Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Chapter 3: Trajectories of Political Development in the Post-Soviet States

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Some 25 years after the collapse of the USSR, most successor states are ruled by non-democratic regimes. This chapter explores why this is so. After looking at some arguments about culture, the chapter turns to an argument about the circumstances of these countries’ emergence from the USSR, and especially the role of mass-based civil society forces in that process. Most of the post-Soviet countries experienced an overwhelmingly elite-based transition in which the populace played only a subsidiary part. The result was the creation of political systems that were semi-closed, in the sense of providing little scope for real popular participation. Politics was overwhelmingly an elite phenomenon, and those elites acted to maintain the semi-closed nature of their polities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This chapter is only concerned with the 15 former union republics of the USSR and does not include those statelets that have emerged as a result of frozen conflicts, North Ossetia, Abkhazia or Transdnistr.
 
2
A regime is defined as the set of rules that govern access to power in the political system.
 
3
The danger of circularity also exists when scholars shift from an understanding of political culture as subjective values to a wider one including institutions and patterns of action (Lukin 2000, pp. 28–31; McAuley 1984).
 
4
This is a more general argument about the effect of authoritarian parties in mitigating elite conflict and bringing about unity. For an extended analysis, see Brownlee (2007).
 
5
Although, he does acknowledge some failures in this initially: Gamsakhurdia in Georgia, Elchibey in Azerbaijan, Nabiev in Tajikistan and Kravchuk in Ukraine (Hale 2015, pp. 127–133).
 
Literature
go back to reference Berdyaev, N. (1948). The Russian idea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Berdyaev, N. (1948). The Russian idea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Billington, J. H. (1966). The icon and the axe. An interpretive history of Russian culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Billington, J. H. (1966). The icon and the axe. An interpretive history of Russian culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
go back to reference Bremmer, I., & Taras, R. (Eds.) (1997). New politics. Building the post-Soviet nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bremmer, I., & Taras, R. (Eds.) (1997). New politics. Building the post-Soviet nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011), Defeating authoritarian leaders in post-communist countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011), Defeating authoritarian leaders in post-communist countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997a). Conflict, cleavage and change in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997a). Conflict, cleavage and change in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997b). Democratic changes and authoritarian reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997b). Democratic changes and authoritarian reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.CrossRef Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Dicks, H. V. (1960). Some notes on the Russian national character. In: C. E. Black (Ed.), The transformation of Russian society (pp. 558–573). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dicks, H. V. (1960). Some notes on the Russian national character. In: C. E. Black (Ed.), The transformation of Russian society (pp. 558–573). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Gill, G. (2002). Democracy and post-communism. Political change in the post-communist world. London: Routledge. Gill, G. (2002). Democracy and post-communism. Political change in the post-communist world. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Gill, G. (2015). Building an authoritarian polity. Russia in post-Soviet times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gill, G. (2015). Building an authoritarian polity. Russia in post-Soviet times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Gorer, G., & Rickman, J. (1949). The people of Great Russia. A psychological study. London: The Cresset Press. Gorer, G., & Rickman, J. (1949). The people of Great Russia. A psychological study. London: The Cresset Press.
go back to reference Hahn, G. (2002). Russia’s revolution from above. Reform, transition and revolution in the fall of the Soviet communist regime 1985–2000. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Hahn, G. (2002). Russia’s revolution from above. Reform, transition and revolution in the fall of the Soviet communist regime 1985–2000. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal politics. Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal politics. Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Comparative authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Comparative authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lukin, A. (2000). Political culture of Russian democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lukin, A. (2000). Political culture of Russian democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference McAuley, M. (1984). Political culture and communist studies: one step forward, two steps back. In: A. Brown (Ed.), Political culture and communist studies (pp. 13–39). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef McAuley, M. (1984). Political culture and communist studies: one step forward, two steps back. In: A. Brown (Ed.), Political culture and communist studies (pp. 13–39). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference McMann, K. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy. Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef McMann, K. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy. Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Mead, M. (1955). Soviet attitudes toward authority. An introductory approach to problems of Soviet character. New York: William Morrow. Mead, M. (1955). Soviet attitudes toward authority. An introductory approach to problems of Soviet character. New York: William Morrow.
go back to reference Pipes, R. (1974). Russia under the old regime. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Pipes, R. (1974). Russia under the old regime. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
go back to reference Smith, G. (1999). The post-Soviet states. Mapping the politics of transition. London: Arnold. Smith, G. (1999). The post-Soviet states. Mapping the politics of transition. London: Arnold.
go back to reference Szamuely, T. (1974). The Russian tradition. London: Secker & Warburg. Szamuely, T. (1974). The Russian tradition. London: Secker & Warburg.
go back to reference Way, L. A. (2005) Authoritarian state building and the sources of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave. The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57(2), 231–261.CrossRef Way, L. A. (2005) Authoritarian state building and the sources of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave. The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57(2), 231–261.CrossRef
go back to reference Way, L. (2010). Resistance to contagion: Sources of authoritarian stability in the former Soviet Union. In: V. Bunce, M. McFaul, K. Stoner-Weiss (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the post-communist world (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Way, L. (2010). Resistance to contagion: Sources of authoritarian stability in the former Soviet Union. In: V. Bunce, M. McFaul, K. Stoner-Weiss (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the post-communist world (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Way, L. A., & Levitsky, S. (2006). The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the cold war. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 387–410.CrossRef Way, L. A., & Levitsky, S. (2006). The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the cold war. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 387–410.CrossRef
go back to reference White, S. (1979). Political culture and Soviet politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef White, S. (1979). Political culture and Soviet politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chapter 3: Trajectories of Political Development in the Post-Soviet States
Author
Graeme Gill
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_4

Premium Partner