Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Architecture and Deployment Models-SDN Protocols, APIs, and Layers, Applications and Implementations

Authors : Bhawana Rudra, Thanmayee S.

Published in: Software Defined Internet of Everything

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The current Internet infrastructure is not anticipating such a growth of IoT and increasing the network complexity. New network architecture for the management of IoT data flow and also catering to the Quality of Service of different IoT services is required. The existing incompatible solutions are limited to the early adoption of IoT. The standardization bodies, industries, researches were involved in developing standards to support end-to-end connection, interoperation between devices from different vendors and also provide cost-efficient solutions. The Working Groups (WG) at the IETF introduced new solutions that have allowed the connection of low-power wireless networks to the Internet. In spite of the vast exploration of solutions for deploying IoT, the management of IoT networks requires complex routing topologies with a simplified user operation. This gives rise to the need for centralized network control which is facilitated by Software Defined Networking (SDN). SDN was a standard technology for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) already available which is the early version of IoT as the world knows it today. SDN provides a framework to ease the complexity involved in the management of sophisticated networks. We discuss various protocols present in the architecture along with the research challenges for the future.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
2.
go back to reference Aujla, G. S., & Kumar, N. (2018). SDN-based energy management scheme for sustainability of data centers: An analysis on renewable energy sources and electric vehicles participation. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 117, 228–245.CrossRef Aujla, G. S., & Kumar, N. (2018). SDN-based energy management scheme for sustainability of data centers: An analysis on renewable energy sources and electric vehicles participation. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 117, 228–245.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aujla, G. S., Jindal, A., Kumar, N., & Singh, M. (2016). SDN-based data center energy management system using RES and electric vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). New York: IEEE. Aujla, G. S., Jindal, A., Kumar, N., & Singh, M. (2016). SDN-based data center energy management system using RES and electric vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). New York: IEEE.
4.
go back to reference Aujla, G. S., Jindal, A., & Kumar, N. (2018). EVaaS: Electric vehicle-as-a-service for energy trading in SDN-enabled smart transportation system. Computer Networks, 143, 247–262.CrossRef Aujla, G. S., Jindal, A., & Kumar, N. (2018). EVaaS: Electric vehicle-as-a-service for energy trading in SDN-enabled smart transportation system. Computer Networks, 143, 247–262.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Aujla, G. S., Chaudhary, R., Kumar, N., Kumar, R., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2018). An ensembled scheme for QoS-aware traffic flow management in software defined networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7). New York: IEEE. Aujla, G. S., Chaudhary, R., Kumar, N., Kumar, R., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2018). An ensembled scheme for QoS-aware traffic flow management in software defined networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7). New York: IEEE.
6.
go back to reference Aujla, G. S, Singh, A., & Kumar, N. (2019). Adaptflow: Adaptive flow forwarding scheme for software-defined industrial networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7), 5843–5851.CrossRef Aujla, G. S, Singh, A., & Kumar, N. (2019). Adaptflow: Adaptive flow forwarding scheme for software-defined industrial networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7), 5843–5851.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Braun, W., & Menth, M. (2014). Software-defined networking using OpenFlow: Protocols, applications and architectural design choices. Future Internet 2014, 6, 302–336.CrossRef Braun, W., & Menth, M. (2014). Software-defined networking using OpenFlow: Protocols, applications and architectural design choices. Future Internet 2014, 6, 302–336.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cai, Z., Cox, A. L., Ng, T. S. E. (2010). Maestro: A System for Scalable OpenFlow Control, Rice University Technical Report TR10-08, December 2010. Cai, Z., Cox, A. L., Ng, T. S. E. (2010). Maestro: A System for Scalable OpenFlow Control, Rice University Technical Report TR10-08, December 2010.
10.
go back to reference Cai, Z., Cox, A. L., & Ng, T. S. E. (2011). Maestro: Balancing Fairness, Latency, and Throughput in the OpenFlow Control Plane. Rice University Technical Report TR11-07, December 2011. Cai, Z., Cox, A. L., & Ng, T. S. E. (2011). Maestro: Balancing Fairness, Latency, and Throughput in the OpenFlow Control Plane. Rice University Technical Report TR11-07, December 2011.
