Top

Information Systems Frontiers

Published in:

19-10-2020

An Investigation of Peripheral and Central Cues of Online Customer Review Voting and Helpfulness through the Lens of Elaboration Likelihood Model

Authors: Mohammadreza Mousavizadeh, Mehrdad Koohikamali, Mohammad Salehan, Dam J. Kim

Published in: Information Systems Frontiers | Issue 1/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Online consumer reviews (OCRs) have become an important part of online consumers’ decision-making to purchse products. Consumers use OCRs not only to get a better understanding of the characteristics of products but also to learn about other customers’ experiences with them. Drawing upon Elaboration Likelihood Model, this research investigates the predictors of popularity and helpfulness of OCRs. The results of the study show that longer reviews, as well as those with extreme star ratings, are more popular. Moreover, the amount of hedonic and utilitarian cues in a review and its sentiment significantly influence perceptions of online consumers regarding its helpfulness. The results also show how product type moderates the effect of utilitarian and hedonic cues on helpfulness. Our results can be used by online review websites to develop more efficient methods for sorting OCRs.

previous article Context Modeling for the Adaption of Mobile Business Processes – An Empirical Usability Evaluation

next article Recovering Troubled IT Projects: The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Project Complexity

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

According to Cao et al. [14], some reviews are too long to absorb the attention of customers and may not be read by them. Therefore, online consumers may not read extremely long reviews because it takes too much time and effort to read them. This study examines the quadratic relationship of the review length on review popularity to test whether too short or too long reviews are less likely to be read by the customers.

Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217–232.

Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2012). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers' objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99–126.

Bailey, A. A. (2005). Consumer awareness and use of product review websites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 68–81.

Bansal, G., Zahedi, F., & Gefen, D. (2015). The role of privacy assurance mechanisms in building trust and the moderating role of privacy concern. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(6), 1–21.

Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103–117.

Baum, D., & Spann, M. (2014). The interplay between online consumer reviews and recommender systems: An experimental analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(1), 129–162.

Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (1988). A generalization of Cohen's kappa agreement measure to interval measurement and multiple raters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 921–933.

Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., Cox, C., & Buultjens, J. (2011). Trust perceptions of online travel information by different content creators: Some social and legal implications. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(2), 221–235.

Burton, J., & Khammash, M. (2010). Why do people read reviews posted on consumer-opinion portals? Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3–4), 230–255.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. ACR North American Advances, 11, 673–675.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1990). Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46(3), 347–364.

Cameron, A, C., & Trivedi, P, K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (Vol. 53): Cambridge University Press.

Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521.

Capoccia, C. (2018). Online reviews are the best thing that ever happened to small businesses. Forbes. Retrieved February 2, 2019.

Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249–254.

Chang, W. L. (2019). The impact of emotion: A blended model to estimate influence on social media. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(5), 1137–1151.

Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 129–133.

Chen, C. C., & Tseng, Y.-D. (2011). Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decision Support Systems, 50(4), 755–768.

Chen, P.-Y., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. D. (2008). All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at Amazon.com. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=918083.

Cheung, M., Sia, C. L., & Kuan, K. K. (2012). Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 618–635.

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 48–63.

Connors, L., Mudambi, S, M., & Schuff, D. (2011) Is it the review or the reviewer? A multi-method approach to determine the antecedents of online review helpfulness. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, Hawaii, (pp. 1–10): IEEE.

Dahlen, M. (2002). Thinking and feeling on the world wide web: The impact of product type and time on world wide web advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8(2), 115–125.

Dahlen, M., & Bergendahl, J. (2001). Informing and transforming on the web: An empirical study of response to banner ads for functional and expressive products. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 189–205.

Dahlen, M., Rasch, A., & Rosengren, S. (2003). Love at first site? A study of website advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(1), 25–33.

Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Kossinets, G., Kleinberg, J., & Lee, L. (2009). How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on amazon. com helpfulness votes. In International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 141–150). Madrid, Spain: ACM.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60–71.

Duric, A., & Song, F. (2012). Feature selection for sentiment analysis based on content and syntax models. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 704–711.

Eastin, M, S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4).

Fang, B., Ye, Q., Kucukusta, D., & Law, R. (2016). Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics. Tourism Management, 52, 498–506.

