Top

Water Resources Management

Published in:

01-08-2022

Calculation of Water Depth during Flood in Rivers using Linear Muskingum Method and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm

Authors: Hadi Norouzi, Jalal Bazargan

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 11/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

To estimate the damage caused by flooding rivers, it is critical to analyze unsteady flow and determine downstream water depth. Hydraulic methods for examining unsteady river flow require cross-sectional specifications of the river at a close distance with optimal accuracy. Obtaining these specifications is often time-consuming and expensive. In contrast, hydrologic routing methods, such as the linear Muskingum method, are more beneficial for the analysis of unsteady flow. In flood routing, the linear Muskingum method has only been utilized to calculate the outflow hydrograph (downstream). However, in practical problems regarding flood analysis, such as economic analysis, damage assessment, and flood management and engineering, downstream water depth is needed. By employing kinematic wave relations, the linear Muskingum method, and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, the present study estimates water depth, with respect to time, of a downstream section of the Karun River, between the Mollasani (upstream) and Ahwaz (downstream) hydrometric stations. The proposed approach is simpler and less expensive and more accurate than hydraulic methods. The current work estimated the values of the Mean Relative Error (MRE) to the total flood and the Mean Relative Error (MRE) to the peak section of input depth along with the absolute value of the peak deviations of the observed and routed depth (DPO) as 1.29, 0.24, and 1.16 percent, respectively.

previous article Combining Radial Basis Function Neural Network Models and Inclusive Multiple Models for Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads

next article Using Periodic Copula to Assess the Relationship Between Two Meteorological Cyclostationary Time Series Datasets

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Afshar A, Kazemi H, Saadatpour M (2011) Particle swarm optimization for automatic calibration of large scale water quality model (CE-QUAL-W2): Application to Karkheh Reservoir, Iran. Water Resour Manag 25(10):2613–2632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9829-7CrossRef

Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Blöschl G (2004) Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4(2):295–308. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004,2004CrossRef

Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Blöschl G (2006) A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8603-7CrossRef

Apel H, Merz B, Thieken AH (2008) Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments. Int J River Basin Manag 6(2):149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635344CrossRef

Bazargan J, Norouzi H (2018) Investigation the effect of using variable values for the parameters of the Linear Muskingum method using the particle swarm algorithm (PSO). Water Resour Manage 32(14):4763–4777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2082-6CrossRef

Chang CN, Singer EDM, Koussis AD (1983) On the mathematics of storage routing. J Hydrol 61(4):357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90001-XCrossRef

Chari MM, Davary K, Ghahraman B, Ziaei AN (2019) General equation for advance and recession of water in border irrigation. Irrig Drain 68(3):476–487CrossRef

Chau K (2005) A split-step PSO algorithm in prediction of water quality pollution. In International Symposium on Neural Networks (pp. 1034–1039). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11427469_164

Chow V (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill International Editions

Chu HJ, Chang LC (2009) Applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model. J Hydrol Eng 14(9):1024–1027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000070CrossRef

De Moel H, Aerts JCJH (2011) Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Nat Hazards 58(1):407–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9675-6CrossRef

Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K (2003) A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol 277(1–2):24–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00084-2CrossRef

Eizeldin MA, Almasalmeh O (2019) Flash flood modelling of ungagged watershed based on geomorphology and kinematic wave: Case study of Billi drainage basin, Egypt‏

Farsirotou ED, Kotsopoulos SI (2015) Free-surface flow over river bottom sill: experimental and numerical study. Environ Process 2(1):133–139CrossRef

Fiorillo D, De Paola F, Ascione G, Giugni M (2022) Drainage systems optimization under climate change scenarios. Water Resour Manag 1–18

Garcia-Navarro P, Vazquez-Cendon ME (2000) On numerical treatment of the source terms in the shallow water equations. Comput Fluids 29(8):951–979CrossRef

Hall JW, Sayers PB, Dawson RJ (2005a) National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Nat Hazards 36(1–2):147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-4546-7CrossRef

Hall JW, Tarantola S, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2005b) Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. J Hydraul Eng 131(2):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:2(117)CrossRef

Jahandideh-Tehrani M, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA (2020) Application of particle swarm optimization to water management: an introduction and overview. Environ Monit Assess 192(5):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8228-zCrossRef

Jain SC (2000) Open-channel flow. John Wiley & Sons

Katopodes ND (1982) On zero-inertia and kinematic waves. J Hydraul Div 108(11):1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005939CrossRef

Kok M, Huizinga HJ, Vrouwenvelder ACWM, Barendregt A (2005) Standaardmethode2004—Schade en Slachtoffers als gevolg van overstromingen. DWW-2005-005. RWS Dienst Weg- en Waterbouwkunde

Krutov A, Choriev R, Norkulov B, Mavlyanova D, Shomurodov A (2021) Mathematical modelling of bottom deformations in the kinematic wave approximation. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1030, No. 1, p. 012147). IOP Publishing

Kumar DN, Reddy MJ (2007) Multipurpose reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:3(192)CrossRef

Kvočka D, Falconer RA, Bray M (2015) Appropriate model use for predicting elevations and inundation extent for extreme flood events. Nat Hazards 79(3):1791–1808CrossRef

