Top

Published in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

14. Bestimmung von Teststärke, Effektgröße und optimalem Stichprobenumfang

Authors : Nicola Döring, Jürgen Bortz

Published in: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel vermittelt folgende Lernziele: Die Teststärke definieren und Post-hoc- sowie A-priori-Teststärkeanalysen voneinander abgrenzen können. Wissen, was man unter der Effektgröße versteht und wie man sie berechnet. Verschiedene standardisierte Effektgrößenmaße unterscheiden und hinsichtlich ihrer Ausprägung als kleine, mittlere oder große Effekte einordnen können. Das Konzept des optimalen Stichprobenumfangs erläutern können. Wissen, wie man den optimalen Stichprobenumfang für Studien mit unterschiedlichen Signifikanztests im Zuge der Untersuchungsplanung festlegt.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Ergebnispräsentation

next chapter Minimum-Effektgrößen-Tests

Abelson, R. P. & Prentice, D. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis. Psychological Methods, 2(4), 315–328.

Aberson, C. L. (2010). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.

Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen’s standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent group case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328.

APA, American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

APA, American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Bausell, B. R. & Li, Y.–F. (2003) Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bird, K. D. (2002). Confidence intervalls for effect sizes in analysis of variance. Educational Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 197–226.

Bortz, J. (2005). Statistik (6. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

Bortz, J. & Lienert, G. A. (2003). Kurzgefasste Statistik für die klinische Forschung (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

Bortz, J. & Lienert, G. A. (2008). Kurzgefasste Statistik für die klinische Forschung (3. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., & Boehnke, K. (2008). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik (3. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.

Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. New York: Broadway Books.

Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 39(4), 860–864.

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Research, 65(3), 145–153.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304–1312.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p \(<\) 0.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003.

Cramer, E. M. & Nicewander, W. A. (1979). Some symmetric, invariant measures of multivariate association. Psychometrika, 44(1), 43–54.

Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.

Cumming, G. & Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, Use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distribution. Educational Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 532–574.

Dunlop, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measure designs. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 170–177.

Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: an introduction to statistical power, meta-analysis and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

Erdfelder, E. (1984). Zur Bedeutung und Kontrolle des beta-Fehlers bei der inferenzstatistischen Prüfung log-linearer Modelle. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15(1), 18–32.

Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., Buchner, A., & Cüpper, L. (2010). Effektgröße und Teststärke. In H. Holling & B. Schmitz (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologischen Methoden und Evaluation (S. 358–369). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538.

Fleiss, J. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp. 246–259). New York: Sage.

Fowler, R. L. (1987). A general method for comparing effect-magnitudes in ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 361–367.

Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18.

Gatsonis, C. & Sampson, A. R. (1989). Multiple correlation: Exact power and sample size calculations. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 519–524.

Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the ID in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioural sciences. Methodological Issues (pp. 311–339). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Gillett, R. (1994). The average power criterion for sample size estimation. Statistician, 43, 389–394.

Gillett, R. (2003). The metric comparability of meta-analytic effectsize estimators from factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 419–433.

Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.

Grissom, R. J. & Kim, J. J. (2011). Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd ed.). Milton Park: Routledge.

Haddock, C. K., Rindskopf, D., & Shadish, W. R. (1998). Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data. A primer on methods and issues. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 339–353.

Hager, W. (2004). Testplanung zur statistischen Prüfung psychologischer Hypothesen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Halpern, S. D., Karlawish, J. H. T., & Berlin, J. A. (2002). The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(3), 358–362.

Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.

Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 490–499.

Held, U. (2010). Was ist eine „Odds Ratio“ und wann wird sie verwendet? Schweiz Med Forum, 10(37), 634–645.

Hoenig, J. M. & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55(1), 19–24.

Hsu, L. M. (2004). Biases of success rate differences shown in binomial effect size displays. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 183–197.

James, D. & Drakich, J. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Janosky, J. E. (2002). The ethics of underpowered clinical trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(17), 2118.

Kelley, K. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Sample Size for multiple regression. Obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 305–321.

Keren, G. & Lewis, C. (1979). Partial omega squared for ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 119–128.

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759.

Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Kraemer, H. C. & Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kshirsagar, A. M. (1972). Multivariate analysis. New York: Dekker.

Küchler, M. (1980). The analysis of nonmetric data. Sociological Methods and Research, 8(4), 369–388.

Leonhart, R. (2009). Statistik – Einstieg und Vertiefung (2. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.

Lilford, R., & Stevens, A. J. (2002). Underpowered studies. British Journal of Surgery, 89(2), 129–131.

Lipsey, M. W. (1997). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for applied experimental research. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 39–68). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Maxwell, S. E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(4), 434–458.

Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 147–163.

Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramirez–Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317(5834), 82.

Mendoza, J. L. & Stafford, K. L. (2001). Confidence Intervals, power calculation, and sample size estimation for the squared multiple correlation coefficient under the fixed and random regression models: A computer program and useful standard tables. Educational Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 650–667.

Murphy, K. R., Myors, B., & Wolach, A. (2008). Statistical power analysis: 2. Milton Park: Routledge.

Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 241–301.

Olejnik, S. & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434–477.

Peng, C.-Y. J., Long, H., & Abaci, S. (2012). Power analysis software for educational researchers. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 113–136.

Reedera, H. M. (1996). A critical look at gender difference in communication research. Communication Studies, 47(4), 318–330.

Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). The fugitive literature. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 85–94). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitudes of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 166–169.

Sachs, L. (2002). Statistische Auswertungsmethoden (10. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

Sedlmeier, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 309–316.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Smithson, M. J. (2003). Confidence intervals. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F-Test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 164–182.

Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837–847.

Thompson, B. (2002). „Statistical“, „practical“, and „clinical“: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(1), 64–71.

Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik. Ein Lehrbuch zur Psychologischen Methodenlehre. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Wilkinson, L. & Inference, T. T. F. o. S. (1999). Statistical methods in psychological journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604.

Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: Mc–Graw Hill.

Title: Bestimmung von Teststärke, Effektgröße und optimalem Stichprobenumfang
Authors: Nicola Döring
Jürgen Bortz
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41088-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-41089-5

Copyright Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_14