Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 5/2014

01-10-2014 | RERS

Combining static analysis and state transition graphs for verification of event-condition-action systems in the RERS 2012 and 2013 challenges

Authors: Markus Schordan, Adrian Prantl

Published in: International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer | Issue 5/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present a combination of approaches for the verification of event-condition-action (ECA) systems. The analyzed ECA systems range from structurally simple to structurally complex systems. We address the verification of reachability properties and behavioral properties. Reachability properties are represented by assertions in the program and we determine statically whether an assertion holds for all execution paths. Behavioral properties are represented as linear temporal logic formulas specifying the input/output behavior of the program. Our approach assumes a finite state space. We compare a symbolic analysis with an exhaustive state space exploration and discuss the trade-offs between the approaches in terms of the number of computed states and run-time behavior. All variants compute a state transition graph which can also be passed to an LTL verifier. The variants have a different impact on the number of computed states in the state transition graph which in turn impacts the run-time and memory consumption of subsequent phases. We evaluate the different analysis variants with the RERS benchmarks.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Almeida, E.E., Luntz, J.E., Tilbury, D.M.: Event–condition–action systems for reconfigurable logic control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 167–181 (2007)CrossRef Almeida, E.E., Luntz, J.E., Tilbury, D.M.: Event–condition–action systems for reconfigurable logic control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 167–181 (2007)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Armando, Alessandro, Mantovani, Jacopo, Platania, Lorenzo: Bounded model checking of software using SMT solvers instead of SAT solvers. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 11(1), 69–83 (2009)CrossRef Armando, Alessandro, Mantovani, Jacopo, Platania, Lorenzo: Bounded model checking of software using SMT solvers instead of SAT solvers. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 11(1), 69–83 (2009)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bauer, Andreas, Leucker, Martin, Schallhart, Christian: Comparing LTL semantics for runtime verification. J. Logic Comput. 20(3), 651–674 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNet Bauer, Andreas, Leucker, Martin, Schallhart, Christian: Comparing LTL semantics for runtime verification. J. Logic Comput. 20(3), 651–674 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
4.
go back to reference Beyer, D., Henzinger, T.A., Théoduloz, G.: Configurable software verification: concretizing the convergence of model checking and program analysis. In: Proc. CAV, LNCS 4590, pp. 504–518. Springer, Berlin (2007) Beyer, D., Henzinger, T.A., Théoduloz, G.: Configurable software verification: concretizing the convergence of model checking and program analysis. In: Proc. CAV, LNCS 4590, pp. 504–518. Springer, Berlin (2007)
5.
go back to reference Beyer, Dirk, Henzinger, Thomas A., Jhala, Ranjit, Majumdar, Rupak: The software model checker Blast: applications to software engineering. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 9(5), 505–525 (2007)CrossRef Beyer, Dirk, Henzinger, Thomas A., Jhala, Ranjit, Majumdar, Rupak: The software model checker Blast: applications to software engineering. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 9(5), 505–525 (2007)CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Burch, J.R., Clarke, E.M., McMillan, K.L., Dill, D.L., Hwang, L.J.: Symbolic model checking: \(10^{20}\) states and beyond. In: Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1990. LICS ’90, Proceedings, pp. 428–439, Jun 1990 Burch, J.R., Clarke, E.M., McMillan, K.L., Dill, D.L., Hwang, L.J.: Symbolic model checking: \(10^{20}\) states and beyond. In: Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1990. LICS ’90, Proceedings, pp. 428–439, Jun 1990
8.
go back to reference Claessen, K., Hughes, J.: Quickcheck: a lightweight tool for random testing of Haskell programs. SIGPLAN Not. 35(9), 268–279 (2000)CrossRef Claessen, K., Hughes, J.: Quickcheck: a lightweight tool for random testing of Haskell programs. SIGPLAN Not. 35(9), 268–279 (2000)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clarke, E., Biere, A., Raimi, R., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking using satisfiability solving. Form. Methods Syst. Des. 19(1), 7–34 (2001)CrossRefMATH Clarke, E., Biere, A., Raimi, R., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking using satisfiability solving. Form. Methods Syst. Des. 19(1), 7–34 (2001)CrossRefMATH
10.
go back to reference Clarke, E.M.: 25 years of model checking. In: The Birth of Model Checking, pp. 1–26. Springer, Berlin (2008) Clarke, E.M.: 25 years of model checking. In: The Birth of Model Checking, pp. 1–26. Springer, Berlin (2008)
11.
