Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Almost sure central limit theorem for products of sums of partial sums

Authors: Fengxiang Feng, Dingcheng Wang

Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Issue 1/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH
loading …

Abstract

Considering a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables, for products of sums of partial sums we establish an almost sure central limit theorem, which holds for some class of unbounded measurable functions.
Notes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

FF conceived of the study and drafted and completed the manuscript. DW participated in the discussion of the manuscript. FF and DW read and approved the final manuscript.

1 Introduction and main results

Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of random variables and define \(S_{n}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\). Some results as regards the limit theorem of products \(\prod_{j=1}^{n}S_{j}\) were obtained in recent years. Rempala and Wesolowski [1] obtained the following asymptotics for products of sums for a sequence of i.i.d. random variables.
Theorem A
Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive square integrable random variables with \(\mathbb{E}X_{1}=\mu\), the coefficient of variation \(\gamma=\sigma/\mu\), where \(\sigma ^{2}=\operatorname{Var}(X_{1})\). Then
$$ \biggl(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{n} S_{k}}{n!\mu^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma \sqrt{n}}}\stackrel{d}{\rightarrow} {e}^{\sqrt{2}\mathcal{N}} \quad \textit{as } n\to\infty. $$
(1.1)
Here and in the sequel, \(\mathcal{N}\) is a standard normal random variable and \(\stackrel{d}{\rightarrow}\) denotes the convergence in distribution.
Gonchigdanzan and Rempala [2] discussed the almost sure central limit theorem (ASCLT) for the products of partial sums and obtained the following result.
Theorem B
Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables with \(\mathbb{E}X_{1}=\mu\), \(\operatorname {Var}(X_{1})=\sigma^{2}\) the coefficient of variation \(\gamma=\sigma/\mu \). Then
$$ \lim_{N \to\infty}\frac{1}{\log N}\sum_{n=1}^{N} \frac {1}{n}I \biggl\{ \biggl(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{n} S_{k}}{n!\mu^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac {1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}}\leq x \biggr\} =F(x) \quad \textit{a.s. for any } x \in\mathbb{R}, $$
(1.2)
where F is the distribution function of the random variable \(e^{\sqrt {2}\mathcal{N}}\). Here and in the sequel, \(I \{\cdot \}\) denotes the indicator function.
Tan and Peng [3] proved the result of Theorem B still holds for some class of unbounded measurable functions and obtained the following result.
Theorem C
Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables with \(\mathbb{E}X_{1}=\mu\), \(\operatorname {Var}(X_{1})=\sigma^{2}\), \(\mathbb{E}|X_{1}|^{3}<\infty\), the coefficient of variation \(\gamma =\sigma/\mu\). Let \(g(x)\) be a real valued almost everywhere continuous function on \(\mathbb{R}\) such that \(|g(e^{x})\phi(x)|\leq c(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\) with some \(c>0\) and \(\alpha>5\). Then
$$ \lim_{N \to\infty}\frac{1}{\log N}\sum_{n=1}^{N} \frac {1}{n}g \biggl\{ \biggl(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{n} S_{k}}{n!\mu^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac {1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}} \biggr\} = \int_{0}^{\infty}g(x)\,\mathrm{d}F(x) \quad \textit{a.s. for any } x \in\mathbb{R}, $$
(1.3)
where \(F(\cdot)\) is the distribution function of the random variable \(e^{\sqrt {2}\mathcal{N}}\) and \(\phi(x)\) is the density function of the standard normal random variable.
Zhang et al. [4] discussed the almost sure central limit theory for products of sums of partial sums and obtained the following result.
Theorem D
Let \(\{X,X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive square integrable random variables with \(\mathbb{E}X=\mu\), \(\operatorname{Var}(X)=\sigma^{2}<\infty\), the coefficient of variation \(\gamma =\sigma/\mu\). Denote \(S_{n}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\), \(T_{k}=\sum_{i=1}^{k} S_{i}\). Then
$$ \lim_{n \to\infty}\frac{1}{\log n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac {1}{k}I \biggl\{ \biggl(\frac{2^{k}\prod_{j=1}^{k} T_{j}}{k!(k+1)!\mu^{k}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{k}}}\leq x \biggr\} =F(x) \quad \textit{a.s. for any } x \in\mathbb{R}, $$
(1.4)
where \(F(\cdot)\) is the distribution function of the random variable \(e^{\sqrt{10/3}\mathcal{N}}\).
The purpose of this article is to establish that Theorem D holds for some class of unbounded measurable functions.
