Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Review of Managerial Science 2-3/2011

01-07-2011 | Review Paper

Accounting information for managerial decision-making in shareholder management versus stakeholder management

Authors: Friederike Wall, Dorothea Greiling

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 2-3/2011

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With global challenges like climate change and, of course, the crisis of capital markets in the recent past stakeholder oriented management receives enhanced attention whereas shareholder value management is increasingly criticized for its undesirable external effects on stakeholders other than owners. Regardless of whether these criticisms are well founded or not, the question arises how accounting-related techniques for supporting managerial decision-making differ in shareholder and stakeholder value management. Accounting information can affect managerial decision-making in two ways: directly as input to decisions or indirectly by influencing the behavior of managers. This article reviews the contributions and limitations of information that prominent accounting-related techniques of shareholder management and stakeholder management provide for managerial decision-making. In a comparative perspective we find that the approaches in shareholder value management are much more advanced. In particular the two roles of information in shareholder value management are manifest in accounting-related techniques which are focused on increasing firm value. The value driver models or residual income-based performance measures may serve as examples. In comparison, accounting-related techniques to support managerial decision-making in stakeholder management are not as well advanced. So far we have approaches which concentrate on selective stakeholder groups and only partially address the multi-dimensionality of stakeholder value creation. From a conceptual perspective our findings indicate that stakeholder value creation requires a more integrated approach for answering the question whether stakeholder value is created or diminished. As a consequence, if stakeholder-orientation is taken seriously, the time has come to pay more attention to related accounting techniques.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference AccountAbility (eds) (2008) AccountAbility principle standards 1000. London AccountAbility (eds) (2008) AccountAbility principle standards 1000. London
go back to reference Adams CA (2004) The ethical, social and environmental reporting: performance–portrayal gap. Acc Audit Acc J 17:731–757CrossRef Adams CA (2004) The ethical, social and environmental reporting: performance–portrayal gap. Acc Audit Acc J 17:731–757CrossRef
go back to reference Agle BR, Mitchell RK (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: introduction: recent research and new questions. Bus Ethics Q 18:153–159 Agle BR, Mitchell RK (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: introduction: recent research and new questions. Bus Ethics Q 18:153–159
go back to reference Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2007) Management accounting as practice. Acc Org Soc 32:1–27CrossRef Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2007) Management accounting as practice. Acc Org Soc 32:1–27CrossRef
go back to reference Anheier HK (2005) Nonprofit organizations. Routledge, Milton Parks Anheier HK (2005) Nonprofit organizations. Routledge, Milton Parks
go back to reference Arya A, Glover J, Sunder S (1998) Earnings management and the revelation principle. Rev Acc Stud 3:7–34CrossRef Arya A, Glover J, Sunder S (1998) Earnings management and the revelation principle. Rev Acc Stud 3:7–34CrossRef
go back to reference Asel J, Posch A, Speckbacher G (2011) Squeezing or cuddling? The impact of economic crises on management control and stakeholder management. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue) Asel J, Posch A, Speckbacher G (2011) Squeezing or cuddling? The impact of economic crises on management control and stakeholder management. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue)
go back to reference Atkinson AA, Waterhouse JH, Wells RB (1997) A stakeholder approach towards strategic performance measurement. Sloan Manag Rev 38:25–37 Atkinson AA, Waterhouse JH, Wells RB (1997) A stakeholder approach towards strategic performance measurement. Sloan Manag Rev 38:25–37
go back to reference Baiman S (1982) Agency research in managerial accounting: a survey. J Acc Lit 1:154–213 Baiman S (1982) Agency research in managerial accounting: a survey. J Acc Lit 1:154–213
go back to reference Baiman S (1990) Agency research in managerial accounting: a second look. Acc Org Soc 15:341–371CrossRef Baiman S (1990) Agency research in managerial accounting: a second look. Acc Org Soc 15:341–371CrossRef
go back to reference Banard CI (1938) The function of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Banard CI (1938) The function of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Barsky NP, Hussein ME, Jablonsky SF (1999) Shareholder and stakeholder value in corporate downsizing: the case of United Technology Corporation. Acc Audit Acc J 12:583–604CrossRef Barsky NP, Hussein ME, Jablonsky SF (1999) Shareholder and stakeholder value in corporate downsizing: the case of United Technology Corporation. Acc Audit Acc J 12:583–604CrossRef