go back to reference Cordeiro, L., Fischer, B., Marques-Silva, J.: SMT-based bounded model checking for embedded ANSI-C software. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’09, pp. 137–148. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009) Cordeiro, L., Fischer, B., Marques-Silva, J.: SMT-based bounded model checking for embedded ANSI-C software. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’09, pp. 137–148. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)
12.
go back to reference Duret-Lutz, A.: LTL translation improvements in spot. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Verification and Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems, VECoS’11, pp. 72–83. British Computer Society, Swinton (2011) Duret-Lutz, A.: LTL translation improvements in spot. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Verification and Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems, VECoS’11, pp. 72–83. British Computer Society, Swinton (2011)
13.
go back to reference Alexandre, D.L.: LTL translation improvements in Spot 1.0. Int. J. Crit. Comput.-Based Syst. 5(1/2):31–54 (2014) Alexandre, D.L.: LTL translation improvements in Spot 1.0. Int. J. Crit. Comput.-Based Syst. 5(1/2):31–54 (2014)
15.
go back to reference Holzmann, G.J.: Parallelizing the spin model checker. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Model Checking Software, SPIN’12, pp. 155–171. Springer, Berlin (2012) Holzmann, G.J.: Parallelizing the spin model checker. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Model Checking Software, SPIN’12, pp. 155–171. Springer, Berlin (2012)
16.
go back to reference Holzmann, G.J., Bosnacki, D.: Multi-core model checking with spin. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2007. IPDPS 2007. IEEE International, pp. 1–8, March (2007) Holzmann, G.J., Bosnacki, D.: Multi-core model checking with spin. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2007. IPDPS 2007. IEEE International, pp. 1–8, March (2007)
17.
go back to reference Howar, F., Isberner, M., Merten, M., Steffen, B., Beyer, D.: The RERS grey-box challenge 2012: analysis of event–condition–action systems. In: Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Technologies for Mastering Change—5th International Symposium, ISoLA 2012, LNCS 4590, pp. 608–614. Springer, Berlin (2007) Howar, F., Isberner, M., Merten, M., Steffen, B., Beyer, D.: The RERS grey-box challenge 2012: analysis of event–condition–action systems. In: Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Technologies for Mastering Change—5th International Symposium, ISoLA 2012, LNCS 4590, pp. 608–614. Springer, Berlin (2007)
18.
go back to reference Howar, F., Isberner, M., Merten, M., Steffen, B., Beyer, D., Pasareanu, C.S.: Rigorous examination of reactive systems. In: The RERS Challenges 2012 and 2013. Software Tools for Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10009-014-0337-y (2014) Howar, F., Isberner, M., Merten, M., Steffen, B., Beyer, D., Pasareanu, C.S.: Rigorous examination of reactive systems. In: The RERS Challenges 2012 and 2013. Software Tools for Technology Transfer. doi:10.​1007/​s10009-014-0337-y (2014)
19.
go back to reference Jhala, R., Majumdar, R.: Software model checking. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(4), 21:1–21:54 (2009) Jhala, R., Majumdar, R.: Software model checking. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(4), 21:1–21:54 (2009)
20.
go back to reference Lerda, F., Sinha, N., Theobald, M.: Symbolic model checking of software. Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci., 89(3), 480–498 (2003). SoftMC 2003, Workshop on Software Model Checking (Satellite Workshop of CAV ’03) Lerda, F., Sinha, N., Theobald, M.: Symbolic model checking of software. Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci., 89(3), 480–498 (2003). SoftMC 2003, Workshop on Software Model Checking (Satellite Workshop of CAV ’03)
21.
go back to reference McCarthy, D., Dayal, U.: The architecture of an active database management system. In: Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD ’89, pp. 215–224. ACM, New York (1989) McCarthy, D., Dayal, U.: The architecture of an active database management system. In: Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD ’89, pp. 215–224. ACM, New York (1989)
22.
go back to reference Steffen, B., Isberner, M., Naujokat, S., Margaria, T., Geske, M.: Property-driven benchmark generation: synthesizing programs of realistic structure. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. doi:10.1007/s10009-014-0336-z (2014) Steffen, B., Isberner, M., Naujokat, S., Margaria, T., Geske, M.: Property-driven benchmark generation: synthesizing programs of realistic structure. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. doi:10.​1007/​s10009-014-0336-z (2014)
Metadata
Title
Combining static analysis and state transition graphs for verification of event-condition-action systems in the RERS 2012 and 2013 challenges
Authors
Markus Schordan
Adrian Prantl
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1433-2779
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2787
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-014-0338-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 5/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partner