Our main result is the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1
Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables with \(\mathbb{E}X_{1}=\mu\), \(\operatorname {Var}(X_{1})=\sigma^{2}\), \(\mathbb{E}|X_{1}|^{3}<\infty\), the coefficient of variation \(\gamma =\sigma/\mu\). Let \(g(x)\) be a real valued almost everywhere continuous function on \(\mathbb{R}\) such that \(|g(e^{\sqrt{10/3} x})\phi(x)|\leq c(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\) with some \(c>0\) and \(\alpha>5\). Denote \(S_{n}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\), \(T_{k}=\sum_{i=1}^{k} S_{i}\). Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{N \to\infty}\frac{1}{\log N}\sum_{n=1}^{N} \frac {1}{n}g \biggl( \biggl(\frac{2^{n}\prod_{k=1}^{n} T_{k}}{n!(n+1)!{\mu }^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}} \biggr) \\& \quad = \int_{0}^{\infty }g(x)\,\mathrm{d}F(x) \quad \textit{a.s. for any } x \in\mathbb{R}, \end{aligned}$$
(1.5)
where \(F(\cdot)\) is the distribution function of the random variable \(e^{\sqrt{10/3}\mathcal{N}}\). Here and in the sequel, \(\phi(x)\) is the density function of the standard normal random variable.
Remark 1
Let \(f(x)=g(e^{\sqrt{10/3} x})\), \(t=e^{\sqrt{10/3} x}\). Then
$$\begin{aligned}& x=\sqrt{\frac{3}{10}}\log t, \qquad g(t)=f \biggl(\sqrt {\frac{3}{10}} \log t \biggr), \\& g \biggl( \biggl(\frac{2^{n}\prod_{k=1}^{n} T_{k}}{n!(n+1)!{\mu}^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}} \biggr) =f \Biggl( \sqrt{\frac{3}{10}}\log \Biggl(\prod_{k=1}^{n} \frac {2T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu} \Biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}} \Biggr) \\& \hphantom{g \biggl( \biggl(\frac{2^{n}\prod_{k=1}^{n} T_{k}}{n!(n+1)!{\mu}^{n}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{n}}} \biggr)}=f \Biggl(\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10n/3}}\sum _{k=1}^{n} \log \frac {T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2} \Biggr). \end{aligned}$$
Since \(F(x)\) is the distribution function of the random variable \(e^{\sqrt{10/3}\mathcal{N}}\), we can get \(F(x)=\Phi (\sqrt{\frac{3}{10}}\log x )\), where \(\Phi (x)\) is the distribution function of the standard normal random variable. Hence we have the following: Let \(f(x)=g(e^{\sqrt{10/3} x})\) and \(f(x)\) be a real valued almost everywhere continuous function on \(\mathbb{R}\) such that \(|f(x)\phi(x)|\leq c(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\) with some \(c>0\) and \(\alpha>5\), then (1.5) is equivalent to
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{N \to\infty}\frac{1}{\log N}\sum_{n=1}^{N} \frac {1}{n}f \Biggl(\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10n/3}}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \log \frac {T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2} \Biggr) \\& \quad = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\phi(x)\,\mathrm {d}x\quad \mbox{a.s. for any } x \in\mathbb{R}. \end{aligned}$$
(1.6)
Remark 2
By the proof of Theorem 2 of Berkes et al. [5], in order to prove (1.5), it suffices to show (1.6) holds true for \(f(x)\phi(x)=(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\) with \(\alpha>5\). Here and in the sequel, \(f(x)\) satisfies \(f(x)\phi(x)=(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\) with \(\alpha>5\).

