Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Audience Analysis and Reception Studies of Rhetoric

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Without audiences, there would be no rhetoric. Understanding audiences, therefore, is essential for understanding rhetoric. If we do not understand when, how and why audiences are influenced by communication, or see how they negotiate and reject rhetorical messages, then we do not understand rhetoric. In light of this, it is surprising that rhetorical scholars have paid so little attention to audiences—or to be more precise: to empirical audiences. This book encourages researchers to do more studies of empirical audiences and their reception of rhetoric. The chapters offer examples of central methods of understanding reception and empirical audiences: historical approaches such as archival-historical methodology and historiography, interviews and focus group research, protocol analysis, ethnographic participation and observation, appropriation as reception and finally triangulation, where the researcher applies several methods in unison. While these methods are common in media studies, anthropology, cultural studies and other fields of research, they are surprisingly rare in rhetorical studies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
I thank Richard Toye for this point.
 
Literature
go back to reference Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen. Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
go back to reference Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang. Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
go back to reference Benbunan-Fich, Raquel. 2001. Using Protocol Analysis to Evaluate the Usability of a Commercial Web Site. Information and Management 39: 151–163.CrossRef Benbunan-Fich, Raquel. 2001. Using Protocol Analysis to Evaluate the Usability of a Commercial Web Site. Information and Management 39: 151–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Bengtsson, Mette. 2014. For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede. En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen. Bengtsson, Mette. 2014. For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede. En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
go back to reference Benoit, William L., and Mary Jeanette Smythe. 2003. Rhetorical Theory as Message Reception: A Cognitive Response Approach to Rhetorical Theory and Criticism. Communication Studies 54 (1): 96–114. doi:10.1080/10510970309363268.CrossRef Benoit, William L., and Mary Jeanette Smythe. 2003. Rhetorical Theory as Message Reception: A Cognitive Response Approach to Rhetorical Theory and Criticism. Communication Studies 54 (1): 96–114. doi:10.​1080/​1051097030936326​8.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14. ———. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.
go back to reference ———. 1980. Functional Communication. In Rhetoric in Transition. Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric, ed. E.E. White, 21–38. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. ———. 1980. Functional Communication. In Rhetoric in Transition. Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric, ed. E.E. White, 21–38. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
go back to reference Black, Edwin. 2013. The Second Persona. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 595–603. New York: Routledge. Black, Edwin. 2013. The Second Persona. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 595–603. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Blair, Carole. 2015. “We Are All Just Prisoners Here of Our Own Device” Rhetoric in Speech Communication After Wingspread. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina. Blair, Carole. 2015. “We Are All Just Prisoners Here of Our Own Device” Rhetoric in Speech Communication After Wingspread. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
go back to reference Blair, Carole, and Neil Michel. 1999. Commemorating in the Theme Park Zone: Reading the Astronauts Memorial. In At the Intersection: Cultural Studies and Rhetorical Studies, ed. Thomas Rosteck, 29–83. New York: Guilford Press. Blair, Carole, and Neil Michel. 1999. Commemorating in the Theme Park Zone: Reading the Astronauts Memorial. In At the Intersection: Cultural Studies and Rhetorical Studies, ed. Thomas Rosteck, 29–83. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Booth, Wayne C. 1983. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Booth, Wayne C. 1983. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her. A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her. A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger.
go back to reference Ceccarelli, Leah. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Ceccarelli, Leah. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Charland, Maurice. 2013. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 433–447. New York: Routledge. Charland, Maurice. 2013. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 433–447. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Condit, Celeste Michelle. 2013. The Rhetorical Limits of Polysemy. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson. New York: Routledge. Condit, Celeste Michelle. 2013. The Rhetorical Limits of Polysemy. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Condit, C.M., and M. Williams. 1997. Audience Responses to the Discourse of Medical Genetics: Evidence Against the Critique of Medicalization. Health Communication 9 (3): 219–235.CrossRef Condit, C.M., and M. Williams. 1997. Audience Responses to the Discourse of Medical Genetics: Evidence Against the Critique of Medicalization. Health Communication 9 (3): 219–235.CrossRef
go back to reference Drury, Sara A. Mehltretter. 2015. Responses to Rhetoric’s Invitation. An Analysis of the Bush Presidency, the Immigration Debate, and Rhetoric’s Effect. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 139–161. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Drury, Sara A. Mehltretter. 2015. Responses to Rhetoric’s Invitation. An Analysis of the Bush Presidency, the Immigration Debate, and Rhetoric’s Effect. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 139–161. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
go back to reference Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
go back to reference Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Michael K. Middleton. 2016. In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections Between Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 511–524. doi:10.1177/1532708616655820.CrossRef Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Michael K. Middleton. 2016. In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections Between Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 511–524. doi:10.​1177/​1532708616655820​.CrossRef
go back to reference Ericsson, K. Anders, and Herbert Simon. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review 87: 215–251.CrossRef Ericsson, K. Anders, and Herbert Simon. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review 87: 215–251.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1984/1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Boston, MA: MIT Press. ———. 1984/1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Fiske, John. 1986. Television: Polysemy and Popularity. Critical Studies in Media Communication 3 (4): 391–408. Fiske, John. 1986. Television: Polysemy and Popularity. Critical Studies in Media Communication 3 (4): 391–408.