11.
go back to reference Cao, H., Wu, S., Aujla, G. S., Wang, Q., Yang, L., & Zhu, H. (2019). Dynamic embedding and quality of service-driven adjustment for cloud networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(2), 1406–1416.CrossRef Cao, H., Wu, S., Aujla, G. S., Wang, Q., Yang, L., & Zhu, H. (2019). Dynamic embedding and quality of service-driven adjustment for cloud networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(2), 1406–1416.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Campbell, A. T., et al. (1999). Open signaling for ATM, internet and mobile networks (OPENSIG’98). ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(1), 97–108.CrossRef Campbell, A. T., et al. (1999). Open signaling for ATM, internet and mobile networks (OPENSIG’98). ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(1), 97–108.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conti, M., Chong, S., Fdida, S., Jia, W., Karl, H., Lin, Y., Mähönen, P., Maier, M., Molva, R., Uhlig, S., & Zukerman, M. (2011). Research challenges towards the Future Internet. Computer Communications 2011, 34(18), 2115–2134. Conti, M., Chong, S., Fdida, S., Jia, W., Karl, H., Lin, Y., Mähönen, P., Maier, M., Molva, R., Uhlig, S., & Zukerman, M. (2011). Research challenges towards the Future Internet. Computer Communications 2011, 34(18), 2115–2134.
15.
go back to reference Feghali, A., Kilany, R., & Chamoun, M. (2015). SDN security problems and solutions analysis. In 2015 International Conference on Protocol Engineering (ICPE) and International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems (NTDS), Paris, 2015 (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/NOTERE.2015.7293514. Feghali, A., Kilany, R., & Chamoun, M. (2015). SDN security problems and solutions analysis. In 2015 International Conference on Protocol Engineering (ICPE) and International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems (NTDS), Paris, 2015 (pp. 1–5). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​NOTERE.​2015.​7293514.
16.
go back to reference Fei, H., Hao, Q., & Bao, K. (2013). A Survey on software-defined network (SDN) and OpenFlow: From concept to implementation. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 2181–2206 (2013) Fei, H., Hao, Q., & Bao, K. (2013). A Survey on software-defined network (SDN) and OpenFlow: From concept to implementation. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 2181–2206 (2013)
18.
go back to reference Foster, N., Freedman, M. J., Harrison, R., Rexford, J., Meola, M. L., & Walker, D. (2010). Frenetic: A highlevel language for OpenFlow networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Programmable Routers for Extensible Services of Tomorrow (PRESTO ’10), Philadelphia, PA (2010) (article no. 6) Foster, N., Freedman, M. J., Harrison, R., Rexford, J., Meola, M. L., & Walker, D. (2010). Frenetic: A highlevel language for OpenFlow networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Programmable Routers for Extensible Services of Tomorrow (PRESTO ’10), Philadelphia, PA (2010) (article no. 6)
19.
go back to reference Foster, N., Harrison, R., Freedman, M. J., Monsanto, C., Rexford, J., Story, A., & Walker, D. (2011). Frenetic: A network programming language. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices—ICFP ’11 (Vol. 46, pp. 279–291). Foster, N., Harrison, R., Freedman, M. J., Monsanto, C., Rexford, J., Story, A., & Walker, D. (2011). Frenetic: A network programming language. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices—ICFP ’11 (Vol. 46, pp. 279–291).
20.
go back to reference Hakiri, A., Gokhale, A., Berthou, P., Schmidt, D. C., & Gayraud, T. (2014). Software-defined networking: Challenges and research opportunities for Future Internet. Computer Networks, 75(Part A), 453–471. ISSN:1389-1286. Hakiri, A., Gokhale, A., Berthou, P., Schmidt, D. C., & Gayraud, T. (2014). Software-defined networking: Challenges and research opportunities for Future Internet. Computer Networks, 75(Part A), 453–471. ISSN:1389-1286.
