Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. An Intervening Intermediary: Making Political Sense of Media Influence

Author : Gunnar Thesen

Published in: How Political Actors Use the Media

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This theoretical chapter puts political actors’ news use into a broader political science context. Despite increasing acknowledgement of the media as a political institution and actor, media influence on politics should be distinguished from other types of influence typically studied by political scientists. Media influence is not about what the media “gets”, but rather about how news intervene in the political processes that determine the distribution of power between other political actors and institutions. We call this the second layer of media’s political influence, and argue that studies of media and politics should to a larger extent use theories about the strategies and motives of political actors as a starting point in order to contribute to the explanation of who gets what, when, and how.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Asp, K. (2007). Fairness, informativeness and scrutiny: The role of news media in democracy. Nordicom Review, 28‚ 31–49. Asp, K. (2007). Fairness, informativeness and scrutiny: The role of news media in democracy. Nordicom Review, 28‚ 31–49.
go back to reference Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Cater, D. (1959). The fourth branch of government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Cater, D. (1959). The fourth branch of government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
go back to reference Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
go back to reference Cook, Timothy E. (2005). Governing with the news. The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Cook, Timothy E. (2005). Governing with the news. The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2015). Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media. Political Communication, 32(3), 453–474.CrossRef De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2015). Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media. Political Communication, 32(3), 453–474.CrossRef
go back to reference Dowding, K. (1996). Power. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Dowding, K. (1996). Power. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
go back to reference Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030–1049.CrossRef Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030–1049.CrossRef
go back to reference Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Springer. Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Springer.
go back to reference Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(03), 663–677.CrossRef Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(03), 663–677.CrossRef
go back to reference Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.CrossRef Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Jarren, O., & Donges, P. (2006). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft. Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Jarren, O., & Donges, P. (2006). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft. Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
go back to reference Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman.
go back to reference Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill. Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Linsky, M. (Ed.). (1986). How the press affects federal policymaking: Six case studies. Norton. Linsky, M. (Ed.). (1986). How the press affects federal policymaking: Six case studies. Norton.
go back to reference Meyer, Thomas. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonize politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Meyer, Thomas. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonize politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Newton, K. (2006). May the weak forces be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2), 209–234.CrossRef Newton, K. (2006). May the weak forces be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2), 209–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Nørgaard, A. S., & Klemmensen, R. (2009). Hvorfor stemmer oppositionen for regeringens lovforslag? Korporatisme og parlamentariske forlig, 1953–1999 []. Politica, 41, 68–91. Nørgaard, A. S., & Klemmensen, R. (2009). Hvorfor stemmer oppositionen for regeringens lovforslag? Korporatisme og parlamentariske forlig, 1953–1999 []. Politica, 41, 68–91.
go back to reference Page, B. I. (1996). The mass media as political actors. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29(01), 20–24. Page, B. I. (1996). The mass media as political actors. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29(01), 20–24.
go back to reference Petersson, O. (1994). Journalistene som klass, Journalismen som ideologi. Media og samfunnsstyring. Edvardsen and T. Steen. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Petersson, O. (1994). Journalistene som klass, Journalismen som ideologi. Media og samfunnsstyring. Edvardsen and T. Steen. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
go back to reference Robert‚ A. Dahl. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science‚ 2(3):201–215. Robert‚ A. Dahl. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science‚ 2(3):201–215.
go back to reference Rommetvedt, H., Thesen, G., Christiansen, P. M., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2013). Coping with corporatism in decline and the revival of parliament: Interest group lobbyism in Denmark and Norway, 1980–2005. Comparative Political Studies, 46(4), 457–485.CrossRef Rommetvedt, H., Thesen, G., Christiansen, P. M., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2013). Coping with corporatism in decline and the revival of parliament: Interest group lobbyism in Denmark and Norway, 1980–2005. Comparative Political Studies, 46(4), 457–485.CrossRef
go back to reference Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt.
go back to reference Schmitter, P. C. (2010). Micro-foundations for the science(s) of politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33, 316–330.CrossRef Schmitter, P. C. (2010). Micro-foundations for the science(s) of politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33, 316–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 249–269.CrossRef Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 249–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Seeberg, H. B. (2013). The opposition’s influence on policy through issue politicization. Journal of Public Policy, 33(1), 89–107.CrossRef Seeberg, H. B. (2013). The opposition’s influence on policy through issue politicization. Journal of Public Policy, 33(1), 89–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Sevenans, J. (2017). One concept, many interpretations. The media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes. European Political Science Review, 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1755773917000078. Sevenans, J. (2017). One concept, many interpretations. The media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes. European Political Science Review, 1–21. doi: 10.​1017/​S175577391700007​8.
go back to reference Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370.CrossRef Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370.CrossRef
go back to reference Sparrow, B. H. (1999). Uncertain guardians: The news media as a political institution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Sparrow, B. H. (1999). Uncertain guardians: The news media as a political institution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press Politics, 13(3), 228–246.CrossRef Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press Politics, 13(3), 228–246.CrossRef
go back to reference Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping politics: Mediatization and media interventionism. Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping politics: Mediatization and media interventionism.
go back to reference Thesen, G. (2013). When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389.CrossRef Thesen, G. (2013). When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389.CrossRef
go back to reference Thesen, G. (2015). Win some, lose none? Support parties at the polls and in political agenda-setting. Political Studies, 64, 1467–9248. Thesen, G. (2015). Win some, lose none? Support parties at the polls and in political agenda-setting. Political Studies, 64, 1467–9248.
go back to reference Thesen, G., Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. (2016). Priming, issue ownership, and party support: The electoral gains of an issue-friendly media agenda. Political Communication. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1233920. Thesen, G., Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. (2016). Priming, issue ownership, and party support: The electoral gains of an issue-friendly media agenda. Political Communication. doi:10.​1080/​10584609.​2016.​1233920.
go back to reference Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2011). Minimal or massive? The political agenda setting power of the mass media according to different methods. International Journal of Press Politics, 16(3), 295–313.CrossRef Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2011). Minimal or massive? The political agenda setting power of the mass media according to different methods. International Journal of Press Politics, 16(3), 295–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of mass media influence on parliament in Belgium, 1993–2000. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342.CrossRef Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of mass media influence on parliament in Belgium, 1993–2000. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2004). The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication, 21(4), 479–500. Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2004). The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication, 21(4), 479–500.
go back to reference Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Towards a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.CrossRef Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Towards a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26(2), 144–175.CrossRef Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26(2), 144–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfsfeld, G., & Cohen, A. (1993). Framing the Intifada: People and media. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. Wolfsfeld, G., & Cohen, A. (1993). Framing the Intifada: People and media. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
go back to reference Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23, 333–354.CrossRef Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23, 333–354.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Intervening Intermediary: Making Political Sense of Media Influence
Author
Gunnar Thesen
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_2