2 Preliminaries

In the following, the notation \(a_{n}\sim b_{n}\) means that \(\lim_{n \to\infty}a_{n}/ b_{n}= 1\) and \(a_{n}\ll b_{n}\) means that \(\limsup_{n \to\infty}|a_{n}/ b_{n}|<+\infty\). We denote \(b_{k,n}=\sum_{j=k}^{n} \frac {1}{j}\), \(c_{k,n}=2\sum_{j=k}^{n} \frac{j+1-k}{j(j+1)}\), \(d_{k,n}=\frac {n+1-k}{n+1}\), \(\widetilde{X}_{i}=\frac{{X}_{i}-\mu}{\sigma}\), \(\widetilde{S}_{k}=\sum_{i=1}^{k}\widetilde{X}_{i}\), \({S}_{k,n}=\sum_{i=1}^{k} c_{i,n}\widetilde{X}_{i}\). By Lemma 2.1 of Wu [6], we can get
$$c_{i,n}=2(b_{i,n}-d_{i,n}), \qquad \sum _{i=1}^{n} c_{i,n}^{2} \sim \frac{10n}{3}. $$
Let
$$Y_{i}=\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10i/3}}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \log \frac {T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}. $$
Note that
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{1}{\gamma}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \biggl( \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr) \\& \quad =\frac{1}{\gamma}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \biggl(\frac{2\sum_{j=1}^{k} S_{j}-k(k+1)\mu }{k(k+1)\mu} \biggr) \\& \quad =\frac{1}{\gamma}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \frac{2}{k(k+1)\mu}\sum_{j=1}^{k}\sum _{l=1}^{j}(X_{l}-\mu) \\& \quad =\frac{1}{\gamma}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \frac{2}{k(k+1)\mu}\sum_{l=1}^{k}\sum _{j=l}^{k}(X_{l}-\mu) \\& \quad =\frac{\mu}{\sigma}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \frac{2}{k(k+1)\mu}\sum_{l=1}^{k}(k+1-l) (X_{l}-\mu) \\& \quad =\sum_{k=1}^{i}\sum _{l=1}^{k} \frac{2(k+1-l)}{k(k+1)}\frac{X_{l}-\mu }{\sigma} \\& \quad =\sum_{l=1}^{i} \sum _{k=l}^{i}\frac{2(k+1-l)}{k(k+1)}\widetilde{X}_{l} \\& \quad =\sum_{l=1}^{i} c_{l,i} \widetilde{X}_{l}=S_{i,i}. \end{aligned}$$
By the fact that \(\log (1+x)=x+\frac{\delta}{2}x^{2}\), where \(|x|<1\), \(\delta\in(-1,0)\), thus we have
$$\begin{aligned} Y_{i}&=\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10i/3}}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \log \frac {T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2} \\ &=\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10i/3}}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \biggl( \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu /2}-1 \biggr)+\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10i/3}} \sum_{k=1}^{i} \frac{\delta_{k}}{2} \biggl(\frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr)^{2} \\ &=\frac{1}{\sqrt{10i/3}}S_{i,i}+\frac{1}{\gamma\sqrt{10i/3}}\sum _{k=1}^{i}\frac{\delta_{k}}{2} \biggl( \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr)^{2} \\ &=:\frac{1}{\sqrt{10i/3}}S_{i,i}+R_{i}. \end{aligned}$$
By the fact that \(\mathbb{E}|X_{1}|^{2}<\infty\), using the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund strong large number law, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& S_{k}-k\mu=o \bigl(k^{1/2} \bigr) \quad \mbox{a.s.}, \\& \biggl\vert \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr\vert = \biggl\vert \frac{2\sum_{j=1}^{k} S_{j}-k(k+1)\mu}{k(k+1)\mu} \biggr\vert \\& \hphantom{\biggl\vert \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr\vert }\leq\frac{2\vert \sum_{j=1}^{k} (S_{j}-j\mu)\vert }{k(k+1)\mu} \\& \hphantom{\biggl\vert \frac{T_{k}}{k(k+1)\mu/2}-1 \biggr\vert }\leq\frac{2\sum_{j=1}^{k} j^{1/2}}{k(k+1)\mu}\ll\frac {k^{3/2}}{k^{2}}=\frac{1}{k^{1/2}}. \end{aligned}$$
Thus
$$ |R_{i}|\ll\frac{1}{\sqrt{i}}\sum_{k=1}^{i} \frac{1}{k}\ll\frac{\log i}{\sqrt{i}}\quad \mbox{a.s.} $$
(2.1)
In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we introduce the following lemmas.
Lemma 2.1
Let X and Y be random variables. Set \(F(x)=P(X< x)\), \(G(x)=P(X+Y< x)\), then for any \(\varepsilon>0\) and \(x\in\mathbb{R}\),
$$ F(x-\varepsilon)-P \bigl(\vert Y\vert \geq\varepsilon \bigr)\leq G(x)\leq F(x+ \varepsilon )+P \bigl(\vert Y\vert \geq\varepsilon \bigr). $$
Proof
See Lemma 3 on p.16 of Petrov [7]. □
Lemma 2.2
Let \(\{X_{n};n\geq1\}\) be a sequence of i.i.d. positive random variables. Denote \(S_{n}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\), \(F^{s}\) denotes the distribution function obtained from F by symmetrization and choose \(L >0\) so large that \(\int_{|x|\leq L}x^{2}\,\mathrm{d}F^{s}(x)\geq1\). Then, for any \(n\geq1\), \(\lambda>0\), there exists a \(c>0\) such that
$$\sup_{a}P \biggl(a\leq\frac{S_{n}}{\sqrt{n}}\leq a+\lambda \biggr) \leq c\lambda $$
holds for \(\lambda\sqrt{n}\geq L\).
Proof
See (20) on p.73 of Berkes et al. [5]. □
Let
$$\begin{aligned}& Z_{k}=\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{1}{i}f(Y_{i}), \\& Z_{k}^{*}=\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{1}{i}f(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i})\leq \frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta}} \biggr\} , \end{aligned}$$
where \(1<\beta<(\alpha-3)/2\).
