Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Review of Managerial Science 1/2020

12-07-2018 | Original Paper

Automating profitably together: Is there an impact of open innovation and automation on firm turnover?

Authors: Petra A. Nylund, Xavier Ferras-Hernandez, Alexander Brem

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 1/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Technologies like computer vision, advanced sensors, internet of things, 3D printing, big data, or artificial intelligence are penetrating all facets of the industrial value chains. Hence, industry is engaged in an accelerated automation race where industrial automation converts value chains into intelligent, data-driven systems. This generates new business models and spurs firm competitiveness in general. Companies thus pay attention to the development, acquisition, and incorporation of related technologies to profit from these developments in specific. For this, they must incorporate external flows of knowledge to succeed in innovation. Yet, there is a dearth of research that links open innovation to the incorporation of industrial automation, and to firm performance. Hence, this paper takes a knowledge-based view of the firm and sheds light on the moderating role of the processes of open innovation on the economic results of firms’ subject to automation. In order to do so, we estimate the impact of the interaction of open innovation and automation on firm turnover using panel data for 5287 Spanish firms from a variety of manufacture and service industries. We separate the effects for different open-innovation partners and find that turnover is increased for those automating firms that engage in open innovation with suppliers. These results indicate that suppliers possess the knowledge required for successful automation, and firms that innovate together with suppliers fare better at leveraging investments in automation. In addition, automating firms should exercise caution when choosing collaboration partners from the same country.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Acemoglu D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Price B (2014) Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 104(5):394–399 Acemoglu D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Price B (2014) Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 104(5):394–399
go back to reference Afcha S, García-Quevedo J (2016) The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. Ind Corp Change 25(6):955–975 Afcha S, García-Quevedo J (2016) The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. Ind Corp Change 25(6):955–975
go back to reference Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45:425–455 Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45:425–455
go back to reference Almirall E, Casadesus-Masanell R (2010) Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad Manag Rev 35:27–47 Almirall E, Casadesus-Masanell R (2010) Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad Manag Rev 35:27–47
go back to reference Andries P, Faems D (2013) Patenting activities and firm performance: does firm size matter? J Prod Innov Manag 30(6):1089–1098 Andries P, Faems D (2013) Patenting activities and firm performance: does firm size matter? J Prod Innov Manag 30(6):1089–1098
go back to reference Arrow KJ (1974) The limits of organization. Norton, New York Arrow KJ (1974) The limits of organization. Norton, New York
go back to reference Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333 Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333
go back to reference Baldwin CY, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ Sci 22(6):1399–1441 Baldwin CY, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ Sci 22(6):1399–1441
go back to reference Baltagi B (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, New York Baltagi B (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120 Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120
go back to reference Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182 Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182
go back to reference Benzell SG, Kotlikoff LJ, LaGarda G, Sachs JD (2015) Robots are us: some economics of human replacement (No. w20941). National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper no 20941 Benzell SG, Kotlikoff LJ, LaGarda G, Sachs JD (2015) Robots are us: some economics of human replacement (No. w20941). National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper no 20941
go back to reference Bogers M, Lhuillery S (2011) A functional perspective on learning and innovation: investigating the organization of absorptive capacity. Ind Innov 18(6):581–610 Bogers M, Lhuillery S (2011) A functional perspective on learning and innovation: investigating the organization of absorptive capacity. Ind Innov 18(6):581–610
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10(2):381–409 Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10(2):381–409
go back to reference Brem A, Tidd J (2012) Perspectives on supplier innovation: theories, concepts and empirical insights on open innovation and the integration of suppliers. World Scientific, Singapore Brem A, Tidd J (2012) Perspectives on supplier innovation: theories, concepts and empirical insights on open innovation and the integration of suppliers. World Scientific, Singapore
go back to reference Brem A, Gerhard DA, Voigt KI (2014) Strategic technological sourcing decisions in the context of timing and market strategies: an empirical analysis. Int J Innov Technol Manag 11(03):1450016 Brem A, Gerhard DA, Voigt KI (2014) Strategic technological sourcing decisions in the context of timing and market strategies: an empirical analysis. Int J Innov Technol Manag 11(03):1450016
go back to reference Brem A, Nylund PA, Schuster G (2016) Innovation and de facto standardization: the influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation 50:79–88 Brem A, Nylund PA, Schuster G (2016) Innovation and de facto standardization: the influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation 50:79–88
go back to reference Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin Sci Q 46:597–621 Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin Sci Q 46:597–621
