Top

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Published in:

18-11-2019

Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy

Authors: Cenjie Liu, Zhongbao Zhou, Qing Liu, Rui Xie, Ximei Zeng

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 7/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Low-carbon pilot (LCP) policy aims to not only achieve economic development but also address climate change problems in China. With a difference-in-difference (DID) approach, this study provides empirical evidence to support the policy’s implementation by analysing its impacts on green total factor productivity (GTFP). We find that the implementation of the low-carbon pilot policy has a significant positive impact on GTFP. The low-carbon pilot policy significantly improves the GTFP in the year following implementation, and its efficacy diminishes over time. In terms of mechanism analysis, the policy enables China to achieve win-win development through industry structure adjustment and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. Innovation does not immediately improve GTFP, although the low-carbon pilot policy promotes regional innovation. Our results provide strong support for China’s recent third set of low-carbon pilot policies. As for global mitigation strategy, countries should incorporate the low-carbon development path into their strategic planning. In particular, developing countries should enforce more efforts on low-carbon development as such development path may improve their green productivity. It helps narrow the gap between developing and developed countries.

previous article Co-control of carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions in China from a cost-effective perspective

next article Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power in different regions of China and spatial correlations

Available only for authorised users

Alder S, Shao L, Zilibotti F (2016) Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities. J Econ Growth 21(4):305–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-016-9131-xCrossRef

Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016CrossRef

Bai Y, Hua CC, Jiao JL, Yang M, Li FY (2018) Green efficiency and environmental subsidy: evidence from thermal power firms in China. J Clean Prod 188:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.312CrossRef

Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078CrossRef

Berman E, Bui LTM (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 83(3):498–510. https://doi.org/10.1162/00346530152480144CrossRef

Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J 34(8):891–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041CrossRef

Brännlund R, Lundgren T, Marklund PO (2014) Carbon intensity in production and the effects of climate policy-evidence from Swedish industry. Energ Policy 67:844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.012CrossRef

Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, Yu LH (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ 123:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003CrossRef

Chen Z, Kahn ME, Liu Y, Wang Z (2018) The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. J Environ Econ Manag 88:468–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010CrossRef

Chung S (2014) Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. J Dev Econ 108:222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.01.003CrossRef

Coelli T (1998) A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. Oper Res Lett 23(3):143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00036-4CrossRef

Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.08.001CrossRef

David M, Sinclair-Desgagné B (2005) Environmental regulation and the eco-industry. J Regul Econ 28(2):141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-3106-8CrossRef

Duan H, Zhang G, Wang S, Fan Y (2019) Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis. Environ Res Lett 14(3):033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf8f9CrossRef

Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2009) Output slacks-adjusted cost efficiency and value-based technical efficiency in DEA models. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 52(2):86–104. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.52.86CrossRef

Ge JL, Fu Y, Xie R, Liu Y, Mo WY (2018) The effect of GVC embeddedness on productivity improvement: from the perspective of R&D and government subsidy. Technol Forecast Soc 135:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.057

Gray WB (1987) The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. Am Econ Rev 77(5):998–1006

Greenstone M, List JA, Syverson C (2012) The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of US manufacturing. National Bureau of Economic Research

Grimes P, Kentor J (2003) Exporting the greenhouse: foreign capital penetration and CO? Emissions 1980 1996. Journal of World-systems Research 9(2):261–275

Hamamoto M (2006) Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 28(4):299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.11.001CrossRef

Han F, Xie R, Fang JY, Liu Y (2018) The effects of urban agglomeration economies on carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese cities. J Clean Prod 172:1096–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.005CrossRef

Hering L, Poncet S (2014) Environmental policy and exports: evidence from Chinese cities. J Environ Econ Manag 68(2):296–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.005CrossRef

Jiang W (2015) Could a less developed city solve its CO₂ emission dilemma? Evidence from a low carbon pilot city. Chin J Urban Environ Stud 3(01):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748115500074CrossRef

Khanna N, Fridley D, Hong L (2014) China's pilot low-carbon city initiative: a comparative assessment of national goals and local plans. Sustain Cities Soc 12:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.03.005CrossRef

Kheder SB, Zugravu N (2012) Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: an economic geography model in an international comparative study. Ecol Econ 77:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.005CrossRef

Korhonen J, Pätäri S, Toppinen A, Tuppura A (2015) The role of environmental regulation in the future competitiveness of the pulp and paper industry: the case of the sulfur emissions directive in Northern Europe. J Clean Prod 108:864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.003CrossRef

Kou ZL, Liu XY (2017) FIND Report on City and Industrial Innovation in China, Fudan Institute of Industrial Development. Fudan University, School of Economics

Kudamatsu M (2012) Has democratization reduced infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from micro data. J Eur Econ Assoc 10(6):1294–1317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01092.xCrossRef

Kwakwa PA, Alhassan H, Aboagye S (2018) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in a financial development and natural resource extraction context: evidence from Tunisia. Quantitative Finance and Economics 2(4):981–1000. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2018.4.981

Li K, Lin B (2015) Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO₂ emissions and its convergence analysis for China. Energy Econ 48:230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.006CrossRef

Li K, Lin B (2016) Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Appl Energy 168:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.104CrossRef

