Top

Empirical Software Engineering

Published in:

01-11-2023

Analyzing the BizDev interface in an enterprise context: a case of developers acting in business

Authors: Caique G. Moreira, Breno B. N. de França, Tayana U. Conte

Published in: Empirical Software Engineering | Issue 6/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Context

Currently, organizations seek to evolve software engineering methodologies targeting a wider and healthier collaboration among their functional areas. In this context, the interface between business and development (BizDev) includes all the interactions between Information Technology and business areas within an organization. Although we have been observing a small number of studies about this interface, we still consider the area lacks deeper characterization and deserves analysis in more diverse contexts.

Goal

We aimed to understand how the BizDev interface works under enterprise and innovative contexts, raising information on roles, responsibilities, and practices in the interface.

Method

We conducted a case study in a Brazilian company through the application of semi-structured interviews with fifteen people from both technology and business areas. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and further analyzed using Grounded Theory procedures, namely the open, axial, and selective coding phases. Finally, the synthesis was validated with participants.

Results

Not only we obtained relevant information on roles, responsibilities, and practices in the BizDev interface, but we also identified a phenomenon in which IT people acted in business. We observed development analysts and leaders working on defining and prioritizing requirements, analyzing business indicators, and presenting feature propositions. Also, the organizational culture strongly influenced this behavior through the sense of ownership and meritocracy. This performance is also characterized as data-driven, with IT people constantly extracting metrics and using them to validate and justify their work in business.

Conclusion

The organizational culture and the open BizDev communication were the main motivators and support for IT people to act in business. Despite the positive results, developers also delivered features that harmed some business aspects. Therefore, while we advocate organizations should review their organizational values and culture to motivate this behavior, we suggest that guidance from the business area is necessary, introducing measures to prevent business decisions from being made solely by the IT area.

previous article Operationalizing validity of empirical software engineering studies

next article An empirical study on software understandability and its dependence on code characteristics

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

https://www.scaledagileframework.com

Throughout this paper, we refer to the company as CompanyP, and ProductP for referring to its main product, the mobile app, for confidentiality.

ATLAS.ti supports different GT procedures, such as tagging codes on raw text files and creating networks connecting these codes: https://software.com.br/p/atlas-ti

When interviewers at CompanyP reference Squads, they are referencing Spotify’s model of organization, in which teams (squads) should be composed of people from different areas of knowledge: https://blog.crisp.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SpotifyScaling.pdf

Slack is an instant messaging program developed for professional and organizational communications: https://slack.com/

“A 1-1 is a dedicated space on the calendar and in your mental map for open-ended and anticipated conversation between a manager and an employee.” (https://wavelength.asana.com/workstyle-what-is-a-1-1/)

Firebase is a set of back-end cloud computing services provided by Google, including detailed dashboards with relevant metrics for applications: https://firebase.google.com

Abrahamsson P, Salo O, Ronkainen J, Warsta J (2002) Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis. VTT Publications, Finland

Brown AD, Starkey K (1994) The effect of organizational culture on communication and information. J Manag Stud 31(6):807–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00640.xCrossRef

Conboy K (2009) Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inf Syst Res 20(3):329–354. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0236CrossRef

Diel E, Marczak S, Cruzes DS (2016) Communication challenges and strategies in distributed devops. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), IEEE, pp 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2016.28

Fitzgerald B, Stöl KJ (2015) Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda. J Syst Softw 123:176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.063CrossRef

de França BBN, Jeronimo H, Travassos GH (2016) Characterizing devops by hearing multiple voices. In: Proceedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2973839.2973845

Gruhn V, Schäfer C (2015) Bizdevops: because devops is not the end of the story. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools, and Techniques, Springer, pp 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22689-7_30

Karvonen T, Sharp H, Barroca L (2018) Enterprise agility: Why is transformation so hard? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Software Development, Springer, pp 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_9

Knauss E, Yussuf A, Blincoe K, Damian D, Knauss A (2018) Continuous clarification and emergent requirements flows in open-commercial software ecosystems. Requir Eng 23:97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0259-1CrossRef

Moreira C, de França B (2019) Towards a healthier collaboration at the business-development interface. In: Proceedings of the XXII Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering (CIbSE), pp 86–99

Nyrud H (2017) Bizdev teams in agile software development. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo

Oriol M, Stade M, Fotrousi F, Nadal S, Varga J, Seyff N, Abello A, Franch X, Marco J, Schmidt O (2018) Fame: Supporting continuous requirements elicitation by combining user feedback and monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00030

Palomares C, Franch X, Quer C, Chatzipetrou P, López L, Gorschek T (2021) The state-of-practice in requirements elicitation: an extended interview study at 12 companies. Requir Eng 26(2):273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-020-00345-xCrossRef

Petersen K, Gencel C (2013) Worldviews, research methods, and their relationship to validity in empirical software engineering research. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, IEEE, pp 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2013.22

Putta A, Uludağ Ö, Hong SL, Paasivaara M, Lassenius C (2021a) Why do organizations adopt agile scaling frameworks? a survey of practitioners. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475716.3475788

Putta A, Uludağ Ö, Paasivaara M, Hong SL (2021b) Benefits and challenges of adopting safe-an empirical survey. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Software Development, Springer, Cham, pp 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_11

Remta D, Buchalcevova A (2021) Product owner’s journey to safe®–role changes in scaled agile framework®. Information 12(3):107CrossRef

Runeson P, Höst M (2009) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir Softw Eng 14(2):131–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8CrossRef

Agile S (2011) Scaled agile framework. https://www.scaledagileframework.com, [Online; accessed 04-Jun-2023]

Sharp H, Robinson H (2010) Three ‘c’s of agile practice: collaboration, coordination and communication. In: Agile Software Development, Springer, pp 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12575-1_4

Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Inc

trode DE, Huff SL, Tretiakov A (2009) The impact of organizational culture on agile method use. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.436

Van Waardenburg G, Van Vliet H (2013) When agile meets the enterprise. Information and Software Technology 55(12):2154–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.012CrossRef

Weiss RS (1995) Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster

Title: Analyzing the BizDev interface in an enterprise context: a case of developers acting in business
Authors: Caique G. Moreira
Breno B. N. de França
Tayana U. Conte
Publication date: 01-11-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Empirical Software Engineering / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10383-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Context

Goal

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Technical leverage analysis in the Python ecosystem

Operationalizing validity of empirical software engineering studies

Developers talking about code quality

On the effectiveness of log representation for log-based anomaly detection

Automated NFR testing in continuous integration environments: a multi-case study of Nordic companies

On the coordination of vulnerability fixes

Premium Partner