go back to reference Carnevale A, Jayasundera T, Gulish A (2016) America’s divided recovery: college haves and haves-not. Georgetown University, Washington Carnevale A, Jayasundera T, Gulish A (2016) America’s divided recovery: college haves and haves-not. Georgetown University, Washington
go back to reference Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external technology acquisition. Manag Sci 52(1):68–82 Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external technology acquisition. Manag Sci 52(1):68–82
go back to reference Castells M (2000) The rise of the network society, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford Castells M (2000) The rise of the network society, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
go back to reference Chesbrough HW (2006) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston Chesbrough HW (2006) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston
go back to reference Chesbrough HW (2007) Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):22 Chesbrough HW (2007) Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):22
go back to reference Chesbrough H (2013) Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press, Boston Chesbrough H (2013) Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press, Boston
go back to reference Chesbrough H, Bogers M (2014) Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–28 Chesbrough H, Bogers M (2014) Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–28
go back to reference Chui M, Manyika J, Miremadi M (2015) Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Q 11:1–9 Chui M, Manyika J, Miremadi M (2015) Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Q 11:1–9
go back to reference Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405 Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405
go back to reference Conner K, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organ Sci 7:477–501 Conner K, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organ Sci 7:477–501
go back to reference D’Este P, Rentocchini F, Vega-Jurado J (2014) The role of human capital in lowering the barriers to engaging in innovation: evidence from the Spanish innovation survey. Ind Innov 21(1):1–19 D’Este P, Rentocchini F, Vega-Jurado J (2014) The role of human capital in lowering the barriers to engaging in innovation: evidence from the Spanish innovation survey. Ind Innov 21(1):1–19
go back to reference Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston
go back to reference Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag 36(3):333–346 Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag 36(3):333–346
go back to reference Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679 Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679
go back to reference Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strateg Manag J 27(12):1141–1158 Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strateg Manag J 27(12):1141–1158
go back to reference Frey CB, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford University Working Paper Frey CB, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford University Working Paper
go back to reference Funk K, Lyall B, Wilson J, Vint R, Niemczyk M, Suroteguh C, Owen G (1999) Flight deck automation issues. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:109–123 Funk K, Lyall B, Wilson J, Vint R, Niemczyk M, Suroteguh C, Owen G (1999) Flight deck automation issues. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:109–123
go back to reference Gassmann O, Enkel E, Chesbrough H (2010) The future of open innovation. R&D Manag 40(3):213–221 Gassmann O, Enkel E, Chesbrough H (2010) The future of open innovation. R&D Manag 40(3):213–221
go back to reference Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122 Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122
go back to reference Greene WH (1993) Econometric analysis, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York Greene WH (1993) Econometric analysis, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York
go back to reference Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res Policy 31(4):477–492 Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res Policy 31(4):477–492
go back to reference Huizingh EK (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31(1):2–9 Huizingh EK (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31(1):2–9
go back to reference Kafouros MI, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C (2008) The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28(1):63–74 Kafouros MI, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C (2008) The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28(1):63–74
go back to reference Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397 Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397
go back to reference Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ Sci 7:502–518 Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ Sci 7:502–518
go back to reference Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill, New York Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference Laursen K, Salter AJ (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27:131–150 Laursen K, Salter AJ (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27:131–150
go back to reference Lechevalier S, Nishimura J, Storz C (2014) Diversity in patterns of industry evolution: how an intrapreneurial regime contributed to the emergence of the service robot industry. Res Policy 43(10):1716–1729 Lechevalier S, Nishimura J, Storz C (2014) Diversity in patterns of industry evolution: how an intrapreneurial regime contributed to the emergence of the service robot industry. Res Policy 43(10):1716–1729
go back to reference Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strateg Manag J 31:224–236 Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strateg Manag J 31:224–236
go back to reference Narla SRK (2013) The evolution of connected vehicle technology: from smart drivers to smart cars to… self-driving cars. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE J 83(7):22 Narla SRK (2013) The evolution of connected vehicle technology: from smart drivers to smart cars to… self-driving cars. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE J 83(7):22
