Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Anomalies and Multifactor Models

Authors : James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnönen

Published in: Investment Valuation and Asset Pricing

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Fama and French (1992, 1993, 1995, 1996) proposed the three-factor model. Their model motivated researchers to propose other multifactor models. Here we review the four-factor models by Carhart (1997), Fama and French (2015), Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2015), and Stambaugh and Yuan (2017), in addition to a six-factor model by Fama and French (2018) as well as a machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) model by Lettau and Pelger (2020). According to Cochrane (2011) a factor zoo exists nowadays with hundreds of different factors. A new challenge in asset pricing is: Which factors and models should we use?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Novy-Marx (2013) also found that stock returns are related to expected profits.
 
2
Gordon (1962)  is famous for this simple valuation model.
 
3
In a later study by Barillas and Shanken (2018), various factors and models in previous studies were tested. Using novel tests of the relative performance of different models, in both in-sample and out-of-sample tests, they found that a six-factor model containing market, size, value, profit, investment, and momentum factors outperformed other possible models.
 
4
The 11 anomalies were: net stock issues, equity issuance, accruals, net operating assets, asset growth, investment to assets, financial distress, O-score of distress, momentum, gross profitability, and return on assets.
 
5
As cited in footnote 3, Barillas and Shanken (2018) tested this model also.
 
6
Beyond the scope of the present introductory text, this squared Sharpe ratio test of intercepts was based on work by Barillas and Shanken (2018), who developed the performance metric for comparing competing asset pricing models.
 
7
Barillas and Shanken (2018) tested different factors and models and found that a six-factor model with market, size, value, profit, investment, and momentum factors outperformed other models in both in-sample and out-of-sample tests.
 
8
Fama and French (2018) conducted a different kind of out-of-sample test for models by using a subsample of returns in the sample period for in-sample test statistics and then using the remaining returns in the same sample period for out-of-sample test statistics.
 
9
In regression models with an intercept term, OLS fits the model such that the average of the residuals, or \(E(e_{it})\), approximately equals zero. Without an error term in model (9.10) the average of the residual terms will not be zero and, therefore, is a good proxy for the mispricing alpha.
 
10
As in their 2015 study of the six-factor model, they applied maximum squared Sharpe ratio tests of the intercepts also (see footnote 6).
 
Literature
go back to reference Back, K., N. Kapadia, and B. Ostdiek. 2013. Slopes as factors: Characteristic pure plays. Working paper, Rice University. Back, K., N. Kapadia, and B. Ostdiek. 2013. Slopes as factors: Characteristic pure plays. Working paper, Rice University.
go back to reference Back, K., N. Kapadia, and B. Ostdiek. 2015. Testing factor models on characteristic and covariance pure plays. Working paper, Rice University. Back, K., N. Kapadia, and B. Ostdiek. 2015. Testing factor models on characteristic and covariance pure plays. Working paper, Rice University.
go back to reference Barillas, F., and J. Shanken. 2018. Comparing asset pricing models. Journal of Finance 73: 715–754. Barillas, F., and J. Shanken. 2018. Comparing asset pricing models. Journal of Finance 73: 715–754.
go back to reference Barroso, P., and P. Santa-Clara. 2015. Momentum has its moments. Journal of Financial Economics 116: 111–120.CrossRef Barroso, P., and P. Santa-Clara. 2015. Momentum has its moments. Journal of Financial Economics 116: 111–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Carhart, M.M. 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52: 57–82.CrossRef Carhart, M.M. 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52: 57–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Cochrane, J.H. 1991. Production-based asset pricing and the link between stock returns and economic fluctuations. Journal of Finance 46: 209–237.CrossRef Cochrane, J.H. 1991. Production-based asset pricing and the link between stock returns and economic fluctuations. Journal of Finance 46: 209–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Cochrane, J.H. 2011. Presidential address: Discount rates. Journal of Finance 56: 1047–1108.CrossRef Cochrane, J.H. 2011. Presidential address: Discount rates. Journal of Finance 56: 1047–1108.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniel, K., and T. Moskowitz. 2016. Momentum crashes. Journal of Financial Economics 122: 221–247.CrossRef Daniel, K., and T. Moskowitz. 2016. Momentum crashes. Journal of Financial Economics 122: 221–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and J.D. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81: 607–636.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and J.D. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81: 607–636.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427–465.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1993. The cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3–56.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1993. The cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1995. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance 50: 131–156.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1995. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance 50: 131–156.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1996. The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. Journal of Finance 51: 1947–1958.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1996. The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. Journal of Finance 51: 1947–1958.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2015. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116: 1–22.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2015. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116: 1–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2018. Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics 128: 234–252.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2018. Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics 128: 234–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2020. Comparing cross-section and time-series factor models. Review of Financial Studies 33: 1892–1926.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2020. Comparing cross-section and time-series factor models. Review of Financial Studies 33: 1892–1926.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferson, W.E. 2019. Empirical Asset Pricing: Models and Methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Ferson, W.E. 2019. Empirical Asset Pricing: Models and Methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Ferson, W.E., S.K. Nallareddy, and B. Xie. 2013. The “out-of-sample” performance of long-run risk models. Journal of Financial Economics 107: 537–556.CrossRef Ferson, W.E., S.K. Nallareddy, and B. Xie. 2013. The “out-of-sample” performance of long-run risk models. Journal of Financial Economics 107: 537–556.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibbons, M.R., S.A. Ross, and J. Shanken. 1989. A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica 57: 1121–1152.CrossRef Gibbons, M.R., S.A. Ross, and J. Shanken. 1989. A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica 57: 1121–1152.CrossRef
go back to reference Gordon, M.J. 1962. The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin. Gordon, M.J. 1962. The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.
go back to reference Hou, K., C. Xue, and L. Zhang. 2015. Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Review of Financial Studies 28: 650–705.CrossRef Hou, K., C. Xue, and L. Zhang. 2015. Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Review of Financial Studies 28: 650–705.CrossRef
go back to reference Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance 48: 65–91.CrossRef Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance 48: 65–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Kozak, S., S. Nagel, and S. Santosh. 2020. Shrinking the cross section. Journal of Financial Economics 135: 271–292.CrossRef Kozak, S., S. Nagel, and S. Santosh. 2020. Shrinking the cross section. Journal of Financial Economics 135: 271–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Lettau, M., and M. Pelger. 2020. Factors that fit the time series and cross-section of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies 33: 2274–2325.CrossRef Lettau, M., and M. Pelger. 2020. Factors that fit the time series and cross-section of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies 33: 2274–2325.CrossRef
go back to reference Merton, R.C. 1972. An analytical derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Finance 7: 1851–1872.CrossRef Merton, R.C. 1972. An analytical derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Finance 7: 1851–1872.CrossRef
go back to reference Novy-Marx, R. 2013. The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics 108: 1–28.CrossRef Novy-Marx, R. 2013. The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics 108: 1–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Ross, S.A. 1976. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 341–360.CrossRef Ross, S.A. 1976. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 341–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Simin, T. 2008. The poor performance of asset pricing models. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43: 335–380.CrossRef Simin, T. 2008. The poor performance of asset pricing models. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43: 335–380.CrossRef
go back to reference Stambaugh, R.F., and Y. Yuan. 2017. Mispricing factors. Review of Financial Studies 30: 1270–1315.CrossRef Stambaugh, R.F., and Y. Yuan. 2017. Mispricing factors. Review of Financial Studies 30: 1270–1315.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anomalies and Multifactor Models
Authors
James W. Kolari
Seppo Pynnönen
Copyright Year
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16784-3_9