Lemma 2.3
Under the conditions of Theorem  1.1, we get
$$\mathbb{P} \bigl(Z_{k}\neq Z_{k}^{*}, \mathrm{i.o.} \bigr)=0. $$
Proof
It is easy to get
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\{ Z_{k}\neq Z_{k}^{*} \bigr\} \subseteq& \bigl\{ |Y_{i}|\geq f^{-1} \bigl(k/(\log k)^{\beta} \bigr) \mbox{ for some } 2^{k}< i\leq2^{k+1} \bigr\} \\ =& \biggl\{ \biggl\vert \frac{1}{\sqrt{10i/3}}S_{i,i}+R_{i} \biggr\vert \geq f^{-1} \bigl(k/(\log k)^{\beta} \bigr)\geq \bigl(2\log k+(\alpha-2\beta)\log \log k \bigr)^{1/2} \\ &\mbox{for some } 2^{k}< i\leq2^{k+1} \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$
Since \(|R_{i}|\ll\frac{\log i}{\sqrt{i}}\) a.s.; see (2.1). By the law of iterated logarithm (Feller [8], Theorem 2), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb{P} \bigl(Z_{k}\neq Z_{k}^{*}, \mathrm{i.o.} \bigr) \leq& \mathbb{P} \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac {1}{\sqrt{10i/3}}S_{i,i} \biggr\vert \geq \bigl(2\log \log i+(\alpha-2\beta)\log \log \log i-O(1) \bigr)^{1/2}, \mathrm{i.o.} \biggr) \\ =&0. \end{aligned}$$
We complete the proof of Lemma 2.3. □
Let \(G_{i}\), \(F_{i}\), F denote the distribution functions of \(Y_{i}\), \(\frac {\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}}\), \(\widetilde{X}_{1}\), respectively. Φ denotes the distribution function of the standard normal distribution function. Set
$$\begin{aligned}& \sigma_{i}^{2} = \int_{-\sqrt{i}}^{\sqrt{i}}x^{2}\,\mathrm{d}F(x)- \biggl( \int _{-\sqrt{i}}^{\sqrt{i}}x\,\mathrm{d}F(x) \biggr)^{2}, \\& \varepsilon_{i} =\sup_{x} \biggl\vert F_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr) \biggr\vert ,\qquad \theta_{i}=\sup_{x} \biggl\vert G_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr) \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$
Obviously \(\sigma_{i}\leq1\), \(\lim_{i \to\infty}\sigma_{i}= 1\).
Lemma 2.4
Under the conditions of Theorem  1.1, we have
$$\sum_{k=1}^{N}\mathbb{E} \bigl(Z_{k}^{*} \bigr)^{2}\ll\frac{N^{2}}{(\log N)^{2\beta}}. $$
Proof
Note that the estimation
$$ \biggl\vert \int_{-a}^{a}\Psi(x)\,\mathrm{d} \bigl(H_{1}(x)-H_{2}(x) \bigr) \biggr\vert \leq\sup _{-a\leq x \leq a} \bigl\vert \Psi(x) \bigr\vert \cdot\sup _{-a\leq x \leq a} \bigl\vert H_{1}(x)-H_{2}(x) \bigr\vert $$
(2.2)
holds for any bounded, measurable function \(\Psi(x)\) and the distribution functions \(H_{1}(x)\), \(H_{2}(x)\). Thus for \(2^{k}< i\leq 2^{k+1}\), we get
$$\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{E}f^{2}(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i})\leq \frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta }} \biggr\} \\& \quad = \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f^{2}(x)\,\mathrm{d}G_{i}(x) \\& \quad \leq \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f^{2}(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi \biggl( \frac{x}{\sigma _{i}} \biggr)+\theta_{i}\frac{k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}} \\& \quad \ll \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f^{2}(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi(x)+ \theta_{i}\frac {k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}}; \end{aligned}$$
here and in the sequel \(a_{k}=f^{-1}(\frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta }})\). Hence, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the fact that \(f(x)\phi(x)=(1+|x|)^{-\alpha}\), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb{E} \bigl(Z_{k}^{*} \bigr)^{2} &\ll\mathbb{E} \Biggl( \Biggl(\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \biggl( \frac{1}{i} \biggr)^{2} \Biggr)^{1/2} \Biggl(\sum _{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}}f^{2}(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i}) \leq\frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta}} \biggr\} \Biggr)^{1/2} \Biggr)^{2} \\ &\ll \Biggl(\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{1}{i^{2}} \Biggr) \Biggl(\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \biggl( \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f^{2}(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi (x)+ \theta_{i}\frac{k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}} \biggr) \Biggr) \\ &\ll\frac{1}{2^{k}} \Biggl(2^{k} \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f^{2}(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi (x)+ \frac{k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}}\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}}\theta _{i} \Biggr) \\ &\ll \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}\frac{e^{x^{2}/2}}{(1+|x|)^{2\alpha}}\,\mathrm {d}x+\frac{k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}} \sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}}\frac {\theta_{i}}{i}. \end{aligned}$$
