Top

Published in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Arms Control and Security Cooperation: Contending Approaches

Author : Gamal M. Selim

Published in: Global and Regional Approaches to Arms Control in the Middle East

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Arms control is but one of a series of alternative approaches to achieving international security through military strategies. Although the basic idea of arms control has its roots in the nineteenth century, the rise of modern arms control as a theory and practice can be traced to the Cold War era as an outcome of the American-Soviet nuclear arms race. In fact, arms control started to assume considerable importance in the field of security studies toward the late 1960s when the two superpowers entered their Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) in Vienna and Helsinki in 1969 and concluded their first arms control agreement, SALT I, in 1972. Since then, the Americans, the Soviets and the Europeans have spent more than 30 years in discussing, negotiating, and signing different agreements on arms control in both the nuclear and the conventional fields.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Introduction

next chapter The Rise of the Arms Control Agenda in the Middle East

“Strengthening International Regimes for Arms Control and Disarmament”. Background Note prepared by the United Nations Department for Disarmament Affairs, New York, 19–20 October 2004.

Statement by Harold E. Stassen to the UN Disarmament Subcommittee, 6 September 1955. Documents on Disarmament 1945–1959, Vol. I. (Washington, DC: ACDA, 1960), p. 512.

For a detailed review of CBMs within the context of the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty, see the text of the “Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty”, 1979; available at: http://www.mideastweb.org/egyptisraeltreaty.htm.

See the text of “The Helsinki Final Act”, 1975; available at: http://www.osce.org/mc/39501?download=true.

See text of “The Stockholm Document”, 1986; available at:http://www.osce.org/fsc/41238

Under START I, the two superpowers were obliged to cut the number of their strategic nuclear warheads to no more than 6,000 each, which could be deployed on no more than 1,600 strategic missiles and heavy bombers. The treaty also banned the production, testing and deployment of new or modified ICBMs and SLBMs with more than ten warheads, and provided for intrusive verification procedures.

Ahmar, M. (2001). Rationalizing the concept of confidence-building measures. In M. Ahmar (Ed.), The challenge of confidence-building in South Asia. Karachi: Paramount Books Ltd.

Attina, F., & Attina, F. (2001). Partnership and security: Some theoretical and empirical reasons for positive developments in the euro-mediterranean area. In F. Attina & S. Stavridis (Eds.), The Barcelona process and euro-mediterranean issues from Stuttgart to Marseilles. Milano: Dott. A. Giuffre Editors.

Blacker, C. D., & Duffy, G. (1984). International arms control: Issues and agreements. California: Stanford University Press.

Booth, K. (1987). Disarmament and arms control. In J. Baylis, K. Booth, J. Garnett, & P. Williams (Eds.), Contemporary strategy I.: Theories and concepts. Teaneck, NJ: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

Bowker, M., & Williams, P. (1985). Helsinki and west European security. International Affairs, 61,4 (Autumn).

Brauch, H. G. (2000). From confidence to partnership building measures in Europe and the mediterranean: Conceptual and political efforts revisited. In H. G. Brauch, A. Marquina, A. Biad, & P. Liotta (Eds.), Euro-mediterranean partnership for the 21st century. London: Macmillan.

Brauch, H. G. (2000a). Beyond Stuttgart: Prospects for confidence and partnership building measures in euro-mediterranean relations for the 21st century. In H. G. Brauch, A. Marquina, A. Biad, & P. Liotta (Eds.), Euro-mediterranean partnership for the 21st century. London: Macmillan.

Bromley, M., & Perdomo, C. (2005). CBMs in Latin America and the effect of arms acquisitions by Venezuela. Working Paper (WP) 41/2005, Real Instituto Elcano, 22 September.

Bull, H. (1965). The control of the arms race: Disarmament and arms control in the missile age. New York: Fredeirck A. Praeger Publishers.