go back to reference Bassen A, Kovacs AM (2009) Corporate social responsibility als Kennzahlensystem. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 309–321 Bassen A, Kovacs AM (2009) Corporate social responsibility als Kennzahlensystem. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 309–321
go back to reference Belal AR (2002) Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms? Social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9:8–25CrossRef Belal AR (2002) Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms? Social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9:8–25CrossRef
go back to reference Birnberg JG, Luft J, Shields MD (2007) Psychology theory in management accounting research. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 113–135 Birnberg JG, Luft J, Shields MD (2007) Psychology theory in management accounting research. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 113–135
go back to reference Bischof J (2002) Die Balanced Scorecard als instrument einer modernen controlling-konzeption. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden Bischof J (2002) Die Balanced Scorecard als instrument einer modernen controlling-konzeption. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden
go back to reference Boatright J (1994) What is so special about shareholders. Bus Ethics Q 4:393–408CrossRef Boatright J (1994) What is so special about shareholders. Bus Ethics Q 4:393–408CrossRef
go back to reference Breur T (2006) The importance of focus for generating customer value. J Financ Serv Market 11:64–71CrossRef Breur T (2006) The importance of focus for generating customer value. J Financ Serv Market 11:64–71CrossRef
go back to reference Bromwich M (2007) Economics in management accounting. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 137–162 Bromwich M (2007) Economics in management accounting. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 137–162
go back to reference Bromwich M, Walker M (1998) Residual income past and future. Manag Acc Res 9:391–419CrossRef Bromwich M, Walker M (1998) Residual income past and future. Manag Acc Res 9:391–419CrossRef
go back to reference Bukh PN, Malmi T (2005) Re-examining the cause-and-effect principle of the Balanced Scorecard. In: Mouritsen J, Jönsson S (eds) Northern lights in accounting. Liber, Stockholm, pp 87–113 Bukh PN, Malmi T (2005) Re-examining the cause-and-effect principle of the Balanced Scorecard. In: Mouritsen J, Jönsson S (eds) Northern lights in accounting. Liber, Stockholm, pp 87–113
go back to reference Chan YCL (2004) Performance measurement and adoption of Balanced Scorecards: a survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada. Int J Public Sect Manag 17:204–221CrossRef Chan YCL (2004) Performance measurement and adoption of Balanced Scorecards: a survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada. Int J Public Sect Manag 17:204–221CrossRef
go back to reference Chong VK, Eggleton IRC (2003) The decision-facilitating role of management accounting systems on managerial performance: the influence of locus of control and task uncertainty. Adv Account 20:165–197CrossRef Chong VK, Eggleton IRC (2003) The decision-facilitating role of management accounting systems on managerial performance: the influence of locus of control and task uncertainty. Adv Account 20:165–197CrossRef
go back to reference Choudhury N (1986) Responsibility accounting and controllability. Acc Bus Res 16:189–198 Choudhury N (1986) Responsibility accounting and controllability. Acc Bus Res 16:189–198
go back to reference Clarkson MBE (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20:92–117 Clarkson MBE (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20:92–117
go back to reference Cooper DJ, Hopper T (2007) Critical theorising in management accounting research. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 207–245 Cooper DJ, Hopper T (2007) Critical theorising in management accounting research. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 207–245
go back to reference Cooper SM, Owen DL (2007) Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Acc Org Soc 32:649–667CrossRef Cooper SM, Owen DL (2007) Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Acc Org Soc 32:649–667CrossRef
go back to reference Copeland T, Koller T, Murrin J (1996) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley, New York Copeland T, Koller T, Murrin J (1996) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Cregg W (2002) Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Bus Ethics Q 12:113–142CrossRef Cregg W (2002) Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Bus Ethics Q 12:113–142CrossRef
go back to reference Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
go back to reference Datar S, Gupta M (1994) Aggregation, specification and measurement errors in product costing. Acc Rev 69:567–591 Datar S, Gupta M (1994) Aggregation, specification and measurement errors in product costing. Acc Rev 69:567–591
