Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Paper

Application of rough sets for environmental decision support in industry

Authors: Kathleen B. Aviso, Raymond R. Tan, Alvin B. Culaba

Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Issue 1/2008

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Practical environmental decision-making in industry is a complex task that often entails a subtle interplay between alternatives and criteria. Quantitative tools are used to aid decision-makers to arrive at rational conclusions. However, conventional decision aids are often limited by the need to define a priori weights for the criteria being considered; identifying the correct weights to use is not a trivial task and has been the subject of considerable research. An alternative approach based on rough set methodology is described in this work. The procedure develops an empirical, rule-based model from example responses derived from an expert panel. The model can then be used for decision-making in cases resembling the example used previously. Rough set theory also provides numerical measures of the reliability of the rule-based model developed. The approach is illustrated with two case studies, the first involving comparison of alternative energy sources, and the second involving the ranking of pollution prevention strategies in manufacturing.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aloysius J (2006) User Acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: the impact of preference elicitation techniques. Eur J Oper Res 169:273–285MATHCrossRefMathSciNet Aloysius J (2006) User Acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: the impact of preference elicitation techniques. Eur J Oper Res 169:273–285MATHCrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Aviso K, Tan R, Culaba A (2006) A multi-criteria rough set based methodology for life cycle impact assessment. J Philipp Inst Ind Eng 3(1):1–12 Aviso K, Tan R, Culaba A (2006) A multi-criteria rough set based methodology for life cycle impact assessment. J Philipp Inst Ind Eng 3(1):1–12
go back to reference Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) Life cycle assessment and multiobjective optimization. J Cleaner Prod 7:135–143CrossRef Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) Life cycle assessment and multiobjective optimization. J Cleaner Prod 7:135–143CrossRef
go back to reference Beynon M, Driffield N (2005) An illustration of variable precision rough sets model: an analysis of findings of the UK monopolies and mergers commission. Comput Oper Res 32(7):1739–1759MATHCrossRef Beynon M, Driffield N (2005) An illustration of variable precision rough sets model: an analysis of findings of the UK monopolies and mergers commission. Comput Oper Res 32(7):1739–1759MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Culaba A, Purvis M (1999) A methodology for the life cycle and sustainability analysis of manufacturing processes. J Cleaner Prod 7:435–445CrossRef Culaba A, Purvis M (1999) A methodology for the life cycle and sustainability analysis of manufacturing processes. J Cleaner Prod 7:435–445CrossRef
go back to reference Daniel S et al (2004) Aggregating and evaluating the results of different environmental impact assessment methods. Ecol Indic 4:125–138CrossRef Daniel S et al (2004) Aggregating and evaluating the results of different environmental impact assessment methods. Ecol Indic 4:125–138CrossRef
go back to reference Geldermann J, Spengler T, Rentz O (2000) Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:45–65MATHCrossRef Geldermann J, Spengler T, Rentz O (2000) Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:45–65MATHCrossRef
go back to reference González B, Adenso-Diaz B, González-Torre P (2002) A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resour Conserv Recycl 37:61–79CrossRef González B, Adenso-Diaz B, González-Torre P (2002) A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resour Conserv Recycl 37:61–79CrossRef
go back to reference Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1999) Theory and methodology: rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117:63–83MATHCrossRef Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1999) Theory and methodology: rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117:63–83MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2002) Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. Eur J Oper Res 138:247–259MATHCrossRefMathSciNet Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2002) Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. Eur J Oper Res 138:247–259MATHCrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Henson R, Culaba A (2004) A diagnostic model for green productivity assessment of manufacturing processes. Int J LCA 9(6):379–386 Henson R, Culaba A (2004) A diagnostic model for green productivity assessment of manufacturing processes. Int J LCA 9(6):379–386
go back to reference Henson R, Culaba A, Mendoza G (2002) Evaluating environmental performance of pulp and paper manufacturing using the analytic hierarchy process and life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 6(1):15–28CrossRef Henson R, Culaba A, Mendoza G (2002) Evaluating environmental performance of pulp and paper manufacturing using the analytic hierarchy process and life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 6(1):15–28CrossRef
go back to reference Huang J, Ang B, Poh K (1995) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling. Energy 20:843–855CrossRef Huang J, Ang B, Poh K (1995) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling. Energy 20:843–855CrossRef
go back to reference Lo SC, Ma HW, Lo SL (2005) Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo Method. Sci Total Environ 340:25–33 Lo SC, Ma HW, Lo SL (2005) Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo Method. Sci Total Environ 340:25–33
go back to reference Luger G, Stubblefield W (1989) Artificial intelligence and the design of expert systems. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., CaliforniaMATH Luger G, Stubblefield W (1989) Artificial intelligence and the design of expert systems. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., CaliforniaMATH
go back to reference Mann M, Spath P (1997) Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle system. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado Mann M, Spath P (1997) Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle system. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado
go back to reference Mann M, Spath P (2001) A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant. Clean Prod Processes 3:81–91CrossRef Mann M, Spath P (2001) A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant. Clean Prod Processes 3:81–91CrossRef
