Top

Published in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Case Theory in Minimalist Grammars

Author : Sabine Laszakovits

Published in: Formal Grammar 2018

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper investigates the consequences of one-to-many licensing relationships for Minimalist Grammars (MGs; [30]) on the example of case. Dependent Case Theory [2, 23] has proposed that a single noun phrase can assign accusative case to arbitrarily many other noun phrases in particular structural configurations. Taking a licensing view rather than an assignment view on the distribution of case, this implies that accusative case can be licensed by a single licensor on arbitrarily many licensees. This paper argues that the distribution rules for case can be formalized as at most monadic second-order constraints, which are known to be translatable into an MG with refined Merge-features [16]. However, an implementation as Move-features is not feasible because such an MG would need to “count” and would thereby generate non-regular derivation tree languages. It is argued that this increase in complexity can be avoided by suspending the SMC for licensing relationships that involve neither displacement of phonological nor of semantic features.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Paracompositionality, MWEs and Argument Substitution

next chapter A Challenge for Tier-Based Strict Locality from Uyghur Backness Harmony

Language differ with respect to restrictions on the licensing nominals, in particular with respect to their case marking. In many languages, nominals with inherent case cannot be licensors (“quirky subjects”, e.g. in Icelandic [34], Diyari, Kannada [2]). If the subject carries dative, the object will carry nominative, not accusative. However, Tamil as well as some dialect of Faroese exhibit dat‐acc patterns [2, pp. 187–194], and some dialects of Kurdish allow erg-marking on the subject if the object carries inherent dat [1], as is also found in Warlpiri, Burushaski, and Ingush [2, pp. 187–194]. In this paper, I will model the Icelandic patterns, but everything I say extends straight-forwardly to the Faroese pattern.

It has been argued [20, 21] that unmarked cases are the morphological marking that arises in the absence of case. In this paper, I take unmarked cases to be assigned and licensed like other cases.

[20, 21] argue that only case-less NPs (carrying unmarked case) can license dependent case. If this is correct, the daisy-chain configuration for case assignment does not exist, and these structures employ the 1:n-configuration instead where all assignment is performed by NP\(_1\).

They do not, however, provide an example showing that both NPs lose their accusative-marking together.

[28, p. 205] brings up the idea that dependent cases are feature values that are assigned in the presence of the licensing NP, but does not spell out how this might proceed.

For linguistic arguments in support of this approach, see the feature indeterminacy problems discussed in [8‐10].

This is a welcome result. MSO can capture many patterns that we do not expect to find in the case distribution in natural language. For instance, MSO-logic can implement modulo-counting, i.e., for a sequence of NPs, the case of the NP depends on its position in the sequence modulo some integer.

This follows the traditional formalization of DCT [23]. More recently, data have shown that erg‐erg‐abs patterns are unattested [2, 24] and realized as erg–abs–abs instead. This paper does not aim to contribute to this issue.

We could even reduce this to a single lexical item per noun. This is irrelevant for the formalism because the blow-up to the lexicon is constant and thereby negligible, but it does have linguistic significance. Given that the phonological content of a potential licensor virtually never changes with respect to whether it is a licensor or not (J. Bobaljik, p.c.), we would not like our formalism to employ accidental homophony to capture this because doing so would allow us to derive non-homophonous pairs of licensors, thereby overgenerating with respect to the linguistic data. We have two options to capture this systematic syncretism. The first one is to assume a generative lexicon that contains entries of the one type (either licensors or not) and derives entries of the second type. The second option is to introduce a rule that deletes +Acc from a nominal and applies optionally, (i), and to add the scheme for production rules in (ii) to our MG.

Akkuş, F.: On Iranian case & agreement, talk given at the University of Vienna, Austria, 15 December 2017

Baker, M.: Case: Its Principles and Its Parameters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRef

Baker, M., Bobaljik, J.: On Inherent and Dependent Theories of Ergative Case. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)

Baker, M., Vinokurova, N.: Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 28(3), 593–642 (2010)CrossRef

Bobaljik, J., Wurmbrand, S.: Questions with declarative syntax tell us what about selection. In: Gallego, Á., Ott, D. (eds.) 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 77. MIT Press (2015)

Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)MATH

Comon, H., Dauchet, M., Gilleron, R., Löding, C., Jacquemard, F., Lugiez, D., Tison, S., Tommasi, M.: Tree Automata Techniques and Applications (2008). http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/tata. Accessed 18 Nov 2008

Dalrymple, M., Kaplan, R.M.: Feature indeterminacy and feature resolution. Language 76(4), 759–798 (2000)CrossRef

Dalrymple, M., King, T.H., Sadler, L.: Indeterminacy by underspecification. J. Linguist. 45(1), 31–68 (2009)CrossRef

10.