go back to reference Deegan C, Blomquist C (2006) Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: an exploration of the interaction between WWD-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Acc Org Soc 31:343–373CrossRef Deegan C, Blomquist C (2006) Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: an exploration of the interaction between WWD-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Acc Org Soc 31:343–373CrossRef
go back to reference Demski JS (1998) Performance measure manipulation. Contemp Acc Res 15:261–285CrossRef Demski JS (1998) Performance measure manipulation. Contemp Acc Res 15:261–285CrossRef
go back to reference Demski JS, Feltham GA (1976) Cost determination: a conceptual approach. Iowa State University Press, Ames Demski JS, Feltham GA (1976) Cost determination: a conceptual approach. Iowa State University Press, Ames
go back to reference Dikolli SS, Sedatole KL (2007) Improvements in the information content of nonfinancial forward-looking performance measures: a taxonomy and empirical application. J Manag Acc Res 19:71–104 Dikolli SS, Sedatole KL (2007) Improvements in the information content of nonfinancial forward-looking performance measures: a taxonomy and empirical application. J Manag Acc Res 19:71–104
go back to reference Dillard JF, Yuthas K (2001) A responsible ethics for audit expert systems. J Bus Ethics 30:337–345CrossRef Dillard JF, Yuthas K (2001) A responsible ethics for audit expert systems. J Bus Ethics 30:337–345CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the cooperation: concepts, evidence and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20:65–91 Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the cooperation: concepts, evidence and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20:65–91
go back to reference Dyer JS et al (1992) Multiple criteria decision making theory, multiple attribute utility theory: the next 10 years. Organ Sci 38:645–654 Dyer JS et al (1992) Multiple criteria decision making theory, multiple attribute utility theory: the next 10 years. Organ Sci 38:645–654
go back to reference Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14:57–74 Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14:57–74
go back to reference Emerson J (2003) The blended value proposition: integrating social and financial returns. Calif Manag Rev 45:35–51 Emerson J (2003) The blended value proposition: integrating social and financial returns. Calif Manag Rev 45:35–51
go back to reference Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf Soc 20:325–344CrossRef Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf Soc 20:325–344CrossRef
go back to reference Ewert R, Wagenhofer A (2008) Interne Unternehmensrechnung, 7th edn. Springer, Berlin Ewert R, Wagenhofer A (2008) Interne Unternehmensrechnung, 7th edn. Springer, Berlin
go back to reference Flamholtz EG (2001) Human resource accounting, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Boston Flamholtz EG (2001) Human resource accounting, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Boston
go back to reference Flamholtz EG, Bullen ML, Well H (2002) Human resource accounting: a historical perspective and future implications. Manag Decis 40:947–954CrossRef Flamholtz EG, Bullen ML, Well H (2002) Human resource accounting: a historical perspective and future implications. Manag Decis 40:947–954CrossRef
go back to reference Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
go back to reference Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory. Some further directions. Bus Ethics Q 4:409–421CrossRef Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory. Some further directions. Bus Ethics Q 4:409–421CrossRef
go back to reference Freeman RE (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: ending the so-called “Friedman–freeman” debate. Bus Ethics Q 18:162–166 Freeman RE (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: ending the so-called “Friedman–freeman” debate. Bus Ethics Q 18:162–166
go back to reference Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Pramar P (2004) Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organ Sci 15:364–369CrossRef Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Pramar P (2004) Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organ Sci 15:364–369CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
go back to reference Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4:28–36CrossRef Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4:28–36CrossRef
go back to reference Gamerschlag R, Möller K, Verbeeten F (2011) Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue) Gamerschlag R, Möller K, Verbeeten F (2011) Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue)
go back to reference Gebauer M (2009) Human resource accounting. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 197–201 Gebauer M (2009) Human resource accounting. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 197–201
go back to reference Global Reporting Initative (GRI) (2002) Sustainability reporting guidelines. GRI, Amsterdam Global Reporting Initative (GRI) (2002) Sustainability reporting guidelines. GRI, Amsterdam
