Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Chapter 9: Ukraine’s Democratisation Path Post-Orange Revolution: Examining the Internal and External Impediments to Successful Democratic Reform in Ukraine

Author : Nicholas Ross Smith

Published in: A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Orange revolution raised hopes for a positive upsurge in Ukraine’s democratisation trajectory. However, more than a decade after the Orange Revolution, it is clear that Ukraine has made little progress with regard to democratisation. This chapter identifies two important factors, one internal and one external, which help explain, in part, the lack of tangible democratic reform in Ukraine. Internally, it is argued that the role of elites (oligarchs) has been detrimental to Ukraine’s democratisation efforts. Externally, it is argued that Ukraine’s geopolitical positioning in Eastern Europe is a bulwark to the potential external diffusion of democracy. Ultimately, because of Ukraine’s geopolitical positioning, any positive democratic gains will have to be driven from within; a difficult task given the entrenchment of oligarchs.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A liberal definition of democracy goes beyond mere elections as a benchmark as it also requires the existence of the rule of law, a free press, basic human rights and active political participation (through a vibrant civil society) on the part of the general population (Dahl 1973; Diamond 1995). Thus, liberal democratic system allows a polity to exert effective control over their elected political leaders (who themselves become the de facto and de jure rulers of the country).
 
2
Fareed Zakaria (1997, p. 22) first coined the term illiberal democracy after noticing that many putatively functioning democracies were ‘routinely ignoring constitutional limits on their power and depriving their citizens of basic rights and freedoms’ (see Andras Pap’s chapter in this volume for a deeper discussion on illiberal democracy and the emerging Hungarian model of illiberal democracy). Numerous other terms have also been used to describe this kind of failing democratic system: semi-democracy, pseudo-democracy, managed democracy, competitive authoritarianism, hybrid regime and delegative democracy (Diamond 2002).
 
3
The interview with a Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) official took place in Brussels on 25 September 2013.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ambrosio, T. (2010). Constructing a framework of authoritarian diffusion: concepts, dynamics, and future research. International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 375–392.CrossRef Ambrosio, T. (2010). Constructing a framework of authoritarian diffusion: concepts, dynamics, and future research. International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 375–392.CrossRef
go back to reference Åslund, A. (2009a). How Ukraine became a market economy and democracy. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute. Åslund, A. (2009a). How Ukraine became a market economy and democracy. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
go back to reference Åslund, A. (2009b). Ukraine’s financial crisis, 2009. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(4), 371–386.CrossRef Åslund, A. (2009b). Ukraine’s financial crisis, 2009. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(4), 371–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Averre, D. (2009). Competing rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “shared neighbourhood.” Europe-Asia Studies, 61(10), 1689–1713.CrossRef Averre, D. (2009). Competing rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “shared neighbourhood.” Europe-Asia Studies, 61(10), 1689–1713.CrossRef
go back to reference Bader, J., Grävingholt, J., Kästner, A. (2010). Would autocracies promote autocracy? A political economy perspective on regime-type export in regional neighbourhoods. Contemporary Politics, 16(1), 81–100.CrossRef Bader, J., Grävingholt, J., Kästner, A. (2010). Would autocracies promote autocracy? A political economy perspective on regime-type export in regional neighbourhoods. Contemporary Politics, 16(1), 81–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Beichelt, T. (2004). Autocracy and democracy in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Democratization, 11(5), 113–132.CrossRef Beichelt, T. (2004). Autocracy and democracy in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Democratization, 11(5), 113–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Beissinger, M. R. (2009). An interrelated wave. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 74–77.CrossRef Beissinger, M. R. (2009). An interrelated wave. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 74–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Burlyuk, O. (2015). The introduction and consolidation of the rule of law in Ukraine: domestic hindrances at the level of the demand for law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 7(1), 1–25.CrossRef Burlyuk, O. (2015). The introduction and consolidation of the rule of law in Ukraine: domestic hindrances at the level of the demand for law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 7(1), 1–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.CrossRef Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Casier, T. (2011). The EU’s two-track approach to democracy promotion: the case of Ukraine. Democratization, 18(4), 956–977.CrossRef Casier, T. (2011). The EU’s two-track approach to democracy promotion: the case of Ukraine. Democratization, 18(4), 956–977.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, R. K., Rakhimkulov, E. R., Wise, C. R. (2005). The Ukrainian Orange Revolution brought more than a new president: what kind of democracy will the institutional changes bring? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38(2), 207–230.CrossRef Christensen, R. K., Rakhimkulov, E. R., Wise, C. R. (2005). The Ukrainian Orange Revolution brought more than a new president: what kind of democracy will the institutional changes bring? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38(2), 207–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Diamond, L. J. (1995). Promoting democracy in the 1990s: actors and instruments, issues and imperatives. New York: Carnegie. Diamond, L. J. (1995). Promoting democracy in the 1990s: actors and instruments, issues and imperatives. New York: Carnegie.
