Top

Operations Management Research

Published in:

07-06-2023

An efficiency-based aggregate production planning model for multi-line manufacturing systems

Authors: S. Ali Naji Nasrabadi Yazd, Amirhossein Salamirad, Siamak Kheybari, Alessio Ishizaka

Published in: Operations Management Research | Issue 4/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Aggregate production planning (APP) is a medium-term planning in the production system, which determines the optimal production plan in the planning horizon. To allocate the optimal production quantity to the production lines, we propose an efficiency-based APP to multi-line manufacturing systems. For that purpose, first, considering the line efficiency factors, we calculate the efficiency score of production lines with an extension of data envelopment analysis (namely DEA-AR). Pollution rate, defective product rate, production capacity, downtime, and electricity consumption are the criteria employed to calculate the efficiency of production lines. Then, using the result of DEA as a parameter, we develop a bi-objectives integer mathematical model that allocates the most production to efficient lines while minimizing total production costs considering loading constraints. To solve the proposed model, the ℇ-constraint method is employed. We evaluate the performance of the multi-line APP using a set of data collected from a plastic production factory. Results indicate that in using the proposed model, both efficiency and production costs are appropriately satisfied in the efficiency-based APP. The proposed framework is generic and provides the managers of different manufacturing organizations with a powerful tool to deal with medium-term planning by taking the line efficiency into account.

previous article Adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain operations: a comprehensive literature study analysis

next article A multi objective input–output model to select optimal strategies under COVID-19 conditions: In the pharmaceutical industry

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Amindoust A (2018) A resilient-sustainable based supplier selection model using a hybrid intelligent method. Comput Ind Eng 126:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.031CrossRef

Bazargan-Lari MR, Taghipour S, Zaretalab A, Sharifi M (2022) Production scheduling optimization for a parallel machine subject to physical distancing due to COVID-19. Oper Manag Res 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00233-9

Bian Y (2012) A Gram-Schmidt process based approach for improving DEA discrimination in the presence of large dimensionality of data set. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3793–3799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.080CrossRef

Campo EA, Cano JA, Gómez-Montoya RA (2018) Linear programming for aggregate production planning in a textile company. Fibres Text East Eur. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.2525CrossRef

Cao Y, Wang Q, Du J, Nojavan S, Jermsittiparsert K, Ghadimi N (2019) Optimal operation of CCHP and renewable generation-based energy hub considering environmental perspective: An epsilon constraint and fuzzy methods. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 20:100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2019.100274

Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8CrossRef

Chen Y-K, Liao H-C (2003) An investigation on selection of simplified aggregate production planning strategies using MADM approaches. Int J Prod Res 41(14):3359–3374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000118107CrossRef

Ebrahimi B, Khalili M (2018) A new integrated AR-IDEA model to find the best DMU in the presence of both weight restrictions and imprecise data. Comput Ind Eng 125:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.008CrossRef

Entezaminia A, Heydari M, Rahmani D (2016) A multi-objective model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a green supply chain: Considering collection and recycling centers. J Manuf Syst 40:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.06.004CrossRef

Erfanian M, Pirayesh M (2016) Integration aggregate production planning and maintenance using mixed integer linear programming. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), (pp. 927–930). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798013

Farzam Rad M, Shirouyehzad H (2014) Proposing an Aggregate Production Planning Model by Goal Programming Approach, a Case Study. Data Envelop Anal Decision Sci 1–13

Hahn GJ, Kaiser C, Kuhn H, Perdu L, Vandaele NJ (2012) Enhancing aggregate production planning with an integrated stochastic queuing model. In: Operations Research Proceedings 2011, (pp. 451–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.5899/2014/dea-00061

Hashimoto A (1997) A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. Eur J Oper Res 97(3):600–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00281-0CrossRef

Hongmei G, Zhihua W, Dandan J, Guoxing C, Liping J (2015) Fuzzy evaluation on seismic behavior of reservoir dams during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Eng Geol 197:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.023CrossRef

Huang B, Zhang L, Ma L, Bai W, Ren J (2021) Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index. Energy 228:120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120481

Jahanshahloo GR, Sanei M, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Saleh H (2009) A comment on “A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems.” Comput Ind Eng 56(4):1713–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.10.021CrossRef

Jamalnia A, Soukhakian MA (2009) A hybrid fuzzy goal programming approach with different goal priorities to aggregate production planning. Comput Ind Eng 56(4):1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.010CrossRef