go back to reference Goodpaster K (1991) Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Bus Ethics Q 2:53–73CrossRef Goodpaster K (1991) Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Bus Ethics Q 2:53–73CrossRef
go back to reference Gray R et al (1997) Struggling with the practice of social accounting. Acc Audit Acc J 10:325–364CrossRef Gray R et al (1997) Struggling with the practice of social accounting. Acc Audit Acc J 10:325–364CrossRef
go back to reference Gregory R, Keeney RL (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manag Sci 40:1035–1048CrossRef Gregory R, Keeney RL (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manag Sci 40:1035–1048CrossRef
go back to reference Greiling D (2010) Balanced Scorecard implementation in German non-profit organisations. Int J Prod Perform Meas 59:534–554 Greiling D (2010) Balanced Scorecard implementation in German non-profit organisations. Int J Prod Perform Meas 59:534–554
go back to reference Hall M (2010) Accounting information and managerial work. Acc Org Soc 35:301–315CrossRef Hall M (2010) Accounting information and managerial work. Acc Org Soc 35:301–315CrossRef
go back to reference Harrison JS, Bosse DA, Phillips RA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility function and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 31:58–74CrossRef Harrison JS, Bosse DA, Phillips RA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility function and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 31:58–74CrossRef
go back to reference Healy PM, Wahlen JM (1999) A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Acc Horiz 13:365–383CrossRef Healy PM, Wahlen JM (1999) A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Acc Horiz 13:365–383CrossRef
go back to reference Hill CW, Jones TW (1992) Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manag Stud 29:127–154CrossRef Hill CW, Jones TW (1992) Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manag Stud 29:127–154CrossRef
go back to reference Hirst M (1983) The controllability of financial outcomes. Abacus 19:29–38CrossRef Hirst M (1983) The controllability of financial outcomes. Abacus 19:29–38CrossRef
go back to reference Hosseni JC, Brenner SN (1992) The stakeholder theory of the firm: a methodology to generate value matrix weights. Bus Ethics Q 2:99–119CrossRef Hosseni JC, Brenner SN (1992) The stakeholder theory of the firm: a methodology to generate value matrix weights. Bus Ethics Q 2:99–119CrossRef
go back to reference Ittner CD, Larcker DF (2001) Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. J Acc Econ 32:349–410CrossRef Ittner CD, Larcker DF (2001) Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. J Acc Econ 32:349–410CrossRef
go back to reference Janisch M (1993) Das strategische Anspruchsgruppenmanagement. Haupt, Bern Janisch M (1993) Das strategische Anspruchsgruppenmanagement. Haupt, Bern
go back to reference Jensen MC (2001) Value creation, stakeholder theory and corporate objective function. Eur Financ Manag 7:297–317CrossRef Jensen MC (2001) Value creation, stakeholder theory and corporate objective function. Eur Financ Manag 7:297–317CrossRef
go back to reference Jones TW (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev 20:404–437 Jones TW (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev 20:404–437
go back to reference Jones TW, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manage Rev 24:206–221 Jones TW, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manage Rev 24:206–221
go back to reference Joseph G (2007) Implications of a stakeholder view on corporate reporting. Acc Publ Interest 7:50–64CrossRef Joseph G (2007) Implications of a stakeholder view on corporate reporting. Acc Publ Interest 7:50–64CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan RS (2001) Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprof Manag Leader 11:354–370 Kaplan RS (2001) Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprof Manag Leader 11:354–370
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The Balanced Scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70:71–79 Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The Balanced Scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70:71–79
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev 74:75–85 Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev 74:75–85
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001a) The strategy-focused organization. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001a) The strategy-focused organization. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001b) Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Acc Horiz 15:87–104CrossRef Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001b) Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Acc Horiz 15:87–104CrossRef
go back to reference Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Kelly M, Alam M (2008) Management accounting and the stakeholder value model. J Appl Manag Acc Res 6:75–86 Kelly M, Alam M (2008) Management accounting and the stakeholder value model. J Appl Manag Acc Res 6:75–86
