Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Civil Society Mobilisation in Croatia

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines rule of law-related civil society mobilisation in Croatia during the final years of the country’s membership talks and in the early post-accession period. It points to a tangible strengthening of Croatian civil society actors during the final stages of the accession process, which was favoured by their collective mobilisation and direct engagement with EU actors. Empowerment, however, remained tightly circumscribed due to civil society actors’ late mobilisation and their overreliance upon the EU as an ally, a role the EU ceased to play upon Croatia’s accession. The chapter highlights the importance of domestic agency and the role of deliberate and creative usages of the EU accession framework. At the same time, it points to the limitations of mobilisation strategies that, by necessity as much as by choice, privilege EU leverage over a broader engagement at the domestic level.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bežovan, Gojko, and Jelena Matančević. 2011. Building Identity: Future Challenges for CSOs as Professionals in the Societal Arena. Zagreb: CIVICUS. Bežovan, Gojko, and Jelena Matančević. 2011. Building Identity: Future Challenges for CSOs as Professionals in the Societal Arena. Zagreb: CIVICUS.
go back to reference Bežovan, Gojko, Siniša Zrinščak, and Marina Vugec. 2005. Civil Society in Croatia: Gaining Trust and Establishing Partnerships with the State and Other Stakeholders. Zagreb: CIVICUS. Bežovan, Gojko, Siniša Zrinščak, and Marina Vugec. 2005. Civil Society in Croatia: Gaining Trust and Establishing Partnerships with the State and Other Stakeholders. Zagreb: CIVICUS.
go back to reference Bobić, Maja, and Relja Božić. 2012. Civil Society in the Process of European Integration—From Constructive Dialogue to Successful Negotiations. Belgrade, Serbia. Bobić, Maja, and Relja Božić. 2012. Civil Society in the Process of European Integration—From Constructive Dialogue to Successful Negotiations. Belgrade, Serbia.
go back to reference Coalition for the Monitoring of Accession Negotiations. 2011a. “Joint Opinion of Croatian Civil Society Organizations on the Progress Regarding the Readiness of the Republic of Croatia to Close Negotiations in Chapter 23—Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.” Zagreb, 10 May. Coalition for the Monitoring of Accession Negotiations. 2011a. “Joint Opinion of Croatian Civil Society Organizations on the Progress Regarding the Readiness of the Republic of Croatia to Close Negotiations in Chapter 23—Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.” Zagreb, 10 May.
go back to reference ———. 2011b. “Joint Opinion of the Croatian Civil Society Organisations on the Readiness of the Republic of Croatia for the Closing of Negotiations in Chapter 23—Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.” Zagreb, 16 February. ———. 2011b. “Joint Opinion of the Croatian Civil Society Organisations on the Readiness of the Republic of Croatia for the Closing of Negotiations in Chapter 23—Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.” Zagreb, 16 February.
go back to reference Đokić, Irena, and Marijana Sumpor. 2013. The Role of Croatian Civil Society Organisations in the European Union Accession Process. Zagreb, June. Đokić, Irena, and Marijana Sumpor. 2013. The Role of Croatian Civil Society Organisations in the European Union Accession Process. Zagreb, June.
go back to reference Dolenec, Danijela. 2015. “Hangover After EU Accession: The Rise of Organised Intolerance in Croatia.” Paper Prepared for the EUSA Conference, 4–6 May. Dolenec, Danijela. 2015. “Hangover After EU Accession: The Rise of Organised Intolerance in Croatia.” Paper Prepared for the EUSA Conference, 4–6 May.
go back to reference European Commission. 2002. “Croatia: Stabilisation and Association Report.” SEC (2002) 341. Brussels, 4 April. European Commission. 2002. “Croatia: Stabilisation and Association Report.” SEC (2002) 341. Brussels, 4 April.
go back to reference ———. 2011. “Interim Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: On Reforms in Croatia in the Field of Judiciary and Fundamental Rights (Negotiation Chapter 23).” COM (2011) 110. Brussels, 2 March. ———. 2011. “Interim Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: On Reforms in Croatia in the Field of Judiciary and Fundamental Rights (Negotiation Chapter 23).” COM (2011) 110. Brussels, 2 March.
go back to reference ———. 2012. “Main Findings of the Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Croatia’s State of Preparedness for EU Membership.” COM (2012) 601 Final. Brussels, 10 October. ———. 2012. “Main Findings of the Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Croatia’s State of Preparedness for EU Membership.” COM (2012) 601 Final. Brussels, 10 October.
go back to reference European Economic and Social Committee. 2014. Enhancing the Transparency and Inclusiveness of the EU Accession Process: REX/401. Brussels, 10 July. European Economic and Social Committee. 2014. Enhancing the Transparency and Inclusiveness of the EU Accession Process: REX/401. Brussels, 10 July.
go back to reference Fagan, Adam. 2010a. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma: Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris. Fagan, Adam. 2010a. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma: Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris.
go back to reference ———. 2010b. “The New Kids on the Block—Building Environmental Governance in the Western Balkans.” Acta Politica 45 (1/2): 203–28. ———. 2010b. “The New Kids on the Block—Building Environmental Governance in the Western Balkans.” Acta Politica 45 (1/2): 203–28.
go back to reference Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 1013–31. Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 1013–31.
go back to reference Ker-Lindsay, James. 2013. “Conclusion.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 257–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ker-Lindsay, James. 2013. “Conclusion.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 257–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Kuntz, Jessica. 2011. “(Re)Entering Europe: The Post-Communist Transition of Croatian Political Culture.” Politička misao 48 (5): 215–46. Kuntz, Jessica. 2011. “(Re)Entering Europe: The Post-Communist Transition of Croatian Political Culture.” Politička misao 48 (5): 215–46.
go back to reference Marović, Jovana. 2012. “Montenegro and the Negotiations in Chapter 23.” Podgorica. Marović, Jovana. 2012. “Montenegro and the Negotiations in Chapter 23.” Podgorica.
go back to reference Miošić, Nives, and Duje Prkut. 2012. “Access to Information in Croatia: Exercise of a Constitutional Right in an Institutional Culture of Secrecy.” Zagreb, July. Miošić, Nives, and Duje Prkut. 2012. “Access to Information in Croatia: Exercise of a Constitutional Right in an Institutional Culture of Secrecy.” Zagreb, July.
go back to reference O’Brennan, John. 2013. “The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. O’Brennan, John. 2013. “The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović, James Ker-Lindsay, and Denisa Kostovicova, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference ———. 2014. “Assessment of the Reform Capacities of the Croatian Government, 2011–2014.” ———. 2014. “Assessment of the Reform Capacities of the Croatian Government, 2011–2014.”
go back to reference Podolnjak, Robert, and Djordje Gardašević. 2014. “Great Expectations: The New Croatian Freedom of Information Act.” Iustinianus Primus Law Review 6 (10): 1–26. Podolnjak, Robert, and Djordje Gardašević. 2014. “Great Expectations: The New Croatian Freedom of Information Act.” Iustinianus Primus Law Review 6 (10): 1–26.
go back to reference Raik, Kristi. 2006. “The Ambivalent Impact of Accession on Civil Society: The Case of Estonia.” In Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europäisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Europäische Schriften, edited by Amelie Kutter and Vera Trappmann, 317–38. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Raik, Kristi. 2006. “The Ambivalent Impact of Accession on Civil Society: The Case of Estonia.” In Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europäisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Europäische Schriften, edited by Amelie Kutter and Vera Trappmann, 317–38. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
go back to reference Škrabalo, Marina. 2012. Transparency in Retrospect: Preliminary Lessons from Croatia’s EU Accession Process. Zagreb, May. Škrabalo, Marina. 2012. Transparency in Retrospect: Preliminary Lessons from Croatia’s EU Accession Process. Zagreb, May.
go back to reference Teršelič, Vesna. 2014. “Advocacy for ‘Dealing with the Past’ as Part of the EU Accession Process – Experience from Civil Initiatives in Croatia.” Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center. Teršelič, Vesna. 2014. “Advocacy for ‘Dealing with the Past’ as Part of the EU Accession Process – Experience from Civil Initiatives in Croatia.” Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center.
go back to reference Vidačak, Igor, and Marina Škrabalo. 2014. “Exploring the Effects of Europeanization on the Openness of Public Administration in Croatia.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14 (1): 149–87. Vidačak, Igor, and Marina Škrabalo. 2014. “Exploring the Effects of Europeanization on the Openness of Public Administration in Croatia.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14 (1): 149–87.
go back to reference Youth Initiative for Human Rights. 2013. Pregled međunarodnih instrumenata i normi za zaštitu jezičnih prava nacionalnih manjina. Zagreb: Youth Initiative for Human Rights. Youth Initiative for Human Rights. 2013. Pregled međunarodnih instrumenata i normi za zaštitu jezičnih prava nacionalnih manjina. Zagreb: Youth Initiative for Human Rights.
Metadata
Title
Civil Society Mobilisation in Croatia
Author
Natasha Wunsch
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91845-7_3