Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

23. Co-management of Forests and Forest Land Under Decentralization Process in Central Vietnam

Authors : Tran Nam Tu, Paul Burgers, Annelies Zoomers

Published in: Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With global concerns over climate change and forest degradation, poverty reduction in and around forest areas seem to be less prominent on the agenda, even though there is an intrinsic link between poverty and deforestation. In this highly complex context, where forests must fulfill roles that range from global to local ecological and socio-economic services, forest policies face new challenges, depending on the institutional, legal and economic conditions in different countries. Vietnam has already taken up this challenge to integrate rural development with issues for sustainable natural resource management from the early nineties onward through their Forest Land Allocation (FLA) policy. After almost 20 years of FLA policies implementation, this chapter analyses the impacts of these decentralization FLA policies have on forest protection and socio-economic improvement of selected rural communities in and around the bufferzone of the Bach Ma National Park (BMNP), Central region of Vietnam. It pays particular attention to the effects of FLA policies on long existing customary institutions at the community level to sustainably use and protect forest resources. The research argues that the policy was a good initiative to create resource use rights as well as co-management for local communities. However, local people do not benefit from the implemented “decentralized” measures, shown by continuous illegal encroachment into the core zone of the BMNP. The main reason is that active participation of local people is absent, and policies do not fit the local needs and priorities. This chapter critically examines the process of decentralization as it has taken place in central Vietnam, focusing on the buffer zone surrounding (BMNP), where the Government and international organizations have implemented projects on decentralized forest land management, following along the policy framework and donor agendas. The study emphasizes that the decentralization process in forest management is to achieve success if participation of local people is given more attention.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
SNV (Netherlands Development Organization) positions itself as a global organization of advisors in over 30 countries worldwide, with its original office in the Netherlands. SNV focuses on various themes, including health, education, energy, tourism, agriculture, water and sanitation, and forestry. With regard to forestry, the objective of SNV is to develop employment in forestry at the local level, amongst others by strengthening local people’s access rights to forests (SNV 2008). In Vietnam, the focus of SNV is also clearly on the reduction of poverty at the local level, rather than focusing mainly on the protection of forests. One of important consultant activities is to pursue in the Land Use Planning and Land Allocation project supporting forest land allocation. It is also important to notice that posing poverty reduction as the main objective might conflict with the forest protection interests of the government.
 
2
Helvetas is a Swiss independent organization for development cooperation in 20 countries. The sectors Helvetas focuses on are infrastructure in rural areas; sustainable management of natural resources; education and society; and civil society and the state (Helvetas 2008). The forest land allocation method for community forestry management developed by Helvetas has partially been formalized in national law.
 
Literature
go back to reference Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2008) ‘Decentralization and community-based forestry: learning from experience’. In: Edward LW, Ganesh PSi (eds) Decentralization, forests and rural communities—policy outcomes in South and Southeast Asia. Sage, New Delhi, pp 44–67 Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2008) ‘Decentralization and community-based forestry: learning from experience’. In: Edward LW, Ganesh PSi (eds) Decentralization, forests and rural communities—policy outcomes in South and Southeast Asia. Sage, New Delhi, pp 44–67
go back to reference Ananda J (2007) Implementing participatory decision making in forestry planning. Environ Manag 39:534–544CrossRef Ananda J (2007) Implementing participatory decision making in forestry planning. Environ Manag 39:534–544CrossRef
go back to reference Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Am Assoc Advanc Sci 320:1460–1462 Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Am Assoc Advanc Sci 320:1460–1462
go back to reference Baskent EZ, Sagdan B, Salih T (2008) Developing and implementing participatory and ecosystem based multiple use forest management planning approach (ETCAP): yalnizcam case study. For Ecol Manag 256:798–807CrossRef Baskent EZ, Sagdan B, Salih T (2008) Developing and implementing participatory and ecosystem based multiple use forest management planning approach (ETCAP): yalnizcam case study. For Ecol Manag 256:798–807CrossRef
go back to reference Castella JCBS, Nguyen HT, Novosad P (2006) Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous provinces in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 23:147–160CrossRef Castella JCBS, Nguyen HT, Novosad P (2006) Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous provinces in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 23:147–160CrossRef
go back to reference Cleaver F (1999) Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. J Int Develop 11:597–612CrossRef Cleaver F (1999) Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. J Int Develop 11:597–612CrossRef
go back to reference Clement F, Amezaga JM (2008) Linking reforestation policies with land use change in Northern Vietnam: why do local factors matter. Geoforum 39(1):217–240CrossRef Clement F, Amezaga JM (2008) Linking reforestation policies with land use change in Northern Vietnam: why do local factors matter. Geoforum 39(1):217–240CrossRef
go back to reference Conley A, Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resources management. Soc Natur Resour 16:371–386CrossRef Conley A, Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resources management. Soc Natur Resour 16:371–386CrossRef
go back to reference Evans K, Wil de J, Cronkleton P, Nghi TH (2010) Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities. Soc Natur Resour 23(7):604–619CrossRef Evans K, Wil de J, Cronkleton P, Nghi TH (2010) Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities. Soc Natur Resour 23(7):604–619CrossRef
go back to reference Gomiero T, Pettenella D, Trieu GP, Paoletti MG (2000) Vietnamese uplands: environmental and socio-economic perspective of forest land allocation and deforestation process. Environ Dev Sustain 2:119–142CrossRef Gomiero T, Pettenella D, Trieu GP, Paoletti MG (2000) Vietnamese uplands: environmental and socio-economic perspective of forest land allocation and deforestation process. Environ Dev Sustain 2:119–142CrossRef
go back to reference Melissa NB, Phillip R (2009) Co-management and protected area management: achieving effective management of a contested site, lessons from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). Marine Policy 33:118–127CrossRef Melissa NB, Phillip R (2009) Co-management and protected area management: achieving effective management of a contested site, lessons from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). Marine Policy 33:118–127CrossRef
go back to reference Nguyen TQ (2009) Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? Case Study Vietnam. Report for Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Nguyen TQ (2009) Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? Case Study Vietnam. Report for Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
go back to reference Nijenhuis G (2006) Political decentralization, local governance, and participatory development. In: Van LP, De JA, Nijenhuis G (eds) Development matters: geographical studies on development processes and policies. University Press, Utrecht Nijenhuis G (2006) Political decentralization, local governance, and participatory development. In: Van LP, De JA, Nijenhuis G (eds) Development matters: geographical studies on development processes and policies. University Press, Utrecht
go back to reference Nygren A (2005) Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras. World Devel 33(4):639–655CrossRef Nygren A (2005) Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras. World Devel 33(4):639–655CrossRef
go back to reference Phuong PX (2008) Overview of forest land allocation policy in Vietnam: real status and orientation for the coming period. Paper presented at the National Forum on forest land allocation in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam, 28 May 2008 Phuong PX (2008) Overview of forest land allocation policy in Vietnam: real status and orientation for the coming period. Paper presented at the National Forum on forest land allocation in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam, 28 May 2008
go back to reference Ros-Tonen M, Hombergh H van den, Zoomers A (2007) Partnerships in sustainable forest resource management: Lessons from Latin Amercia. CEDLA Latin America Series, Brill, Leiden, Brill publishers, 94:3–36 Ros-Tonen M, Hombergh H van den, Zoomers A (2007) Partnerships in sustainable forest resource management: Lessons from Latin Amercia. CEDLA Latin America Series, Brill, Leiden, Brill publishers, 94:3–36
go back to reference Sarah S-L (2006) Devolution of forest management: a cautionary case of pukhtun jirgas in dispute settlements. Hum Ecol 34:637–653CrossRef Sarah S-L (2006) Devolution of forest management: a cautionary case of pukhtun jirgas in dispute settlements. Hum Ecol 34:637–653CrossRef
go back to reference Sikor T (1998) Forest policy reform: from state to household forestry. In: Mark Poffenberger (ed) Stewards of Vietnam’s upland forests, Asia Forest Network, Berkeley, pp 18–37 Sikor T (1998) Forest policy reform: from state to household forestry. In: Mark Poffenberger (ed) Stewards of Vietnam’s upland forests, Asia Forest Network, Berkeley, pp 18–37
go back to reference Sikor T (2001) The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: did it cause the expansion of forests in the Northern? Forest Policy Econo 2:1–11CrossRef Sikor T (2001) The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: did it cause the expansion of forests in the Northern? Forest Policy Econo 2:1–11CrossRef
go back to reference Sikor T, Nguyen TQ (2007) Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s central highlands. World Devel 35(11):2010–2025CrossRef Sikor T, Nguyen TQ (2007) Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s central highlands. World Devel 35(11):2010–2025CrossRef
go back to reference SNV (2005) Linking reforestation with democratization and poverty reduction in Vietnam. Land Use Planning and Land Allocation. SNV Vietnam SNV (2005) Linking reforestation with democratization and poverty reduction in Vietnam. Land Use Planning and Land Allocation. SNV Vietnam
go back to reference Tan NQ (2006) Forest devolution in Vietnam: Differentiation in benefits from forest among local households. Forest Policy and. Economics 8:409–420 Tan NQ (2006) Forest devolution in Vietnam: Differentiation in benefits from forest among local households. Forest Policy and. Economics 8:409–420
go back to reference Wollenberg E, Anderson J, Lopez C (2005) Though all things differ. Pluralism as a basis for cooperation in forests. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. CIFOR. vii, 101, p ISBN: 979–3361-71–9 Wollenberg E, Anderson J, Lopez C (2005) Though all things differ. Pluralism as a basis for cooperation in forests. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. CIFOR. vii, 101, p ISBN: 979–3361-71–9
Metadata
Title
Co-management of Forests and Forest Land Under Decentralization Process in Central Vietnam
Authors
Tran Nam Tu
Paul Burgers
Annelies Zoomers
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_23