2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
Arguing about Emotion
Authors : Martyn Lloyd-Kelly, Adam Wyner
Published in: Advances in User Modeling
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Emotions are commonly thought to be beyond rational analysis. In this paper, we develop the position that emotions can be the
objects
of argumentation and used as terms in
emotional argumentation schemes
. Thus, we can argue about whether or not, according to normative standards and available evidence, it is plausible that an individual had a particular emotion. This is particularly salient in legal cases, where decisions can depend on explicit arguments about emotional states.