By the same methods as that on p.72 of Berkes et al. [5], we get
$$\int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}\frac{e^{x^{2}/2}}{(1+|x|)^{2\alpha}}\,\mathrm{d}x\ll \frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta+(\alpha+1)/2}}. $$
Now we estimate \(\theta_{i}\). By Lemma 2.1, for any \(\varepsilon>0\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \theta_{i} =&\sup_{x} \biggl\vert G_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ \leq&\sup_{x} \bigl\vert G_{i}(x)-F_{i}(x) \bigr\vert +\sup_{x} \biggl\vert F_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ =&\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P(Y_{i}\leq x)-P \biggl( \frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt {i}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert +\varepsilon_{i} \\ \leq&\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P(Y_{i}\leq x)-P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt {10i/3}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert + \sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr)-P \biggl( \frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert +\varepsilon _{i} \\ \leq&\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}+R_{i} \leq x \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x+\varepsilon \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ &{} +\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x+\varepsilon \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ &{} +\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert + \varepsilon_{i} \\ \leq& P \bigl(\vert R_{i}\vert \geq\varepsilon \bigr)+\sup _{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac {S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x+ \varepsilon \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac {S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ &{}+ \sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert + \varepsilon_{i}. \end{aligned}$$
By the Markov inequality and (2.1), we have
$$P \bigl(\vert R_{i}\vert \geq\varepsilon \bigr)\leq \frac{\mathbb{E}|R_{i}|}{\varepsilon}\ll \frac{\log i}{\sqrt{i}\varepsilon}. $$
By Lemma 2.2, we have
$$\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x+ \varepsilon \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert \ll \varepsilon. $$
By the Berry-Esseen inequality, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}}\leq x \biggr)-P \biggl(\frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}}\leq x \biggr) \biggr\vert \\& \quad \leq\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}} \leq x \biggr)-\Phi(x) \biggr\vert +\sup_{x} \biggl\vert P \biggl(\frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt {i}}\leq x \biggr)-\Phi(x) \biggr\vert \\& \quad \ll\frac{1}{i^{1/2}}+\frac{1}{i^{1/2}}. \end{aligned}$$
Let \(\varepsilon=i^{-1/3}\), then
$$\theta_{i}\ll\frac{\log i}{i^{1/6}}+ \frac{1}{i^{1/3}}+ \frac {1}{i^{1/2}}+\varepsilon_{i}. $$
Therefore, there exists \(\varepsilon_{0}>0\) such that
$$\theta_{i}\ll\frac{1}{i^{\varepsilon_{0}}}+\varepsilon_{i}. $$
By Theorem 1 of Friedman et al. [9], we have
$$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{\varepsilon_{i}}{i}< \infty. $$
Hence
$$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{\theta_{i}}{i}\ll\sum _{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{\frac {1}{i^{\varepsilon_{0}}}+\varepsilon_{i}}{i}< \infty. $$
By the fact that \((\alpha+1)/2>\beta\), we have
$$\sum_{k=1}^{N}\mathbb{E} \bigl(Z_{k}^{*} \bigr)^{2}\ll\sum_{k=1}^{N} \frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta+(\alpha+1)/2}} +\sum_{k=1}^{N} \frac{k^{2}}{(\log k)^{2\beta}}\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{\theta_{i}}{i}\ll\frac{N^{2}}{(\log N)^{2\beta}}. $$
We complete the proof of Lemma 2.4. □
Lemma 2.5
Under the conditions of Theorem  1.1, for \(l\geq l_{0}\), we have
$$\bigl\vert \operatorname{Cov} \bigl(Z_{k}^{*},Z_{l}^{*} \bigr) \bigr\vert \ll\frac{kl}{(\log k)^{\beta }(\log l)^{\beta}}2^{-(l-k)\tau}, $$
where τ is a constant \(0<\tau\leq1/8\).