go back to reference Keyt JC (2001) Beyond strategic control: applying the Balanced Scorecard to a religious organization. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 8:91–103CrossRef Keyt JC (2001) Beyond strategic control: applying the Balanced Scorecard to a religious organization. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 8:91–103CrossRef
go back to reference Labro E, Vanhoucke M (2007) A simulation analysis of interactions among errors in costing systems. Acc Rev 82:939–962CrossRef Labro E, Vanhoucke M (2007) A simulation analysis of interactions among errors in costing systems. Acc Rev 82:939–962CrossRef
go back to reference Lambert RA (2007) Agency theory and management accounting. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 247–268 Lambert RA (2007) Agency theory and management accounting. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 247–268
go back to reference Lev B (1998) Towards a theory of equitable and efficient accounting policies. Acc Rev LXVIII:1–22 Lev B (1998) Towards a theory of equitable and efficient accounting policies. Acc Rev LXVIII:1–22
go back to reference Lev B, Zambon S (2003) Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue. Eur Acc Rev 12:597–603CrossRef Lev B, Zambon S (2003) Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue. Eur Acc Rev 12:597–603CrossRef
go back to reference Levinthal D (1988) A survey of agency of organizations. J Econ Behav Organ 9:153–185CrossRef Levinthal D (1988) A survey of agency of organizations. J Econ Behav Organ 9:153–185CrossRef
go back to reference Lewis TG (1994) Steigerung des Unternehmenswertes—total value management. Moderne Industrie, Landsberg/Lech Lewis TG (1994) Steigerung des Unternehmenswertes—total value management. Moderne Industrie, Landsberg/Lech
go back to reference Littkeman J, Derfuß K (2009) Corporate Governance-Gestaltung mit Hilfe des Controlling? Eine konflikttheoretische Analyse. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 61–80 Littkeman J, Derfuß K (2009) Corporate Governance-Gestaltung mit Hilfe des Controlling? Eine konflikttheoretische Analyse. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 61–80
go back to reference Lu LYY, Wu CH, Kuo TC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331CrossRef Lu LYY, Wu CH, Kuo TC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331CrossRef
go back to reference Luft JL (2004) Discussion of "managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system". Contemp Acc Res 21:959–964 Luft JL (2004) Discussion of "managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system". Contemp Acc Res 21:959–964
go back to reference Malmi T (2001) Balanced Scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note. Manag Acc Res 12:207–220CrossRef Malmi T (2001) Balanced Scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note. Manag Acc Res 12:207–220CrossRef
go back to reference March JG (1986) Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Acc Org Soc 12:153–168CrossRef March JG (1986) Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Acc Org Soc 12:153–168CrossRef
go back to reference March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. McGraw Hill, New York March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. McGraw Hill, New York
go back to reference Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic theory of teams. Yale University Press, New Haven Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic theory of teams. Yale University Press, New Haven
go back to reference Martin J, Petty W, Wallace J (2009) Shareholder value maximization—is there a role for corporate social responsibility? J Appl Corp Finance 21:110–118CrossRef Martin J, Petty W, Wallace J (2009) Shareholder value maximization—is there a role for corporate social responsibility? J Appl Corp Finance 21:110–118CrossRef
go back to reference McAdam R, Hazlett SA, Casey C (2005) Performance management in the UK public sector: addressing multiple stakeholder complexity. Int J Public Sect Manag 18:256–273CrossRef McAdam R, Hazlett SA, Casey C (2005) Performance management in the UK public sector: addressing multiple stakeholder complexity. Int J Public Sect Manag 18:256–273CrossRef
go back to reference McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26:117–127 McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26:117–127
go back to reference Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J Acc Econ 19:179–208CrossRef Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J Acc Econ 19:179–208CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell RK (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: the joint-stake company and accountability for opportunities: what if? Bus Ethics Q 18:176–181 and 183–184 (Appendix) Mitchell RK (2008) Dialogue towards superior stakeholder theory: the joint-stake company and accountability for opportunities: what if? Bus Ethics Q 18:176–181 and 183–184 (Appendix)