Jang J, Do Chung B (2020) Aggregate production planning considering implementation error: A robust optimization approach using bi-level particle swarm optimization. Comput Ind Eng 142:106367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106367

Kia R (2020) A genetic algorithm to integrate a comprehensive dynamic cellular manufacturing system with aggregate planning decisions. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 15(2):138–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2019.1655674CrossRef

Klement N, Abdeljaouad MA, Porto L, Silva C (2021) Lot-sizing and scheduling for the plastic injection molding industry—A hybrid optimization approach. Appl Sci 11(3):1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031202CrossRef

Kong W-H, Fu T-T (2012) Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega 40(5):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.10.004CrossRef

Lai PL, Potter A, Beynon M, Beresford A (2015) Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique. Transport Policy 42:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.008CrossRef

Leung SC, Chan SS (2009) A goal programming model for aggregate production planning with resource utilization constraint. Comput Ind Eng 56(3):1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.017CrossRef

Liang L, Li Y, Li S (2009) Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimensionality of data sets with PCA. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5895–5899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.022CrossRef

Lisboa JV, Gomes CF, Yasin MM (2012) Improving Organizational Efficiency: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Aggregate Production Planning. Int J Manag 29(2):792

Liu ST (2008) A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 54(1):66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.035CrossRef

Liu ST, Chuang M (2009) Fuzzy efficiency measures in fuzzy DEA/AR with application to university libraries. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.013CrossRef

Lu S, Ren J, Lee CK, Zhang L (2022) Spatial-temporal energy poverty analysis of China from subnational perspective. J Clean Prod 341:130907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130907

Lu W, Park SH, Huang T, Yeo GT (2019) An analysis for Chinese airport efficiency using weighted variables and adopting CFPR. Asian J Shipp Logist 35(4):230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.010CrossRef

Mehdizadeh E, Abkenar AA (2014) Harmony search algorithm for solving two aggregate production planning models with breakdowns and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the International Management Conference, (Vol. 8, pp. 306–320). Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Mehdizadeh E, Niaki STA, Hemati M (2018) A bi-objective aggregate production planning problem with learning effect and machine deterioration: Modeling and solution. Comput Oper Res 91:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.11.001CrossRef

Méndez CA, Cerdá J, Grossmann IE, Harjunkoski I, Fahl M (2006) State-of-the-art review of optimization methods for short-term scheduling of batch processes. Comput Chem Eng 30(6–7):913–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.008CrossRef

Modarres M, Izadpanahi E (2016) Aggregate production planning by focusing on energy saving: A robust optimization approach. J Clean Prod 133:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.133CrossRef

Nojavan S, Majidi M, Najafi-Ghalelou A, Ghahramani M, Zare K (2017) A cost-emission model for fuel cell/PV/battery hybrid energy system in the presence of demand response program: ε-constraint method and fuzzy satisfying approach. Energy Convers Manage 138:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.003CrossRef

Nouri A, Khodaei H, Darvishan A, Sharifian S, Ghadimi N (2018) Optimal performance of fuel cell-CHP-battery based micro-grid under real-time energy management: An epsilon constraint method and fuzzy satisfying approach. Energy 159:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.141CrossRef

Omar MK, Jusoh MM, Omar M (2012) Investigating the benefits of fuzzy mathematical programming approach for solving aggregate production planning. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2012.6251368

Omar MK, Jusoh MM, Omar M (2013) Fmilp Formulation for aggregate production planning. World Appl Sci J 21. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2012.6251368

Ouchi F (2004) A literature review on the use of expert opinion in probabilistic risk analysis

Phruksaphanrat B (2011a) Preemptive possibilistic linear programming: Application to aggregate production planning. Int J Ind Manuf Eng 5(8):1592-1599. 10.5281/zenodo.1334153

Phruksaphanrat B, Ohsato A, Yenradee P (2011b) Aggregate production planning with fuzzy demand and variable system capacity based on theory of constraints measures. Int J Ind Eng 18(5)

Pradenas L, Alvarez C, Ferland J (2009) A solution for the aggregate production planning problem in a multi-plant, multi-period and multi-product environment. Acta Math Vietnam 34(1):11–17

Raa B, Dullaert W, Aghezzaf E-H (2013) A matheuristic for aggregate production–distribution planning with mould sharing. Int J Prod Econ 145(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.006CrossRef

Rahmani D, Zandi A, Behdad S, Entezaminia A (2019) A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines. Oper Res 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00451-x

