Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

01-09-2015

Being Good When Being International in an Emerging Economy: The Case of China

Authors: Yan-Leung Cheung, Dongmin Kong, Weiqiang Tan, Wenming Wang

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The importance imposed on corporate social responsibility (CSR) is greater in developed economies than in emerging markets. The pressures from various stakeholder groups on the CSR are expected to have substantial spillover impact on companies domiciled in emerging economies that obtain revenues from companies in developed economies. Based on the data from 1,330 listed companies in China, the largest emerging economy in the world, this study provides evidence that the CSR performance of China firms is positively related to the degree of their internationalization, and such a positive association is less pronounced for state-owned enterprises. Our findings support the hypothesis that internationalized companies in emerging economies are motivated to improve their CSR practices to address concerns from their importers or outsourcers in developed economies.

previous article The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France

next article CEO Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Moderated Mediation Model

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Lococo (2012).

Since 1998, the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges have classified some listed firms as special treatment firms. A firm is labeled special treatment if there is an abnormality in its financial status, along with other factors that result in difficulty in judging company prospects.

In China, most listed companies do not disclose their adverting expenses. However, given that advertising expenses are typically a stable proportion of sales expenses, we use the ratio of sales expenses to total sales as a proxy for advertising intensity.

China Securities Regulatory Commission issued the Industry Classification Guide of Listed Companies in April 2001, which categorizes companies into 12 industries.

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.CrossRef

Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRef

Arora, N., & Henderson, T. (2007). Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 26, 514–531.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRef

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef

Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106.CrossRef

Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.CrossRef

Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–878.CrossRef

Contractor, F. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Management International Review, 47(3), 453–475.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.CrossRef

Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.CrossRef

Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Fry, L., Keim, G., & Meiners, R. (1982). Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25, 94–106.CrossRef

Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 467–498.CrossRef

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRef

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.CrossRef

Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRef

Li, J., & Qian, C. (2013). Principal‐principal conflicts under weak institutions: A study of corporate takeovers in China. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 498–508.

Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804.CrossRef

Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 631–645.CrossRef

Lin, J. Y., & Tan, G. (1999). Policy burdens, accountability, and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 426–431.

Lococo, E. (2012). Apple’s Tim Cook Visits Foxconn iPhone Plant in China. Bloomberg News, 29 March.

Low, P., & Yeats, A. (1992). Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate? In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment (pp. 89–104). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Lucas, R. E. B., Wheeler, D., & Hettige, H. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution, 1960–1988. In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment (pp. 67–88). Washington: World Bank.

Luo, Y. D., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.CrossRef

Markoczy, L., Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Shi, W., Ren, B. (2013). Social network contingency, symbolic management and boundary stretching. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1367–1387.

Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945.CrossRef

Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1–26.CrossRef

Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40(4), 369–396.CrossRef

Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471.CrossRef

Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). A model of the global and institutional antecedents of high-level corporate environmental performance. Business and Society, 43(1), 6–36.CrossRef

Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159–180.CrossRef

Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2000). How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1227–1247.CrossRef

Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204.CrossRef

Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–862.CrossRef

Surroca, J., Tribo, J., & Zahra, S. (2013). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 549–572.CrossRef

Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.CrossRef

Uhlenbruck, K., & De Castro, J. O. (2000). Foreign acquisitions in Central and Eastern Europe: Outcomes of privatization in transitional economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 381–402.

Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60–83.CrossRef

Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2008). Corporate diversification: The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 115–132.CrossRef

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 18, 691–718.

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.

Title: Being Good When Being International in an Emerging Economy: The Case of China
Authors: Yan-Leung Cheung
Dongmin Kong
Weiqiang Tan
Wenming Wang
Publication date: 01-09-2015
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2268-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Reclaiming the Child Left Behind: The Case for Corporate Cultural Responsibility

CEO Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Moderated Mediation Model

Special Issue on Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: An Introduction

Corporate Social Responsibility and Insider Trading

Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach

Theoretical Lenses for Understanding the CSR–Consumer Paradox