go back to reference Mitchell RK, Bradly RA, Wood DJ (1997) Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principles of who and what counts. Acad Manage Rev 22:853–886 Mitchell RK, Bradly RA, Wood DJ (1997) Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principles of who and what counts. Acad Manage Rev 22:853–886
go back to reference Möller K, Isbruch F (2009) Stakeholderintegration durch Netzwerkcontrolling. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 105–126 Möller K, Isbruch F (2009) Stakeholderintegration durch Netzwerkcontrolling. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 105–126
go back to reference Neumann B, Roberts ML, Cauvin E (2011) Stakeholder value disclosures: anchoring on primacy and importance of financial and nonfinancial performance measures. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue) Neumann B, Roberts ML, Cauvin E (2011) Stakeholder value disclosures: anchoring on primacy and importance of financial and nonfinancial performance measures. Rev Manag Sci 5 (this issue)
go back to reference Nicholls A (2009) We do good things, don’t we? ‘Blended value accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Acc Org Soc 34:755–769CrossRef Nicholls A (2009) We do good things, don’t we? ‘Blended value accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Acc Org Soc 34:755–769CrossRef
go back to reference Niemark M, Tinker T (1986) The social construction of management control systems. Acc Org Soc 11:369–395CrossRef Niemark M, Tinker T (1986) The social construction of management control systems. Acc Org Soc 11:369–395CrossRef
go back to reference Nørreklit H (2000) The balance on the Balanced Scorecard. A critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Manag Acc Res 11:65–88CrossRef Nørreklit H (2000) The balance on the Balanced Scorecard. A critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Manag Acc Res 11:65–88CrossRef
go back to reference Nørreklit H (2003) The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard. Acc Org Soc 28:91–619 Nørreklit H (2003) The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard. Acc Org Soc 28:91–619
go back to reference O’Hanlon J, Peasnell K (1998) Wall Street’s contribution to management accounting: the Stern Stewart EVA© financial management system. Manag Acc Res 9:421–444CrossRef O’Hanlon J, Peasnell K (1998) Wall Street’s contribution to management accounting: the Stern Stewart EVA© financial management system. Manag Acc Res 9:421–444CrossRef
go back to reference Owen DL, O’Dwyer B (2008) Corporate social responsibility: the reporting and assurance dimension. In: Crane A et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 384–409CrossRef Owen DL, O’Dwyer B (2008) Corporate social responsibility: the reporting and assurance dimension. In: Crane A et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 384–409CrossRef
go back to reference Palazzo G, Scherer AG (2006) Communicative legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66:72–88CrossRef Palazzo G, Scherer AG (2006) Communicative legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66:72–88CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips RA (1997) Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Bus Ethics Q 7:51–66 Phillips RA (1997) Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Bus Ethics Q 7:51–66
go back to reference Phillips J, Pincus M, Rego SO (2003a) Earnings management: new evidence based on deferred tax expense. Acc Rev 78:491–521CrossRef Phillips J, Pincus M, Rego SO (2003a) Earnings management: new evidence based on deferred tax expense. Acc Rev 78:491–521CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips R, Freeman RA, Wicks AC (2003b) What stakeholder theory is not. Bus Ethics Q13:479–502 Phillips R, Freeman RA, Wicks AC (2003b) What stakeholder theory is not. Bus Ethics Q13:479–502
go back to reference Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J Econ Lit 37:7–63CrossRef Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J Econ Lit 37:7–63CrossRef
go back to reference Quinn D, Jones TM (1995) An agent morality view of business policy. Acad Manag Rev 20:22–24 Quinn D, Jones TM (1995) An agent morality view of business policy. Acad Manag Rev 20:22–24
go back to reference Rapp A, Schellong D, Schmidt M, Wolff M (2011) Considering the shareholder perspective: value-based management systems and stock market performance. Rev Manag Sci 5. doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0056-z Rapp A, Schellong D, Schmidt M, Wolff M (2011) Considering the shareholder perspective: value-based management systems and stock market performance. Rev Manag Sci 5. doi:10.​1007/​s11846-010-0056-z
go back to reference Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. The Free Press, New York Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. The Free Press, New York
go back to reference Rausch A (2011) Reconstruction of decision-making behavior in shareholder and stakeholder theory: Implications for management accounting systems. Rev Manag Sci 5. doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0053-2 Rausch A (2011) Reconstruction of decision-making behavior in shareholder and stakeholder theory: Implications for management accounting systems. Rev Manag Sci 5. doi:10.​1007/​s11846-010-0053-2
