rhetoric and military disarmament: Russia’s security policy and military behavior in the northern regions). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Metadata
Title
A Two-Faced Russia? Civilian Interests and Great Power Politics in the High North
Author
Jørgen Staun
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_1