Desjardins, M.-F. (1996). Rethinking confidence-building measures: Obstacles to agreement and the risks of overselling the process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, N. W. (1998). Bridging the gaps on arms control. In N. Gallagher (Ed.), Arms control: New approaches to theory and policy. New York: Frank Cass.

Glaser, C. L. (1995). Realists as optimists: Cooperation and self-help. International Security, 19, 3.

Gray, C. (1992). House of cards: Why arms control must fail. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Griffiths, M., & O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International relations: The key concepts. London: Routledge.

Gunduz, A. (1994). Security & Human Rights in Europe: The CECE process. Istanbul: University of Marmara.

Haggard, S, & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41, 3 (Summer).

Heller, M. A. (2000). Weapons of mass destruction and Euro-Mediterranean policies of arms control: An Israeli perspective. In A. Vasconcelos & G. Joffe (Eds.), The Barcelona process: Building a Euro-Mediterranean regional community. London: Frank Cass.

Holst, J., & Melander, K. (1977, July/August). European security and confidence-building measures. Survival.

Holst, J. (1987). A CBM regime in Europe: 19 interrelated propositions. In R. B. Byers, F. S. Larrabee, & A. Lynch (Eds.), Confidence-building measures and international security. New York: Institute for East–West Security Studies.

Jervis, R. (1993). Arms control, stability, and causes of war. Political Science Quarterly, 108, 2 (Summer).

Kemp, G. (1991). The control of the Middle East arms race. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Krause, K. (1997). Cross-cultural dimensions of multilateral non-proliferation and arms control dialogues: An overview. In A. Latham (Ed.), Non-proliferation agreements, arrangements and responses: Proceedings of the 1996 Canadian non-proliferation workshop. Toronto: The York Center for International and Security Studies.

Larsen, J. A. (2002). An introduction to arms control. In J. A. Larsen (Ed.), Arms control: Cooperative security in a changing environment. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Macintosh, J. (1987). Confidence-building measures—a conceptual exploration. In R. B. Byers, F. S. Larrabee, & A. Lynch (Eds.), Confidence-building measures and international security. New York: Institute for East–West, Security Studies.

Macintosh, J. (1996). Confidence building in the arms control process: A transformation view. A study prepared for the Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (October).

McFate, P. B. et al. (Eds.), (1994). The converging roles of arms control verification, confidence-building measures, and peace operations: opportunities for harmonization and synergies. A Study prepared for the Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Ottawa, Canada (October).

Nachmias, C. F., & Nachmias, D. (1992). Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St.Martin’s Press.

Reich, B. (1994). The United States and the Arab–Israeli peace process. In G. Ben-Dor & D. B. Dewitt (Eds.), Confidence building measures in the Middle East. San Francisco: Westview Press.

Rittberger, V., Efinger, M., & Mendler, M. (1990, February). Toward an east–west security regime: The case of confidence-and security-building measures. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 1.

Schelling, T. C., & Halperin, M. H. (1985). Strategy and arms control. Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassy’s.

Schofield, J. (2000, December). Arms control failure and the balance of power. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33, 4.

Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L. S., & Cook, S. W. (1976). Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt and Rinehart.

Simon, J. (1978). Basic research methods in social science and the art of empirical investigation. New York: Random House.

Steinberg, G. M. (2004). The centrality of confidence-building measures: Lessons from the Middle East. In A. Schnabel & D. Carment (Eds.), Conflict prevention: From rhetoric to reality. Ottawa: Lexington Books.

Tanner, F. (2000). The Euro-Mediterranean security partnership: Prospects for arms limitation and confidence-building. In A. Vasconcelos & G. Joffe (Eds.), The Barcelona process: Building a Euro-Mediterranean regional community. London: Frank Cass.

Tuchman, B. (1984). The alternative to arms control. Los Angeles: Center for International and Strategic Studies, University of California at Los Angeles.

Title: Arms Control and Security Cooperation: Contending Approaches
Author: Gamal M. Selim
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Global and Regional Approaches to Arms Control in the Middle East
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29313-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-29314-6

Copyright Year: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29314-6_2