Li S, Wang S (2019) Examining the effects of socioeconomic development on China’s carbon productivity: a panel data analysis. Sci Total Environ 659:681–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.409CrossRef

Li B, Wu S (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153:342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.042CrossRef

Li H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Wang TY (2013) Trends in road freight transportation carbon dioxide emissions and policies in China. Energ Policy 57:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.070CrossRef

Liang CY (2009) Industrial structure changes and the measurement of total factor productivity growth: the Krugman-Kim-Lau-Young Hypothesis revisited. Academia Economic Papers 37:305–338

Mulia R, Widayati A, Agung P, Zulkarnain MT (2014) Low carbon emission development strategies for Jambi, Indonesia: simulation and trade-off analysis using the FALLOW model. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 19(6):773–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9485-8CrossRef

NDRC (2010) Notice of the national development and reform commission on launching low carbon provinces and cities pilot. National Development and Reform of China

NDRC (2017) Notice of the national development and reform commission on launching the third batch pilot of low carbon cities. National Development and Reform of China

Newman C, Rand J, Talbot T, Tarp F (2015) Technology transfers, foreign investment and productivity spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 76:168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.02.005CrossRef

Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97CrossRef

Ramanathan R (2002) Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a cross-country comparison. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 17(3):214–227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2002.000941

Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2010) The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: testing the Porter hypothesis. Land Econ 86(2):329–344. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.2.329CrossRef

Raymond W, Mairesse J, Mohnen P, Palm F (2015) Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. Eur Econ Rev 78:285–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002CrossRef

Ren S, Li X, Yuan BL, Li DY, Chen XH (2018) The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: A cross-region analysis in China. J Clean Prod 173:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.113CrossRef

Rogge KS, Schneider M, Hoffmann VH (2011) The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System—findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecol Econ 70(3):513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032CrossRef

Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energ Policy 83:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014CrossRef

Shao LG, He YY, Feng C, Zhang SJ (2016) An empirical analysis of total-factor productivity in 30 sub-sub-sectors of China’s nonferrous metal industry. Res Policy 50:264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.10.010CrossRef

Shi X, Xu Z (2018) Environmental regulation and firm exports: evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. J Environ Econ Manag 89:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.003CrossRef

Skoczkowski T, Bielecki S, Węglarz A, Włodarczak M, Gutowski P (2018) Impact assessment of climate policy on Poland’s power sector. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 23(8):1303–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9786-z

Stavropoulos S, Wall R, Xu Y (2018) Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: evidence from China. Appl Econ 50(12):1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363858CrossRef

Tanaka S, Yin W, Jefferson GH (2014) Environmental regulation and industrial performance: evidence from China. Work. Pap., Tufts Univ., Medford

Tang D, Tang J, Xiao Z, Ma TY, Bethel BJ (2017) Environmental regulation efficiency and total factor productivity-effect analysis based on Chinese data from 2003 to 2013. Ecol Indic 73:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.040CrossRef

Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5CrossRef

Walter I, Ugelow JL (1979) Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio 8(2):102–109

Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354CrossRef

Wang YF, Song QJ, He JJ, Qi Y (2015) Developing low-carbon cities through pilots. Clim Pol 15(1):81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1050347CrossRef

Wang SJ, Zeng JY, Liu XP (2019) Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO₂ emissions in China: a panel quantile regression approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 103:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046CrossRef

Wanlley W (1994) The contribution of environmental regulations to slowdown in productivity growth. J Environ Manag 8(4):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(81)90048-6CrossRef

Wei YP (2016) 52 cities are applying to be the third batch of LCCPs, and they will set carbon peak targets. Beijing: The 21st Century Economic Report.

Xie R, Fang JY, Liu CJ (2017) The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Appl Energy 196:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.020CrossRef

Zhang N, Wei X (2015) Dynamic total factor carbon emissions performance changes in the Chinese transportation industry. Appl Energy 146:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.072CrossRef

Zhang YJ, Peng YL, Ma CQ, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energ Policy 100:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005CrossRef

Zhao X, Sun B (2016) The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. J Clean Prod 112:1528–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.029CrossRef

Zhao L, Lin J, Zhu J (2015) Green total factor productivity of hog breeding in China: application of SE-SBM Model and Grey Relation Matrix. Pol J Environ Stud 24(1):403–412

Zhou Y, Xing XP, Fang KN, Liang DP, Xu CL (2013) Environmental efficiency analysis of power industry in China based on an entropy SBM model. Energ Policy 57:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.060CrossRef

Zhu X, Chen Y, Feng C (2018) Green total factor productivity of China’s mining and quarrying industry: a global data envelopment analysis. Res Policy 57:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.009CrossRef

Title: Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy
Authors: Cenjie Liu
Zhongbao Zhou
Qing Liu
Rui Xie
Ximei Zeng
Publication date: 18-11-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09897-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Technology-side carbon abatement cost curves for China’s power generation sector

Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power in different regions of China and spatial correlations

Co-control of carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions in China from a cost-effective perspective

Uncovering impact factors of carbon emissions from transportation sector: evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta Area

Multi-round auctions in an emissions trading system considering firm bidding strategies and government regulations

Heterogeneity in the relationship between carbon emission performance and urbanization: evidence from China