Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Blurring Boundaries

Towards the Collective Team Grokking of Product Requirements

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Software development has become increasingly software ‘product’ development, without an authoritative ‘customer’ stakeholder that many requirements engineering processes assume exists in some form. Many progressive software product companies today are empowering cross-functional product teams to ‘own’ their product – to collectively understand the product context, the true product needs, and manage its on-going evolution – rather than develop to a provided specification.
Some teams do this better than others and neither established requirements elicitation and validation processes nor conventional team leadership practices explain the reasons for these observable differences. This research examines cross-functional product teams and identifies factors that support or inhibit the team’s ability to collectively create and nurture a shared mental model that accurately represents the external product domain and its realities. The research also examines how teams use that collective understanding to shape development plans, internal and external communications, new team member onboarding, etc.
We are engaged with several software product companies using a constructivist Grounded Theory method towards the research question.
Early results are emerging as organisational factors, within and surrounding the teams. One emerging observation relates to the degree to which functional distinctions are treated as demarcations or blurred boundaries. The other observation is the impact an expectation of mobility has on an individual’s sense of feeling part of the collective team versus solely being a functional expert. This also becomes a factor in the first observation.
The research is in-progress but early observations are consistent with a basic element of empathy that a certain blurring of the boundaries is necessary for a period of time in order to better understand the other context. Future research will examine whether the observed organisational factors are pre-conditions for the team being able to collectively understand the context of the product requirements, collectively and deeply.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Grok: Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989) Grok: Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
2.
go back to reference Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th edn. University of Chicago Press, London (2012)CrossRef Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th edn. University of Chicago Press, London (2012)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. In: Knowledge in Organisations (1997) Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. In: Knowledge in Organisations (1997)
4.
go back to reference Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004) Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)
5.
go back to reference Ralph, P.: The illusion of requirements in software development. Requirements Eng. 18(3), 293–296 (2013)CrossRef Ralph, P.: The illusion of requirements in software development. Requirements Eng. 18(3), 293–296 (2013)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mohanani, R., Ralph, P., Shreeve, B.: Requirements fixation. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 895–906 (2014) Mohanani, R., Ralph, P., Shreeve, B.: Requirements fixation. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 895–906 (2014)
7.
go back to reference Guinan, P.J., Cooprider, J.G., Faraj, S.: Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioral versus technical approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 9(2), 101–125 (1998)CrossRef Guinan, P.J., Cooprider, J.G., Faraj, S.: Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioral versus technical approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 9(2), 101–125 (1998)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ralph, P., Mohanani, R.: Is requirements engineering inherently counterproductive?. In: Proceedings - 5th International Workshop on the Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture, TwinPeaks 2015 (2015) Ralph, P., Mohanani, R.: Is requirements engineering inherently counterproductive?. In: Proceedings - 5th International Workshop on the Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture, TwinPeaks 2015 (2015)
9.
go back to reference Koppen, E., Meinel, C.: Knowing people: the empathetic designer. Des. Philos. Pap. 10(1), 35–51 (2012) Koppen, E., Meinel, C.: Knowing people: the empathetic designer. Des. Philos. Pap. 10(1), 35–51 (2012)
10.
go back to reference Van Rijn, H., Sleeswijk Visser, F., Stappers, P.J., Özakar, A.D.: Achieving empathy with users: the effects of different sources of information. CoDesign 7(2), 65–77 (2011)CrossRef Van Rijn, H., Sleeswijk Visser, F., Stappers, P.J., Özakar, A.D.: Achieving empathy with users: the effects of different sources of information. CoDesign 7(2), 65–77 (2011)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Postma, C., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E., Du, J.: Challenges of doing empathic design: experiences from industry. Int. J. Des. 6(1) (2012) Postma, C., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E., Du, J.: Challenges of doing empathic design: experiences from industry. Int. J. Des. 6(1) (2012)
12.
go back to reference Woodcock, A., McDonagh, D., Osmond, J., Scott, W.: Empathy, design and human factors. In: Advances in Usability and User Experience, pp. 569–579 (2018) Woodcock, A., McDonagh, D., Osmond, J., Scott, W.: Empathy, design and human factors. In: Advances in Usability and User Experience, pp. 569–579 (2018)
14.
go back to reference Kouprie, M., Sleeswijk-Visser, F.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20(5), 437–448 (2009)CrossRef Kouprie, M., Sleeswijk-Visser, F.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20(5), 437–448 (2009)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kolko, J.: Well-Designed: How to Create Empathy to Create Products People Love. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (2014) Kolko, J.: Well-Designed: How to Create Empathy to Create Products People Love. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (2014)
17.