go back to reference Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.CrossRef Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Dobriansky, P. J. (1994). Ukraine: a question of survival. The National Interest, 65–72. Dobriansky, P. J. (1994). Ukraine: a question of survival. The National Interest, 65–72.
go back to reference Dragneva, R., & Wolczuk, K. (2012). Russia, the Eurasian customs union and the EU: cooperation, stagnation or rivalry? Chatham House Briefing Paper. Dragneva, R., & Wolczuk, K. (2012). Russia, the Eurasian customs union and the EU: cooperation, stagnation or rivalry? Chatham House Briefing Paper.
go back to reference Flikke, G. (2008). Pacts, parties and elite struggle: Ukraine’s troubled post-orange transition. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(3), 375–396.CrossRef Flikke, G. (2008). Pacts, parties and elite struggle: Ukraine’s troubled post-orange transition. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(3), 375–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Garrard, J. (2001). Democratisation in Britain: elites, civil society and reform since 1800. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Garrard, J. (2001). Democratisation in Britain: elites, civil society and reform since 1800. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Gawrich, A., Melnykovska, I., Schweickert, R. (2010). Neighbourhood Europeanization through ENP: the case of Ukraine. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1209–1235. Gawrich, A., Melnykovska, I., Schweickert, R. (2010). Neighbourhood Europeanization through ENP: the case of Ukraine. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1209–1235.
go back to reference Gershman, C. (2015). A fight for democracy. World Affairs, 177(6), 47–56. Gershman, C. (2015). A fight for democracy. World Affairs, 177(6), 47–56.
go back to reference Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.CrossRef Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.CrossRef
go back to reference Gnedina, E. (2015). “Multi-vector” foreign policies in Europe: balancing, bandwagoning or bargaining? Europe-Asia Studies, 67(7), 1007–1029.CrossRef Gnedina, E. (2015). “Multi-vector” foreign policies in Europe: balancing, bandwagoning or bargaining? Europe-Asia Studies, 67(7), 1007–1029.CrossRef
go back to reference Grugel, J., & Bishop, M. L. (2002). Democratization: a critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Grugel, J., & Bishop, M. L. (2002). Democratization: a critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2005). Regime cycles: democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 58(01), 133–165.CrossRef Hale, H. E. (2005). Regime cycles: democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 58(01), 133–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2013). Regime change cascades: what we have learned from the 1848 revolutions to the 2011 Arab uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 331–353.CrossRef Hale, H. E. (2013). Regime change cascades: what we have learned from the 1848 revolutions to the 2011 Arab uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 331–353.CrossRef
go back to reference Haran, O. (2011). From Viktor to Viktor: democracy and authoritarianism in Ukraine. Demokratizatsiya, 19(2), 93–110. Haran, O. (2011). From Viktor to Viktor: democracy and authoritarianism in Ukraine. Demokratizatsiya, 19(2), 93–110.
go back to reference Higley, J., & Burton, M. G. (1989). The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review, 54(1), 17–32.CrossRef Higley, J., & Burton, M. G. (1989). The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review, 54(1), 17–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 1). Norman: University of Oklahoma press. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 1). Norman: University of Oklahoma press.
go back to reference Karatnycky, A. (1992). The Ukrainian factor. Foreign Affairs, 71(3), 90–107.CrossRef Karatnycky, A. (1992). The Ukrainian factor. Foreign Affairs, 71(3), 90–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Karatnycky, A. (1995). Ukraine at the crossroads. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 117–130.CrossRef Karatnycky, A. (1995). Ukraine at the crossroads. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 117–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Karatnycky, A. (2005). Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Foreign Affairs, 84(2), 35–52.CrossRef Karatnycky, A. (2005). Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Foreign Affairs, 84(2), 35–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Katchanovski, I. (2008). The Orange Evolution? The “Orange Revolution” and political changes in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24(4), 351–382.CrossRef Katchanovski, I. (2008). The Orange Evolution? The “Orange Revolution” and political changes in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24(4), 351–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Kovalov, M. (2014). Electoral manipulations and fraud in parliamentary elections: the case of Ukraine. East European Politics & Societies, 28 (4), 781–807.CrossRef Kovalov, M. (2014). Electoral manipulations and fraud in parliamentary elections: the case of Ukraine. East European Politics & Societies, 28 (4), 781–807.CrossRef
go back to reference Kubiček, P. (2001). The limits of electoral democracy in Ukraine. Democratization, 8(2), 117–139.CrossRef Kubiček, P. (2001). The limits of electoral democracy in Ukraine. Democratization, 8(2), 117–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Kubiček, P. (2009). Problems of post-post-communism: Ukraine after the Orange Revolution. Democratization, 16(2), 323–343.CrossRef Kubiček, P. (2009). Problems of post-post-communism: Ukraine after the Orange Revolution. Democratization, 16(2), 323–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Kubiček, P. (1994). Delegative democracy in Russia and Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 27(4), 423–441.CrossRef Kubiček, P. (1994). Delegative democracy in Russia and Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 27(4), 423–441.CrossRef
go back to reference Kudelia, S. (2014). The house that Yanukovych built. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 19–34.CrossRef Kudelia, S. (2014). The house that Yanukovych built. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 19–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuzio, T. (1994). The multi-party system in Ukraine on the eve of elections: Identity problems, conflicts and solutions. Government and Opposition, 29(1), 109–127.CrossRef Kuzio, T. (1994). The multi-party system in Ukraine on the eve of elections: Identity problems, conflicts and solutions. Government and Opposition, 29(1), 109–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuzio, T. (1996). Kravchuk to Kuchma: the Ukrainian presidential elections of 1994. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 12(2), 117–144.CrossRef Kuzio, T. (1996). Kravchuk to Kuchma: the Ukrainian presidential elections of 1994. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 12(2), 117–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuzio, T. (2005). Neither east nor west: Ukraine’s security policy. Problems of Post-Communism, 52(2), 59–68. Kuzio, T. (2005). Neither east nor west: Ukraine’s security policy. Problems of Post-Communism, 52(2), 59–68.
go back to reference Kuzio, T. (2007). Oligarchs, tapes and oranges: “Kuchmagate” to the Orange Revolution. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23(1), 30–56.CrossRef Kuzio, T. (2007). Oligarchs, tapes and oranges: “Kuchmagate” to the Orange Revolution. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23(1), 30–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuzio, T. (2010). Nationalism, identity and civil society in Ukraine: understanding the Orange Revolution. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(3), 285–296.CrossRef Kuzio, T. (2010). Nationalism, identity and civil society in Ukraine: understanding the Orange Revolution. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(3), 285–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Lynch, G., & Crawford, G. (2011). Democratization in Africa 1990–2010: an assessment. Democratization, 18(2), 275–310.CrossRef Lynch, G., & Crawford, G. (2011). Democratization in Africa 1990–2010: an assessment. Democratization, 18(2), 275–310.CrossRef
go back to reference McFaul, M. (2007). Ukraine imports democracy: external influences on the Orange Revolution. International Security, 32(2), 45–83.CrossRef McFaul, M. (2007). Ukraine imports democracy: external influences on the Orange Revolution. International Security, 32(2), 45–83.CrossRef
go back to reference Melnykovska, I., Plamper, H., Schweickert, R. (2012). Do Russia and China promote autocracy in Central Asia? Asia Europe Journal, 10(1), 1–15.CrossRef Melnykovska, I., Plamper, H., Schweickert, R. (2012). Do Russia and China promote autocracy in Central Asia? Asia Europe Journal, 10(1), 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Motyl, A. J. (2013). Yanukovych’s choice. Foreign Affairs, 46–51. Motyl, A. J. (2013). Yanukovych’s choice. Foreign Affairs, 46–51.
go back to reference O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Petrovic, M., & Smith, N. R. (2013). In Croatia’s slipstream or on an alternative road? Assessing the objective case for the remaining Western Balkan states acceding into the EU. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 13(4), 553–573.CrossRef Petrovic, M., & Smith, N. R. (2013). In Croatia’s slipstream or on an alternative road? Assessing the objective case for the remaining Western Balkan states acceding into the EU. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 13(4), 553–573.CrossRef
go back to reference Pond, E. (2015). Will Ukraine snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? Survival, 57(6), 59–68.CrossRef Pond, E. (2015). Will Ukraine snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? Survival, 57(6), 59–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Potter, D. S. (1997). Explaining democratization. In: D. S. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh, P. Lewis (Eds.), Democratization (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Polity. Potter, D. S. (1997). Explaining democratization. In: D. S. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh, P. Lewis (Eds.), Democratization (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Polity.