21.
go back to reference Hicks, M., et al. (1998). PLAN: A packet language for active networks. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 34(1), 86–93 (1998). Hicks, M., et al. (1998). PLAN: A packet language for active networks. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 34(1), 86–93 (1998).
24.
go back to reference Kim, E.-D., Lee, S.-I., Choi, Y., Shin, M.-K., & Kim, H.-J. (2014). A flow entry management scheme for reducing controller overhead. In 2014 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (pp. 754–757). Kim, E.-D., Lee, S.-I., Choi, Y., Shin, M.-K., & Kim, H.-J. (2014). A flow entry management scheme for reducing controller overhead. In 2014 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (pp. 754–757).
27.
go back to reference Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Verissimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14–76.CrossRef Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Verissimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14–76.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference L. Foundation, Opendaylight: An Open Source Community and Meritocracy for Software-Defined Networking. A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project (April 2013). L. Foundation, Opendaylight: An Open Source Community and Meritocracy for Software-Defined Networking. A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project (April 2013).
29.
go back to reference Lara, A., Kolasani, A., & Ramamurthy, B. (2014). Network innovation using OpenFlow: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 493–512 (2014). First Quarter. Lara, A., Kolasani, A., & Ramamurthy, B. (2014). Network innovation using OpenFlow: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 493–512 (2014). First Quarter.
30.
go back to reference Liu, D., & Deng, H. (2013). Mobility Support in Software Defined Networking, Tech. Rep. Liu, D., & Deng, H. (2013). Mobility Support in Software Defined Networking, Tech. Rep.
32.
go back to reference Monsanto, C., Reich, J., Foster, N., Rexford, J., & Walker, D. (2013). Composing software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Monsanto, C., Reich, J., Foster, N., Rexford, J., & Walker, D. (2013). Composing software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation.
33.
go back to reference NSDI’13 (2013). Proceedings of the 10th USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’13), Lombard, IL (pp. 1–14). NSDI’13 (2013). Proceedings of the 10th USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’13), Lombard, IL (pp. 1–14).
34.
go back to reference Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(3), 1617–1634.CrossRef Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(3), 1617–1634.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Open Network Foundation (2013). SDN Architecture Overview, version 1.0. Open Network Foundation (2013). SDN Architecture Overview, version 1.0.
39.
go back to reference Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., Viljoen, N., Miller, M., & Rao, N. (2013). Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2013, 36–43.CrossRef Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., Viljoen, N., Miller, M., & Rao, N. (2013). Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2013, 36–43.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tennenhouse, D. L., et al. (1997). A survey of active network research. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(1), 80–86.CrossRef Tennenhouse, D. L., et al. (1997). A survey of active network research. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(1), 80–86.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Van der Merwe, J. E., et al. (1998). The tempest—A practical framework for network programmability. IEEE Network, 12(3), 20–28.CrossRef Van der Merwe, J. E., et al. (1998). The tempest—A practical framework for network programmability. IEEE Network, 12(3), 20–28.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Wetherall, D. J., Guttag, J. V., & Tennenhouse, D. L. (1998). ANTS: A toolkit for building and dynamically deploying network protocols. In IEEE Open Architectures and Network Programming (pp. 117–129). Wetherall, D. J., Guttag, J. V., & Tennenhouse, D. L. (1998). ANTS: A toolkit for building and dynamically deploying network protocols. In IEEE Open Architectures and Network Programming (pp. 117–129).
45.
go back to reference Yeganeh, S.H., Tootoonchian, A., & Ganjali, Y. (2013). On scalability of software-defined networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(2), 136–141.CrossRef Yeganeh, S.H., Tootoonchian, A., & Ganjali, Y. (2013). On scalability of software-defined networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(2), 136–141.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Architecture and Deployment Models-SDN Protocols, APIs, and Layers, Applications and Implementations
Authors
Bhawana Rudra
Thanmayee S.
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89328-6_4

Premium Partner