go back to reference Flick, Uwe. 2014. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRef Flick, Uwe. 2014. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Flower, Linda, et al. 1986. Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision. College Composition and Communication 37 (1): 16–55.CrossRef Flower, Linda, et al. 1986. Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision. College Composition and Communication 37 (1): 16–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Flower, Linda S., and John R. Hayes. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39 (4): 449–461.CrossRef Flower, Linda S., and John R. Hayes. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39 (4): 449–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.CrossRef Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.CrossRef
go back to reference Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Gentikow, Barbara. 1997. Retorikk og resepsjon. Et medievitenskapelig perspektiv. Rhetorica Scandinavica 3: 26–41. Gentikow, Barbara. 1997. Retorikk og resepsjon. Et medievitenskapelig perspektiv. Rhetorica Scandinavica 3: 26–41.
go back to reference ———. 1998. The Contested Power of Persuasion. Nordicom Review 16: 143–158. ———. 1998. The Contested Power of Persuasion. Nordicom Review 16: 143–158.
go back to reference Greenwood, Anna, and Andrea Bernardi. 2014. Understanding the Rift, the (Still) Uneasy Bedfellows of History and Organization Studies. Organization 21 (6): 907–932.CrossRef Greenwood, Anna, and Andrea Bernardi. 2014. Understanding the Rift, the (Still) Uneasy Bedfellows of History and Organization Studies. Organization 21 (6): 907–932.CrossRef
go back to reference Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In Culture, Media, Language, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham. Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In Culture, Media, Language, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
go back to reference Hariman, Robert, and John Louis Lucaites. 2007. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Hariman, Robert, and John Louis Lucaites. 2007. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Hauser, Gerard A. 2011. Attending the Vernacular: A Plea for an Ethnographic Rhetoric. In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. Christian Meyer and Felix Girke, 157–172. New York: Berhahan Books. Hauser, Gerard A. 2011. Attending the Vernacular: A Plea for an Ethnographic Rhetoric. In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. Christian Meyer and Felix Girke, 157–172. New York: Berhahan Books.
go back to reference Hayes, John R., and Linda Flower. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39: 449–461.CrossRef Hayes, John R., and Linda Flower. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39: 449–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. 2007. Online Ethos. Retorisk kritik af karakterfremstilling i politikere, bloggere og brugerfællesskabers webretorik. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen. Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. 2007. Online Ethos. Retorisk kritik af karakterfremstilling i politikere, bloggere og brugerfællesskabers webretorik. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
go back to reference ———. 2008. Online Ethos: Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. ———. 2008. Online Ethos: Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
go back to reference Holub, Robert C. 2003. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. Oxon, England: Routledge. Holub, Robert C. 2003. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. Oxon, England: Routledge.
go back to reference Houck, Davis W. 2015. Of ‘Very Few Men’ with ‘Unusual Gifts’ and ‘Acute Sensitivity’—Whither Wichelns, Black and Zarefsky? In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects: Past, Present and Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 282–296. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Houck, Davis W. 2015. Of ‘Very Few Men’ with ‘Unusual Gifts’ and ‘Acute Sensitivity’—Whither Wichelns, Black and Zarefsky? In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects: Past, Present and Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 282–296. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
go back to reference Houck, Davis W., and Mihaela Nocasian. 2002. FDR’s First Inaugural Address: Text, Context, and Reception. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (4): 649–678.CrossRef Houck, Davis W., and Mihaela Nocasian. 2002. FDR’s First Inaugural Address: Text, Context, and Reception. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (4): 649–678.CrossRef
go back to reference Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Der Akt des Lesens. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Der Akt des Lesens. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2012. Lost, Found, and Made: Qualitative Data in the Study of Three-Step Flows of Communication. In The Handbook of Global Media Research, ed. Ingrid Volkmer, 435–450. Aberdeen: Blackwell Publishing. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2012. Lost, Found, and Made: Qualitative Data in the Study of Three-Step Flows of Communication. In The Handbook of Global Media Research, ed. Ingrid Volkmer, 435–450. Aberdeen: Blackwell Publishing.
go back to reference Kiewe, Amos. 2015. Letters to Franklin D. Roosevelt Following the First Fireside Chat. The Case for Studying Effects. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects. Past, Present, Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 178–192. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Kiewe, Amos. 2015. Letters to Franklin D. Roosevelt Following the First Fireside Chat. The Case for Studying Effects. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects. Past, Present, Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 178–192. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
go back to reference Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising. A Cognitive, Contextual and Reception Oriented Approach. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–132. Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising. A Cognitive, Contextual and Reception Oriented Approach. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–132.
go back to reference ———. 2008. Retoriske omstændigheder. Rhetorica Scandinavica 48: 42–63. ———. 2008. Retoriske omstændigheder. Rhetorica Scandinavica 48: 42–63.