go back to reference Reichelstein S (1997) Investment decisions and managerial performance evaluation. Rev Acc Stud 2:157–180CrossRef Reichelstein S (1997) Investment decisions and managerial performance evaluation. Rev Acc Stud 2:157–180CrossRef
go back to reference Reynolds SJ, Schultz FC, Hekman DR (2006) Stakeholder theory and managerial decision making. J Bus Ethics 64:285–301CrossRef Reynolds SJ, Schultz FC, Hekman DR (2006) Stakeholder theory and managerial decision making. J Bus Ethics 64:285–301CrossRef
go back to reference Roberts RW (1992) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: an application of stakeholder theory. Acc Org Soc 17:595–612CrossRef Roberts RW (1992) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: an application of stakeholder theory. Acc Org Soc 17:595–612CrossRef
go back to reference Roberts RW, Mahoney L (2004) Stakeholder conceptions of the corporation: their meaning and influence in accounting research. Bus Ethics Q 14:399–431 Roberts RW, Mahoney L (2004) Stakeholder conceptions of the corporation: their meaning and influence in accounting research. Bus Ethics Q 14:399–431
go back to reference Rogerson W (1997) Intertemporal cost allocation and managerial incentives: a theory explaining the use of economic value added as a performance measure. J Polit Econ 105:770–795CrossRef Rogerson W (1997) Intertemporal cost allocation and managerial incentives: a theory explaining the use of economic value added as a performance measure. J Polit Econ 105:770–795CrossRef
go back to reference Ronen J, Yaari V (2008) Earnings management: emerging insights in theory, practice, and research. Springer, Berlin Ronen J, Yaari V (2008) Earnings management: emerging insights in theory, practice, and research. Springer, Berlin
go back to reference Rowe C, Birnberg JG, Shields MD (2008) Effects of organizational process change on responsibility accounting and managers’ revelations of private knowledge. Acc Org Soc 33:164–198CrossRef Rowe C, Birnberg JG, Shields MD (2008) Effects of organizational process change on responsibility accounting and managers’ revelations of private knowledge. Acc Org Soc 33:164–198CrossRef
go back to reference Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties; a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad Manag Rev 22:887–910 Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties; a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad Manag Rev 22:887–910
go back to reference Saaty TL (1988) Decision making for leaders. RWS Publications, Pittsburg Saaty TL (1988) Decision making for leaders. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
go back to reference Scholz C, Stein V, Bechtel R (2004) Human capital management. Vahlen, München Scholz C, Stein V, Bechtel R (2004) Human capital management. Vahlen, München
go back to reference Schröder RW (2009) Zwischen Stakeholder- und Shareholder-Orientierung: Anforderungen an umfassende Steuerungsinstrumente für das Controlling. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 365–379 Schröder RW (2009) Zwischen Stakeholder- und Shareholder-Orientierung: Anforderungen an umfassende Steuerungsinstrumente für das Controlling. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 365–379
go back to reference Schröder RW, Wall F (2009) Customer perceived value als Komponente von Performance Measurement-Systemen. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 105–126 Schröder RW, Wall F (2009) Customer perceived value als Komponente von Performance Measurement-Systemen. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 105–126
go back to reference Shaoul J (1998) Critical financial analysis and accounting for stakeholders. Crit Persp Acc 9:235–249CrossRef Shaoul J (1998) Critical financial analysis and accounting for stakeholders. Crit Persp Acc 9:235–249CrossRef
go back to reference Siegel DS, Vitalino DF (2006) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Rensselaer Working Paper on Economics, No. 0602, Rensselaer Siegel DS, Vitalino DF (2006) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Rensselaer Working Paper on Economics, No. 0602, Rensselaer
go back to reference Siggelkow N (2002) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: organizational consequences. Manag Sci 48:900–916CrossRef Siggelkow N (2002) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: organizational consequences. Manag Sci 48:900–916CrossRef
go back to reference Speckbacher G, Bischof J, Pfeiffer T (2003) A descriptive analysis on the implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-speaking countries. Manag Acc Res 14:361–388CrossRef Speckbacher G, Bischof J, Pfeiffer T (2003) A descriptive analysis on the implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-speaking countries. Manag Acc Res 14:361–388CrossRef
go back to reference Stadler C, Matzler K, Hinterhuber H et al (2006) The CEO’s attitude towards the shareholder value and the stakeholder model: a comparison between the continental European and the Anglo-Saxon perspectives. Probl Persp Manag 4:41–48 Stadler C, Matzler K, Hinterhuber H et al (2006) The CEO’s attitude towards the shareholder value and the stakeholder model: a comparison between the continental European and the Anglo-Saxon perspectives. Probl Persp Manag 4:41–48