Eisenberg, P.: A note on “Identity of Constituents”. Linguist. Inq. 4(3), 417–420 (1973)

11.

Ermolaeva, M.: Morphological agreement in minimalist grammars. In: Foret, A., Muskens, R., Pogodalla, S. (eds.) FG 2017. LNCS, vol. 10686, pp. 20–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56343-4_2CrossRef

12.

Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: On the treatment of multiple-wh-interrogatives in minimalist grammars. In: Hanneforth, T., Fanselow, G. (eds.) Language and Logos. Studia Grammatica, pp. 339–366. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (2010)CrossRef

13.

Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: In defense of generalized wh-clustering. In: Baglini, R., Grinsell, T., Keane, X., Singerman, A., Thomas, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session, pp. 137–146. The Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago (2014)

14.

Graf, T.: Closure properties of minimalist derivation tree languages. In: Pogodalla and Prost [25], pp. 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4

15.

Graf, T.: Movement-generalized minimalist grammars. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 58–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_4CrossRef

16.

Graf, T.: Local and transderivational constraints in syntax and semantics. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA (2013). http://thomasgraf.net/doc/papers/PhDThesis_RollingRelease.pdf

17.

Keenan, E., Moss, L.: Mathematical Structures in Languages. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2015)

18.

Kobele, G., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata-theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10, 13–17 August 2007, Organized as Part of ESSLLI 2007 (2007). https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/34852154/

19.

Kobele, G.M.: Minimalist tree languages are closed under intersection with recognizable tree languages. In: Pogodalla and Prost [25], pp. 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4

20.

Kornfilt, J., Preminger, O.: Nominative as ‘no case at all’: an argument from raising-to-ACC in Sakha. In: Joseph, A., Predolac, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL9). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 76, pp. 109–120. MIT Press (2015)

21.

Levin, T.: Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 35, 447–498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9342-zCrossRef

22.

Maling, J.: Of nominative and accusative: the hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish. In: Holmberg, A., Nikanne, U. (eds.) Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (1993)

23.

Marantz, A.: Case and licensing. In: Westphal, G., Ao, B., Chae, H.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) 1991, pp. 234–253. Cornell University, CLC Publications, Ithaca (1992)

24.

Nie, Y.: Why is there NOM-NOM and ACC-ACC but no ERG-ERG? In: Lamont, A., Tetzloff, K. (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 47. vol. 2, pp. 315–328 (2017)

25.

Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.): LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4CrossRefMATH

26.

Poole, E.: A configurational account of Finnish case. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21, Article 26 (2015). https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol21/iss1/26

27.

Poole, E.: The locality of dependent case (2016). http://ethanpoole.com/handouts/2016/poole-dependent-case-locality.pdf. Presented at GLOW 39 (April 5) and WCCFL 34 (April 30, no proceedings paper)

28.

Preminger, O.: Agreement and its Failures, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, vol. 68. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)CrossRef

29.

Salvati, S.: Minimalist grammars in the light of logic. In: Pogodalla, S., Quatrini, M., Retoré, C. (eds.) Logic and Grammar. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6700, pp. 81–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_5CrossRefMATH

30.

Stabler, E.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS, vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052152CrossRef

31.

Stabler, E.: Computational perspectives on minimalism. In: Boeckx, C. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, chap. 27, pp. 617–642. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.001.0001CrossRef

32.

Stabler, E., Keenan, E.: Structural similarity within and among languages. Theor. Comput. Sci. 293(2), 345–363 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRef

33.

Vinokurova, N.: Lexical categories and argument structure: a study with reference to Sakha. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht (2005)

34.

Yip, M., Maling, J., Jackendoff, R.: Case in tiers. Language 63(2), 217–250 (1987)CrossRef

Title: Case Theory in Minimalist Grammars
Author: Sabine Laszakovits
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Formal Grammar 2018
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57783-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-57784-4

Copyright Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57784-4_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner