Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Autonomous Robots 4/2013

01-11-2013

An anytime assignment algorithm: From local task swapping to global optimality

Authors: Lantao Liu, Dylan A. Shell

Published in: Autonomous Robots | Issue 4/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The assignment problem arises in multi-robot task-allocation scenarios. Inspired by existing techniques that employ task exchanges between robots, this paper introduces an algorithm for solving the assignment problem that has several appealing features for online, distributed robotics applications. The method may start with any initial matching and incrementally improve the current solution to reach the global optimum, producing valid assignments at any intermediate point. It is an any-time algorithm with a performance profile that is attractive: quality improves linearly with stages (or time). Additionally, the algorithm is comparatively straightforward to implement and is efficient both theoretically (complexity of \(O(n^3\lg n)\) is better than many widely used solvers) and practically (comparable to the fastest implementation, for up to hundreds of robots/tasks). The algorithm generalizes “swap” primitives used by existing task exchange methods already used in the robotics community but, uniquely, is able to obtain global optimality via communication with only a subset of robots during each stage. We present a centralized version of the algorithm and two decentralized variants that trade between computational and communication complexity. The centralized version turns out to be a computational improvement and reinterpretation of the little-known method of Balinski–Gomory proposed half a century ago. Thus, deeper understanding of the relationship between approximate swap-based techniques—developed by roboticists—and combinatorial optimization techniques, e.g., the Hungarian and Auction algorithms—developed by operations researchers but used extensively by roboticists—is uncovered.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The algorithm was first presented in the 2012 Robotics: Science and Systems conference (Liu and Shell 2012a).
 
2
Every traversed entry on the path segments, no matter whether it is assigned or unassigned, must connect to a new entry in other rows, requiring a message be passed. The number is approximately half of all the traversed entries since each entry is counted twice for the analysis of communication complexity.
 