Rakes TR, Franz LS, James Wynne A (1984) Aggregate production planning using chance-constrained goal programming. Int J Prod Res 22(4):673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548408942487CrossRef

Rasmi SAB, Kazan C, Türkay M (2019) A multi-criteria decision analysis to include environmental, social, and cultural issues in the sustainable aggregate production plans. Comput Ind Eng 132:348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.036CrossRef

Ray SC, Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) Market entity behavior of Chinese state-owned enterprises. Omega 26(2):263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00044-3CrossRef

Ríos-Solís YÁ, Ibarra-Rojas OJ, Cabo M, Possani E (2020) A heuristic based on mathematical programming for a lot-sizing and scheduling problem in mold-injection production. Eur J Oper Res 284(3):861–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.016CrossRef

Sequeira M, Adlemo A, Hilletofth P (2022) A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions. Oper Manag Res 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00284-6

Seyfi SA, Yılmaz G, Yanıkoğlu İ, Garip A (2022) Capacitated Stochastic Lot-sizing and Production Planning Problem Under Demand Uncertainty. IFAC-PapersOnLine 55(10):2731–2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.130CrossRef

Tadić S, Krstić M, Brnjac N (2019) Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals. J Transp Geogr 78:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.004CrossRef

Takey FM, Mesquita MA (2006) Aggregate Planning for a Large Food Manufacturer with High Seasonal Demand. Braz J Oper Prod Manag 3(1):05–20

Taylor WM, Thompson RG, Thrall RM, Dharmapala PS (1997) DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of Mexican banks a total income model. Eur J Oper Res 98(2):346–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00352-9CrossRef

Thompson RG, Brinkmann EJ, Dharmapala PS, Gonzalez-Lima MD, Thrall RM (1997) DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large US banks. Eur J Oper Res 98(2):213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00343-8CrossRef

Thompson RG, Dharmapala PS, Rothenberg LJ, Thrall RM (1996) DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in US exploration and production. Comput Oper Res 23(4):357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(95)00044-5CrossRef

Thompson RG, Singleton Jr FD, Thrall RM, Smith BA (1986) Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16(6):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.6.35

Wen Z, Liao H (2021) Capturing attitudinal characteristics of decision-makers in group decision making: application to select policy recommendations to enhance supply chain resilience under COVID-19 outbreak. Oper Manag Res 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00170-z

Wang R-C, Liang T-F (2004) Application of fuzzy multi-objective linear programming to aggregate production planning. Comput Ind Eng 46(1):17–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2003.09.009CrossRef

Wu TH, Chung YF, Huang SW (2021) Evaluating global energy security performances using an integrated PCA/DEA-AR technique. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 45:101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101041

Wu SD, Golbasi H (2004) Multi-item, multi-facility supply chain planning: Models, complexities, and algorithms. Comput Optim Appl 28(3):325–356. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COAP.0000033967.18695.9dCrossRef

Xin L, Lang S, Mishra AR (2022) Evaluate the challenges of sustainable supply chain 4.0 implementation under the circular economy concept using new decision making approach. Oper Manag Res 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00243-

Yu P, Lee JH (2013) A hybrid approach using two-level SOM and combined AHP rating and AHP/DEA-AR method for selecting optimal promising emerging technology. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.043CrossRef

Zhou Z, Yang W, Ma C, Liu W (2010) A comment on “A comment on ‘A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems”’and “A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems.” Comput Ind Eng 59(4):1019–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.027CrossRef

Zhou Z, Zhao L, Lui S, Ma C (2012) A generalized fuzzy DEA/AR performance assessment model. Math Comput Model 55(11–12):2117–2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.01.017CrossRef

Title: An efficiency-based aggregate production planning model for multi-line manufacturing systems
Authors: S. Ali Naji Nasrabadi Yazd
Amirhossein Salamirad
Siamak Kheybari
Alessio Ishizaka
Publication date: 07-06-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Operations Management Research / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 1936-9735
Electronic ISSN: 1936-9743
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00381-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Mapping the Role and Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Supply Chain Digital Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis

Coordination of circular supply chain for online recommerce platform in industry 4.0 environment: a game-theoretic approach

A literature review on applications of Industry 4.0 in Project Management

Blockchain adoption in food supply chain for new business opportunities: an integrated approach

Examining the role of urban-industrial symbiosis in the circular economy: an approach based on N-Force field theory of change and N-ISM-Micmac

Is digital twin a better solution to improve ESG evaluation for vaccine logistics supply chain: an evolutionary game analysis

Premium Partner