go back to reference Ngai EW, Jin C, Liang T (2008) A qualitative study of inter-organizational knowledge management in complex products and systems development. R&D Manag 38(4):421–440 Ngai EW, Jin C, Liang T (2008) A qualitative study of inter-organizational knowledge management in complex products and systems development. R&D Manag 38(4):421–440
go back to reference Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37 Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37
go back to reference Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New York Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Reichstein T, Salter A (2006) Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Ind Corp Change 15(4):653–682 Reichstein T, Salter A (2006) Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Ind Corp Change 15(4):653–682
go back to reference Remneland-Wikhamn B, Ljungberg JAN, Bergquist M, Kuschel J (2011) Open innovation, generativity and the supplier as peer: the case of iPhone and Android. Int J Innov Manag 15(01):205–230 Remneland-Wikhamn B, Ljungberg JAN, Bergquist M, Kuschel J (2011) Open innovation, generativity and the supplier as peer: the case of iPhone and Android. Int J Innov Manag 15(01):205–230
go back to reference Rumelt RP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb RB (ed) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Rumelt RP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb RB (ed) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
go back to reference Sandulli FD, Fernandez-Menendez J, Rodriguez-Duarte A, Lopez-Sanchez JI (2012) Testing the Schumpeterian hypotheses on an open innovation framework. Manag Decis 50(7):1222–1232 Sandulli FD, Fernandez-Menendez J, Rodriguez-Duarte A, Lopez-Sanchez JI (2012) Testing the Schumpeterian hypotheses on an open innovation framework. Manag Decis 50(7):1222–1232
go back to reference Schuster G, Brem A (2015) How to benefit from open innovation? An empirical investigation of open innovation, external partnerships and firm capabilities in the automotive industry. Int J Technol Manag 69(1):54–76 Schuster G, Brem A (2015) How to benefit from open innovation? An empirical investigation of open innovation, external partnerships and firm capabilities in the automotive industry. Int J Technol Manag 69(1):54–76
go back to reference Simon HA (1965) The shape of automation for men and management. Harper & Row, New York Simon HA (1965) The shape of automation for men and management. Harper & Row, New York
go back to reference Simon HA (1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In: Greenberger M (ed) Computers, communication, and the public interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore Simon HA (1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In: Greenberger M (ed) Computers, communication, and the public interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
go back to reference Spithoven A, Vanhaverbeke W, Roijakkers N (2013) Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Bus Econ 41(3):537–562 Spithoven A, Vanhaverbeke W, Roijakkers N (2013) Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Bus Econ 41(3):537–562
go back to reference Stringham EP, Miller JK, Clark JR (2015) Overcoming barriers to entry in an established industry: Tesla motors. Cal Manag Rev 57(4):85–103 Stringham EP, Miller JK, Clark JR (2015) Overcoming barriers to entry in an established industry: Tesla motors. Cal Manag Rev 57(4):85–103
go back to reference Teece DJ (1984) Economic analysis and strategic management. Cal Manag Rev 26(3):87–110 Teece DJ (1984) Economic analysis and strategic management. Cal Manag Rev 26(3):87–110
go back to reference Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15(6):285–305 Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15(6):285–305
go back to reference Trigo A, Vence X (2012) Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises. Res Policy 41(3):602–613 Trigo A, Vence X (2012) Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises. Res Policy 41(3):602–613
go back to reference Voigt KI, Buliga O, Michl K (2017) Business model pioneers: how innovators successfully implement new business models. Springer, Berlin Voigt KI, Buliga O, Michl K (2017) Business model pioneers: how innovators successfully implement new business models. Springer, Berlin
go back to reference Von Hippel E (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res Policy 5(3):212–239 Von Hippel E (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res Policy 5(3):212–239
go back to reference Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180 Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180
go back to reference West J (2003) How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res Policy 32(7):1259–1285 West J (2003) How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res Policy 32(7):1259–1285
go back to reference Whittaker J, Whitehead J, Somers M (2005) The neglog transformation and quantile regression for the analysis of a large credit scoring database. Appl Stat 54:863–878 Whittaker J, Whitehead J, Somers M (2005) The neglog transformation and quantile regression for the analysis of a large credit scoring database. Appl Stat 54:863–878
go back to reference Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and anti-trust implications. Free Press, New York Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and anti-trust implications. Free Press, New York
go back to reference Williamson O (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Soc 87:548–577 Williamson O (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Soc 87:548–577
Metadata
Title
Automating profitably together: Is there an impact of open innovation and automation on firm turnover?
Authors
Petra A. Nylund
Xavier Ferras-Hernandez
Alexander Brem
Publication date
12-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Review of Managerial Science / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0294-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Review of Managerial Science 1/2020 Go to the issue