go back to reference Stern JM, Stewart BG, Chew D, Stewart Co (1998) The EVA© financial management system. In: Stern JD, Chew D (eds) The revolution in corporate finance, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Madden, pp 474–488 Stern JM, Stewart BG, Chew D, Stewart Co (1998) The EVA© financial management system. In: Stern JD, Chew D (eds) The revolution in corporate finance, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Madden, pp 474–488
go back to reference Stewart GB (1991) The quest for value—the EVA management guide. Harper Business, New York Stewart GB (1991) The quest for value—the EVA management guide. Harper Business, New York
go back to reference Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategies and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610 Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategies and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610
go back to reference Sundaram AK, Inkpen AC (2004) The corporate objective revisited. Organ Sci 15:350–363CrossRef Sundaram AK, Inkpen AC (2004) The corporate objective revisited. Organ Sci 15:350–363CrossRef
go back to reference Sundin H, Granlund M, Brown DA (2010) Balancing multiple competing objectives with a Balanced Scorecard. Eur Acc Rev 19:203–246CrossRef Sundin H, Granlund M, Brown DA (2010) Balancing multiple competing objectives with a Balanced Scorecard. Eur Acc Rev 19:203–246CrossRef
go back to reference Sutton SG, Arnold V (1998) Deconstructing economic stakeholder theories or is might really right. Crit Persp Account 9:251–260CrossRef Sutton SG, Arnold V (1998) Deconstructing economic stakeholder theories or is might really right. Crit Persp Account 9:251–260CrossRef
go back to reference Ulrich P (1999) Was ist gute Unternehmensführung? Zur normativen Dimension der shareholder-stakeholder-debatte. In: Kumar BN, Osterloh M, Schreyögg G (eds) Unternehmensethik und die Transformation des Wettbewerbs. Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 27–52 Ulrich P (1999) Was ist gute Unternehmensführung? Zur normativen Dimension der shareholder-stakeholder-debatte. In: Kumar BN, Osterloh M, Schreyögg G (eds) Unternehmensethik und die Transformation des Wettbewerbs. Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 27–52
go back to reference Unermann J, Bennett M (2004) Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability of reinforcing capitalist hegemony. Acc Org Soc 29:685–707CrossRef Unermann J, Bennett M (2004) Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability of reinforcing capitalist hegemony. Acc Org Soc 29:685–707CrossRef
go back to reference Vilanova L (2007) Neither shareholder nor stakeholder management: what happens when firms run for their short term salient stakeholders. Eur Manag J 25:146–162CrossRef Vilanova L (2007) Neither shareholder nor stakeholder management: what happens when firms run for their short term salient stakeholders. Eur Manag J 25:146–162CrossRef
go back to reference Wall F (2001) Ursache-Wirkungsketten als ein zentraler Bestandteil der Balanced Scorecard. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Gewinnbarkeit. Controlling 13:65–74 Wall F (2001) Ursache-Wirkungsketten als ein zentraler Bestandteil der Balanced Scorecard. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Gewinnbarkeit. Controlling 13:65–74
go back to reference Wall F (2009) Stakeholder-orientiertes Controlling als Koordination bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 345–363 Wall F (2009) Stakeholder-orientiertes Controlling als Koordination bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 345–363
go back to reference Webb RA (2004) Managers’ commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system. Contemp Acc Res 21:925–958CrossRef Webb RA (2004) Managers’ commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system. Contemp Acc Res 21:925–958CrossRef
go back to reference Weißenberger BE (2009) Shareholder-value und finanzielle Vorgaben im Unternehmen. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 39–60 Weißenberger BE (2009) Shareholder-value und finanzielle Vorgaben im Unternehmen. In: Wall F, Schröder RW (eds) Controlling zwischen shareholder-value und stakeholder-value. Oldenbourg, München, pp 39–60
go back to reference Wisniewski M, Stewart D (2004) Performance measurement for stakeholders: the case of Scottish local authorities. Int J Public Sect Manag 17:222–233CrossRef Wisniewski M, Stewart D (2004) Performance measurement for stakeholders: the case of Scottish local authorities. Int J Public Sect Manag 17:222–233CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accounting information for managerial decision-making in shareholder management versus stakeholder management
Authors
Friederike Wall
Dorothea Greiling
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Review of Managerial Science / Issue 2-3/2011
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-011-0063-8

Other articles of this Issue 2-3/2011

Review of Managerial Science 2-3/2011 Go to the issue