Top

Published in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Proaktives Verhalten: Schlüsselkompetenz für die Karriereentwicklung

Authors : Annett Hüttges, Doris Fay

Published in: Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Proaktives Verhalten beschreibt selbststartende, veränderungs- und zukunftsorientierte Handlungen, die darauf ausgerichtet sind, das berufliche Umfeld positiv zu beeinflussen. Empirische Befunde belegen die positive Bedeutung proaktiven Verhaltens für das Individuum, seine berufliche Laufbahnentwicklung und den Gesamterfolg von Organisationen. Führungskräfte können das proaktive Verhalten ihrer Beschäftigten fördern, indem sie vollständige Arbeitsaufgaben übertragen, eine gute Austauschbeziehung gestalten sowie positive Beispiele für Eigeninitiative und Verantwortungsübernahme etablieren.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Die Rolle des Laufbahncommitments in der beruflichen Entwicklung

next chapter Kompetenzmanagement in Organisationen: Ein Beitrag zur Laufbahnentwicklung

Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, und newcomer learning: Integration socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001.CrossRef

Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 49(1), 192–221.CrossRef

Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative und psychological safety, process innovations, und firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman und Co.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership und performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure und correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.

Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative und its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x.CrossRef

Bolino, M. C., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X493134.CrossRef

Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX und power distance in the United States und Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415.CrossRef

Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2000.4468066.CrossRef

Chiaburu, D. S., Smith, T. A., Wang, J., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2014). Relative importance of leader influences for subordinates’ proactive behaviors, prosocial behaviors, und task performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000105.CrossRef

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304.CrossRef

Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs und organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 859–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00772.x.CrossRef

Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06.CrossRef

Fay, D., & Hüttges, A. (2016). Drawbacks of proactivity: Effects of daily proactivity on daily salivary cortisol und subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000042;10.1037/ocp0000042.supp (Supplemental).CrossRefPubMed

Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). A look back to move ahead: New directions for research on proactive performance und other discretionary work behaviours. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 59(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00413.x.CrossRef

Fay, D., Lührmann, H., & Kohl, C. (2004). Proactive climate in a post-reorganization setting: When staff compensates managers’ weakness. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 13, 241–267.CrossRef

Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2000). Entwicklung von Eigeninitiative: Neue Herausforderung für Mitarbeiter und Manager. In M. K. Welge, K. Häring & A. Voss (Hrsg.), Management development (S. 63–79). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Bd. 23, S. 133–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East und West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/256630.CrossRef

Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability und validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x.CrossRef

Frese, M., Garman, G., Garmeister, K., Halemba, K., Hortig, A., Pulwitt, T., & Schildbach, S. (2002). Training zur Erhöhung der Eigeninitiative bei Arbeitslosen: Bericht über einen Pilotversuch. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 46(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1026//0932-4089.46.2.89.

Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007a). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics und personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084.CrossRefPubMed

Frese, M., Krauss, S. I., Keith, N., Escher, S., Grabarkiewicz, R., Luneng, S. T., Friedrich, C. et al. (2007b). Business owners’ action planning und it’s relationship to business success in three African countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1481.

Frese, M., Tornau, K., & Fay, D. (2008). Forschung zur Analyse und Förderung der Eigeninitiative: Love it, leave it or change it. Zeitschrift für Personalführung, 3, 38–57.

Fuller, J. B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactivity literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008.CrossRef

Glaub, M. E., Frese, M., Fischer, S., & Hoppe, M. (2014). Increasing personal initiative in small business managers or owners leads to entrepreneurial success: A theory-based controlled randomized field intervention for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(3), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0234.CrossRef

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRef

Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002.CrossRef

Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value und how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x.CrossRef

Hacker, W. (1998). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Bern: Hans Huber.

Hahn, V. C., Frese, M., Binnewies, C., & Schmitt, A. (2012). Happy und proactive? The role of hedonic und eudaimonic well-being in business owners’ personal initiative. Entrepreneurship Theory und Practice, 36(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00490.x.CrossRef

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions und organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Janz, T., Hellervik, L., & Gilmore, D. C. (1986). Behavior description interviewing. Boston: Alan & Bacon.

Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents und their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.779.CrossRefPubMed

Kanning, U. P. (2015). Personalauswahl zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Karoly, P., & Kanfer, F. H. (1982). Self-management und behaviour change: From theory to practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Li, W. D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P. D., & Gao, X. Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality und work characteristics: A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036169.CrossRefPubMed

Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency und proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113.CrossRef

Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/257011.CrossRef

Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective und subjective career success. A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.CrossRef

Parker, S., Bindl, U., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732.CrossRef

Paul, K., & Moser, K. (2017). Ursachen und Auswirkungen von Arbeitslosigkeit: Folgen für die Laufbahngestaltung und Karriereberatung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.

Paulsen, H., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Kompetenzmanagement in Organisationen: Ein Beitrag zur Laufbahnentwicklung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.

Raabe, B., Frese, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2007). Action regulation theory und career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.005.CrossRef

Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, und initiative. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 53(3), 518–528.CrossRef

Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, und success. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701595438.CrossRef

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality und career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427.CrossRef

Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 59–73.CrossRef

Speier, C., & Frese, M. (1997). Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator und moderator between control und complexity at work und personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10(2), 171–192.CrossRef

Spychala, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). The dark und the bright sides of proactive work behaviour und situational constraints: Longitudinal relationships with task conflicts. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 654–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.487646.CrossRef

Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359.CrossRef

Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts und their incremental validities. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 62(1), 44–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x.CrossRef

Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2015). ‚Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts und their incremental validities‘: Corrigendum. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 64(4), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12045.CrossRef

Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored und contest mobility und the school system. American Sociological Review, 25, 855–867.CrossRef

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping und voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct und predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measures. Educational und Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 197–210.CrossRef

Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors und outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.373.CrossRefPubMed

Wihler, A., Blickle, G., Ellen, B. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Personal initiative und job performance evaluations: Role of political skill in opportunity recognition und Journal of Management, 43, 1388–1420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314552451.

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.CrossRef

Title: Proaktives Verhalten: Schlüsselkompetenz für die Karriereentwicklung
Authors: Annett Hüttges
Doris Fay
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48749-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-48750-1

Copyright Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_20

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner