Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Ancillary Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage

Author : Asbjørn Torvanger

Published in: Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Ancillary benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are defined as positive effects of CCS deployment that are additional to the primary climate change mitigation effect through reduced carbon dioxide emissions. One category of ancillary benefits of CCS is the use of carbon dioxide for synthetic fuels, chemicals and plastics, building materials, and Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). A second category of ancillary benefits is related to removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which is deemed necessary in many climate policy scenarios, where CCS deployment is essential for two removal technologies, namely Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) and Direct Air Capture (DAC). A third category is new industry opportunities associated with geological storage of carbon dioxide services, and production of carbon dioxide capture equipment. The last category examined is benefits of CCS for petroleum producing countries in a carbon-constrained world, since more of the resource rent from petroleum production can be kept by producers instead of being transferred to governments in consuming countries as revenue from taxing or sales of carbon dioxide emission allowances.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The full definition of “ancillary benefits” in IPCC (2001) is:
‘The ancillary, or side effects, of policies aimed exclusively at climate change mitigation. Such policies have an impact not only on greenhouse gas emissions, but also on resource use efficiency, like reduction in emissions of local and regional air pollutants associated with fossil-fuel use, and on issues such as transportation, agriculture, land-use practices, employment, and fuel security. Sometimes these benefits are referred to as “ancillary impacts” to reflect that in some cases the benefits may be negative. From the perspective of policies directed at abating local air pollution, greenhouse gas mitigation may also be considered an ancillary benefit, but these relationships are not considered in this assessment.’
 
Literature
go back to reference Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Angelini A (2013) The changing paradigm in carbon dioxide utilization. J CO2 Util 3–4:65–73CrossRef Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Angelini A (2013) The changing paradigm in carbon dioxide utilization. J CO2 Util 3–4:65–73CrossRef
go back to reference Centi G, Perathoner S (2009) Opportunities and prospects in the chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to fuels. Catal Today 148:191–205CrossRef Centi G, Perathoner S (2009) Opportunities and prospects in the chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to fuels. Catal Today 148:191–205CrossRef
go back to reference Extavour M, Bunje P (2016) CCUS: utilizing carbon dioxide to reduce emissions, CEP Magazine, June, 52–59 Extavour M, Bunje P (2016) CCUS: utilizing carbon dioxide to reduce emissions, CEP Magazine, June, 52–59
go back to reference Fasihi M, Efimova O, Breyer C (2019) Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants. J Clean Prod 224:957–980CrossRef Fasihi M, Efimova O, Breyer C (2019) Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants. J Clean Prod 224:957–980CrossRef
go back to reference IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://​www.​ipcc.​ch/​sr15/​
go back to reference Pawar RJ, Bromhal GS, Carey JW, Foxall W, Korre A, Ringrose PS, Tucker O, Watson MN, White JA (2015) Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic carbon dioxide storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40(Special issue):292–311CrossRef Pawar RJ, Bromhal GS, Carey JW, Foxall W, Korre A, Ringrose PS, Tucker O, Watson MN, White JA (2015) Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic carbon dioxide storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40(Special issue):292–311CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin ES, Davison JE, Herzog HJ (2015) The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40(Special issue):378–400CrossRef Rubin ES, Davison JE, Herzog HJ (2015) The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40(Special issue):378–400CrossRef
go back to reference Scott A (2015) Learning to love carbon dioxide. Chem Eng News 93(45):10–16CrossRef Scott A (2015) Learning to love carbon dioxide. Chem Eng News 93(45):10–16CrossRef
go back to reference Torvanger A (2018) Governance of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): accounting, rewarding, and the Paris agreement. Clim Pol 19(3):329–341CrossRef Torvanger A (2018) Governance of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): accounting, rewarding, and the Paris agreement. Clim Pol 19(3):329–341CrossRef
go back to reference Torvanger A, Meadowcroft J (2011) The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies. Glob Environ Chang 21:303–312CrossRef Torvanger A, Meadowcroft J (2011) The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies. Glob Environ Chang 21:303–312CrossRef
go back to reference Torvanger A, Grimstad A-A, Lindeberg E, Rive N, Rypdal K, Skeie RB, Fuglestvedt J, Tollefsen P (2012) Quality of geological CO2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets. Clim Chang 114(2):245–260CrossRef Torvanger A, Grimstad A-A, Lindeberg E, Rive N, Rypdal K, Skeie RB, Fuglestvedt J, Tollefsen P (2012) Quality of geological CO2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets. Clim Chang 114(2):245–260CrossRef
go back to reference Vögele S, Rübbelke D (2013) Decisions on investments in photovoltaics and carbon capture and storage: a comparison between two different greenhouse gas control strategies. Energy 62:385–392CrossRef Vögele S, Rübbelke D (2013) Decisions on investments in photovoltaics and carbon capture and storage: a comparison between two different greenhouse gas control strategies. Energy 62:385–392CrossRef
go back to reference Vögele S, Rübbelke D, Mayer P, Kuckshinrichs W (2018) Germany’s “no” to carbon dioxide capture and storage: just a question of lacking acceptance? Appl Energy 214:205–218CrossRef Vögele S, Rübbelke D, Mayer P, Kuckshinrichs W (2018) Germany’s “no” to carbon dioxide capture and storage: just a question of lacking acceptance? Appl Energy 214:205–218CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ancillary Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage
Author
Asbjørn Torvanger
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_12

Premium Partner