Li M, Guyenne P, Li F, Xu L (2017) A positivity-preserving well-balanced central discontinuous Galerkin method for the nonlinear shallow water equations. J Sci Comput 71(3):994–1034CrossRef

Lu WZ, Fan HY, Leung AYT, Wong JCK (2002) Analysis of pollutant levels in central Hong Kong applying neural network method with particle swarm optimization. Environ Monit Assess 79(3):217–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020274409612CrossRef

Maidment DR (1993) Hand book of hydrology. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co, USA

Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M (2007) Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In Flood Risk Management in Europe (pp. 231–251). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4200-3_13

Merz B, Thieken AH (2009) Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds. Nat Hazards 51(3):437–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9452-6CrossRef

Meyer V, Messner F (2005) National flood damage evaluation methods: a review of applied methods in England, the Netherlands, the Czech Republik and Germany. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45193

Moghaddam A, Behmanesh J, Farsijani A (2016) Parameters estimation for the new four-parameter nonlinear Muskingum model using the particle swarm optimization. Water Resour Manage 30(7):2143–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1278-xCrossRef

Norouzi H, Bazargan J, Azhang F, Nasiri R (2021) Experimental study of drag coefficient in non-Darcy steady and unsteady flow conditions in rockfill. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02047-4

Norouzi H, Hasani MH, Bazargan J, Shoaei SM (2022) Estimating output flow depth from Rockfill Porous media. Water Supply 22(2):1796–1809. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.317CrossRef

Nujić M (1995) Efficient implementation of non-oscillatory schemes for the computation of free-surface flows. J Hydraul Res 33(1):101–111CrossRef

Oubanas H, Gejadze I, Malaterre PO, Mercier F (2018) River discharge estimation from synthetic SWOT-type observations using variational data assimilation and the full Saint-Venant hydraulic model. J Hydrol 559:638–647CrossRef

Patel P, Sarkar A (2022) Entropy-based flow and sediment routing in data deficit river networks. Water Resour Manag 1–21

Prawira D, Soeryantono H, Anggraheni E, Sutjiningsih D (2019) Efficiency analysis of Muskingum-Cunge method and kinematic wave method on the stream routing (Study case: upper Ciliwung watershed, Indonesia). In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 669, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing.

Razmi A, Mardani-Fard HA, Golian S, Zahmatkesh Z (2022) Time-varying univariate and bivariate frequency analysis of nonstationary extreme sea level for New York City. Environ Process 9(1):1–27CrossRef

Rossman LA, Huber W (2017) Storm water management model reference manual volume II–hydraulics. US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA 2:190

Roohi M, Soleymani K, Salimi M, Heidari M (2020) Numerical evaluation of the general flow hydraulics and estimation of the river plain by solving the Saint-Venant equation. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(2):645–658CrossRef

Sabzevari T, Karami Moghadam M, Ghadampour Z (2019) Surface runoff prediction of catchments hillslopes based on kinematic wave method and subsurface runoff based on solving Richard Equations in Hydrus Model

Sanders BF (2001) High-resolution and non-oscillatory solution of the St. Venant equations in non-rectangular and non-prismatic channels. J Hydraul Res 39(3):321–330.

Shultz MJ, Crosby CE, McEnery AJ (2008) Kinematic wave technique applied to hydrologic distributed modeling using stationary storm events: an application to synthetic rectangular basins and an actual watershed. Hydrol Days 116–126. https://hdl.handle.net/10217/200700

Smith DI (1994) Flood damage estimation- a review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. Water S. A. 20(3):231–238. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA03784738_1124

Thieken AH, Olschewski A, Kreibich H, Kobsch S, Merz B (2008) Development and evaluation of Flumps–a new Flood Loss Estimation Model for the private sector. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 118:315–324CrossRef

Tsai CW (2005) Flood routing in mild-sloped rivers—wave characteristics and downstream backwater effect. J Hydrol 308(1):151–167CrossRef

Tseng MH (2004) Improved treatment of source terms in TVD scheme for shallow water equations. Adv Water Resour 27(6):617–629CrossRef

Xing Y (2014) Exactly well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin methods for the shallow water equations with moving water equilibrium. J Comput Phys 257:536–553CrossRef

Yang L, Hals J, Moan T (2012) Comparative study of bond graph models for hydraulic transmission lines with transient flow dynamics.

Yu CW, Hodges BR, Liu F (2021) Automated detection of instability-inducing channel geometry transitions in Saint-Venant simulation of large-scale river networks. Water 13(16):2236CrossRef

Title: Calculation of Water Depth during Flood in Rivers using Linear Muskingum Method and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm
Authors: Hadi Norouzi
Jalal Bazargan
Publication date: 01-08-2022
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Water Resources Management / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03257-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Framework for Hyperparameter Impact Analysis and Selection for Water Resources Feedforward Neural Network

Monthly rainfall forecasting by a hybrid neural network of discrete wavelet transformation and deep learning

Comparative Evaluation of Water Resource Data Policy Inventories Towards the Improvement of East African Climate and Water Data Infrastructure

Impacts of Receding of the Lakes Located in the Arid and Semi-arid Areas on the Coastal Groundwater: Integrated Modeling and Experimental Study

Digital Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Water Industry

A Novel Approach for Predicting Water Demand with Complex Patterns Based on Ensemble Learning