Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance 3/2018

30-06-2017

Another look at the determinants of the financial condition of state pension plans

Authors: James R. Barth, Sunghoon Joo, Kang Bok Lee

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Given the financial troubles facing state pension plans in recent years, we examine determinants of the ratio of assets to liabilities, or the funded ratio, based on data for 153 pension plans from 2001 to 2014. The focus is on the relationship between both the actual investment return on pension assets and the assumed return used to discount pension liabilities, or the funded ratio. Importantly, only when appropriate empirical techniques are employed to address potential econometric problems do we find that these two factors have the expected relationship with the funded ratio. Surprisingly, we also find the actual and assumed returns are negatively correlated, even though the correlation is quite low. Furthermore, the assumed return is on average higher than the actual return and has a much larger marginal effect on the funded ratio. We therefore show how a relatively high value can be assigned to the assumed return to make a pension plan appear to far healthier than actually is the case.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which itself is facing financial difficulties, is a federal agency created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to protect pension benefits in private-sector defined benefit plans. For more information, go to www.​pbgc.​gov.
 
2
A few states have hybrid plans that combine features of both defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. For information on such states, see Barth and Jahera (2015).
 
4
According to Cebula (2014), quantitative easing has not only reduced cash flows for pensions but also placed them under greater interest rate risk.
 
5
Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs, U.S. Department of Labor, 1975–2014.
 
6
2014 Survey of Public Pension: State & Local Data, the U.S. Census Bureau.
 
7
Financial Accounts of the United States, Federal Reserve Board, March 12, 2015.
 
8
Financial Accounts of the United States, Federal Reserve Board, March 12, 2015.
 
9
See American Academy of Actuaries (July 2012). In addition, it is stated “A plan’s actuarial funding method should have a built-in mechanism for moving the plan to the target of 100% funding” (p. 2).
 
10
In the published version of their paper, Munnell et al. (2011) do not include ARC, but do include it an earlier working paper. We also include ARC in our empirical model. See Table 2 for the ARC by state for year 2014.
 
11
The null hypothesis of the Sargan’s and Hansen’s tests is that specified orthogonality conditions of the instrument set are satisfied. If we reject the null hypothesis of the Sagan’s or Hansen’s tests, we should strongly doubt the validity of the estimates.
 
12
A fixed effects model may suffer from a finite sample bias (see Nickell 1981) because we include a lagged endogenous variable in the equation. We therefore used a GMM estimator and conducted the standard diagnosis statistics (e.g., second order autocorrelation test AR (2)), which did not indicate any issue on the validity of the instrumentation at the 5% significant level.
 
Literature
go back to reference Altonji JG, Segal LM (1996) Small-sample bias in GMM estimation of covariance structures. J Bus Econ Stat 14:353–366 Altonji JG, Segal LM (1996) Small-sample bias in GMM estimation of covariance structures. J Bus Econ Stat 14:353–366
go back to reference Andersen TG, Sørensen BE (1996) GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: a Monte Carlo study. J Bus Econ Stat 14:328–352 Andersen TG, Sørensen BE (1996) GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: a Monte Carlo study. J Bus Econ Stat 14:328–352
go back to reference Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–279CrossRef Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–279CrossRef
go back to reference Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68:29–51CrossRef Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68:29–51CrossRef
go back to reference Barth JR, Jahera JS Jr (2015) Alabama’s public pensions: building a stable financial foundation for the years ahead. Research report for the Alabama policy institute, Birmingham Barth JR, Jahera JS Jr (2015) Alabama’s public pensions: building a stable financial foundation for the years ahead. Research report for the Alabama policy institute, Birmingham
go back to reference Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89:634–647CrossRef Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89:634–647CrossRef
go back to reference Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87:115–143CrossRef Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87:115–143CrossRef
go back to reference Bond S, Meghir C (1994) Dynamic investment models and the firm's financial policy. Rev Econ Stud 61:197–222CrossRef Bond S, Meghir C (1994) Dynamic investment models and the firm's financial policy. Rev Econ Stud 61:197–222CrossRef
go back to reference Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90:443–450 Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90:443–450
go back to reference Bowsher CG (2002) On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Econ Lett 77:211–220CrossRef Bowsher CG (2002) On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Econ Lett 77:211–220CrossRef
go back to reference Cebula RJ (2014) Preliminary evidence on the impact of budget deficits on the nominal interest rates yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury notes after allowing for quantitative easing. Economia Internazionale 67:181–200 Cebula RJ (2014) Preliminary evidence on the impact of budget deficits on the nominal interest rates yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury notes after allowing for quantitative easing. Economia Internazionale 67:181–200
go back to reference Chaney BA, Copley PA, Stone MS (2003) The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. J Account Public Policy 21:287–313CrossRef Chaney BA, Copley PA, Stone MS (2003) The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. J Account Public Policy 21:287–313CrossRef
go back to reference Eaton TV, Nofsinger JR (2008) Funding levels and gender in public pension plans. Public Budg Finance 28:108–128CrossRef Eaton TV, Nofsinger JR (2008) Funding levels and gender in public pension plans. Public Budg Finance 28:108–128CrossRef
go back to reference Elder EM, Wagner GA (2015) Political effects on pension underfunding. Econ Polit 27:1–27CrossRef Elder EM, Wagner GA (2015) Political effects on pension underfunding. Econ Polit 27:1–27CrossRef
go back to reference Hahn J, Kuersteiner G (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both n and T are large. Econometrica 70:1639–1657CrossRef Hahn J, Kuersteiner G (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both n and T are large. Econometrica 70:1639–1657CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50:1029–1054CrossRef Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50:1029–1054CrossRef
go back to reference Kelly DG (2014) The political economy of unfunded public pension liabilities. Public Choice 158:21–38CrossRef Kelly DG (2014) The political economy of unfunded public pension liabilities. Public Choice 158:21–38CrossRef
go back to reference Mohan N, Zhang T (2014) An analysis of risk-taking behavior for public defined benefit pension plans. J Bank Financ 40:403–419CrossRef Mohan N, Zhang T (2014) An analysis of risk-taking behavior for public defined benefit pension plans. J Bank Financ 40:403–419CrossRef
go back to reference Munnell AH, Aubry JP, Quinby L (2011) Public pension funding in practice. J Pension Econ Financ 10:247–268CrossRef Munnell AH, Aubry JP, Quinby L (2011) Public pension funding in practice. J Pension Econ Financ 10:247–268CrossRef
go back to reference Nickell SJ (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49:1417–1426CrossRef Nickell SJ (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49:1417–1426CrossRef
go back to reference Podestà F (2002) Recent developments in quantitative comparative methodology: the case of pooled time series cross-section analysis. DSS Papers Soc 3:5–44 Podestà F (2002) Recent developments in quantitative comparative methodology: the case of pooled time series cross-section analysis. DSS Papers Soc 3:5–44
go back to reference Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71:135–158CrossRef Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71:135–158CrossRef
go back to reference Sargan JD (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26:393–415CrossRef Sargan JD (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26:393–415CrossRef
go back to reference Seligman JS (2013) State pension funding practices and the great recession of 2007-2009. J Public Budg, Account Financ Manag 25:346CrossRef Seligman JS (2013) State pension funding practices and the great recession of 2007-2009. J Public Budg, Account Financ Manag 25:346CrossRef
go back to reference Staiger DO, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557–586CrossRef Staiger DO, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557–586CrossRef
go back to reference Wang Q, Peng J (2016) An empirical analysis of state and local public pension plan funded ratio change, 2001-2009. Am Rev Public Adm 46:75–91CrossRef Wang Q, Peng J (2016) An empirical analysis of state and local public pension plan funded ratio change, 2001-2009. Am Rev Public Adm 46:75–91CrossRef
go back to reference Yang T, Mitchell OS (2008) Public sector pension governance, funding and performance: a longitudinal appraisal, Chapter 8. In: Evans J, Orszag M, Piggott J (eds) Pension Fund Governance: A Global Perspective on Financial Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Yang T, Mitchell OS (2008) Public sector pension governance, funding and performance: a longitudinal appraisal, Chapter 8. In: Evans J, Orszag M, Piggott J (eds) Pension Fund Governance: A Global Perspective on Financial Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Metadata
Title
Another look at the determinants of the financial condition of state pension plans
Authors
James R. Barth
Sunghoon Joo
Kang Bok Lee
Publication date
30-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Economics and Finance / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1055-0925
Electronic ISSN: 1938-9744
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9402-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Economics and Finance 3/2018 Go to the issue