Proof
For \(1\leq i \leq j/2\), \(j\geq j_{0}\) and any x, y, we first prove
$$ \bigl\vert P(Y_{i}\leq x,Y_{j}\leq y)-P(Y_{i} \leq x)P(Y_{j}\leq y) \bigr\vert \ll \biggl(\frac {i}{j} \biggr)^{\tau}. $$
(2.3)
Let \(\rho=\frac{i}{j}\). By the Chebyshev inequality, we have
$$P \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10j/3}} \biggr\vert \geq\rho^{1/8} \biggr) =P \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10i/3}} \biggr\vert \geq\sqrt{ \frac {j}{i}} {\rho}^{1/8} \biggr)\leq\frac{i}{j} \rho^{-1/4}\leq{\rho }^{1/8}\leq\rho^{\tau_{1}}, $$
where \(\tau_{1}\) is a constant \(0<\tau_{1}\leq1/8\).
By the Markov inequality and (2.1), for \(j\geq j_{0}\), we have
$$P \bigl(\vert R_{j}\vert \geq\rho^{1/8} \bigr)\leq \frac{\mathbb{E}|R_{j}|}{\rho^{1/8}}\ll \frac{\log j}{j^{1/2}\rho^{1/8}} =\rho^{1/8}\frac{\log j}{j^{1/4}i^{1/4}}\ll \rho^{\tau_{2}}, $$
where \(\tau_{2}\) is a constant, \(0<\tau_{2}\leq1/8\).
By the Markov inequality, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& P \biggl( \biggl\vert \sqrt{1-\rho}\frac{c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt {10(j-i)/3}} \biggr\vert \geq \rho^{1/8} \biggr) \\& \quad =P \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac{\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{i}} \biggr\vert \geq\sqrt{ \frac {10/3j}{i}}\frac{1}{c_{i+1,j}}{\rho}^{1/8} \biggr) \\& \quad \leq\frac{3}{10}{\rho}^{3/4}(c_{i+1,j})^{2}= \frac{3}{10}{\rho }^{3/4}(2b_{i+1,j}-2d_{i+1,j})^{2} \\& \quad =\frac{3}{10}{\rho}^{3/4} \Biggl[ \Biggl(2\sum _{k=i+1}^{j}\frac{1}{k} \Biggr)^{2}+4 \biggl(\frac {j+1-i-1}{j+1} \biggr)^{2}-8 \Biggl(\sum _{k=i+1}^{j}\frac{1}{k} \Biggr) \frac {j+1-i-1}{j+1} \Biggr] \\& \quad \ll{\rho}^{3/4} \biggl[ \biggl(\log \frac{j}{i} \biggr)^{2}+ \biggl(\frac {j-i}{j+1} \biggr)^{2}- \frac{j-i}{j+1}\log \frac{j}{i} \biggr] \\& \quad \ll\rho^{\tau_{3}}, \end{aligned}$$
where \(\tau_{3}\) is a constant that satisfies \(0<\tau_{3}\leq1/8\).
By Lemma 2.2 and the fact that \(\rho=\frac{i}{j}\), \(1\leq i \leq j/2\), we have
$$P \biggl(y-3{\rho}^{1/8}\leq\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}}\leq y \biggr)\ll\frac{{\rho}^{1/8}}{\sqrt{1-\rho}}\ll\rho^{1/8}. $$
Set \(\tau=\min\{\tau_{1},\tau_{2},\tau_{3},1/8\}\), we get
$$\begin{aligned}& P(Y_{i}\leq x,Y_{j}\leq y) \\& \quad =P \biggl(Y_{i}\leq x,\frac{S_{j,j}}{\sqrt{10j/3}}+R_{j}\leq y \biggr) \\& \quad =P \biggl(Y_{i}\leq x,\frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10j/3}}+\sqrt{1-\rho} \frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} +\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac{c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt {10(j-i)/3}}+R_{j}\leq y \biggr) \\& \quad \geq P \biggl(Y_{i}\leq x,\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr) \\& \qquad {} -P \biggl(y-3{\rho}^{1/8}\leq\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr)-P \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac{S_{i,i}}{\sqrt{10j/3}} \biggr\vert \geq\rho ^{1/8} \biggr) \\& \qquad {} -P \biggl( \biggl\vert \sqrt{1-\rho}\frac{c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt {10(j-i)/3}} \biggr\vert \geq\rho^{1/8} \biggr) -P \bigl(\vert R_{j}\vert \geq \rho^{1/8} \bigr) \\& \quad \geq P \biggl(Y_{i}\leq x,\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr)-\rho^{\tau} \\& \quad = P(Y_{i}\leq x)P \biggl(\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr)-\rho^{\tau}. \end{aligned}$$
We can get a similar upper estimate for \(P(Y_{i}\leq x,Y_{j}\leq y)\) in the same way. Thus there exists some constant M such that
$$P(Y_{i}\leq x,Y_{j}\leq y)=P(Y_{i}\leq x)P \biggl(\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr)+M\rho^{\tau}. $$
A similar argument,
$$P(Y_{i}\leq x)P(Y_{j}\leq y)=p(Y_{i}\leq x)P \biggl(\sqrt{1-\rho}\frac {S_{j,j}-S_{i,i}-c_{i+1,j}\widetilde{S}_{i}}{\sqrt{10(j-i)/3}} \leq y \biggr)+M' \rho^{\tau}, $$
holds for some constant \(M'\). Thus we prove that (2.3) holds.