Literature
go back to reference Akgül, M. (1992). The linear assignment problem. In M. Akgiil & S. Tufecki (Eds.), Combinatorial optimization (pp. 85–122). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Akgül, M. (1992). The linear assignment problem. In M. Akgiil & S. Tufecki (Eds.), Combinatorial optimization (pp. 85–122). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Balinski, M. L., & Gomory, R. E. (1964). A primal method for the assignment and transportation problems. Management Science, 10(3), 578–593.CrossRef Balinski, M. L., & Gomory, R. E. (1964). A primal method for the assignment and transportation problems. Management Science, 10(3), 578–593.CrossRef
go back to reference Berhault, M., Huang, H., Keskinocak, P., Koenig, S., Elmaghraby, W., Griffin, P., & Kleywegt, A. J. (2003). Robot Exploration with Combinatorial Auctions (pp. 1957–1962). In Proceedings of the IROS. Berhault, M., Huang, H., Keskinocak, P., Koenig, S., Elmaghraby, W., Griffin, P., & Kleywegt, A. J. (2003). Robot Exploration with Combinatorial Auctions (pp. 1957–1962). In Proceedings of the IROS.
go back to reference Bertsekas, D. P. (1990). The auction algorithm for assignment and other network flow problems: A tutorial. Interfaces, 20(4), 133–149.CrossRef Bertsekas, D. P. (1990). The auction algorithm for assignment and other network flow problems: A tutorial. Interfaces, 20(4), 133–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Burkard, R., Dell’Amico, M., & Martello, S. (2009). Assignment problems. New York, NY: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.MATHCrossRef Burkard, R., Dell’Amico, M., & Martello, S. (2009). Assignment problems. New York, NY: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Cao, Y. U., Fukunaga, A. S., & Kahng, A. B. (1997). Cooperative mobile robotics: Antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, 4, 226–234.CrossRef Cao, Y. U., Fukunaga, A. S., & Kahng, A. B. (1997). Cooperative mobile robotics: Antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, 4, 226–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Chaimowicz, L., Campos, M. F. M., & Kumar, V. (2002). Dynamic role assignment for cooperative robots (pp. 293–298). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Chaimowicz, L., Campos, M. F. M., & Kumar, V. (2002). Dynamic role assignment for cooperative robots (pp. 293–298). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
go back to reference Cunningham, W., & Marsh, A. B, I. (1978). A primal algorithm for optimum matching. Mathematical Programming Study, 8, 50–72. Cunningham, W., & Marsh, A. B, I. (1978). A primal algorithm for optimum matching. Mathematical Programming Study, 8, 50–72.
go back to reference Dantzig, G. (1963). Linear programming and extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.MATH Dantzig, G. (1963). Linear programming and extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.MATH
go back to reference Dias, M.B., & Stentz, A. (2002). Opportunistic optimization for market-based multirobot control (pp. 2714–2720 ). In Proceedings of the IROS. Dias, M.B., & Stentz, A. (2002). Opportunistic optimization for market-based multirobot control (pp. 2714–2720 ). In Proceedings of the IROS.
go back to reference Dias, M. B., Zlot, R., Kalra, N., & Stentz, A. (2006). Market-based multirobot coordination: A survey and analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE. Dias, M. B., Zlot, R., Kalra, N., & Stentz, A. (2006). Market-based multirobot coordination: A survey and analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE.
go back to reference Edmonds, J., & Karp, R. M. (1972). Theoretical improvements in algorithmic efficiency for network flow problems. Journal of the ACM, 19(2), 248–264.MATHCrossRef Edmonds, J., & Karp, R. M. (1972). Theoretical improvements in algorithmic efficiency for network flow problems. Journal of the ACM, 19(2), 248–264.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., & Ziparo, V. A. (2006). Assignment of dynamically perceived tasks by token passing in multi-robot systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Multi-robot Systems. Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., & Ziparo, V. A. (2006). Assignment of dynamically perceived tasks by token passing in multi-robot systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Multi-robot Systems.
go back to reference Gerkey, B. P., & Matarić, M. J. (2004). A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems. International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(9), 939–954.CrossRef Gerkey, B. P., & Matarić, M. J. (2004). A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems. International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(9), 939–954.CrossRef
go back to reference Giordani, S., Lujak, M., & Martinelli, F. (2010). A distributed algorithm for the multi-robot task allocation problem. LNCS: Trends in Applied Intelligent Systems, 6096, 721–730.CrossRef Giordani, S., Lujak, M., & Martinelli, F. (2010). A distributed algorithm for the multi-robot task allocation problem. LNCS: Trends in Applied Intelligent Systems, 6096, 721–730.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldberg, A. V., & Kennedy, R. (1995). An efficient cost scaling algorithm for the assignment problem. Mathematics Programs, 71(2), 153–177.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Goldberg, A. V., & Kennedy, R. (1995). An efficient cost scaling algorithm for the assignment problem. Mathematics Programs, 71(2), 153–177.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., & Rizzi, S. (1997). Multi-agent path planning based on task-swap negotiation (pp. 69–82). In Proceedings of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group, Workshop. Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., & Rizzi, S. (1997). Multi-agent path planning based on task-swap negotiation (pp. 69–82). In Proceedings of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group, Workshop.