go back to reference Pawlak Z (1997) Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. Eur J Oper Res 99:48–57MATHCrossRef Pawlak Z (1997) Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. Eur J Oper Res 99:48–57MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Renaud J, Thibault J, Lanouette R, Kiss LN, Zaras K, Fonteix C (2007) Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: net flow and rough set methods in a high yield pulping process. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1418–1432MATHCrossRef Renaud J, Thibault J, Lanouette R, Kiss LN, Zaras K, Fonteix C (2007) Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: net flow and rough set methods in a high yield pulping process. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1418–1432MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Rich E, Knight K (1991) Artificial intelligence. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi Rich E, Knight K (1991) Artificial intelligence. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi
go back to reference Seppälä J, Basson L, Norris G (2001) Decision analysis framework for life cycle impact assessment. J Ind Ecol 5(4):45–68CrossRef Seppälä J, Basson L, Norris G (2001) Decision analysis framework for life cycle impact assessment. J Ind Ecol 5(4):45–68CrossRef
go back to reference Shih LH, Chang YS, Lin YT (2006) Intelligent evaluation approach for electronic product recycling via case-based reasoning. Adv Eng Inf 20:137–145CrossRef Shih LH, Chang YS, Lin YT (2006) Intelligent evaluation approach for electronic product recycling via case-based reasoning. Adv Eng Inf 20:137–145CrossRef
go back to reference Sousa I, Eisenhard J, Wallace D (2000) Approximate life-cycle assessment of product concepts using learning systems. J Ind Ecol 4(4):61–81CrossRef Sousa I, Eisenhard J, Wallace D (2000) Approximate life-cycle assessment of product concepts using learning systems. J Ind Ecol 4(4):61–81CrossRef
go back to reference Spath P, Mann M (2000) Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined cycle power generation system. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado (see also: http://www.doe.gov/bridge) Spath P, Mann M (2000) Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined cycle power generation system. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado (see also: http://​www.​doe.​gov/​bridge)
go back to reference Tan R (2005) Rule-based life cycle impact assessment using modified rough set induction methodology. Environ Model Softw 20:509–513CrossRef Tan R (2005) Rule-based life cycle impact assessment using modified rough set induction methodology. Environ Model Softw 20:509–513CrossRef
go back to reference Tan R, Culaba A (2005) A fuzzy decision support model for the selection of environment-friendly fuels for road vehicles. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 6:3264–3275 Tan R, Culaba A (2005) A fuzzy decision support model for the selection of environment-friendly fuels for road vehicles. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 6:3264–3275
go back to reference Tan R, Culaba A, Purvis M (2004) POLCAGE 1.0—a possibilistic life-cycle assessment model for evaluating alternative transportation fuels. Environ Modell Softw 19:907–918CrossRef Tan R, Culaba A, Purvis M (2004) POLCAGE 1.0—a possibilistic life-cycle assessment model for evaluating alternative transportation fuels. Environ Modell Softw 19:907–918CrossRef
go back to reference Tay F, Shen L (2002) Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model. Eur J Oper Res 141:641–659MATHCrossRef Tay F, Shen L (2002) Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model. Eur J Oper Res 141:641–659MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Thibault J, Taylor D, Yanofsky C, Lanouette R, Fonteix C, Zaras K (2003) Multicriteria optimization of a high yield pulping process with rough sets. Chem Eng Sci 58:203–213CrossRef Thibault J, Taylor D, Yanofsky C, Lanouette R, Fonteix C, Zaras K (2003) Multicriteria optimization of a high yield pulping process with rough sets. Chem Eng Sci 58:203–213CrossRef
go back to reference Tseng TL, Huang CC (2007) Rough set-based approach to feature selection in customer relationship management. The International Journal of Management Science, Omega 35(4):365–383 Tseng TL, Huang CC (2007) Rough set-based approach to feature selection in customer relationship management. The International Journal of Management Science, Omega 35(4):365–383
go back to reference Vestas Wind Systems (2005) Life cycle assessment of offshore and onshore sited wind power plants based on Vestas V90—3.0 MW turbines. Vestas Wind Systems, Denmark (see also: http://www.vestas.com) Vestas Wind Systems (2005) Life cycle assessment of offshore and onshore sited wind power plants based on Vestas V90—3.0 MW turbines. Vestas Wind Systems, Denmark (see also: http://​www.​vestas.​com)
go back to reference Walczak B, Massart DL (1999) Tutorial: rough sets theory. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 47:1–16CrossRef Walczak B, Massart DL (1999) Tutorial: rough sets theory. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 47:1–16CrossRef
go back to reference Wang QH, Li JR (2004) A rough set-based fault ranking prototype system for fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17:909–917CrossRef Wang QH, Li JR (2004) A rough set-based fault ranking prototype system for fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17:909–917CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou P, Ang B, Poh K (2006) Review: decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: an update. Energy 31(14):2604–2622CrossRef Zhou P, Ang B, Poh K (2006) Review: decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: an update. Energy 31(14):2604–2622CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu J, Deshmukh A (2003) Application of Bayesian decision networks to life cycle engineering in green design and manufacturing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:91–103CrossRef Zhu J, Deshmukh A (2003) Application of Bayesian decision networks to life cycle engineering in green design and manufacturing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:91–103CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Application of rough sets for environmental decision support in industry
Authors
Kathleen B. Aviso
Raymond R. Tan
Alvin B. Culaba
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Electronic ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-007-0126-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2008 Go to the issue