Let \(G_{i,j}(x,y)\) be the joint distribution function of \(Y_{i}\) and \(Y_{j}\). By (2.2) and (2.3), for \(2^{k}< i\leq2^{k+1}\), \(2^{l}< j\leq 2^{l+1}\), \(l-k\geq3\), \(l\geq l_{0}\), we can get
$$\begin{aligned}& \biggl\vert \operatorname{Cov} \biggl(f(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i})\leq\frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta}} \biggr\} ,f(Y_{j})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{j})\leq\frac{l}{(\log l)^{\beta}} \biggr\} \biggr) \biggr\vert \\& \quad = \biggl\vert \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}} \int_{|y|\leq a_{l}}f(x)f(y)\,\mathrm {d} \bigl(G_{i,j}(x,y)-G_{i}(x)G_{j}(y) \bigr) \biggr\vert \\& \quad \ll\frac{kl}{(\log k)^{\beta}(\log l)^{\beta}} \biggl(\frac {i}{j} \biggr)^{\tau} \ll \frac{kl}{(\log k)^{\beta}(\log l)^{\beta }}2^{-(l-k-1)\tau}. \end{aligned}$$
Thus we have
$$\bigl\vert \operatorname{Cov} \bigl(Z_{k}^{*},Z_{l}^{*} \bigr) \bigr\vert \ll\frac{kl}{(\log k)^{\beta }(\log l)^{\beta}}2^{-(l-k)\tau}. $$
We complete the proof of Lemma 2.5. □
Lemma 2.6
Under the conditions of Theorem  1.1, denoting \(\eta _{k}=Z_{k}^{*}-\mathbb{E}Z_{k}^{*}\), we have
$$\mathbb{E} \Biggl(\sum_{k=1}^{N} \eta_{k} \Biggr)^{2}=O \biggl(\frac{N^{2}}{(\log N)^{2\beta-1}} \biggr). $$
Proof
It follows from Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.5 that Lemma 2.6 also holds true. The proof is similar to that of Lemma 4 of Berkes et al. [5]. So we omit it here. □

3 Proof of theorem

By Lemma 2.6, we have
$$\mathbb{E} \Biggl(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^{N} \eta_{k} \Biggr)^{2}=O \bigl((\log N)^{1-2\beta} \bigr). $$
Letting \(N_{k}=[e^{k\lambda}]\), \((2\beta-1)^{-1}<\lambda<1\), we get
$$\mathbb{E} \Biggl(\frac{1}{N_{k}}\sum_{k=1}^{N_{k}} \eta_{k} \Biggr)^{2}< \infty, $$
which implies
$$ \lim_{k \to\infty}\frac{1}{N_{k}}\sum_{k=1}^{N_{k}}{ \eta}_{k}=0\quad \mbox{a.s.} $$
(3.1)
Note that for \(2^{k}< i\leq2^{k+1}\),
$$\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{E}f(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i})\leq\frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta }} \biggr\} \\& \quad = \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}G_{i}(x) = \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr)+ \int _{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d} \biggl(G_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr) \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)
Set \(a=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi(x)\). Noting that \(\sigma_{i}\leq1\), \(\lim_{i \to\infty}\sigma_{i}=1\), we have
$$ \lim_{k \to\infty}\sup_{2^{k}< i\leq2^{k+1}} \biggl\vert \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr)-a \biggr\vert =0. $$
(3.3)
Then by (3.2), (3.3), and (2.2) we get
$$\begin{aligned}& \biggl\vert \mathbb{E}f(Y_{i})I \biggl\{ f(Y_{i})\leq \frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta}} \biggr\} -a \biggr\vert \\& \quad \leq \biggl\vert \int_{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma_{i}} \biggr)-a \biggr\vert + \biggl\vert \int _{|x|\leq a_{k}}f(x)\,\mathrm{d} \biggl(G_{i}(x)-\Phi \biggl(\frac{x}{\sigma _{i}} \biggr) \biggr) \biggr\vert \\& \quad \leq o_{k}(1)+\frac{k\theta_{i}}{(\log k)^{\beta}}. \end{aligned}$$
Thus
$$\mathbb{E}Z_{k}^{*}=a\sum_{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{1}{i}+\zeta_{k}\frac {k}{(\log k)^{\beta}}\sum _{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{\theta_{i}}{i}+o_{k}(1), \quad |\zeta_{k}|\leq1. $$
Using \(\sum_{i=1}^{L}1/i=\log L+O(1)\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty }\frac{\theta_{i}}{i}<\infty\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \frac{\mathbb{E}(\sum_{k=1}^{N}Z_{k}^{*})}{\log 2^{N+1}}-a \biggr\vert &\ll\frac{1}{N}\sum _{k=1}^{N}\frac{k}{(\log k)^{\beta}}\sum _{i=2^{k}+1}^{2^{k+1}} \frac{\theta_{i}}{i}+o_{N}(1) \\ &=O \bigl((\log N)^{-\beta} \bigr)+o_{N}(1) \\ &=o_{N}(1). \end{aligned}$$
Thus by (3.1), we get
$$\lim_{k \to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{N_{k}}Z_{k}^{*}}{\log 2^{N_{k}+1}}=a\quad \mbox{a.s.} $$
Then by Lemma 2.3, we have