go back to reference Koenig, S., Keskinocak, P., & Tovey, C. A. (2010). Progress on agent coordination with cooperative auctions. In Proceedings of the AAAI. Koenig, S., Keskinocak, P., & Tovey, C. A. (2010). Progress on agent coordination with cooperative auctions. In Proceedings of the AAAI.
go back to reference Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistic Quarterly, 2, 83–97.CrossRef Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistic Quarterly, 2, 83–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Lagoudakis, M. G., Markakis, E., Kempe, D., Keskinocak, P., Kleywegt, A., Koenig, S., et al. (2005). Auction-based multi-robot routing. In Robotics: Science and Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. Lagoudakis, M. G., Markakis, E., Kempe, D., Keskinocak, P., Kleywegt, A., Koenig, S., et al. (2005). Auction-based multi-robot routing. In Robotics: Science and Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2011). Assessing optimal assignment under uncertainty: An interval-based algorithm. International Journal of Robotics Research, 30(7), 936–953.CrossRef Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2011). Assessing optimal assignment under uncertainty: An interval-based algorithm. International Journal of Robotics Research, 30(7), 936–953.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2012a). A distributable and computation-flexible assignment algorithm: From local task swapping to global optimality. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Sydney, Australia. Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2012a). A distributable and computation-flexible assignment algorithm: From local task swapping to global optimality. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Sydney, Australia.
go back to reference Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2012b). Large-scale multi-robot task allocation via dynamic partitioning and distribution. Autonomous Robots, 33(3), 291–307.CrossRef Liu, L., & Shell, D. (2012b). Large-scale multi-robot task allocation via dynamic partitioning and distribution. Autonomous Robots, 33(3), 291–307.CrossRef
go back to reference Nanjanath, M., & Gini, M. (2006). Dynamic task allocation for robots via auctions (pp. 2781–2786). In Proceedings of the ICRA. Nanjanath, M., & Gini, M. (2006). Dynamic task allocation for robots via auctions (pp. 2781–2786). In Proceedings of the ICRA.
go back to reference Parker, L. E. (2008). Multiple mobile robot systems. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Handbook of robotics chapter 40. Berlin: Springer. Parker, L. E. (2008). Multiple mobile robot systems. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Handbook of robotics chapter 40. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Sandholm, T. (1998). Contract types for satisficing task allocation: I Theoretical results (pp. 68–75). In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Satisficing Models. Sandholm, T. (1998). Contract types for satisficing task allocation: I Theoretical results (pp. 68–75). In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Satisficing Models.
go back to reference Sariel, S., & Balch, T. (2006). A distributed multi-robot cooperation framework for real time task achievement. In Proceedings of Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Sariel, S., & Balch, T. (2006). A distributed multi-robot cooperation framework for real time task achievement. In Proceedings of Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems.
go back to reference Stone, P., Kaminka, G. A., Kraus, S., & Rosenschein, J. S. (2010). Ad Hoc autonomous agent teams: Collaboration without pre-coordination. In Proceedings of the AAAI. Stone, P., Kaminka, G. A., Kraus, S., & Rosenschein, J. S. (2010). Ad Hoc autonomous agent teams: Collaboration without pre-coordination. In Proceedings of the AAAI.
go back to reference Thomas, L., Rachid, A., & Simon, L. (2004). A distributed tasks allocation scheme in multi-UAV context (pp. 3622–3627). In Proceedings of the ICRA. Thomas, L., Rachid, A., & Simon, L. (2004). A distributed tasks allocation scheme in multi-UAV context (pp. 3622–3627). In Proceedings of the ICRA.
go back to reference Wawerla, J., & Vaughan, R. T. (2009). Robot task switching under diminishing returns (pp. 5033–5038). In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent robots and systems, IROS’09. Wawerla, J., & Vaughan, R. T. (2009). Robot task switching under diminishing returns (pp. 5033–5038). In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent robots and systems, IROS’09.
go back to reference Zavlanos, M. M., Spesivtsev, L., & Pappas, G. J. (2008). A distributed auction algorithm for the assignment problem. In Proceedings of the CDC. Zavlanos, M. M., Spesivtsev, L., & Pappas, G. J. (2008). A distributed auction algorithm for the assignment problem. In Proceedings of the CDC.
go back to reference Zheng, X., & Koenig, S. (2009). K-swaps: cooperative negotiation for solving task-allocation problems (pp. 373–378). In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Zheng, X., & Koenig, S. (2009). K-swaps: cooperative negotiation for solving task-allocation problems (pp. 373–378). In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
go back to reference Zilberstein, S. (1996). Using anytime algorithms in intelligent systems. AI Magazine, 17(3), 73–83. Zilberstein, S. (1996). Using anytime algorithms in intelligent systems. AI Magazine, 17(3), 73–83.
Metadata
Title
An anytime assignment algorithm: From local task swapping to global optimality
Authors
Lantao Liu
Dylan A. Shell
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Autonomous Robots / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0929-5593
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7527
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9351-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Autonomous Robots 4/2013 Go to the issue