go back to reference ———. 2013. Speaking to Europe: A Rhetorical Approach to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Speech to the EU Parliament, Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRef ———. 2013. Speaking to Europe: A Rhetorical Approach to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Speech to the EU Parliament, Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2015b. Where Is Visual Argument? In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, ed. H. Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 107–117. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ———. 2015b. Where Is Visual Argument? In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, ed. H. Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 107–117. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
go back to reference ———. 2016. Symbolic Condensation and Thick Representation in Visual and Multimodal Communication. Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 265–281. ———. 2016. Symbolic Condensation and Thick Representation in Visual and Multimodal Communication. Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 265–281.
go back to reference Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Landau, Jamie. 2016. Feeling Rhetorical Critic: Another Affective-Emotional Field Method for Rhetorical Studies. In Text-Field Innovations in Rhetorical Methods, ed. L. McKinnon Sara, Robert Aasen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Landau, Jamie. 2016. Feeling Rhetorical Critic: Another Affective-Emotional Field Method for Rhetorical Studies. In Text-Field Innovations in Rhetorical Methods, ed. L. McKinnon Sara, Robert Aasen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
go back to reference Lewis, Clayton. 1982. Using the “Thinking Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design. New York: IBM TJ Watson Research Center. Lewis, Clayton. 1982. Using the “Thinking Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design. New York: IBM TJ Watson Research Center.
go back to reference Leavy, Patricia. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Leavy, Patricia. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 1996. Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research. Journal of Communication 46 (2): 79–98.CrossRef Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 1996. Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research. Journal of Communication 46 (2): 79–98.CrossRef
go back to reference McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The Problem of Audience in Historical Economics: Rhetorical Thoughts on a Text by Robert Fogel. History and Theory 24 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/2504940.CrossRef McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The Problem of Audience in Historical Economics: Rhetorical Thoughts on a Text by Robert Fogel. History and Theory 24 (1): 1–22. doi:10.​2307/​2504940.CrossRef
go back to reference McCroskey, James C. 2016. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. McCroskey, James C. 2016. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
go back to reference McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture. Western Journal of Communication 54 (3): 274–289.CrossRef McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture. Western Journal of Communication 54 (3): 274–289.CrossRef
go back to reference McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016. Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016. Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
go back to reference Meyer, Renate E., Markus A. Höllerer, Dennis Jancsary, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2013. The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues. The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 489–555. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.781867.CrossRef Meyer, Renate E., Markus A. Höllerer, Dennis Jancsary, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2013. The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues. The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 489–555. doi:10.​1080/​19416520.​2013.​781867.CrossRef
go back to reference Middleton, Michael, Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric In Situ, Participatory Critical Rhetoric. Lanham: Lexington Books. Middleton, Michael, Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric In Situ, Participatory Critical Rhetoric. Lanham: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Morley, David. 2006. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review 9: 101–121.CrossRef Morley, David. 2006. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review 9: 101–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 2013. The Critique of Vernacular Discourse. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 499–523. New York: Routledge. Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 2013. The Critique of Vernacular Discourse. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 499–523. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, La nouvelle rhétorique traité de l’argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, La nouvelle rhétorique traité de l’argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
go back to reference Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press. Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Schrøder, Kim Christian, Catherine Murray, Kirsten Drotner, and Stephen Kline. 2003. Researching Audiences. London: Arnold. Schrøder, Kim Christian, Catherine Murray, Kirsten Drotner, and Stephen Kline. 2003. Researching Audiences. London: Arnold.
go back to reference Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Stromer-Galley, J., and E. Schiappa. 1998. The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture Criticism. Communication Theory 8 (1): 27–62.CrossRef Stromer-Galley, J., and E. Schiappa. 1998. The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture Criticism. Communication Theory 8 (1): 27–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Thonssen, Lester, and A. Craig Baird. 1948. Speech Criticism. The Development of Standards for Rhetorical Criticism. New York: The Ronald Press Company. Thonssen, Lester, and A. Craig Baird. 1948. Speech Criticism. The Development of Standards for Rhetorical Criticism. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
go back to reference Tindale, Christopher W. 2013. Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4): 508–532.CrossRef Tindale, Christopher W. 2013. Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4): 508–532.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2015. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 2015. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Toye, Richard. 2013. The Roar of the Lion: The Untold Story of Churchill’s World War II Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Toye, Richard. 2013. The Roar of the Lion: The Untold Story of Churchill’s World War II Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Wander, Philip. 2013. The Third Persona: An Ideological Turn in Rhetorical Theory. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 604–623. New York: Routledge. Wander, Philip. 2013. The Third Persona: An Ideological Turn in Rhetorical Theory. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 604–623. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Whipple, Amy. 2009. Revisiting the “Rivers of Blood” Controversy: Letters to Enoch Powell. Journal of British Studies 48 (3): 717–735. doi:10.1086/598214.CrossRef Whipple, Amy. 2009. Revisiting the “Rivers of Blood” Controversy: Letters to Enoch Powell. Journal of British Studies 48 (3): 717–735. doi:10.​1086/​598214.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Audience Analysis and Reception Studies of Rhetoric
Author
Jens E. Kjeldsen
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_1