$$ \lim_{k \to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{N_{k}}Z_{k}}{\log 2^{N_{k}+1}}=a\quad \mbox{a.s.} $$
(3.4)
The relation \(\lambda<1\) implies \(\lim_{k \to\infty}N_{k+1}/N_{k}=1\), thus (3.4) and the positivity of the \(Z_{k}\) yield
$$\lim_{N \to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{N}Z_{k}}{\log 2^{N+1}}=a\quad \mbox{a.s.}, $$
i.e. (1.6) holds for the subsequence \(N=2^{k}\). Using again the positivity of the terms, we get (1.6). We complete the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and the referees for their very valuable comments by which the quality of the paper has been improved. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71271042) and the Guangxi China Science Foundation (2013GXNSFAA278003). It is also supported by the Research Project of Guangxi High Institution (YB2014150).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

FF conceived of the study and drafted and completed the manuscript. DW participated in the discussion of the manuscript. FF and DW read and approved the final manuscript.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rempala, G, Wesolowski, J: Asymptotics for products of sums and U-statistics. Electron. Commun. Probab. 7, 47-54 (2002) CrossRefMathSciNet Rempala, G, Wesolowski, J: Asymptotics for products of sums and U-statistics. Electron. Commun. Probab. 7, 47-54 (2002) CrossRefMathSciNet
2.
go back to reference Gonchigdanzan, K, Rempala, G: A note on the almost sure limit theorem for the product of partial sums. Appl. Math. Lett. 19, 191-196 (2006) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH Gonchigdanzan, K, Rempala, G: A note on the almost sure limit theorem for the product of partial sums. Appl. Math. Lett. 19, 191-196 (2006) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH
3.
go back to reference Tan, ZQ, Peng, ZX: Almost sure central limit theorem for the product of partial sums. Acta Math. Sci. 29, 1689-1698 (2009) MathSciNetMATH Tan, ZQ, Peng, ZX: Almost sure central limit theorem for the product of partial sums. Acta Math. Sci. 29, 1689-1698 (2009) MathSciNetMATH
4.
go back to reference Zhang, Y, Yang, XY, Dong, ZS: An almost sure central limit theorem for products of sums of partial sums under association. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 355, 708-716 (2009) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH Zhang, Y, Yang, XY, Dong, ZS: An almost sure central limit theorem for products of sums of partial sums under association. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 355, 708-716 (2009) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH
5.
go back to reference Berkes, I, Csáki, E, Horváth, L: Almost sure central limit theorems under minimal conditions. Stat. Probab. Lett. 37, 67-76 (1998) CrossRefMATH Berkes, I, Csáki, E, Horváth, L: Almost sure central limit theorems under minimal conditions. Stat. Probab. Lett. 37, 67-76 (1998) CrossRefMATH
6.
go back to reference Wu, QY: Almost sure central limit theory for products of sums of partial sums. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. Ser. B 27, 169-180 (2012) CrossRefMATH Wu, QY: Almost sure central limit theory for products of sums of partial sums. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. Ser. B 27, 169-180 (2012) CrossRefMATH
7.
go back to reference Petrov, V: Sums of Independent Random Variables. Springer, New York (1975) CrossRef Petrov, V: Sums of Independent Random Variables. Springer, New York (1975) CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Friedman, N, Katz, M, Koopmans, LH: Convergence rates for the central limit theorem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 1062-1065 (1966) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH Friedman, N, Katz, M, Koopmans, LH: Convergence rates for the central limit theorem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 1062-1065 (1966) CrossRefMathSciNetMATH
Metadata
Title
Almost sure central limit theorem for products of sums of partial sums
Authors
Fengxiang Feng
Dingcheng Wang
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-0995-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner