Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Appendix

Author : Josemaria Siota

Published in: Linked Innovation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This appendix gathers additional information, on the research project, such as the applied research methodology or the summary of the explained best practices illustrated with case examples, to mention a few.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference George, G., Zahra, S. A. & Wood, D. R. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17, 577–609 (2002). George, G., Zahra, S. A. & Wood, D. R. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17, 577–609 (2002).
2.
go back to reference Azároff, L. V. Industry–University collaboration: how to make it work. Research Management 25, 31–34 (1982). Azároff, L. V. Industry–University collaboration: how to make it work. Research Management 25, 31–34 (1982).
3.
go back to reference Bonaccorsi, A. & Piccaluga, A. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university–industry relationships. R & D Management 24, 229–247 (1994). Bonaccorsi, A. & Piccaluga, A. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university–industry relationships. R & D Management 24, 229–247 (1994).
4.
go back to reference Hall, B. H. et al. Universities as research partners. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 485–491 (2003). Hall, B. H. et al. Universities as research partners. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 485–491 (2003).
5.
go back to reference Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J. C. & Chou, C. J. Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 92, 25–39 (2015). Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J. C. & Chou, C. J. Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 92, 25–39 (2015).
6.
go back to reference Hurmelina, P. Seminar on Innovation: Motivations and Barriers Related to University–Industry Collaboration-Appropriability and the Principle of Publicity (Haas, 2004). Hurmelina, P. Seminar on Innovation: Motivations and Barriers Related to University–Industry Collaboration-Appropriability and the Principle of Publicity (Haas, 2004).
7.
go back to reference Shane, S. University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17, 537–552 (2002). Shane, S. University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17, 537–552 (2002).
8.
go back to reference Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R & D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy 35, 37–55 (2006). Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R & D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy 35, 37–55 (2006).
9.
go back to reference Meyer-Krahmer, F. & Schmoch, U. Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27, 835–851 (1998). Meyer-Krahmer, F. & Schmoch, U. Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27, 835–851 (1998).
10.
go back to reference Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. C. Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy 34, 932–950 (2005). Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. C. Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy 34, 932–950 (2005).
11.
go back to reference Laukkanen, M. Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university‐based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 10, 372–382 (2003). Laukkanen, M. Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university‐based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 10, 372–382 (2003).
12.
go back to reference Spanish National Research Council. Datos (2013). Spanish National Research Council. Datos (2013).
13.
go back to reference Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. & Youtie, J. The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy 44, 34–49 (2015). Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. & Youtie, J. The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy 44, 34–49 (2015).
Metadata
Title
Appendix
Author
Josemaria Siota
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60546-3_8