go back to reference Russell, D., Pirolli, P.: An Overview of Sensemaking: A View from the Workshop CHI 2009. Sensemaking Work. CHI, pp. 1–2 (2009) Russell, D., Pirolli, P.: An Overview of Sensemaking: A View from the Workshop CHI 2009. Sensemaking Work. CHI, pp. 1–2 (2009)
18.
go back to reference Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.: The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex-complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 462–483 (2003)CrossRef Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.: The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex-complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 462–483 (2003)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Klein, G., Moon, B., Hoffman, R., Associates, K.: Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: a macrocognitive model. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(5), 88–92 (2006)CrossRef Klein, G., Moon, B., Hoffman, R., Associates, K.: Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: a macrocognitive model. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(5), 88–92 (2006)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Naumer, C., Fisher, K., Dervin, B.: Sense-Making: a methodological perspective. In: CHI 2008 Work. Sense-Making Florence (2008) Naumer, C., Fisher, K., Dervin, B.: Sense-Making: a methodological perspective. In: CHI 2008 Work. Sense-Making Florence (2008)
21.
go back to reference Kolko, J.: Sensemaking and framing: a theoretical reflection on perspective in design synthesis. In: 2010 Design Research Society Conference, pp. 1–9 (2010) Kolko, J.: Sensemaking and framing: a theoretical reflection on perspective in design synthesis. In: 2010 Design Research Society Conference, pp. 1–9 (2010)
22.
go back to reference Isabella, L.A.: Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: how managers construe key organisational events. Acad. Manag. J. 33(1), 7–41 (1990) Isabella, L.A.: Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: how managers construe key organisational events. Acad. Manag. J. 33(1), 7–41 (1990)
23.
go back to reference Weick, K.E., Roberts, K.H.: Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 357–381 (1993) Weick, K.E., Roberts, K.H.: Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 357–381 (1993)
24.
go back to reference Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRef Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)CrossRef DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gable, G., Sedera, D., Taizan, C.: Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-Impact measurement model. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(7), 1–32 (2008) Gable, G., Sedera, D., Taizan, C.: Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-Impact measurement model. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(7), 1–32 (2008)
27.
go back to reference Oliver, R.L.: Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on post exposure product evaluations - an alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 62(4), 480 (1977)CrossRef Oliver, R.L.: Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on post exposure product evaluations - an alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 62(4), 480 (1977)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17, 460–469 (1980)CrossRef Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17, 460–469 (1980)CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation - confirmation model. MIS Q. 25(3), 351–370 (2001)CrossRef Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation - confirmation model. MIS Q. 25(3), 351–370 (2001)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, Piscataway (1967) Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, Piscataway (1967)
31.
go back to reference Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006) Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006)
32.
go back to reference Adolph, S., Hall, W., Kruchten, P.: Using grounded theory to study the experience of software development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 16(4), 487–513 (2011)CrossRef Adolph, S., Hall, W., Kruchten, P.: Using grounded theory to study the experience of software development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 16(4), 487–513 (2011)CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dagenais, B., Ossher, H., Bellamy, R.K.E., Robillard, M.P., De Vries, J.P.: Moving into a new software project landscape. In: ICSE 2010 Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 275–284 (2010) Dagenais, B., Ossher, H., Bellamy, R.K.E., Robillard, M.P., De Vries, J.P.: Moving into a new software project landscape. In: ICSE 2010 Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 275–284 (2010)
34.
go back to reference Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: a study of Irish software product companies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 654–667 (2007)CrossRef Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: a study of Irish software product companies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 654–667 (2007)CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Martin, A.M.: The role of customers in extreme programming projects. Ph.D. thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (2009) Martin, A.M.: The role of customers in extreme programming projects. Ph.D. thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (2009)
36.
go back to reference Hoda, R.: Self-organizing agile teams : a grounded theory. Ph.D thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (2011) Hoda, R.: Self-organizing agile teams : a grounded theory. Ph.D thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (2011)
37.
go back to reference Eisner, E.W.: The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and The Enhancement of Educational Practice. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998) Eisner, E.W.: The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and The Enhancement of Educational Practice. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)
38.
go back to reference Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2012) Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2012)
39.
go back to reference Krznaric, R.: Empathy: Why It Matters, And How to Get It. Penguin Random House, New York (2014) Krznaric, R.: Empathy: Why It Matters, And How to Get It. Penguin Random House, New York (2014)
Metadata
Title
Blurring Boundaries
Author
Rob Fuller
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21297-1_8

Premium Partner