Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. Applying Circular Economic Principles to Reduce Embodied Carbon

Authors : Danielle Densley Tingley, Jannik Giesekam, Simone Cooper-Searle

Published in: Embodied Carbon in Buildings

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores the connections between the circular economy and the reduction of embodied carbon. Circular economic approaches focus on maintaining the value of materials for as long as possible. A circular economy seeks to keep materials in circulation, removing the concept of waste from the system and the need for material extraction from primary sources. In a completely circular economy, all ‘waste’ outputs would equal system inputs. If the built environment is thought about in this way, as a system, then the inputs are construction materials, and these materials accumulate in buildings, which can also be thought of as the stock. Demolition waste is the output flow of materials in this system. This concept can also be extended to embodied carbon. Construction materials are input flows of embodied carbon. These emissions are new to the system. The adoption of circular economic design approaches that facilitate longer building lifetimes, greater component and material reuse can reduce the input flow of embodied emissions and ensure already expended embodied carbon remains in stock. This chapter commences with a review of the key literature on the circular economy in construction in general terms and provides an overview of four related design strategies: building reuse, material reuse, design for deconstruction and design for adaptability. A series of ‘good practice’ case studies illustrate the respective strategies across a range of structural types. Each case study is used to provide practical insights on project processes, drivers, enabling conditions and the perceived benefits and challenges of adopting circular economic approaches. These insights are drawn from semi-structured interviews with members of each design team, supplemented by supporting literature. The chapter concludes by drawing out common lessons of how circular economic approaches can contribute to the delivery of a low carbon built environment.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Addis, W., & Schouten, J. (2004). Design for deconstruction. Principles of design to facilitate reuse and recycling. London: CIRIA. Addis, W., & Schouten, J. (2004). Design for deconstruction. Principles of design to facilitate reuse and recycling. London: CIRIA.
go back to reference Assefa, G., & Ambler, C. (2017). To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 146–153.CrossRef Assefa, G., & Ambler, C. (2017). To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 146–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they are built. New York: Viking Penguin. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they are built. New York: Viking Penguin.
go back to reference Cheshire, D. (2016). Building revolutions: Applying the circular economy to the built environment. London: RIBA Publishing. ISBN: 9781859466452. Cheshire, D. (2016). Building revolutions: Applying the circular economy to the built environment. London: RIBA Publishing. ISBN: 9781859466452.
go back to reference Densley Tingley, D. (2013). Design for deconstruction: An appraisal (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield. Densley Tingley, D. (2013). Design for deconstruction: An appraisal (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield.
go back to reference Densley Tingley, D., & Allwood, J. M. (2015). The rise of design for deconstruction – A cradle to cradle approach for the built environment. In: International Sustainable Development Research Society conference, the tipping point: Vulnerability and adaptive capacity, 10th–12th July 2015, Geelong, Australia. Densley Tingley, D., & Allwood, J. M. (2015). The rise of design for deconstruction – A cradle to cradle approach for the built environment. In: International Sustainable Development Research Society conference, the tipping point: Vulnerability and adaptive capacity, 10th–12th July 2015, Geelong, Australia.
go back to reference Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. M. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652.CrossRef Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. M. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652.CrossRef
go back to reference Hosseini, M. R., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., & Lehmann, S. (2015). Reverse logistics in the construction industry. Waste Management Research, 33(6), 499–514.CrossRef Hosseini, M. R., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., & Lehmann, S. (2015). Reverse logistics in the construction industry. Waste Management Research, 33(6), 499–514.CrossRef
go back to reference Pinder, J. A., Schmidt, R., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A., & Saker, J. (2017). What is meant by adaptability in buildings? Facilities, 35(1/2), 2–20.CrossRef Pinder, J. A., Schmidt, R., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A., & Saker, J. (2017). What is meant by adaptability in buildings? Facilities, 35(1/2), 2–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C. (2014). Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86, 87–92.CrossRef Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C. (2014). Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86, 87–92.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying Circular Economic Principles to Reduce Embodied Carbon
Authors
Danielle Densley Tingley
Jannik Giesekam
Simone Cooper-Searle
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_12