Filieri, R., Hofacker, C. F., & Alguezaui, S. (2018). What makes information in online consumer reviews diagnostic over time? The role of review relevancy, factuality, currency, source credibility and ranking score. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 122–131.

Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. In The measurement of interrater agreement. Wiley.

Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313.

Fox, J. (2015). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models: Sage Publications.

Gershoff, A., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of online agent advice: Extremity and positivity effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1&2), 161–170.

Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512.

Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 2–14.

Grange, C., & Benbasat, I. (2014). Explaining customers’ utilitarian and hedonic perceptions in the context of product search within social network-enabled shopping websites. In Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction. Auckland, New Zealand.

Han, H. J., Mankad, S., Gavirneni, N., & Verma, R. (2016). What guests really think of your hotel: Text analytics of online customer reviews. Cornell Hospitality Report, 16(2), 3–17.

Harris, R. B., & Paradice, D. (2007). An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12), 2081–2090.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.

Hilbe, J. (2011). Negative binomial regression (second ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.

Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2017). Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: A meta-analytic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 102, 1–11.

Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N. S., & Liu, L. (2012). Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 674–684.

Hu, N., Koh, N. S., & Reddy, S. K. (2014). Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decision Support Systems, 57, 42–53.

Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17–27.

Huang, L., Tan, C. H., Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2018). Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6), 503–522.

Hwang, J., Yoon, Y.-S., & Park, N.-H. (2011). Structural effects of cognitive and affective reponses to web advertisements, website and brand attitudes, and purchase intentions: The case of casual-dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 897–907.

Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C., & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 34–59.

Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31(4), 395–414.

Karimi, S., & Wang, F. (2017). Online review helpfulness: Impact of reviewer profile image. Decision Support Systems, 96, 39–48.

Khan, F. H., Bashir, S., & Qamar, U. (2014). TOM: Twitter opinion mining framework using hybrid classification scheme. Decision Support Systems, 57, 245–257.

Kim, S. M., Pantel, P., Chklovski, T., & Pennacchiotti, M. 2006 Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia, (pp. 423–430): Association for Computational Linguistics.

Koohikamali, M., & Kim, D. (2015). Does information sensitivity make a difference? Mobile applications’ privacy statements: A text mining approach. In Americas Conference on Information Systems. Puerto Rico.

Korfiatis, N., Rodríguez, D., & Sicilia, M.-A. (2008). The impact of readability on the usefulness of online product reviews: A case study on an online bookstore. In Emerging technologies and information systems for the knowledge society (pp. 423–432). Springer.

Korfiatis, N., García-Bariocanal, E., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 205–217.

Kövecses, Z. (1990). Anger. In Emotion concepts (pp. 50–68). Springer.

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Third ed.). London: Sage.

Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1132–1151.

Kuan, K. K., Hui, K.-L., Prasarnphanich, P., & Lai, H.-Y. (2015). What makes a review voted? An empirical investigation of review voting in online review systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 48–71.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. International Biometric Society, 33(1), 159–174.

Lee, S. H. (2009). How do online reviews affect purchasing intention? African Journal of Business Management, 3(10), 581–576.

Lee, S., & Choeh, J. Y. (2014). Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using multilayer perceptron neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 3041–3046.

Li, H., Zhang, Z., Janakiraman, R., & Meng, F. (2016). How review sentiment and readability affect online peer evaluation votes? An examination combining reviewer’s social identity and social network, Tourism Travel and Research Association International Conference. Vail Valley, Colorado.

Liu, J., Cao, Y., Lin, C.-Y., Huang, Y., & Zhou, M. (2007). Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Prague, Czech Republic (pp. 334–342).

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.

Long, J, S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences): Sage.

Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451–466.

Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421–2455.

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38(1), 283–301.

Mousavizadeh, M., Koohikamali, M., & Salehan, M. Antecedents of online customers reviews’ helpfulness: A support vector machine approach. In Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico, 2015: AIS.

Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.

Murphy, R. (2019). Local consumer review survey. https://www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey. Accessed Jan 2020.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2011). Content analysis-a methodological primer for gender research. Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 276–289.

Ngo-Ye, T. L., & Sinha, A. P. (2014). The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: A text regression model. Decision Support Systems, 61, 47–58.

Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120–1136.

Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 407–426.

Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10), 1160–1166.

Palazon, M., & Delgado-Ballester, E. (2013). Hedonic or utilitarian premiums: Does it matter? European Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 1256–1275.

Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 598–612.

Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392–414.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 668–672.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.

Piccoli, G. (2016). Triggered essential reviewing: The effect of technology affordances on service experience evaluations. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(6), 477–492.

Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77–91.

Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559.

Riggio, L., & Kirsner, K. (1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(6), 885–899.

Riordan, M. A., & Kreuz, R. J. (2010). Emotion encoding and interpretation in computer-mediated communication: Reasons for use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1667–1673.

Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1991). Emotions and motivations in advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 100–110.

Safi, R., & Yu, Y. (2017). Online product review as an indicator of users’ degree of innovativeness and product adoption time: A longitudinal analysis of text reviews. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(4), 414–431.

Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2016). Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems, 81, 30–40.

Salehan, M., Mousavizadeh, M., & Koohikamali, M. (2015). A recommender system for online consumer reviews. In Internation Conference on Information Systems. Fort Worth, TX: AIS.

Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729.

Scholz, M., & Dorner, V. (2013). The recipe for the perfect review? Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(3), 141–151.

Schulze, C., Schöler, L., & Skiera, B. (2014). Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 1–19.

Schwenk, C. H. (1986). Information, cognitive biases, and commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 298–310.

Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689–698.

Smith, E, A., & Senter, R, J. (1967). Automated readability index. DTIC Document.

Sridhar, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2012). Social influence effects in online product ratings. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 70–88.

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media-sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248.

Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 5–18.

Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2544–2558.

Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76(3), 282–299.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers' online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223–234.

Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009). Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management, 30(1), 123–127.

Wang, X.-T. (2006). Emotions within reason: Resolving conflicts in risk preference. Cognition and Emotion, 20(8), 1132–1152.

Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., Bronner, F., & de Ridder, J. A. (2011). “Highly recommended!” the content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 19–38.

Wu, J. (2017). Review popularity and review helpfulness: A model for user review effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 97, 92–103.

Wu, P, F., Van der Heijden, H., & Korfiatis, N. (2011) The influences of negativity and review quality on the helpfulness of online reviews. In International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai

Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137–209.

Xu, C., Ryan, S., Prybutok, V., & Wen, C. (2012). It is not for fun: An examination of social network site usage. Information & Management, 49(5), 210–217.

Ye, H. J., Chua, C. E. H., & Sun, J. (2019). Enhancing mobile data services performance via online reviews. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(2), 441–452.

Yelp (2018). Will Yelp remove a false or defamatory review?

Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2014a). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560.

Yin, G., Zhang, Q., & Li, Y. (2014b) Effects of emotional valence and arousal on consumer perceptions of online review helpfulness. In Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, US

Zhang, J., & Piramuthu, S. (2018). Product recommendation with latent review topics. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 617–625.

Zhang, R., & Tran, T. (2011). An information gain-based approach for recommending useful product reviews. Knowledge and Information Systems, 26(3), 419–434.

Zhang, P., Lee, H.-M., Zhao, K., & Shah, V. (2019). An empirical investigation of eWOM and used video game trading: The moderation effects of product features. Decision Support Systems, 123, 1–11.

Zhiming, L., Li, H., & Lu, L. (2014). An investigation of online review helpfulness based on movie reviews. African Journal of Business Management, 8(12), 441–450.

Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148.

Zhu, L., Yin, G., & He, W. (2014). Is this opinion leader's review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 267–280.

Zhu, Y., Liu, M., Zeng, X., & Huang, P. (2020). The effects of prior reviews on perceived review helpfulness: A configuration perspective. Journal of Business Research, 110, 484–494.

Title: An Investigation of Peripheral and Central Cues of Online Customer Review Voting and Helpfulness through the Lens of Elaboration Likelihood Model
Authors: Mohammadreza Mousavizadeh
Mehrdad Koohikamali
Mohammad Salehan
Dam J. Kim
Publication date: 19-10-2020
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Information Systems Frontiers / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10069-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

A Deeper Look at Cloud Adoption Trajectory and Dilemma

Advances on Data Management and Information Systems

Context Modeling for the Adaption of Mobile Business Processes – An Empirical Usability Evaluation

Influence of Habits on Mobile Payment Acceptance: An Ecosystem Perspective

Using Flow Tools to Enact Control in Software Development Projects: A Cross-case Analysis

Usage Continuance in Software-as-a-Service

Premium Partner