go back to reference Pridham, G. (2014). EU/Ukraine relations and the crisis with Russia, 2013–14: a turning point. International Spectator, 49(4), 53–61.CrossRef Pridham, G. (2014). EU/Ukraine relations and the crisis with Russia, 2013–14: a turning point. International Spectator, 49(4), 53–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Puglisi, R. (2003). The rise of the Ukrainian oligarchs. Democratization, 10(3), 99–123.CrossRef Puglisi, R. (2003). The rise of the Ukrainian oligarchs. Democratization, 10(3), 99–123.CrossRef
go back to reference Rose, R. (2001). A diverging Europe. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 93–106.CrossRef Rose, R. (2001). A diverging Europe. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 93–106.CrossRef
go back to reference Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363.CrossRef Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Schimmelfennig, F. (2005). Strategic calculation and international socialization: membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization, 59, 827–860.CrossRef Schimmelfennig, F. (2005). Strategic calculation and international socialization: membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization, 59, 827–860.CrossRef
go back to reference Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.CrossRef Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, N. R. (2014). The underpinning realpolitik of the EU’s policies towards Ukraine: an analysis of norms and interests in the EU-Ukraine association agreement. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(4), 581–596. Smith, N. R. (2014). The underpinning realpolitik of the EU’s policies towards Ukraine: an analysis of norms and interests in the EU-Ukraine association agreement. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(4), 581–596.
go back to reference Smith, N. R. (2015). The EU and Russia’s conflicting regime preferences in Ukraine: assessing regime promotion strategies in the scope of the Ukraine crisis. European Security, 24(4), 525–540.CrossRef Smith, N. R. (2015). The EU and Russia’s conflicting regime preferences in Ukraine: assessing regime promotion strategies in the scope of the Ukraine crisis. European Security, 24(4), 525–540.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, N. R. (2016). The EU under a realist scope: Employing a neoclassical realist framework for the analysis of the EU’s deep and comprehensive free trade agreement offer to Ukraine. International Relations, 30(1), 29–48.CrossRef Smith, N. R. (2016). The EU under a realist scope: Employing a neoclassical realist framework for the analysis of the EU’s deep and comprehensive free trade agreement offer to Ukraine. International Relations, 30(1), 29–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Solonenko, I. (2009). External democracy promotion in Ukraine: the role of the European Union. Democratization, 16(4), 709–731.CrossRef Solonenko, I. (2009). External democracy promotion in Ukraine: the role of the European Union. Democratization, 16(4), 709–731.CrossRef
go back to reference Stent, A. E. (2008). Restoration and revolution in Putin’s foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(6), 1089–1106.CrossRef Stent, A. E. (2008). Restoration and revolution in Putin’s foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(6), 1089–1106.CrossRef
go back to reference Tilly, C. (2000). Processes and mechanisms of democratization. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00085.CrossRef Tilly, C. (2000). Processes and mechanisms of democratization. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00085.CrossRef
go back to reference Tolstrup, J. (2012). When can external actors influence democratization? Leverage, linkages, and gatekeeper elites. Democratization, 20(4), 716–742.CrossRef Tolstrup, J. (2012). When can external actors influence democratization? Leverage, linkages, and gatekeeper elites. Democratization, 20(4), 716–742.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, A. (2006). Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, NGOs and the role of the West. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19(1), 21–32.CrossRef Wilson, A. (2006). Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, NGOs and the role of the West. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19(1), 21–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Youngs, R. (2009). “A door neither closed nor open”: EU policy towards Ukraine during and since the Orange Revolution. International Politics, 46(4), 358–375.CrossRef Youngs, R. (2009). “A door neither closed nor open”: EU policy towards Ukraine during and since the Orange Revolution. International Politics, 46(4), 358–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Zakaria, F. (1997, November–December). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76 (1997), 22–41.CrossRef Zakaria, F. (1997, November–December). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76 (1997), 22–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Zlenko, A. (1992). Independent Ukraine: risk or stability? The RUSI Journal, 137(2), 38–42.CrossRef Zlenko, A. (1992). Independent Ukraine: risk or stability? The RUSI Journal, 137(2), 38–42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chapter 9: Ukraine’s Democratisation Path Post-Orange Revolution: Examining the Internal and External Impediments to Successful Democratic Reform in Ukraine
Author
Nicholas Ross Smith
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_10

Premium Partner